Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #455854 > unrolled thread

The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics

Started bybenj <benj@nobody.net>
First post2018-04-13 15:03 -0400
Last post2018-05-19 06:21 -0700
Articles 3 on this page of 63 — 18 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity


Contents

  The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-13 15:03 -0400
    The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-13 12:08 -0700
    Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 12:09 -0700
      Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-13 12:24 -0700
        Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-13 13:15 -0700
          Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-13 13:19 -0700
      Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-13 19:21 -0400
        Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 16:24 -0700
          Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Rusty Willard <wuut@yaiw.wu> - 2018-04-14 14:06 +0000
            Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-14 11:09 -0700
            Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-14 14:19 -0400
        Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-21 16:56 +0200
          Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-21 13:43 -0400
            Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-21 11:25 -0700
            Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-04-21 19:43 -0500
              Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-22 17:40 +0200
                Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-22 09:07 -0700
                Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-04-23 10:47 -0500
                  Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-26 20:12 +0200
                    Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 12:57 -0700
                      Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-26 15:05 -0700
                      Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Jim Emile <leuu@wwjw.ce> - 2018-04-27 20:42 +0000
                        Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 13:57 -0700
                          Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Erin Koff <umhn@cniwwe.im> - 2018-04-27 21:08 +0000
                            Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 16:26 -0700
                              Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Erin Koff <umhn@cniwwe.im> - 2018-04-28 11:00 +0000
    Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Rusty Willard <wuut@yaiw.wu> - 2018-04-13 19:22 +0000
      Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-13 19:24 -0400
        Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Libor P Striz <poutnik@privacy.net> - 2018-04-14 02:44 +0200
        Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Rusty Willard <wuut@yaiw.wu> - 2018-04-14 10:20 +0000
          Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Libor P Striz <poutnik@privacy.net> - 2018-04-14 13:32 +0200
            Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Rusty Willard <wuut@yaiw.wu> - 2018-04-14 13:53 +0000
            Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-14 14:14 -0400
          Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-14 14:10 -0400
            Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-14 11:26 -0700
            Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-14 11:30 -0700
              Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-14 11:46 -0700
                Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-14 11:55 -0700
                  Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-14 12:08 -0700
    Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-04-14 11:59 +1000
      Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-13 19:02 -0700
        Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 20:24 -0700
    Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-04-13 22:51 -0500
      Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 17:26 -0700
    The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-13 21:17 -0700
      The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-13 21:21 -0700
    Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-14 21:00 +0200
      Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-14 12:15 -0700
      Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-14 15:28 -0400
        Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-14 12:50 -0700
          Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-14 13:05 -0700
        Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-14 22:07 +0200
    Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 06:14 +0100
      Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-05-16 13:50 +0200
        Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-16 19:31 +0000
        Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:48 -0700
        Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-05-16 21:10 -0700
          Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 21:30 -0700
            Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-05-16 21:56 -0700
            Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-05-18 10:33 -0500
              Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-18 21:10 +0200
              Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-05-20 00:14 -0700
    Re: The #1 DUMBEST Belief in Physics paul jark <jarkpaulsmith@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 06:21 -0700

Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]


#458314

FromThomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date2018-05-18 21:10 +0200
Message-ID<fm8mohFd8ukU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#458275
Am 18.05.2018 um 17:33 schrieb Tom Roberts:
> On 5/16/18 11:30 PM, Steve BH wrote:
>> And yet if science holds no truth, the success of technology is a 
>> miracle.
> 
> Not really. We have no idea whether any current scientific theories or 
> models hold any "truth" (in the sense of accurately describing the 
> processes that nature actually uses). And we have no prospect of ever 
> knowing this.

Well, how about my ideas:


https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6

> 
> But we do know that science has produced a series of ever-improving 
> MODELS of the world, and these models are now very accurate in many 
> domains of interest, leading to the technology you think is a "miracle" 
> without "truth". In truth (pun intended), good models are good enough -- 
> which is fortunate for us humans, as that is the best we can ever 
> achieve about the world we inhabit.

If you want models, than it could get a little tough. The reason: we can 
understand processes, which we cannot model.

The best example is weather (but there are other).

> 
>      Humans survive in the world via models of it. 

No. Humans survive because they have shelter, water and something to eat.

Models about the physical world are not really a necessity of life.

>      Think about how
>      you find your bed at night, and you'll realize that you have a
>      mental model of your domicile, and to go to bed you first
>      mentally traverse that model, and then manipulate your body
>      correspondingly. 

This is beyond the level of 'nerd-think', we could see in 'big-bang theory'.



TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#458503

Frommlwozniak@wp.pl
Date2018-05-20 00:14 -0700
Message-ID<803f52d6-8a08-4f7b-b754-902b5de8ab63@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#458275
On Friday, 18 May 2018 17:33:29 UTC+2, tjrob137  wrote:
> On 5/16/18 11:30 PM, Steve BH wrote:
> > And yet if science holds no truth, the success of technology is a miracle.
> 
> Not really. We have no idea whether any current scientific theories or models 
> hold any "truth" (in the sense of accurately describing the processes that 
> nature actually uses). And we have no prospect of ever knowing this.


Oh, of course you don't. You're soooo dumb.


> But we do know that science has produced a series of ever-improving MODELS of 
> the world, and these models are now very accurate in many domains of interest,  leading to the technology you think is a "miracle" without "truth". 

Unfortunately, when talking about The Shit o ingenious
Einstein, you left us no choice. To keep OUR technology
working WE had to piss at YOUR idiocies.



In truth 
> (pun intended), good models are good enough 

And pieces of shit are pieces of shit, poor idiot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#458391

Frompaul jark <jarkpaulsmith@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-19 06:21 -0700
Message-ID<0efa7880-bd19-49e8-abfb-c192083141ea@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#455854
whatsapp......+17546663823

Wickr ID............ketemine355

E-mail............desmondclaydavid677live@gmail.com 

PRICE LIST 

Ketamine hcl liquid 50mg/10mg 
5 bottles/vials..........$200 
10 bottles/vials.........$300 
15 bottles/vials.........$350 
20 bottles/vials.........$400 
25 bottles/vials.........$600 
50 bottles/vials.........$800 
75 bottles/vials.........$1000 
100 bottles/vials.........$1500 
150 bottles/vials.........$2000 
200 bottles/vials.........$2500 
Diazepam Roche 10mg 

-300 pills..................£70 
-500 pills..................£100 
-1000 pills................£180 
-2500 pills...............£250 
-5000 pills...............£400 
-7500 pills...............£600 
-10000 pills............£750 

Diazepam shalina 10mg 
-300 pills..................£65 
-500 pills..................£90 
-1000 pills................£150 
-2500 pills...............£200 
-5000 pills...............£350 
-7500 pills...............£500 
-10000 pills............£650 

Tramadol 200mg 
-300 pills..................`£100 
-500 pills..................£140 
-1000 pills................£250 
-2500 pills...............£350 
-5000 pills...............£650 
-7500 pills...............£750 
-10000 pills............£900 

Zolpidem/Ambien 10mg 
-300 pills..................£80 
-500 pills..................£120 
-1000 pills................£200 
-2500 pills...............£280 
-5000 pills...............£400 
-7500 pills...............£550 
-10000 pills............£800 


For more information on how to place your order: 

CALL/TEXT/WHATSAPP........+17546663823 

E-mail me at..........desmondclaydavid677live@gmail.com 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity


csiph-web