Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #374724 > unrolled thread

Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity Lawrence Senreich <lawest@galaxyredeems.org> - 2016-01-23 18:03 +0000
    Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-01-23 10:21 -0800
      Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity Lawrence Senreich <lawest@galaxyredeems.org> - 2016-01-23 18:39 +0000
    Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 11:22 -0800
      Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity Lawrence Senreich <lawest@galaxyredeems.org> - 2016-01-23 21:05 +0000
        Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-01-23 13:09 -0800
      Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-25 00:17 -0800
    Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-01-23 12:17 -0800
    Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-01-24 03:44 +0100
      Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity Rebecca Ochsenknecht <rebeoch@stritzelhassel.net> - 2016-01-24 12:40 +0000
        Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-01-27 04:15 +0100

#374724 — Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity

Leave Earth Before the Modern Science Destroys It
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35344664

"However, we will not establish self-sustaining colonies in space for at 
least the next hundred years, so we have to be very careful in this 
period."

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#374726

On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 10:04:08 AM UTC-8, Lawrence Senreich wrote:
> Leave Earth Before the Modern Science Destroys It
> http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35344664
> 
> "However, we will not establish self-sustaining colonies in space for at 
> least the next hundred years, so we have to be very careful in this 
> period."

Man is his own problem but he is also the solution on the planet...
Our population problems can't be by space travel.
This alarmism on "the people on other planets" is the danger
in our attitudes to making contact with these people.

We cannot believe they haven't got beyond
their being a problem to themselves if they are older
and superior by time. The Death Star doesn't exist.
Religion knows this better. That because of God
there is no dead universe in the future...
the universe's stars and us won't ever die.
Spirituality means we exist together forever.

Its the cost that shows how absurd that is.
We still have to do what we have to do Universal planetary.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#374727

jamesl51165 wrote:

> On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 10:04:08 AM UTC-8, Lawrence Senreich
> wrote:
>> Leave Earth Before the Modern Science Destroys It
>> http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35344664
>> 
>> "However, we will not establish self-sustaining colonies in space for
>> at least the next hundred years, so we have to be very careful in this
>> period."
>
> Religion knows this better. That because of God there is no dead
> universe in the future... the universe's stars and us won't ever die.
> We still have to do what we have to do Universal planetary.
> Mitchell Raemsch

Dr. Steven Greer Contact, ET & European Connection 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZE01oAO8t4I

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#374731

On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 10:04:08 AM UTC-8, Lawrence Senreich wrote:
> Leave Earth Before the Modern Science Destroys It
> http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35344664
> 
> "However, we will not establish self-sustaining colonies in space for at 
> least the next hundred years,

Make it "never".

Besides, we should focus on making life good here, forget space.

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#374740

JanPB wrote:

> On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 10:04:08 AM UTC-8, Lawrence Senreich
> wrote:
>> Leave Earth Before the Modern Science Destroys It
>> http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35344664
>> 
>> "However, we will not establish self-sustaining colonies in space for at
>> least the next hundred years,
> 
> Make it "never".

This pessimist am I not. Never say never, unless you are pretty sure.

> Besides, we should focus on making life good here, forget space.

No, you contradict yourself. What we need is to go back to Moon, and land 
this time softly, and build bases (under surface of Moon). Or, take over 
the Alien (or Ancient human) Bases already existent over there. The data I 
have strongly indicates that inhabitable bases already are existent on 
Moon. Anyhow, the Chinese are going to take the Moon over pretty soon, 
like it or not.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#374741

On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 1:05:38 PM UTC-8, Lawrence Senreich wrote:
> JanPB wrote:
> 
> > On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 10:04:08 AM UTC-8, Lawrence Senreich
> > wrote:
> >> Leave Earth Before the Modern Science Destroys It
> >> http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35344664
> >> 
> >> "However, we will not establish self-sustaining colonies in space for at
> >> least the next hundred years,
> > 
> > Make it "never".
> 
> This pessimist am I not. Never say never, unless you are pretty sure.
> 
> > Besides, we should focus on making life good here, forget space.
> 
> No, you contradict yourself. What we need is to go back to Moon, and land 
> this time softly, and build bases (under surface of Moon). Or, take over 
> the Alien (or Ancient human) Bases already existent over there. The data I 
> have strongly indicates that inhabitable bases already are existent on 
> Moon. Anyhow, the Chinese are going to take the Moon over pretty soon, 
> like it or not.

But he did it in a wrong way...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#374783

JanPB wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 10:04:08 AM UTC-8, Lawrence Senreich wrote:
> > Leave Earth Before the Modern Science Destroys It
> > http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35344664
> >
> > "However, we will not establish self-sustaining colonies in space for at
> > least the next hundred years,
> 
> Make it "never".
> 
> Besides, we should focus on making life good here, forget space.
> 
> --
> Jan


The only way to forget space and make life good here is to..

prevent the 'scientific community' from brainwashing chidren
to join their space programs.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#374733

On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 10:04:08 AM UTC-8, Lawrence Senreich wrote:
> Leave Earth Before the Modern Science Destroys It
> http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35344664
> 
> "However, we will not establish self-sustaining colonies in space for at 
> least the next hundred years, so we have to be very careful in this 
> period."

Alarmism is stupidity in science. This is not what the world requires
I the upcoming world overload.
Stephen Hawking is not objective to reality of our solving population.
It is far from reason to say we have to do it by outer space.
Be reasonable... What is Hawking's price check on that?
The answer is that that suggestion is absurd.
 
And people on other planets being beyond us in time had to correct itself.
Eventually man won't be his own problem. I predict that is the future
of our world.

Hawking thinks because the universe dies as stars that the universe's people will turn back to territoriality. But the expansion of the universe is
speeding up suggesting man and time are a forever. Religion knows better
about death and spirit.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#374747

Am 23.01.2016 19:03, schrieb Lawrence Senreich:


I always wondered, whether or not the things he 'speaks' actually come 
from his own brain.

Alternative possibility: he is actually 'remote controlled'  and his 
voice synthesiser 'speaks', what was written in hidden offices by 'bad 
guys'/aliens/government/whoknows.

Possibly he is only a puppet and gets driven around in his wheel chair, 
if bad guys need to announce bs.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#374759

Thomas Heger wrote:

> Possibly he is only a puppet and gets driven around in his wheel chair,
> if bad guys need to announce bs.

Racist.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#374888

Am 24.01.2016 13:40, schrieb Rebecca Ochsenknecht:

>> Possibly he is only a puppet and gets driven around in his wheel chair,
>> if bad guys need to announce bs.
>
> Racist.

Well, 'bad guys' could be racists as well.

Actually the term 'race' is inappropriate to characterise human 
features. The word stems from agriculture and activities like horse 
breeding.


What we usually call 'race' are similarities in bodily features, that 
large ethnically related groups have in common.

E.g. Europeans, Russians, Caucasians have relatively light skin, while 
Africans have darker skin. So we call Europeans 'white' and speak of a 
'White Race'.

This is definitely not true, since the skin is more like a brownish pink.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web