Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #671205 > unrolled thread

It has been a long time indeed

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  It has been a long time indeed Y <yborg@zenodo.com> - 2026-06-15 18:50 +1000
    Re: It has been a long time indeed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-15 09:11 -0700
      Re: It has been a long time indeed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-15 09:18 -0700
        Re: It has been a long time indeed Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-06-15 09:40 -0700
        Re: It has been a long time indeed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-15 11:46 -0700

#671205 — It has been a long time indeed

Are these people still posting here ?

Poutnik
Tom Roberts
Gary Harnagel
David A Smith
Ross Finlayson
John Parker (RIP)

*As a side note, I want to express my intention to return to this 
newsgroup after many years away. I’m coming back with new research and 
findings. In particular, I’ve published a new theory (both General and 
Special) that emerges from the fundamental equation of Special 
Relativity, 𝐸=𝑚𝑐^2. There is much more to say about this, but I’ll 
share links to the papers in other, more relevant posts.

This theory, along with my other work, focuses on asymmetries. I’m 
essentially picking up from where I left off with many of you around 
2012 or 2013—nearly 13 years ago. At that time, after long discussions 
and debates with several members here (including Bigdog and others whose 
names I wish I could fully recall), I had begun honing in on specific 
ideas about inertia. Some of you may remember those old discussions. It 
would be interesting to know whether they’re still available or can be 
located. Everything began with my idea of relational inertia, and what 
followed has been a remarkable path of discovery in physics and 
mathematics. I would now like to share with the peers of that era, none 
of whom I’ve forgotten, even if some have since drifted away.

Some of you may also recall that discussions from this newsgroup 
appeared to influence the development of certain widely accepted 
definitions in physics—perhaps even before they became mainstream in 
textbooks or online references. One example is the idea that “inertia is 
resistance to changes in motion,” which wasn’t always phrased that way 
in earlier texts. The history of physics has been interesting in this 
regard, and the influence of the conversations in this group is, in my 
view, quite evident.

Since then, I’ve refined and published this work. I believe my last 
discussions about “relative inertia” were with Gary Harnagel ? What 
emerged from those conversations became the real story: at the time, I 
had performed what is known as a relational inversion of Newton’s laws 
of motion and this methodology has become the cornerstone of my research.

I'm looking forward to sharing it with you.


Kind regards

Yanick Borg

-y

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#671211

Y wrote:
> 
> Are these people still posting here ?
> 
> Poutnik
> Tom Roberts
> Gary Harnagel
> David A Smith
> Ross Finlayson
> John Parker (RIP)


Y?



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671213

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Y wrote:
> >
> > Are these people still posting here ?
> >
> > Poutnik
> > Tom Roberts
> > Gary Harnagel
> > David A Smith
> > Ross Finlayson
> > John Parker (RIP)
> 
> Y?

But, before i tear to shreads Y 'scientific paper'...

i will reveal who Y really is.

(it better not be Tom Roberts posting to himself as Y)

give me some time today...I'll have it ready.


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671215

On 06/15/2026 09:18 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> Y wrote:
>>>
>>> Are these people still posting here ?
>>>
>>> Poutnik
>>> Tom Roberts
>>> Gary Harnagel
>>> David A Smith
>>> Ross Finlayson
>>> John Parker (RIP)
>>
>> Y?
>
> But, before i tear to shreads Y 'scientific paper'...
>
> i will reveal who Y really is.
>
> (it better not be Tom Roberts posting to himself as Y)
>
> give me some time today...I'll have it ready.
>
>

Shut up Starmaker you agitprop plagiarist.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#671217

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Y wrote:
> > >
> > > Are these people still posting here ?
> > >
> > > Poutnik
> > > Tom Roberts
> > > Gary Harnagel
> > > David A Smith
> > > Ross Finlayson
> > > John Parker (RIP)
> >
> > Y?
> 
> But, before i tear to shreads Y 'scientific paper'...
> 
> i will reveal who Y really is.
> 
> (it better not be Tom Roberts posting to himself as Y)


UNBELIVABLE! Y (Yanick Borg) is the real deal.


Now, onward to tear up his ...paper.

dats gonna be easy



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web