Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #671205
| From | Y <yborg@zenodo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | It has been a long time indeed |
| Date | 2026-06-15 18:50 +1000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <110oecv$7pej$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Are these people still posting here ? Poutnik Tom Roberts Gary Harnagel David A Smith Ross Finlayson John Parker (RIP) *As a side note, I want to express my intention to return to this newsgroup after many years away. I’m coming back with new research and findings. In particular, I’ve published a new theory (both General and Special) that emerges from the fundamental equation of Special Relativity, 𝐸=𝑚𝑐^2. There is much more to say about this, but I’ll share links to the papers in other, more relevant posts. This theory, along with my other work, focuses on asymmetries. I’m essentially picking up from where I left off with many of you around 2012 or 2013—nearly 13 years ago. At that time, after long discussions and debates with several members here (including Bigdog and others whose names I wish I could fully recall), I had begun honing in on specific ideas about inertia. Some of you may remember those old discussions. It would be interesting to know whether they’re still available or can be located. Everything began with my idea of relational inertia, and what followed has been a remarkable path of discovery in physics and mathematics. I would now like to share with the peers of that era, none of whom I’ve forgotten, even if some have since drifted away. Some of you may also recall that discussions from this newsgroup appeared to influence the development of certain widely accepted definitions in physics—perhaps even before they became mainstream in textbooks or online references. One example is the idea that “inertia is resistance to changes in motion,” which wasn’t always phrased that way in earlier texts. The history of physics has been interesting in this regard, and the influence of the conversations in this group is, in my view, quite evident. Since then, I’ve refined and published this work. I believe my last discussions about “relative inertia” were with Gary Harnagel ? What emerged from those conversations became the real story: at the time, I had performed what is known as a relational inversion of Newton’s laws of motion and this methodology has become the cornerstone of my research. I'm looking forward to sharing it with you. Kind regards Yanick Borg -y
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
It has been a long time indeed Y <yborg@zenodo.com> - 2026-06-15 18:50 +1000
Re: It has been a long time indeed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-15 09:11 -0700
Re: It has been a long time indeed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-15 09:18 -0700
Re: It has been a long time indeed Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-06-15 09:40 -0700
Re: It has been a long time indeed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-15 11:46 -0700
csiph-web