Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #395312 > unrolled thread
| Started by | LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-09 18:30 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-11-17 17:14 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 30 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 18:30 -0700
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-10 06:55 +0200
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-10 15:22 -0700
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-11 07:01 +0200
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 13:52 -0700
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-10-12 22:55 +0200
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 14:15 -0700
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 14:24 -0700
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 14:30 -0700
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 15:48 -0700
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 18:52 -0700
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 14:46 -0700
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-14 00:04 +0200
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 03:02 -0700
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-14 03:09 -0700
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-14 20:44 +0200
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 19:10 -0800
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-11-17 07:31 +0100
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 22:45 -0800
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 00:00 -0800
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 00:43 -0800
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-17 04:18 -0800
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-17 04:39 -0800
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 06:34 -0800
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 11:07 -0800
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-11-14 11:32 -0800
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:51 -0800
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES Kieth Staudt <KiethS@StaudtInstitute.info> - 2016-11-16 15:13 +0000
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES "Edgar L. Owen" <edgar@edgarlowen.com> - 2016-11-17 06:04 -0800
Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 17:14 -0800
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 18:30 -0700 |
| Subject | genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <abdc36b3-eaf2-44af-821c-6939726afe38@googlegroups.com> |
Genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES http://encode.ru/threads/2608-genuine-US-1000-reward-for-the-most-comprehensive-consistent-fundamental-THEORIES ( An earlier Originally Post by bcs2k3 ) What will be the application and implication of the new algorithm if any one found? This is to know why often people are claiming magical compression as if they foud without showing solid proof or publishing exe. What they will get if they solved? regards, Chandrasekaran B ( An earlier response ) Nothing, because the universe would instantly destroy itself : NOT the above , please ! Genuine sincere , and deserving pls ... we already know more than enough plausibilities umpeenth ways to ridicule , needs not add to I am looking ingenious comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES ( LIKE how Leonard Susskind / Juan Macadena etc comprehensive consistent pointed to Holographic Universe in de Sitter space ... and Erik Verlinde's eureka moment uestlosing his Passport while on holiday came up with 'entropic Gravity' .... YES UNBELIEVABLE WEIRD , just as much as this present request ) I am doing this now finally able takes some time off , having seen random files ( some taken from Random.org ) very consistent gets reduced smaller & then reconstructed exact same . Pls bear with me just a short while and I will release publicly share the results here soon enough this prize is guaranteed for the best consistent fundamental comprehensive , and complete Cheers folks, LawCounsels ( I think I am well enough known qualified as one of very genuine handful who will even be taken serious sincere , if saying this here ... so take your time like Susskind/ Macadena / Verlinde did re-checks work on before postings ) . . . . . . Originally Posted by Sportman View Post Good point. Can you give some background info like what triggered you to create a random data compressor, where the algorithm idea came from, when did you started, what did you tried and what worked and what not, what problems did you faced, how much time and money did you spend so far, did professional people tested your software at your place and what's their opinion, what are your future plans etc.? very leisurely . . . would you like collaborate help makeover to 'reality Internet' , help develop new mathematics foundations & help discover new sciences ( like your DNA already does this ? ) open to wise suggestions, LawCounsels at aol dot com
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-10 06:55 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <e60l9mF77doU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395312 |
Am 10.10.2016 03:30, schrieb LAW COUNSELS: > Genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES > > > http://encode.ru/threads/2608-genuine-US-1000-reward-for-the-most-comprehensive-consistent-fundamental-THEORIES > > > Well, of course my model is the best in the world! The presentation is a little amateurish and a few errors are certainly present. But, over all, I regard it as quite good. Maybe it's actually not the best in the world, but the best I could provide: https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6 TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alsor@interia.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-10 15:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8eb5748d-85b6-4cdb-9fb0-266dfaed7fab@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #395312 |
W dniu poniedziałek, 10 października 2016 03:30:17 UTC+2 użytkownik LAW COUNSELS napisał: > Genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES > > > http://encode.ru/threads/2608-genuine-US-1000-reward-for-the-most-comprehensive-consistent-fundamental-THEORIES > > > > > ( An earlier Originally Post by bcs2k3 ) > What will be the application and implication of the new algorithm if any one found? > > > > > This is to know why often people are claiming magical compression as if they foud without > > > showing solid proof or publishing exe. > > > > > What they will get if they solved? > > regards, > > > Chandrasekaran B > > > > ( An earlier response ) Nothing, because the universe would instantly destroy itself : > > NOT the above , please ! Genuine sincere , and deserving pls ... we already know more than enough plausibilities umpeenth ways to ridicule , needs not add to > > I am looking ingenious comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES ( LIKE how Leonard Susskind / Juan Macadena etc comprehensive consistent pointed to Holographic Universe in de Sitter space ... and Erik Verlinde's eureka moment uestlosing his Passport while on holiday came up with 'entropic Gravity' .... YES UNBELIEVABLE WEIRD , just as much as this present request ) > > I am doing this now finally able takes some time off , having seen random files ( some taken from Random.org ) very consistent gets reduced smaller & then reconstructed exact same . Pls bear with me just a short while and I will release publicly share the results here soon enough > > this prize is guaranteed for the best consistent fundamental comprehensive , and complete > > Cheers folks, > LawCounsels > ( I think I am well enough known qualified as one of very genuine handful who will even be taken serious sincere , if saying this here ... so take your time like Susskind/ Macadena / Verlinde did re-checks work on before postings ) > > . > . > . > . > . > . > Originally Posted by Sportman View Post > Good point. > > Can you give some background info like what triggered you to create a random data compressor, where the algorithm idea came from, when did you started, what did you tried and what worked and what not, what problems did you faced, how much time and money did you spend so far, did professional people tested your software at your place and what's their opinion, what are your future plans etc.? > very leisurely > . > . > . > would you like collaborate help makeover to 'reality Internet' , help develop new mathematics foundations & help discover new sciences ( like your DNA already does this ? ) > > open to wise suggestions, > LawCounsels at aol dot com What? 1000$ ! go away stupid...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-11 07:01 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <e63a17Fqn0sU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395355 |
Am 11.10.2016 00:22, schrieb alsor@interia.pl: >> >> ( An earlier response ) Nothing, because the universe would instantly destroy itself : >> >> NOT the above , please ! Genuine sincere , and deserving pls ... we already know more than enough plausibilities umpeenth ways to ridicule , needs not add to >> >> I am looking ingenious comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES ( LIKE how Leonard Susskind / Juan Macadena etc comprehensive consistent pointed to Holographic Universe in de Sitter space ... and Erik Verlinde's eureka moment uestlosing his Passport while on holiday came up with 'entropic Gravity' .... YES UNBELIEVABLE WEIRD , just as much as this present request ) >> >> I am doing this now finally able takes some time off , having seen random files ( some taken from Random.org ) very consistent gets reduced smaller& then reconstructed exact same . Pls bear with me just a short while and I will release publicly share the results here soon enough >> >> this prize is guaranteed for the best consistent fundamental comprehensive , and complete >> Can you give some background info like what triggered you to create a random data compressor, where the algorithm idea came from, when did you started, what did you tried and what worked and what not, what problems did you faced, how much time and money did you spend so far, did professional people tested your software at your place and what's their opinion, what are your future plans etc.? >> very leisurely >> . >> . >> . >> would you like collaborate help makeover to 'reality Internet' , help develop new mathematics foundations& help discover new sciences ( like your DNA already does this ? ) >> >> open to wise suggestions, >> LawCounsels at aol dot com > > What? 1000$ ! > go away stupid... > I can offer a million Reichsmark instead. ;-) (from 1923, when a stamp had cost a billion) TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-12 13:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <57b92d96-09bc-4592-8c97-57dd187313c7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #395374 |
On Tuesday, 11 October 2016 06:01:30 UTC+1, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 11.10.2016 00:22, schrieb a....@interia.pl: > > >> > >> ( An earlier response ) Nothing, because the universe would instantly destroy itself : > >> > >> NOT the above , please ! Genuine sincere , and deserving pls ... we already know more than enough plausibilities umpeenth ways to ridicule , needs not add to > >> > >> I am looking ingenious comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES ( LIKE how Leonard Susskind / Juan Macadena etc comprehensive consistent pointed to Holographic Universe in de Sitter space ... and Erik Verlinde's eureka moment uestlosing his Passport while on holiday came up with 'entropic Gravity' .... YES UNBELIEVABLE WEIRD , just as much as this present request ) > >> > >> I am doing this now finally able takes some time off , having seen random files ( some taken from Random.org ) very consistent gets reduced smaller& then reconstructed exact same . Pls bear with me just a short while and I will release publicly share the results here soon enough > >> > >> this prize is guaranteed for the best consistent fundamental comprehensive , and complete > > >> Can you give some background info like what triggered you to create a random data compressor, where the algorithm idea came from, when did you started, what did you tried and what worked and what not, what problems did you faced, how much time and money did you spend so far, did professional people tested your software at your place and what's their opinion, what are your future plans etc.? > >> very leisurely > >> . > >> . > >> . > >> would you like collaborate help makeover to 'reality Internet' , help develop new mathematics foundations& help discover new sciences ( like your DNA already does this ? ) > >> > >> open to wise suggestions, > >> LawCounsels at aol dot com > > > > What? 1000$ ! > > go away stupid... > > > > I can offer a million Reichsmark instead. > > ;-) > > (from 1923, when a stamp had cost a billion) > > > TH any clues what / how Universe works then ? whats the new kind of maths foundations then ? what that could even look like
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-12 22:55 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <ntm80d$5ub$1@node1.news.atman.pl> |
| In reply to | #395508 |
Użytkownik "LAW COUNSELS" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:57b92d96-09bc-4592-8c97-57dd187313c7@googlegroups.com... |any clues what / how Universe works then ? It doesn't work, of course.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-12 14:15 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <f176f5cf-3417-4056-a8a9-57f891e38ac7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #395510 |
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 21:55:42 UTC+1, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > Użytkownik "LAW COUNSELS" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:57b92d96-09bc-4592-8c97-57dd187313c7@googlegroups.com... > > |any clues what / how Universe works then ? > > It doesn't work, of course. ( in cosmology , 'big bang' tiny entropy capacity decompressable to huge present day Universe )
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-12 14:24 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <13760f02-d22f-4985-93a0-d9b5a9658ba5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #395514 |
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 22:15:23 UTC+1, LAW COUNSELS wrote: > On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 21:55:42 UTC+1, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > Użytkownik "LAW COUNSELS" napisał w wiadomości grup > > dyskusyjnych:57b92d96-09bc-4592-8c97-57dd187313c7@googlegroups.com... > > > > |any clues what / how Universe works then ? > > > > It doesn't work, of course. > > ( in cosmology , 'big bang' tiny entropy capacity decompressable to huge present day Universe ) blackhole coverts reduces 3-dimensions volume of information into 2-dimensions amount
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-12 14:30 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <e2f75a7c-06c4-4000-b09f-d7c0c2de2361@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #395515 |
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 22:24:50 UTC+1, LAW COUNSELS wrote: > On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 22:15:23 UTC+1, LAW COUNSELS wrote: > > On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 21:55:42 UTC+1, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > > Użytkownik "LAW COUNSELS" napisał w wiadomości grup > > > dyskusyjnych:57b92d96-09bc-4592-8c97-57dd187313c7@googlegroups.com... > > > > > > |any clues what / how Universe works then ? > > > > > > It doesn't work, of course. > > > > ( in cosmology , 'big bang' tiny entropy capacity decompressable to huge present day Universe ) > > blackhole coverts reduces 3-dimensions volume of information into 2-dimensions amount Verlinde attributes gravity emerging from entropy features on the holographic surface .... quantum entanglement ( space and time arises from ) likely similar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-12 15:48 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <d196cd56-0f8d-4ead-9133-555c9daae877@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #395516 |
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 22:30:54 UTC+1, LAW COUNSELS wrote: > On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 22:24:50 UTC+1, LAW COUNSELS wrote: > > On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 22:15:23 UTC+1, LAW COUNSELS wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 21:55:42 UTC+1, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > > > Użytkownik "LAW COUNSELS" napisał w wiadomości grup > > > > dyskusyjnych:57b92d96-09bc-4592-8c97-57dd187313c7@googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > > |any clues what / how Universe works then ? > > > > > > > > It doesn't work, of course. > > > > > > ( in cosmology , 'big bang' tiny entropy capacity decompressable to huge present day Universe ) > > > > blackhole coverts reduces 3-dimensions volume of information into 2-dimensions amount > > Verlinde attributes gravity emerging from entropy features on the holographic surface .... quantum entanglement ( space and time arises from ) likely similar in according science possible time travel , the holograph surface surrounding Universe would accordingly altered .... now the required entropy change to the holographic surface can now be dealt with accommodated
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-12 18:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <e479e9f8-1f38-4763-8c67-8ff9b1d97f93@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #395523 |
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 12:48:36 PM UTC-10, LAW COUNSELS wr > > > > > |any clues what / how Universe works then ? > > > > > > > > > > It doesn't work, of course. > > > > > > > > ( in cosmology , 'big bang' tiny entropy capacity decompressable to huge present day Universe ) > > > > > > blackhole coverts reduces 3-dimensions volume of information into 2-dimensions amount > > > > Verlinde attributes gravity emerging from entropy features on the holographic surface .... quantum entanglement ( space and time arises from ) likely similar > > in according science possible time travel , the holograph surface surrounding Universe would accordingly altered .... now the required entropy change to the holographic surface can now be dealt with accommodated The great Russian Mendeleev made a periodic table, I offer the periodic table of units of measure. The entropy has an abstract factor of area, like mass is area, charge is area, k Boltzmann's constant is area, in a new abstraction. A grand unified theory of Gravity Volume Theory is linked. http://fcgravity.blogspot.com/ http://fcontinuumgravity.blogspot.com/ This is the future of reasonable physics. For you, $900.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-13 14:46 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <5b343109-dca6-4e7f-a5fe-8daedcf54933@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #395532 |
very useful Table of areas have you also connect these areas somehow to the holographic surface Luke Verlinde clear shows how gravity emerges from entropic features on holographic spheres
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-14 00:04 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <e6aendFickoU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395508 |
Am 12.10.2016 22:52, schrieb LAW COUNSELS: >>>> ( An earlier response ) Nothing, because the universe would instantly destroy itself : >>>> >>>> NOT the above , please ! Genuine sincere , and deserving pls ... we already know more than enough plausibilities umpeenth ways to ridicule , needs not add to >>>> >>>> I am looking ingenious comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES ( LIKE how Leonard Susskind / Juan Macadena etc comprehensive consistent pointed to Holographic Universe in de Sitter space ... and Erik Verlinde's eureka moment uestlosing his Passport while on holiday came up with 'entropic Gravity' .... YES UNBELIEVABLE WEIRD , just as much as this present request ) >>>> >>>> I am doing this now finally able takes some time off , having seen random files ( some taken from Random.org ) very consistent gets reduced smaller& then reconstructed exact same . Pls bear with me just a short while and I will release publicly share the results here soon enough >>>> >>>> this prize is guaranteed for the best consistent fundamental comprehensive , and complete >> >>>> Can you give some background info like what triggered you to create a random data compressor, where the algorithm idea came from, when did you started, what did you tried and what worked and what not, what problems did you faced, how much time and money did you spend so far, did professional people tested your software at your place and what's their opinion, what are your future plans etc.? >>>> very leisurely >>>> . >>>> . >>>> . >>>> would you like collaborate help makeover to 'reality Internet' , help develop new mathematics foundations& help discover new sciences ( like your DNA already does this ? ) >>>> >>>> open to wise suggestions, >>>> LawCounsels at aol dot com >>> >>> What? 1000$ ! >>> go away stupid... >>> >> >> I can offer a million Reichsmark instead. >> >> ;-) >> >> (from 1923, when a stamp had cost a billion) >> >> >> TH > > any clues what / how Universe works then ? > > whats the new kind of maths foundations then ? what that could even look like To make big bang possible, the universe must emerge from nothing. 'Nothing' means 'no things, no space, no time'. This should turn into something under certain conditions, which would look like the universe we observe. So: what could eventually behave this way? Well, 'spacetime' could behave this way, if matter stems from spacetime and is kind of 'relative', like space and time. Since our planet is an object composed from matter, we need a timeline right through the Earth. This timeline should connect Earth to the big bang. Around Earth we have space, which extends to infinity. This could be (in dimensional reduction) understood as a cone. This cone starts at the big bang and expands, with the Earth at the centre. Now: what happened before the big bang? Well, the 'big bang' behaves like a black hole with reverted time. So we could imagine, there exists the inverted cone, where the universe shrinks and drops into a black hole. We could assume this 'black hole' (big crunch) is 'on the other side' (of the big bang). Or: What came from the big bang went actually into the big crunch before. Such double cones are in fact known in relativity and are called 'past light cone' or 'future light cone'. The past light cone contracts and the future light cone expands. Now we are obviously in the future of the big bang, hence the description would fit. Since our position is not that special, we could assume different time-lines, with a different big-bang, a different planet and a different axis of time. From this other big-bang came another universe, which has an axis of time in an angle towards ours. This is 'the universe around the corner' (as alternative to 'parallel universe'). TH In case you are interested you may also have a look at my 'book': https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-14 03:02 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <277cb873-3963-4e40-b680-82f7709899d8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #395596 |
> > > > any clues what / how Universe works then ? > > > > whats the new kind of maths foundations then ? what that could even look like > > > To make big bang possible, the universe must emerge from nothing. > > 'Nothing' means 'no things, no space, no time'. > > This should turn into something under certain conditions, which would > look like the universe we observe. > have you established the conditions ? experimental replicable ? now a practicable experimental replicable scenario is where there was initially only miniscule amount entropy ( encoded , almost like nothing , like singularity ) then now replicable demonstrable decompresses turns into something which would look like the universe we observe ( or various distinct universes with different constants encoded in those initial encoded entropy ) > So: what could eventually behave this way? > > Well, 'spacetime' could behave this way, if matter stems from spacetime > and is kind of 'relative', like space and time. > they now say 'entanglements' gives rise to space time , same entropic entanglements ? > > Since our planet is an object composed from matter, we need a timeline > right through the Earth. This timeline should connect Earth to the big > bang. > > Around Earth we have space, which extends to infinity. > > This could be (in dimensional reduction) understood as a cone. This cone > starts at the big bang and expands, with the Earth at the centre. > > Now: what happened before the big bang? > Well, the 'big bang' behaves like a black hole with reverted time. > > So we could imagine, there exists the inverted cone, where the universe > shrinks and drops into a black hole. > > We could assume this 'black hole' (big crunch) is 'on the other side' > (of the big bang). Or: What came from the big bang went actually into > the big crunch before. > > Such double cones are in fact known in relativity and are called 'past > light cone' or 'future light cone'. > > The past light cone contracts and the future light cone expands. > > Now we are obviously in the future of the big bang, hence the > description would fit. > > Since our position is not that special, we could assume different > time-lines, with a different big-bang, a different planet and a > different axis of time. > > From this other big-bang came another universe, which has an axis of > time in an angle towards ours. > > This is 'the universe around the corner' (as alternative to 'parallel > universe'). > > TH > > > > In case you are interested you may also have a look at my 'book': > > > https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-14 03:09 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <bfb9a4fe-1de2-4bcf-8d5f-a9f99a598672@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #395596 |
W dniu piątek, 14 października 2016 00:04:33 UTC+2 użytkownik Thomas Heger napisał: > So we could imagine, there exists the inverted cone, where the universe > shrinks and drops into a black hole. > > We could assume this 'black hole' (big crunch) is 'on the other side' > (of the big bang). Or: What came from the big bang went actually into > the big crunch before. We can also imagine elves, dwarves and hobbits. And we could assume Gandalf the White defeated Saruman.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-14 20:44 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <e6cnd0F49fkU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395621 |
Am 14.10.2016 12:09, schrieb mlwozniak@wp.pl: >> So we could imagine, there exists the inverted cone, where the universe >> shrinks and drops into a black hole. >> >> We could assume this 'black hole' (big crunch) is 'on the other side' >> (of the big bang). Or: What came from the big bang went actually into >> the big crunch before. > > We can also imagine elves, dwarves and hobbits. Imagining elves is easy. Cosmology is a little more difficult to imagine. So feel free to explain the origin of the big bang (if you don't like my explanation). TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-15 19:10 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <eb655857-57de-443f-ad4f-2e0754632af7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #395508 |
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 1:53:04 PM UTC-7, LAW COUNSELS wrote: > On Tuesday, 11 October 2016 06:01:30 UTC+1, Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 11.10.2016 00:22, schrieb a....@interia.pl: > > > > >> > > >> ( An earlier response ) Nothing, because the universe would instantly destroy itself : > > >> > > >> NOT the above , please ! Genuine sincere , and deserving pls ... we already know more than enough plausibilities umpeenth ways to ridicule , needs not add to > > >> > > >> I am looking ingenious comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES ( LIKE how Leonard Susskind / Juan Macadena etc comprehensive consistent pointed to Holographic Universe in de Sitter space ... and Erik Verlinde's eureka moment uestlosing his Passport while on holiday came up with 'entropic Gravity' .... YES UNBELIEVABLE WEIRD , just as much as this present request ) > > >> > > >> I am doing this now finally able takes some time off , having seen random files ( some taken from Random.org ) very consistent gets reduced smaller& then reconstructed exact same . Pls bear with me just a short while and I will release publicly share the results here soon enough > > >> > > >> this prize is guaranteed for the best consistent fundamental comprehensive , and complete > > > > >> Can you give some background info like what triggered you to create a random data compressor, where the algorithm idea came from, when did you started, what did you tried and what worked and what not, what problems did you faced, how much time and money did you spend so far, did professional people tested your software at your place and what's their opinion, what are your future plans etc.? > > >> very leisurely > > >> . > > >> . > > >> . > > >> would you like collaborate help makeover to 'reality Internet' , help develop new mathematics foundations& help discover new sciences ( like your DNA already does this ? ) > > >> > > >> open to wise suggestions, > > >> LawCounsels at aol dot com > > > > > > What? 1000$ ! > > > go away stupid... > > > > > > > I can offer a million Reichsmark instead. > > > > ;-) > > > > (from 1923, when a stamp had cost a billion) > > > > > > TH > > any clues what / how Universe works then ? > > whats the new kind of maths foundations then ? what that could even look like I think the new foundations are about continuum mechanics. Modern mathematics has continuity with delta-epsilon plus least upper bound. That's in the curriculum as "the" definition, of the curriculum. There's also the continuity of the points drawn as a line segment, from beginning to end. This is "simply" the infinitesimal fractions from zero to one. It's the only counterexample to "uncountability", which otherwise has only that one definition of "continuity". It's only all the fractions, it can't be taken in parts, it can't be taken in points, it's the line (or ray) as drawn. There's also the continuity of signal, about when the frequency is high enough as to be continuous. About the infinite, we know conceptually the potential and actual infinite. There is also this notion of the potential, effective, and actual infinite. Geometry we know as following the constructions from points and lines (and of the compass). A geometry can also be formalized as points and spaces (for a spiral space-filling curve as above for drawn continuity for the continuum). Points then are not just defined by the crossings of lines, but the crossings of all the lines through the points. In this way, there is a difference between a point in a line (as drawn), and a point on a line (as coordinated). The individuation (as about measuring or sampling the value of the point) is different than the course-of-passage (or flux). Still, they are both of continuous domains, then in continuum mechanics, but of the pan- and poly-dimensional address of the points, here in the classical fields of physics (vis-a-vis the complete ordered field of mathematics' real numbers and this "drawn continuity"). So, discovering and understanding these features of the continuum, would automatically so equip the theory of the continuum mechanics, which would automatically so equip the usual theories of the mathematical physics, the comprehensive ones, with first-class infinities and infinitesimals, not the finite-element-analysis approach to six pages and a chart.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-17 07:31 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <e95170F3qdtU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #398579 |
Am 16.11.2016 04:10, schrieb Ross A. Finlayson: ... > So, discovering and understanding these features > of the continuum, would automatically so equip > the theory of the continuum mechanics, which > would automatically so equip the usual theories > of the mathematical physics, the comprehensive > ones, with first-class infinities and infinitesimals, > not the finite-element-analysis approach to six pages > and a chart. > In my understanding spacetime behaves like complex numbers. So a Minkowski diagram can be interpreted as a certain version of an Argand diagram. Also the fractal called 'Hofstadter's butterfly' looks like a spacetime diagram: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hofstadter's_butterfly Our world is then a certain subset of a larger picture. We see it from within, as kind of part. How the entire thing looks like could therefore only be estimated by assuming something and looking, if that would look like our world, if being in our position. And complex four-vectors are the closest thing I could find: https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6 TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | LAW COUNSELS <lawcounsels@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-16 22:45 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <121ce578-1829-4590-bf9d-75ee0b36e517@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #398656 |
Maldacena's Ads/CFT and Holographic screen now shown wide applicable brought forth latest emergent spacetime / entropic gravity ...wide accepted how does complex vectors relate ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-17 00:00 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: genuine US$1000 reward for the most comprehensive consistent fundamental THEORIES |
| Message-ID | <2fe37ecc-63e9-412a-b771-5056881be64c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #398656 |
On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 10:32:04 PM UTC-8, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 16.11.2016 04:10, schrieb Ross A. Finlayson: > ... > > > So, discovering and understanding these features > > of the continuum, would automatically so equip > > the theory of the continuum mechanics, which > > would automatically so equip the usual theories > > of the mathematical physics, the comprehensive > > ones, with first-class infinities and infinitesimals, > > not the finite-element-analysis approach to six pages > > and a chart. > > > In my understanding spacetime behaves like complex numbers. > > So a Minkowski diagram can be interpreted as a certain version of an > Argand diagram. > > Also the fractal called 'Hofstadter's butterfly' looks like a spacetime > diagram: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hofstadter's_butterfly > > > Our world is then a certain subset of a larger picture. We see it from > within, as kind of part. > > How the entire thing looks like could therefore only be estimated by > assuming something and looking, if that would look like our world, if > being in our position. > > And complex four-vectors are the closest thing I could find: > > https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6 > > > > TH There are complex, then hypercomplex numbers, like the quaternions after the complex numbers. Penrose, re complex values in objects representing quantum superpositions, then with regards to Feynman: "We may think of the general Feynman diagram to be composed of many basic ingredients of this general kind, pieced together in all sorts of combinations. However, the superposition principle tells us not to think of what actually happens in some such particle collision process as being represented by just one such Feynman diagram, because there are many alternatives, and the actual physical process is represented as some complex linear superposition of many different such Feynman diagrams. The magnitude of the contribution to the total superposition from such a diagram - essentially a complex number such as the w or z that we encountered... is what we need to calculate from any particular Feynman diagram, these numbers being called complex amplitudes." About Weyl and the Majorana spinors and other notions of tensors then spinors well predicting "particles", complex numbers are a tool, and there are richer ones. With gauge theory and SUSY for bosons and fermions, there's a notion not so much for anti-de Sitter space, as just plain de Sitter space. The various parastatistics of bose statistics and fermi statistics of bosons and fermions have to do with the "various" foundations of probability theory of the "various" "continuous distributions" of those things, where spin itself does have a value then for what it means for the bridge or transfer between those various parastatistics, to be simply founded as from modernized continuum mechanics' probability theory.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web