Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #369933 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-14 04:45 -0800 |
| Last post | 2015-11-22 12:42 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 182 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 04:45 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 05:05 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 05:22 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 14:56 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 06:01 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:34 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 06:04 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 06:19 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 06:50 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:41 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 14:26 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 14:11 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 05:21 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 14:41 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 05:56 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:17 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 06:32 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:55 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:27 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 06:34 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 16:04 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 08:08 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 17:31 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 16:38 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 17:59 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 17:28 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-14 19:27 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:14 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:32 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Carl Heinz Krüger <heinzkrueger@ubernetz.org> - 2015-12-03 14:43 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 08:39 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 16:48 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:09 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 18:37 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 14:51 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:11 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:11 +0000
Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-14 12:21 -0800
Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:25 +0000
Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:22 -0500
Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 11:04 -0600
Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-16 18:56 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:17 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 21:22 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:08 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 09:21 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:34 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 17:38 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:34 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 08:59 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 09:16 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:27 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 10:20 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 14:47 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 12:02 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:05 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 21:11 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:26 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 21:34 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 21:12 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:27 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 21:32 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 14:02 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 18:17 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 15:46 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-15 06:13 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-15 06:26 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-15 05:45 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:23 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 17:32 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 14:42 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 21:07 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:09 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 22:17 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:30 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 22:55 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 18:05 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 00:13 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:30 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 00:47 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 10:34 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 19:42 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-15 13:44 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 12:00 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-15 16:24 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 13:55 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 00:30 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 19:11 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 01:25 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 01:28 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-23 20:56 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 08:29 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 05:42 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 16:13 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 11:51 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 10:13 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-16 19:22 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-16 19:32 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-16 19:36 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 11:15 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-17 05:30 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 09:10 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-11-17 13:55 +1100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-16 22:06 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-16 19:31 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-22 06:44 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-22 06:15 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-22 09:24 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-22 09:36 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-23 20:33 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-22 05:06 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-22 05:18 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-22 14:22 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-22 09:05 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-22 19:56 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-22 20:28 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-22 20:45 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-22 23:01 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 15:31 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-22 17:26 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-23 20:38 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-23 17:05 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-24 02:55 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 19:23 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-24 05:23 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-24 10:53 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-24 07:28 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-24 04:57 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-25 07:54 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-25 08:29 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 10:17 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 08:54 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-25 19:42 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 13:21 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-26 05:06 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-26 04:17 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-26 04:25 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-26 04:48 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-26 05:25 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-26 07:07 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-26 20:56 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-27 06:34 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-28 08:02 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-29 22:47 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-30 18:57 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 12:43 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-28 07:55 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-07 17:53 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-29 03:57 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-28 20:11 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-29 07:45 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-29 04:31 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-29 21:35 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-29 13:57 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-30 04:02 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-29 19:38 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-30 05:24 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-29 21:09 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-09 07:40 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-09 04:26 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-24 19:37 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-24 12:06 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-24 21:03 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-30 05:14 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 16:53 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-11-29 12:42 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-29 22:49 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 16:51 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-02 16:34 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Carl Heinz Krüger <heinzkrueger@ubernetz.org> - 2015-12-02 15:57 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 14:47 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-12 17:21 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 10:02 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 10:10 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 22:07 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-24 23:29 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-25 01:39 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-25 02:04 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-25 06:04 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-27 06:27 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 11:22 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 12:42 -0800
Page 6 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 10 Next page →
| From | Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-17 05:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <76892046-66c8-438f-83f6-7fe4ea5359d6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #370285 |
On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 8:16:02 PM UTC+10, Poutnik wrote: > Dne 17/11/2015 v 04:22 Y napsal(a): > > On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 2:13:45 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 11/14/2015 6:45 AM, Y wrote: > >>> Don't really need to ask more here... > >>> > >>> What do you think ? > >>> > >>> -y > >>> > >> > >> Color is the way that our brains interpret certain different frequencies > >> in a narrow band. Radio waves have no color and neither do X-rays, > >> though there is fundamentally nothing different about the difference in > >> frequencies in those bands than the difference in frequencies in the > >> visible band. > > > > It's not necessary for color to be visible. Infrared and ultraviolet are examples. Color is just something that directly corresponds with wavelength , and yes, it's *as* objective as the wavelength itself. Color (as a concept in science) is independent to human visibility so your argument about human brains or eyes etc doesn't follow. > > Colours are fully dependent on how humans define them, > therefore subjective. > > If there were objective, > being infrared or ultraviolet > this attribute would be independent on > how scientists define particular intervals. > > The usual lover limit for UV is 10 nm. > 9 nm is then X-ray, 11 is the UV. > If the limit had been 8 nm, both would have been UV. > If the limit had been 12 nm, both would have been X-ray. > > Where is objectivity, non dependent on subject=scientific community ? Already contained in your message. "The usual lover limit for UV is 10 nm" What kind of NON -physical thing has a limit ? Color is physical mate. -y
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-17 09:10 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n2fg0d$lhb$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370267 |
On 11/16/2015 9:22 PM, Y wrote: > On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 2:13:45 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 11/14/2015 6:45 AM, Y wrote: >>> Don't really need to ask more here... >>> >>> What do you think ? >>> >>> -y >>> >> >> Color is the way that our brains interpret certain different frequencies >> in a narrow band. Radio waves have no color and neither do X-rays, >> though there is fundamentally nothing different about the difference in >> frequencies in those bands than the difference in frequencies in the >> visible band. > > It's not necessary for color to be visible. Infrared and ultraviolet are examples. "Infrared" and "ultraviolet" are words. They do not correspond to colors, precisely because they are not perceived. Notice that the ultraviolet range corresponds to a range of wavelengths comparable to the entire visible spectrum, which has lots of colors. So then you might ask why the ultraviolet range doesn't also correspond to at least as many colors rather than just the one word. That's because it's not perceived. > Color is just something that directly corresponds with wavelength , and yes, it's > *as* objective as the wavelength itself. Color (as a concept in science) is independent > to human visibility so your argument about human brains or eyes etc doesn't follow. There's a reason why scientists don't consider color and wavelength to be synonymous as you are. If YOU PERSONALLY want to consider them synonyms, then I suppose nobody will stop you. But once again, all that's happening is your bending of words and their meanings to suit your agenda and past-time is wasting time on that agenda. > > [Even then, one must take into account the chemical reasons as to why light would appear > different to different people. Observing color isn't some "spiritually" remote controlled > ability for humans. There are directly corresponding physical materials and processes > impacting on the experience of color.] > > Using the word color is just another way of referring to wavelength; except that you're using > the word "color" to discuss a different aspect of the objectivity. Here's are some examples > of the objectivity of color. > > Green plants, blue oceans, - And while it's not pertinent to discuss a PARTICULAR wavelength > when discussing the light reflected by oceans and plants, it's more appropriate to use color > when referring to a RANGE of reflected wavelengths. Blue represents a RANGE of wavelengths reflected > by oceans. Now instead of writing down what those ranges are, we use a tool of language as shorthand. > It's a really easy one too Bodkin. BLUE. You might have learned about BLUE in kindergarten ? > > You'll notice the only alternative to describing wavelength are numbers. The numbers we use to > describe the "distances" between the peaks or the spatial period of the wave. So no matter what > humans do, we are ultimately restricted to describing the world with a language of some kind. Objecting > to the objectivity of color is meaningless. It's like inventing science that can't be measured. When > we speak of blue light, we aren't talking about your color blindness. > > > Then of course, enhancing the objectivity of color is the physical chemistry and surface structure > of matter which underpins what energies are absorbed and which are reflected. > > For example; How do blues and greens get reflected from oceans ? You can already see, if I used > NUMBERS here to discuss these bands or ranges in wavelength, they are equally semantic as using > using colors. > > I think this should be next years FXQi topic. > > I think it's possible and probably a good idea, that the primary colors are in fact NOT RGB, CMYK or > RYB (which are only simplistic models) but are the "periodic table" of elements itself. For > intrinsically, there can be no color if not reflected from a surface made of these elements or > combinations therefore. > > -y > > > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-17 13:55 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <davj99FptsmU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #369933 |
On 14/11/2015 11:45 PM, Y wrote: > Don't really need to ask more here... > > What do you think ? > > -y > No. The spectrum of colours for visible light is an artefact of the way the human eye works. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-16 22:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1c6l4btt443g2kgsag0v2pbhp89sfmej15@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #370261 |
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:55:37 +1100, Sylvia Else
<sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote:
>On 14/11/2015 11:45 PM, Y wrote:
>> Don't really need to ask more here...
>>
>> What do you think ?
>>
>> -y
>>
>
>No. The spectrum of colours for visible light is an artefact of the way
>the human eye works.
>
>Sylvia.
I fell down and bumped my nose,
and saw a lot of stars, all different colors,
that was caused by gravity, wasn't it? :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-16 19:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7c4b13c9-dd3c-458a-9242-cfcdad5c76b5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #370264 |
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 7:07:11 PM UTC-8, kefischer wrote: > On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:55:37 +1100, Sylvia Else > I fell down and bumped my nose, > and saw a lot of stars, all different colors, > that was caused by gravity, wasn't it? :-) No such thing as gravity... the Earth just sucks...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 06:44 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <dbd31aF8gsgU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #369933 |
Am 14.11.2015 13:45, schrieb Y: > Don't really need to ask more here... > > What do you think ? > > -y We see something blue, if we look upwards. 'Blue' is actually a color and 'up' is related to gravity. So: possibly something is coming down from the heaven, what gets accelerated downwards by gravity and this acceleration causes blueshift. So some kind of energy is pouring down to Earth, which gets accelerated and this acceleration is, what makes the sky blue. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | shuba <tim@sh.uba> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 06:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n2rmhq$vif$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370593 |
a crank wrote:
> 'Blue' is actually a color and 'up' is related to gravity.
>
> So: possibly something is coming down from the heaven, what gets
> accelerated downwards by gravity and this acceleration causes
> blueshift.
>
> So some kind of energy is pouring down to Earth, which gets
> accelerated and this acceleration is, what makes the sky blue.
Then again, perhaps standard long-established physics is correct.
The blue sky is not a mystery and no, it isn't due to blueshift.
---Tim Shuba---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 09:24 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <dbdcdqFaf8fU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #370596 |
Am 22.11.2015 07:15, schrieb shuba: > a crank wrote: > >> 'Blue' is actually a color and 'up' is related to gravity. >> >> So: possibly something is coming down from the heaven, what gets >> accelerated downwards by gravity and this acceleration causes >> blueshift. >> >> So some kind of energy is pouring down to Earth, which gets >> accelerated and this acceleration is, what makes the sky blue. > > Then again, perhaps standard long-established physics is correct. > The blue sky is not a mystery and no, it isn't due to blueshift. > Well then, defender of long established physics: why is the sky blue? TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | shuba <tim@sh.uba> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 09:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n2s2a6$ism$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370600 |
a crank wrote:
>why is the sky blue?
I assume, that 'Growing Earth' is actually correct, making the sky
blue as well as proving that 'Hitler' was an English spy.
I assume, there would be different timelines, along which the
disorder in one universe is 'recycled' in another, where time flows
in the opposite direction. This clearly predicts a blue sky.
My own assumption is, that we have actually different timelines, to
which of each is associated an entire universe. So the sky is blue.
My assumption is related to 'complex four-vectors' and 'Pauli
algebra'. Therefore the sky is blue. This sounds certainly strange,
but I would like to express my opinion, this is apparently how
nature works in real. Time-travelers should keep quiet and leave no
signs of their presence. The real nature of the world is understood
somehow, but this is not told to the general public. Instead we
have some sort of blunder, that is utilised to educate apprentices
in the art of logical thinking and acceptance of voodoo rituals.
---Tim Shuba---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-23 20:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <dbh814FakivU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #370603 |
Am 22.11.2015 10:36, schrieb shuba: > a crank wrote: > >> why is the sky blue? > > I assume, that 'Growing Earth' is actually correct, making the sky > blue as well as proving that 'Hitler' was an English spy. > > I assume, there would be different timelines, along which the > disorder in one universe is 'recycled' in another, where time flows > in the opposite direction. This clearly predicts a blue sky. > > My own assumption is, that we have actually different timelines, to > which of each is associated an entire universe. So the sky is blue. > > My assumption is related to 'complex four-vectors' and 'Pauli > algebra'. Therefore the sky is blue. This sounds certainly strange, > but I would like to express my opinion, this is apparently how > nature works in real. Time-travelers should keep quiet and leave no > signs of their presence. The real nature of the world is understood > somehow, but this is not told to the general public. Instead we > have some sort of blunder, that is utilised to educate apprentices > in the art of logical thinking and acceptance of voodoo rituals. > Yes, I remember some of these fragments. Only the context was slightly different. what makes me actually happy: that I have such a faithful reader. Thank's! But next time you should not stir these pieces so terribly together. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 05:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7c4e522a-f87b-4f35-bb12-febbc8729d47@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #370600 |
On Sunday, November 22, 2015 at 6:24:31 PM UTC+10, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 22.11.2015 07:15, schrieb shuba: > > a crank wrote: > > > >> 'Blue' is actually a color and 'up' is related to gravity. > >> > >> So: possibly something is coming down from the heaven, what gets > >> accelerated downwards by gravity and this acceleration causes > >> blueshift. > >> > >> So some kind of energy is pouring down to Earth, which gets > >> accelerated and this acceleration is, what makes the sky blue. > > > > Then again, perhaps standard long-established physics is correct. > > The blue sky is not a mystery and no, it isn't due to blueshift. > > > Well then, defender of long established physics: why is the sky blue? > > TH The chemicals in the sky are obviously reflecting colors in the blue range of the visible spectrum. This would also mean that chemicals in the sky have evolved to poorly absorb higher energy light in the visible spectrum. Each element probably has a different value for the light it reflects, and this may be the basis of color - each element representing a "primary" color on the palette of colors. This may not be useful now, but in the future may be. -y
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 05:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <33a0c361-7a2b-4459-bb35-fce895589118@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #370608 |
On Sunday, November 22, 2015 at 6:06:33 AM UTC-7, Y wrote: > > On Sunday, November 22, 2015 at 6:24:31 PM UTC+10, Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 22.11.2015 07:15, schrieb shuba: > > > a crank wrote: > > > > > >> 'Blue' is actually a color and 'up' is related to gravity. > > >> > > >> So: possibly something is coming down from the heaven, what gets > > >> accelerated downwards by gravity and this acceleration causes > > >> blueshift. > > >> > > >> So some kind of energy is pouring down to Earth, which gets > > >> accelerated and this acceleration is, what makes the sky blue. > > > > > > Then again, perhaps standard long-established physics is correct. > > > The blue sky is not a mystery and no, it isn't due to blueshift. > > > > > Well then, defender of long established physics: why is the sky blue? > > > > TH > > > > The chemicals in the sky are obviously reflecting colors in the blue range > of the visible spectrum. This would also mean that chemicals in the sky > have evolved to poorly absorb higher energy light in the visible spectrum. It's called "scattering" - look it up instead of bloviating nonsense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 14:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n2sj3g$tim$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370610 |
Gary Harnagel wrote: >> The chemicals in the sky are obviously reflecting colors in the blue >> range of the visible spectrum. This would also mean that chemicals in >> the sky have evolved to poorly absorb higher energy light in the >> visible spectrum. > > It's called "scattering" - look it up instead of bloviating nonsense. Oblovious nonsense. It's called Rayleigh Light Scattering, whereas the wavelength of the incident light is larger than the particle. That's why.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 09:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4ri35b9k39j4tfa3pfcb6qqmbvoraqluge@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #370608 |
On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 05:06:30 -0800 (PST), Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On Sunday, November 22, 2015 at 6:24:31 PM UTC+10, Thomas Heger wrote:
>> Am 22.11.2015 07:15, schrieb shuba:
>> > a crank wrote:
>> >
>> >> 'Blue' is actually a color and 'up' is related to gravity.
>> >>
>> >> So: possibly something is coming down from the heaven, what gets
>> >> accelerated downwards by gravity and this acceleration causes
>> >> blueshift.
>> >>
>> >> So some kind of energy is pouring down to Earth, which gets
>> >> accelerated and this acceleration is, what makes the sky blue.
>> >
>> > Then again, perhaps standard long-established physics is correct.
>> > The blue sky is not a mystery and no, it isn't due to blueshift.
>> >
>> Well then, defender of long established physics: why is the sky blue?
>>
>> TH
>
>
>
>The chemicals in the sky are obviously reflecting colors in the blue range of the visible spectrum. This would also mean that chemicals in the sky have evolved to poorly absorb higher energy light in the visible spectrum.
>
>Each element probably has a different value for the light it reflects, and this may be the basis of color - each element representing a "primary" color on the palette of colors.
>
>This may not be useful now, but in the future may be.
>
>-y
No, the atmosphere _absorbs_ red light,
why don't you google instead of giggling.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | shuba <tim@sh.uba> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 19:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n2t6kk$i2s$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370616 |
an incompetent fool wrote:
> the atmosphere _absorbs_ red light
This explains why red balloons and red fireworks are invisible.
---Tim Shuba---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 20:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n2t8h7$n04$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370652 |
shuba wrote: > an incompetent fool wrote: > >> the atmosphere _absorbs_ red light > > This explains why red balloons and red fireworks are invisible. Not sure who is the incompetent fool. As the whatever including red is absorbed, then the blue is given away intensified. The point is that the blue is not absorbed in a sunny day. However, red can also be observed when the sun goes down. This is how things works in physics. You have to take into occurrence the entire spectrum, assuming what it comes from Sun is white, the content of colors is even distributed, before the incidence. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/ Rayleigh_sunlight_scattering.png
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 20:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n2t9gp$pm2$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370655 |
Walter Ilinois wrote: > shuba wrote: > >> an incompetent fool wrote: >> >>> the atmosphere _absorbs_ red light >> >> This explains why red balloons and red fireworks are invisible. > > Not sure who is the incompetent fool. As the whatever including red is > absorbed, then the blue is given away intensified. The point is that the > blue is not absorbed in a sunny day. However, red can also be observed > when the sun goes down. This is how things works in physics. You have to > take into occurrence the entire spectrum, assuming what it comes from > Sun is white, the content of colors is even distributed, before the > incidence. > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/ > Rayleigh_sunlight_scattering.png Maybe the above can be misunderstood. The energy content is conserved. Hence at sharper angles, due to the molecular size, say the Nitrogen, the Blue color is deflected (the wavelength larger then but closer to the molecular size). Now, when the sky is Red, it means the amount of large particles, say dust, is the reason the Red content is deflected (red wavelength close to the larger dust). Size matter. Especially in my Divergent Matter.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 23:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ap355bh19q3jpie09k8nq91voboi13njv2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #370659 |
On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 20:45:13 +0000 (UTC), Walter Ilinois
<walin@wej98j5q.org> wrote:
>Walter Ilinois wrote:
>
>> shuba wrote:
>>
>>> an incompetent fool wrote:
>>>
>>>> the atmosphere _absorbs_ red light
>>>
>>> This explains why red balloons and red fireworks are invisible.
>>
>> Not sure who is the incompetent fool. As the whatever including red is
>> absorbed, then the blue is given away intensified. The point is that the
>> blue is not absorbed in a sunny day. However, red can also be observed
>> when the sun goes down. This is how things works in physics. You have to
>> take into occurrence the entire spectrum, assuming what it comes from
>> Sun is white, the content of colors is even distributed, before the
>> incidence.
>>
>> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/
>> Rayleigh_sunlight_scattering.png
>
>Maybe the above can be misunderstood. The energy content is conserved.
>Hence at sharper angles, due to the molecular size, say the Nitrogen, the
>Blue color is deflected (the wavelength larger then but closer to the
>molecular size). Now, when the sky is Red, it means the amount of large
>particles, say dust, is the reason the Red content is deflected (red
>wavelength close to the larger dust). Size matter. Especially in my
>Divergent Matter.
Only the stupid, annoying nym-changing
troll ever says "my Divergent Matter".
FOAD creep.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-23 15:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n2vbgn$c2a$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370672 |
kefischer wrote: >>Maybe the above can be misunderstood. The energy content is conserved. >>Hence at sharper angles, due to the molecular size, say the Nitrogen, >>the Blue color is deflected (the wavelength larger then but closer to >>the molecular size). Now, when the sky is Red, it means the amount of >>large particles, say dust, is the reason the Red content is deflected >>(red wavelength close to the larger dust). Size matter. Especially in my >>Divergent Matter. > > Only the stupid, annoying nym-changing > troll ever says "my Divergent Matter". FOAD creep. Probably somebody else. In my theory of Divergent Matter the size of "matter" is fundamental. I would even say, size is most fundamental, in Physics. Even Transcendental Fundamental. In fact it must be transcendental in All possible Universes and Simulation outthere. Uneducated individuals like you will never sense this essential particularity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 17:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <c8f45b5atiboo28o4p13aimpiu7m41g0ou@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #370652 |
On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 19:56:04 +0000 (UTC), shuba <tim@sh.uba> wrote:
>an incompetent fool wrote:
>
>> the atmosphere _absorbs_ red light
>
>This explains why red balloons and red fireworks are invisible.
>
>
> ---Tim Shuba---
The scatter story seems to ignore the fact
that molecules do not reflect light as much as
they absorb and re-emit it.
So, the re-emitted light is more toward
the blue.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absorption_spectroscopy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web