Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #400521 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-01 15:25 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-12-05 18:40 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 55 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-01 15:25 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-02 20:12 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 05:29 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-03 13:10 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 18:41 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-03 13:53 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 19:24 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-04 16:04 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-03 22:01 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-04 19:18 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 06:16 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 06:30 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 06:34 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 06:54 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 10:33 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-05 11:23 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 16:53 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-05 12:36 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 18:37 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-05 13:56 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 19:09 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-05 15:41 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 20:46 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-05 15:50 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 21:15 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-05 22:14 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 07:15 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 07:35 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-06 11:07 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 17:07 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-06 13:22 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 17:15 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 17:20 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 17:27 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-06 11:01 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 20:46 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 19:10 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 19:25 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 20:39 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 18:48 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-04 18:54 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 19:33 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 19:36 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 19:45 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 19:42 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 20:19 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-03 22:01 +1100
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-03 06:26 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-03 06:30 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-03 06:34 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-02 19:46 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 07:57 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 09:48 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 09:50 -0800
Re: The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-05 18:40 -0800
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-01 15:25 -0800 |
| Subject | The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat |
| Message-ID | <45e80cc0-e532-41d8-85b8-1a801c5aedbf@googlegroups.com> |
The Fine Structure Constant causes space-time to be Flat as a combination of a governor & a Throttle. Too much = photons are radiated Too little Gravity compacts it. If ((1.5e+10*2+299792458)*1e-9)^2*2 = 1836.154846 is Accurate then the proton electron ratio is a mediator between energy, gravity & the volume of spacetime. Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-02 20:12 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <eacs7lFmcs9U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #400521 |
On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. Sylvia
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-02 05:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <88029abd-d6a2-4393-b9c0-8f5b1ca96cca@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400549 |
Sylvia Else On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. Sylvia To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. & the fourth root of c is 131. 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-03 13:10 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <eaent0F5su6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #400560 |
On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > Sylvia Else > On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >> >> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. >> > I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. > > Sylvia > > > To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess > > In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. > > This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. > > All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. > > & the fourth root of c is 131. > > 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 > > (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 > > ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 > > > What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much deeper problem? Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-02 18:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7188aa5f-c188-4e33-8e35-e6c67c36e978@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400643 |
On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > Sylvia Else > > On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >> > >> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > >> > > I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. > > > > Sylvia > > > > > > To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess > > > > In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. > > > > This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. > > > > All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. > > > > & the fourth root of c is 131. > > > > 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 > > > > (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 > > > > ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 > > > > > > > > What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? > You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who > thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much > deeper problem? > > Sylvia. It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-03 13:53 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <eaeqcgF6dg9U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #400645 |
On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>> Sylvia Else >>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>>> >>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. >>>> >>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. >>> >>> Sylvia >>> >>> >>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess >>> >>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. >>> >>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. >>> >>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. >>> >>> & the fourth root of c is 131. >>> >>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 >>> >>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 >>> >>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 >>> >>> >>> >> >> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? >> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who >> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much >> deeper problem? >> >> Sylvia. > > It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow > It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is not the same as being steady. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-02 19:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d3212193-b510-45a6-82e6-a511f13d2432@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400647 |
On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>> Sylvia Else > >>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > >>>> > >>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. > >>> > >>> Sylvia > >>> > >>> > >>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess > >>> > >>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. > >>> > >>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. > >>> > >>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. > >>> > >>> & the fourth root of c is 131. > >>> > >>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 > >>> > >>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 > >>> > >>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? > >> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who > >> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much > >> deeper problem? > >> > >> Sylvia. > > > > It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow > > > > It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is > not the same as being steady. > > Sylvia. Inertia and the Speed of light make it Very Steady Gravity and relativistic mass make changes Very Preictable Gravity is the fine Structure constant ((137036^4) * (G^2)) / (pi / 2) = 1.00000376
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-04 16:04 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <eahmf4Fr73lU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #400648 |
On 3/12/2016 2:24 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>>>> Sylvia Else >>>>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. >>>>>> >>>>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. >>>>> >>>>> Sylvia >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess >>>>> >>>>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. >>>>> >>>>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. >>>>> >>>>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. >>>>> >>>>> & the fourth root of c is 131. >>>>> >>>>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 >>>>> >>>>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 >>>>> >>>>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? >>>> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who >>>> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much >>>> deeper problem? >>>> >>>> Sylvia. >>> >>> It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow >>> >> >> It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is >> not the same as being steady. >> >> Sylvia. > > Inertia and the Speed of light make it Very Steady > > > Gravity and relativistic mass make changes Very Preictable > > Gravity is the fine Structure constant > > ((137036^4) * (G^2)) / (pi / 2) = 1.00000376 > Are you under the impression that this numerology nonsense means something? You omit the dimensions in these postings. For example, the number 1.00000376 quoted above has the dimensions force * distance^2 / mass^2 which means that it's only close to one because of the particular choice of units. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-03 22:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9a29d228-b397-461b-ad7b-f0e888369ad5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400738 |
On Saturday, December 3, 2016 at 11:04:39 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 3/12/2016 2:24 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>>>> Sylvia Else > >>>>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > >>>>>> > >>>>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. > >>>>> > >>>>> Sylvia > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess > >>>>> > >>>>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. > >>>>> > >>>>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. > >>>>> > >>>>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. > >>>>> > >>>>> & the fourth root of c is 131. > >>>>> > >>>>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 > >>>>> > >>>>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 > >>>>> > >>>>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? > >>>> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who > >>>> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much > >>>> deeper problem? > >>>> > >>>> Sylvia. > >>> > >>> It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow > >>> > >> > >> It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is > >> not the same as being steady. > >> > >> Sylvia. > > > > Inertia and the Speed of light make it Very Steady > > > > > > Gravity and relativistic mass make changes Very Preictable > > > > Gravity is the fine Structure constant > > > > ((137036^4) * (G^2)) / (pi / 2) = 1.00000376 > > > > Are you under the impression that this numerology nonsense means something? > > You omit the dimensions in these postings. For example, the number > 1.00000376 quoted above has the dimensions force * distance^2 / mass^2 > which means that it's only close to one because of the particular choice > of units. > > Sylvia. Sweet Mother Mary ..... Are you that Dull .... or set in your ways or are you just being a TROLL ??? If the Fine Structrue constant is a DIMENSIONLESS CONSTANT ..... THEN ..... THIS ...(((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi .... Means GRAVITY is DIMENSIONLESS ALSO ((e * cos(137035.9991232535539893radians)) - 1) / phi = 1 (((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi NIST G = 6.6740800122e-11 Fuller G = 6.67406745595e-11 c has no vector, just a scalar quantity e is just a Scalar with no vector hbar is just a Scalar alpha is dimensionless that means Gravity is Dimensionless there is NO WAY to make it More Clear.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-04 19:18 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <eai1rkFtkrhU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #400739 |
On 4/12/2016 5:01 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > On Saturday, December 3, 2016 at 11:04:39 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 3/12/2016 2:24 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>>>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>>>>>> Sylvia Else >>>>>>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sylvia >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> & the fourth root of c is 131. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? >>>>>> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who >>>>>> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much >>>>>> deeper problem? >>>>>> >>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>> >>>>> It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow >>>>> >>>> >>>> It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is >>>> not the same as being steady. >>>> >>>> Sylvia. >>> >>> Inertia and the Speed of light make it Very Steady >>> >>> >>> Gravity and relativistic mass make changes Very Preictable >>> >>> Gravity is the fine Structure constant >>> >>> ((137036^4) * (G^2)) / (pi / 2) = 1.00000376 >>> >> >> Are you under the impression that this numerology nonsense means something? >> >> You omit the dimensions in these postings. For example, the number >> 1.00000376 quoted above has the dimensions force * distance^2 / mass^2 >> which means that it's only close to one because of the particular choice >> of units. >> >> Sylvia. > > Sweet Mother Mary ..... Are you that Dull .... or set in your ways or are you just being a TROLL ??? > > If the Fine Structrue constant is a DIMENSIONLESS CONSTANT ..... THEN ..... > > > THIS ...(((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi .... Means GRAVITY is DIMENSIONLESS ALSO Things don't become dimensionless just because you want them to, nor because you can write an equation which would only be correct if they were dimensionless. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-04 06:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <aa0ab935-591e-4bef-a946-ba4c3a165032@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400743 |
On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 2:19:05 AM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 4/12/2016 5:01 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > On Saturday, December 3, 2016 at 11:04:39 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 3/12/2016 2:24 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>> On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>>>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>>>> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>>>>>> Sylvia Else > >>>>>>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Sylvia > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> & the fourth root of c is 131. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? > >>>>>> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who > >>>>>> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much > >>>>>> deeper problem? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sylvia. > >>>>> > >>>>> It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is > >>>> not the same as being steady. > >>>> > >>>> Sylvia. > >>> > >>> Inertia and the Speed of light make it Very Steady > >>> > >>> > >>> Gravity and relativistic mass make changes Very Preictable > >>> > >>> Gravity is the fine Structure constant > >>> > >>> ((137036^4) * (G^2)) / (pi / 2) = 1.00000376 > >>> > >> > >> Are you under the impression that this numerology nonsense means something? > >> > >> You omit the dimensions in these postings. For example, the number > >> 1.00000376 quoted above has the dimensions force * distance^2 / mass^2 > >> which means that it's only close to one because of the particular choice > >> of units. > >> > >> Sylvia. > > > > Sweet Mother Mary ..... Are you that Dull .... or set in your ways or are you just being a TROLL ??? > > > > If the Fine Structrue constant is a DIMENSIONLESS CONSTANT ..... THEN ..... > > > > > > THIS ...(((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi .... Means GRAVITY is DIMENSIONLESS ALSO > > Things don't become dimensionless just because you want them to, nor > because you can write an equation which would only be correct if they > were dimensionless. > > Sylvia. it seems impossible for 2 & pi to add dimension from FSC to G G would just be the curvature of time relative to space, mimicking a force pushing objects together
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-04 06:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4db6fe16-776d-47a8-8eba-82d57d3ee6db@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400749 |
On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 8:16:46 AM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 2:19:05 AM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 4/12/2016 5:01 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > On Saturday, December 3, 2016 at 11:04:39 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > >> On 3/12/2016 2:24 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > >>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > >>>> On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > >>>>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > >>>>>> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > >>>>>>> Sylvia Else > > >>>>>>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Sylvia > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> & the fourth root of c is 131. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? > > >>>>>> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who > > >>>>>> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much > > >>>>>> deeper problem? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Sylvia. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is > > >>>> not the same as being steady. > > >>>> > > >>>> Sylvia. > > >>> > > >>> Inertia and the Speed of light make it Very Steady > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Gravity and relativistic mass make changes Very Preictable > > >>> > > >>> Gravity is the fine Structure constant > > >>> > > >>> ((137036^4) * (G^2)) / (pi / 2) = 1.00000376 > > >>> > > >> > > >> Are you under the impression that this numerology nonsense means something? > > >> > > >> You omit the dimensions in these postings. For example, the number > > >> 1.00000376 quoted above has the dimensions force * distance^2 / mass^2 > > >> which means that it's only close to one because of the particular choice > > >> of units. > > >> > > >> Sylvia. > > > > > > Sweet Mother Mary ..... Are you that Dull .... or set in your ways or are you just being a TROLL ??? > > > > > > If the Fine Structrue constant is a DIMENSIONLESS CONSTANT ..... THEN ..... > > > > > > > > > THIS ...(((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi .... Means GRAVITY is DIMENSIONLESS ALSO > > > > Things don't become dimensionless just because you want them to, nor > > because you can write an equation which would only be correct if they > > were dimensionless. > > > > Sylvia. > > it seems impossible for 2 & pi to add dimension from FSC to G > > G would just be the curvature of time relative to space, mimicking a force pushing objects together (137035.8715^2)/(pi/2)^0.5*G 1 / ((137 035.8715^2) / ((pi / 2)^0.5)) = 6.67408e-11
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-04 06:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <cd94cc16-375a-44f0-8a7f-443c25286dfb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400750 |
On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 8:30:06 AM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 8:16:46 AM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 2:19:05 AM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > On 4/12/2016 5:01 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > > On Saturday, December 3, 2016 at 11:04:39 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > >> On 3/12/2016 2:24 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > >>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > >>>> On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > >>>>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > >>>>>> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > >>>>>>> Sylvia Else > > > >>>>>>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Sylvia > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> & the fourth root of c is 131. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? > > > >>>>>> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who > > > >>>>>> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much > > > >>>>>> deeper problem? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Sylvia. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is > > > >>>> not the same as being steady. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Sylvia. > > > >>> > > > >>> Inertia and the Speed of light make it Very Steady > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Gravity and relativistic mass make changes Very Preictable > > > >>> > > > >>> Gravity is the fine Structure constant > > > >>> > > > >>> ((137036^4) * (G^2)) / (pi / 2) = 1.00000376 > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> Are you under the impression that this numerology nonsense means something? > > > >> > > > >> You omit the dimensions in these postings. For example, the number > > > >> 1.00000376 quoted above has the dimensions force * distance^2 / mass^2 > > > >> which means that it's only close to one because of the particular choice > > > >> of units. > > > >> > > > >> Sylvia. > > > > > > > > Sweet Mother Mary ..... Are you that Dull .... or set in your ways or are you just being a TROLL ??? > > > > > > > > If the Fine Structrue constant is a DIMENSIONLESS CONSTANT ..... THEN ..... > > > > > > > > > > > > THIS ...(((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi .... Means GRAVITY is DIMENSIONLESS ALSO > > > > > > Things don't become dimensionless just because you want them to, nor > > > because you can write an equation which would only be correct if they > > > were dimensionless. > > > > > > Sylvia. > > > > it seems impossible for 2 & pi to add dimension from FSC to G > > > > G would just be the curvature of time relative to space, mimicking a force pushing objects together > > (137035.8715^2)/(pi/2)^0.5*G > > > 1 / ((137 035.8715^2) / ((pi / 2)^0.5)) = 6.67408e-11 1/((137036^2)/(pi/2)^0.5) = 6.6740675e-11 ((e * cos(137035.9991232535539893radians)) - 1) / phi = 1 just geometric ratios
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-04 06:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <02d361b3-23fd-4aca-920f-75acb835dadb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400751 |
On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 8:34:38 AM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 8:30:06 AM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 8:16:46 AM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 2:19:05 AM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > On 4/12/2016 5:01 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > > > On Saturday, December 3, 2016 at 11:04:39 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > >> On 3/12/2016 2:24 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > > >>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > >>>> On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > > >>>>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > >>>>>> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > > >>>>>>> Sylvia Else > > > > >>>>>>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Sylvia > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> & the fourth root of c is 131. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? > > > > >>>>>> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who > > > > >>>>>> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much > > > > >>>>>> deeper problem? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Sylvia. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is > > > > >>>> not the same as being steady. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Sylvia. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Inertia and the Speed of light make it Very Steady > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Gravity and relativistic mass make changes Very Preictable > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Gravity is the fine Structure constant > > > > >>> > > > > >>> ((137036^4) * (G^2)) / (pi / 2) = 1.00000376 > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> Are you under the impression that this numerology nonsense means something? > > > > >> > > > > >> You omit the dimensions in these postings. For example, the number > > > > >> 1.00000376 quoted above has the dimensions force * distance^2 / mass^2 > > > > >> which means that it's only close to one because of the particular choice > > > > >> of units. > > > > >> > > > > >> Sylvia. > > > > > > > > > > Sweet Mother Mary ..... Are you that Dull .... or set in your ways or are you just being a TROLL ??? > > > > > > > > > > If the Fine Structrue constant is a DIMENSIONLESS CONSTANT ..... THEN ..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > THIS ...(((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi .... Means GRAVITY is DIMENSIONLESS ALSO > > > > > > > > Things don't become dimensionless just because you want them to, nor > > > > because you can write an equation which would only be correct if they > > > > were dimensionless. > > > > > > > > Sylvia. > > > > > > it seems impossible for 2 & pi to add dimension from FSC to G > > > > > > G would just be the curvature of time relative to space, mimicking a force pushing objects together which would effect bulk modulus & wave speed & inertial properties of the medium called space time > > > > (137035.8715^2)/(pi/2)^0.5*G > > > > > > 1 / ((137 035.8715^2) / ((pi / 2)^0.5)) = 6.67408e-11 > > 1/((137036^2)/(pi/2)^0.5) = 6.6740675e-11 > > ((e * cos(137035.9991232535539893radians)) - 1) / phi = 1 > > just geometric ratios
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-04 10:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <bbfee62c-8dc8-4bce-9d80-f4f007e0770a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400750 |
On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 8:30:06 AM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 8:16:46 AM UTC-6, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 2:19:05 AM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > On 4/12/2016 5:01 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > > On Saturday, December 3, 2016 at 11:04:39 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > >> On 3/12/2016 2:24 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > >>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > >>>> On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > >>>>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > >>>>>> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > >>>>>>> Sylvia Else > > > >>>>>>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Sylvia > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> & the fourth root of c is 131. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? > > > >>>>>> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who > > > >>>>>> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much > > > >>>>>> deeper problem? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Sylvia. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is > > > >>>> not the same as being steady. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Sylvia. > > > >>> > > > >>> Inertia and the Speed of light make it Very Steady > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Gravity and relativistic mass make changes Very Preictable > > > >>> > > > >>> Gravity is the fine Structure constant > > > >>> > > > >>> ((137036^4) * (G^2)) / (pi / 2) = 1.00000376 > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> Are you under the impression that this numerology nonsense means something? > > > >> > > > >> You omit the dimensions in these postings. For example, the number > > > >> 1.00000376 quoted above has the dimensions force * distance^2 / mass^2 > > > >> which means that it's only close to one because of the particular choice > > > >> of units. > > > >> > > > >> Sylvia. > > > > > > > > Sweet Mother Mary ..... Are you that Dull .... or set in your ways or are you just being a TROLL ??? > > > > > > > > If the Fine Structrue constant is a DIMENSIONLESS CONSTANT ..... THEN ..... > > > > > > > > > > > > THIS ...(((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi .... Means GRAVITY is DIMENSIONLESS ALSO > > > > > > Things don't become dimensionless just because you want them to, nor > > > because you can write an equation which would only be correct if they > > > were dimensionless. > > > > > > Sylvia. > > > > it seems impossible for 2 & pi to add dimension from FSC to G > > > > G would just be the curvature of time relative to space, mimicking a force pushing objects together > > (137035.8715^2)/(pi/2)^0.5*G > > > 1 / ((137 035.8715^2) / ((pi / 2)^0.5)) = 6.67408e-11 1 / ((137036^2) / ((pi / 2)^0.5)) = 6.6740675e-11 Fuller G = 6.67406745595
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-05 11:23 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <eajqcoFcn88U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #400749 |
On 5/12/2016 1:16 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 2:19:05 AM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 4/12/2016 5:01 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>> On Saturday, December 3, 2016 at 11:04:39 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> On 3/12/2016 2:24 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>>>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>> On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>>>>>>>> Sylvia Else >>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sylvia >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> & the fourth root of c is 131. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? >>>>>>>> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who >>>>>>>> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much >>>>>>>> deeper problem? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is >>>>>> not the same as being steady. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>> >>>>> Inertia and the Speed of light make it Very Steady >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Gravity and relativistic mass make changes Very Preictable >>>>> >>>>> Gravity is the fine Structure constant >>>>> >>>>> ((137036^4) * (G^2)) / (pi / 2) = 1.00000376 >>>>> >>>> >>>> Are you under the impression that this numerology nonsense means something? >>>> >>>> You omit the dimensions in these postings. For example, the number >>>> 1.00000376 quoted above has the dimensions force * distance^2 / mass^2 >>>> which means that it's only close to one because of the particular choice >>>> of units. >>>> >>>> Sylvia. >>> >>> Sweet Mother Mary ..... Are you that Dull .... or set in your ways or are you just being a TROLL ??? >>> >>> If the Fine Structrue constant is a DIMENSIONLESS CONSTANT ..... THEN ..... >>> >>> >>> THIS ...(((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi .... Means GRAVITY is DIMENSIONLESS ALSO >> >> Things don't become dimensionless just because you want them to, nor >> because you can write an equation which would only be correct if they >> were dimensionless. >> >> Sylvia. > > it seems impossible for 2 & pi to add dimension from FSC to G > > G would just be the curvature of time relative to space, mimicking a force pushing objects together > G already has dimensions, and the fine structure constant is dimensionless, so your equation cannot possibly be correct. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-04 16:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <19d3e8cc-597d-41ed-b1a1-4803e52a173c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400801 |
On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 6:23:55 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 5/12/2016 1:16 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 2:19:05 AM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 4/12/2016 5:01 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>> On Saturday, December 3, 2016 at 11:04:39 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>> On 3/12/2016 2:24 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>>>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>>>> On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>>>>>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Sylvia Else > >>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Sylvia > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> & the fourth root of c is 131. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? > >>>>>>>> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who > >>>>>>>> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much > >>>>>>>> deeper problem? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Sylvia. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is > >>>>>> not the same as being steady. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sylvia. > >>>>> > >>>>> Inertia and the Speed of light make it Very Steady > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Gravity and relativistic mass make changes Very Preictable > >>>>> > >>>>> Gravity is the fine Structure constant > >>>>> > >>>>> ((137036^4) * (G^2)) / (pi / 2) = 1.00000376 > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Are you under the impression that this numerology nonsense means something? > >>>> > >>>> You omit the dimensions in these postings. For example, the number > >>>> 1.00000376 quoted above has the dimensions force * distance^2 / mass^2 > >>>> which means that it's only close to one because of the particular choice > >>>> of units. > >>>> > >>>> Sylvia. > >>> > >>> Sweet Mother Mary ..... Are you that Dull .... or set in your ways or are you just being a TROLL ??? > >>> > >>> If the Fine Structrue constant is a DIMENSIONLESS CONSTANT ..... THEN ..... > >>> > >>> > >>> THIS ...(((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi .... Means GRAVITY is DIMENSIONLESS ALSO > >> > >> Things don't become dimensionless just because you want them to, nor > >> because you can write an equation which would only be correct if they > >> were dimensionless. > >> > >> Sylvia. > > > > it seems impossible for 2 & pi to add dimension from FSC to G > > > > G would just be the curvature of time relative to space, mimicking a force pushing objects together > > > G already has dimensions, and the fine structure constant is > dimensionless, so your equation cannot possibly be correct. > > Sylvia. OK ... Change it to what looks "more Correct" to You and Let me SEE ... OK ?? Here is your Bare wood .. start Chiseling.. (((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi which looks Surprisingly like the inverse of Kinetic energy Ke = (m*v^2)/2
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-05 12:36 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <eajulcFdjhlU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #400803 |
On 5/12/2016 11:53 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 6:23:55 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 5/12/2016 1:16 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>> On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 2:19:05 AM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> On 4/12/2016 5:01 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, December 3, 2016 at 11:04:39 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>> On 3/12/2016 2:24 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:53:06 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/12/2016 1:41 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 8:10:42 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 3/12/2016 12:29 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia Else >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2016 10:25 AM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Space time is flat for the same reason water drains out of your tub drain at a steady rate. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> To provide just a little reasoning behind my guess >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as Sommerfeld's constant, commonly denoted α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This would directly influence the Quantum Physical creation of particle pair creation from the vacuum and the initial conditions of & resultant effects to the volume of spacetime. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> All along I have been saying a mass energy scalar per cubic meter needs to be derived. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> & the fourth root of c is 131. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 299792458^(1 / 4) = 131.584633668 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> (137036^4) * (G^2) * 2 = 3.14160446 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ((137036^4) * (G^2) * 2) / pi = 1.00000376 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What's the point of ignoring my comment and just adding more gibberish? >>>>>>>>>> You thought something about tubs that is obviously wrong to anyone who >>>>>>>>>> thinks about the physics, yet you expect to be taken seriously on a much >>>>>>>>>> deeper problem? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is "Mostly a Steady rate of flow" and a has Predictable rate of change in flow >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's not mostly steady - it varies continuously. Being predictable is >>>>>>>> not the same as being steady. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Inertia and the Speed of light make it Very Steady >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gravity and relativistic mass make changes Very Preictable >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gravity is the fine Structure constant >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ((137036^4) * (G^2)) / (pi / 2) = 1.00000376 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you under the impression that this numerology nonsense means something? >>>>>> >>>>>> You omit the dimensions in these postings. For example, the number >>>>>> 1.00000376 quoted above has the dimensions force * distance^2 / mass^2 >>>>>> which means that it's only close to one because of the particular choice >>>>>> of units. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>> >>>>> Sweet Mother Mary ..... Are you that Dull .... or set in your ways or are you just being a TROLL ??? >>>>> >>>>> If the Fine Structrue constant is a DIMENSIONLESS CONSTANT ..... THEN ..... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> THIS ...(((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi .... Means GRAVITY is DIMENSIONLESS ALSO >>>> >>>> Things don't become dimensionless just because you want them to, nor >>>> because you can write an equation which would only be correct if they >>>> were dimensionless. >>>> >>>> Sylvia. >>> >>> it seems impossible for 2 & pi to add dimension from FSC to G >>> >>> G would just be the curvature of time relative to space, mimicking a force pushing objects together >>> >> G already has dimensions, and the fine structure constant is >> dimensionless, so your equation cannot possibly be correct. >> >> Sylvia. > > OK ... Change it to what looks "more Correct" to You and Let me SEE ... OK ?? > > Here is your Bare wood .. start Chiseling.. > > (((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi > > > which looks Surprisingly like the inverse of Kinetic energy > Now you have a equation consisting entirely of numbers, yet you seem to think it has some physical significance. Sylvia. > Ke = (m*v^2)/2 >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-04 18:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <bf234fb8-3659-48ec-961a-42e58b0757ab@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #400805 |
On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 7:36:46 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>>> Sweet Mother Mary ..... Are you that Dull .... or set in your ways or are you just being a TROLL ??? > >>>>> > >>>>> If the Fine Structrue constant is a DIMENSIONLESS CONSTANT ..... THEN ..... > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> THIS ...(((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi .... Means GRAVITY is DIMENSIONLESS ALSO > >>>> > >>>> Things don't become dimensionless just because you want them to, nor > >>>> because you can write an equation which would only be correct if they > >>>> were dimensionless. > >>>> > >>>> Sylvia. > >>> > >>> it seems impossible for 2 & pi to add dimension from FSC to G > >>> > >>> G would just be the curvature of time relative to space, mimicking a force pushing objects together > >>> > >> G already has dimensions, and the fine structure constant is > >> dimensionless, so your equation cannot possibly be correct. > >> > >> Sylvia. > > > > OK ... Change it to what looks "more Correct" to You and Let me SEE ... OK ?? > > > > Here is your Bare wood .. start Chiseling.. > > > > (((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi > > > > > > which looks Surprisingly like the inverse of Kinetic energy > > > > Now you have a equation consisting entirely of numbers, yet you seem to > think it has some physical significance. > > Sylvia. > > > Ke = (m*v^2)/2 > > The Fine Structure Constant is Dimensionless and Just a Number ... Just Rail on About that ... OK https://goo.gl/photos/v5RPg5Q3226yvMUE6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-05 13:56 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <eak3acFeifaU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #400808 |
On 5/12/2016 1:37 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > On Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 7:36:46 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>>>>> Sweet Mother Mary ..... Are you that Dull .... or set in your ways or are you just being a TROLL ??? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If the Fine Structrue constant is a DIMENSIONLESS CONSTANT ..... THEN ..... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> THIS ...(((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi .... Means GRAVITY is DIMENSIONLESS ALSO >>>>>> >>>>>> Things don't become dimensionless just because you want them to, nor >>>>>> because you can write an equation which would only be correct if they >>>>>> were dimensionless. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>> >>>>> it seems impossible for 2 & pi to add dimension from FSC to G >>>>> >>>>> G would just be the curvature of time relative to space, mimicking a force pushing objects together >>>>> >>>> G already has dimensions, and the fine structure constant is >>>> dimensionless, so your equation cannot possibly be correct. >>>> >>>> Sylvia. >>> >>> OK ... Change it to what looks "more Correct" to You and Let me SEE ... OK ?? >>> >>> Here is your Bare wood .. start Chiseling.. >>> >>> (((137036^4) * (6.67406745595e-11^2)) * 2) = pi >>> >>> >>> which looks Surprisingly like the inverse of Kinetic energy >>> >> >> Now you have a equation consisting entirely of numbers, yet you seem to >> think it has some physical significance. >> >> Sylvia. >> >>> Ke = (m*v^2)/2 >>> > > The Fine Structure Constant is Dimensionless and Just a Number ... > Just Rail on About that ... OK Yes, the fine structure constant is dimensionless, which is fine, because it's defined in a way that leads to its being dimensionless. Indeed, most of its significance comes from the fact that it is dimensionless - everyone in the universe will arrive at the same number regardless of the units used. G is not defined that way, is not dimensionless and has a numerical value dependent on the units used. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web