Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #616172 > unrolled thread

Oppenheimer Movie Review

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Oppenheimer Movie Review patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-27 20:09 -0700
    Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-27 20:24 -0700
      Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 20:56 -0700
        Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-27 21:02 -0700
          Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-27 22:45 -0700
            Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-27 22:51 -0700
          Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 09:52 -0700
            Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 09:53 -0700
              Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 10:42 -0700
                Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-28 12:50 -0700
                  Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 20:49 -0700
                    Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-28 21:18 -0700
                      Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-28 21:34 -0700
                    Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 09:32 +0200
                      Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-29 13:28 +0200
                      Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 09:16 -0700
                        Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 18:53 +0200
                          Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-29 21:16 +0200
                            Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 14:12 -0700
                              Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-30 14:06 +0200
                                Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review Yudorki Zenkevich <ieii@hheiozed.dz> - 2023-07-30 12:38 +0000
                                Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 11:39 -0700
                                  Chez Watt (was Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-30 22:01 +0200
                                    Re: Chez Watt (was Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review) "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 10:12 -0700
                        Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-29 10:20 -0700
                          Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-29 10:29 -0700
                          Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 14:30 -0700
                            Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 15:28 -0700
                              Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 15:37 -0700
                                Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-29 16:29 -0700
                  Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-29 22:41 -0700
                    Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 09:45 +0200
                      Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-30 01:09 -0700
                        Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 10:27 +0200
                          Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:31 +0200
                            Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 06:57 -0700
                            Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-31 08:44 -0700
                              Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-31 10:28 -0700
                                Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-31 11:43 -0700
                                  Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-31 15:14 -0700
                                  Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-31 15:24 -0700
                            Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-31 08:58 -0700
                    Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-30 11:46 -0700
                      Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-30 11:54 -0700
                        Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-30 11:55 -0700
                          Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-30 12:00 -0700
                            Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-30 12:09 -0700
            Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-29 09:28 +0200
      Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-27 20:58 -0700

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

#616446

patdolan wrote:
> 
> On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 10:28:58 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > patdolan wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 5:31:55 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> > > > On 2023-07-30 08:27:24 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden said:
> > > >
> > > > > On 2023-07-30 08:09:08 +0000, patdolan said:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 12:45:05 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> > > > >>> On 2023-07-30 05:41:01 +0000, The Starmaker said:>> > patdolan wrote:>
> > > > >>>>>>>> On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:42:05 AM UTC-7,
> > > > >>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:> >>> Feynman cracked the government saves
> > > > >>> containing the atom bomb design.> >>> It shows he was willing to do
> > > > >>> something completely wrong just to get> >>> away with it. Only in
> > > > >>> America would that be allowed. And it should not> >>> have been.> >>
> > > > >>> Mitch, surely you meant to type that it was Klaus Fuchs,
> > > > >>> You're making the usual American assumption that the USA is the only>
> > > > >>> country that matters. Fuchs was not American, so he couldn't "betray">
> > > > >>> it.
> > > > >>> --
> > > > >>> athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
> > > > >> Fuchs was not American, to be sure. But all his thefts were committed
> > > > >> on American soil,
> > > > >
> > > > > You think he arrived at Los Alamos knowing nothing? If that were the
> > > > > case why did they bring him?
> > > > >
> > > > >> while earning American Dollars and being protected by same. He
> > > > >> betrayed OUR Bomb program
> > > > It wasn't YOUR bomb programme. You are -- typically for an American --
> > > > forgetting the essential contributions made by British, Canadian and
> > > > refugee-German scientists, without which there would have been no bomb.
> > > >
> > > > Fuchs himself made major contributions, but he was increasingly
> > > > concerned by his realization that the USA was not planning to pass on
> > > > any information to its allies, most notably the USSR, in the war
> > > > against Nazi Germany. After the war the USA tried, with partial
> > > > success, to exclude even the UK from any information about the results
> > > > from the Manhattan project. However, as we know, the Americans defeated
> > > > Germany without any participation by anyone else, so why shouldn't they
> > > > keep the results to themselves?
> > > >
> > > > In reality, of course, it was primarily the USSR that defeated Germany,
> > > > something Hitler understood perfectly well when he placed 35 Divisions
> > > > on the Eastern Front and just one on the Western Front.
> > > >
> > > > On the other hand, I can accept that it was the USA that defeated Japan.
> > > > --
> > > > athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
> > > After much consideration and much soul-searching I find that I can follow no other course of action than to formally request that this forum revoke the top security clearance of Athel-Cornish, Mainly-in-Error. This request to revoke his security clearance is predicated on what can only be construed as the pro-Fuchs, pro-Julius and Ethel sentiments expressed by Athel in the preceding post. I request that he be officially excluded from all further threads concerned with atomic secrets. As for
> > Bob Dylan doesn't write songs...he steals from other song writers. din't
> > you know dat?
> >
> >
> > da only good commie is a dead commie
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
> Starmaker!  I had no idea of the BD plagiarism.  Please present your case.  Especially for "My Back Pages"
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGEIMCWob3U
> 
> Just look at Neil Young, the angriest man in music.  And the only singer worse than BD hizself. If (when) Trump is re-elected, his Bush-Trump derangement syndrome will kill him.  Why couldn't Tom Petty outgrow the hard drugs?


Joni Mitchell once said: "Bob Dylan is not authentic at all. He's a
plagiarist and his name and voice are fake. Everything about Bob is a
deception...."

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616413

On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 5:31:55 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> On 2023-07-30 08:27:24 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden said: 
> 
> > On 2023-07-30 08:09:08 +0000, patdolan said: 
> > 
> >> On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 12:45:05 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: 
> >>> On 2023-07-30 05:41:01 +0000, The Starmaker said:>> > patdolan wrote:> 
> >>>>>>>> On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:42:05 AM UTC-7, 
> >>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:> >>> Feynman cracked the government saves 
> >>> containing the atom bomb design.> >>> It shows he was willing to do 
> >>> something completely wrong just to get> >>> away with it. Only in 
> >>> America would that be allowed. And it should not> >>> have been.> >> 
> >>> Mitch, surely you meant to type that it was Klaus Fuchs, 
> >>> You're making the usual American assumption that the USA is the only> 
> >>> country that matters. Fuchs was not American, so he couldn't "betray"> 
> >>> it. 
> >>> -- 
> >>> athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots 
> >> Fuchs was not American, to be sure. But all his thefts were committed 
> >> on American soil, 
> > 
> > You think he arrived at Los Alamos knowing nothing? If that were the 
> > case why did they bring him? 
> > 
> >> while earning American Dollars and being protected by same. He 
> >> betrayed OUR Bomb program
> It wasn't YOUR bomb programme. You are -- typically for an American -- 
> forgetting the essential contributions made by British, Canadian and 
> refugee-German scientists, without which there would have been no bomb. 
> 
> Fuchs himself made major contributions, but he was increasingly 
> concerned by his realization that the USA was not planning to pass on 
> any information to its allies, most notably the USSR, in the war 
> against Nazi Germany. After the war the USA tried, with partial 
> success, to exclude even the UK from any information about the results 
> from the Manhattan project. However, as we know, the Americans defeated 
> Germany without any participation by anyone else, so why shouldn't they 
> keep the results to themselves? 
> 
> In reality, of course, it was primarily the USSR that defeated Germany, 
> something Hitler understood perfectly well when he placed 35 Divisions 
> on the Eastern Front and just one on the Western Front. 
> 
> On the other hand, I can accept that it was the USA that defeated Japan.
> -- 
> athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
After much consideration and much soul-searching I find that I can follow no other course of action than to formally request that this forum revoke the top security clearance of Athel-Cornish, Mainly-in-Error. This request to revoke his security clearance is predicated on what can only be construed as the pro-Fuchs, pro-Julius and Ethel sentiments expressed by Athel in the preceding post. I request that he be officially excluded from all further threads concerned with atomic secrets. As for Athel, may he find consolation in the possibility that Bob Dylan will write a song for him too.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616342

Albert Einstein sent a letter recommending Klaus Fuchs to work at the Manhattan Project...


Here are excepts of the fbi file on einstein:

Einstein was the one who requested Fuchs  assignment to him

Einstein had sent for him to help work on the atom bomb 

Professor Einstein, after reading the younger Fuchs  papers on nuclear energy, considered him valuable to the Allied war effort 









The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> patdolan wrote:
> >
> > On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:42:05 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Feynman cracked the government saves containing the atom bomb design.
> > > It shows he was willing to do something completely wrong just to get
> > > away with it. Only in America would that be allowed. And it should not
> > > have been.
> > Mitch, surely you meant to type that it was Klaus Fuchs, Julius & Ethel who betrayed atom and hydrogen bomb secrets to the mid twentieth century czars of Russia.
> >
> > In my capacity as the official movie reviewer of this forum, I pronounce two rotten tomatoes for Oppenheimer.  There was so much to say about him and the bomb.  Instead I spent 3 hours watching some meaningless story about some nondescript DC swamp creature's attempt to torpedo Oppy's security clearance.  Silly.
> >
> 
> Albert Einstein was very upset that they were arresting 'all his friends'.
> 
> I mean, Albert Einstein 'hand picked' every single one of them.
> 
> Albert Einstein first started to pick scientists who were all members of
> a communist society group.
> 
> Then he made sure those 12 scientist dand picked other communists scientists, amd so on and so on.
> 
> Albert Einstein WAS the Master Spy.
> 
> Albert Einstein transfered *thousands* of atomic secrets to Russia.
> 
> More than anyone else.
> 
> The FBI simply wasn't that smart then...
> 
> This is all they had on him...
> 
> https://vault.fbi.gov/Albert%20Einstein
> 
> https://www.amazon.com/Albert-Einstein-Files-F-B-I-Vault-ebook/dp/B0B64W78C3
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616343

https://books.google.com/books?id=k184DBrn_JEC&pg=PA36&lpg=PA36&dq=%22Einstein+had+sent+for+him+to+help+work+on+the+atom+bomb%22#v=onepage&q=%22Einstein%20had%20sent%20for%20him%20to%20help%20work%20on%20the%20atom%20bomb%22&f=false

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Albert Einstein sent a letter recommending Klaus Fuchs to work at the Manhattan Project...
> 
> Here are excepts of the fbi file on einstein:
> 
> Einstein was the one who requested Fuchs  assignment to him
> 
> Einstein had sent for him to help work on the atom bomb
> 
> Professor Einstein, after reading the younger Fuchs  papers on nuclear energy, considered him valuable to the Allied war effort
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > patdolan wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:42:05 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > Feynman cracked the government saves containing the atom bomb design.
> > > > It shows he was willing to do something completely wrong just to get
> > > > away with it. Only in America would that be allowed. And it should not
> > > > have been.
> > > Mitch, surely you meant to type that it was Klaus Fuchs, Julius & Ethel who betrayed atom and hydrogen bomb secrets to the mid twentieth century czars of Russia.
> > >
> > > In my capacity as the official movie reviewer of this forum, I pronounce two rotten tomatoes for Oppenheimer.  There was so much to say about him and the bomb.  Instead I spent 3 hours watching some meaningless story about some nondescript DC swamp creature's attempt to torpedo Oppy's security clearance.  Silly.
> > >
> >
> > Albert Einstein was very upset that they were arresting 'all his friends'.
> >
> > I mean, Albert Einstein 'hand picked' every single one of them.
> >
> > Albert Einstein first started to pick scientists who were all members of
> > a communist society group.
> >
> > Then he made sure those 12 scientist dand picked other communists scientists, amd so on and so on.
> >
> > Albert Einstein WAS the Master Spy.
> >
> > Albert Einstein transfered *thousands* of atomic secrets to Russia.
> >
> > More than anyone else.
> >
> > The FBI simply wasn't that smart then...
> >
> > This is all they had on him...
> >
> > https://vault.fbi.gov/Albert%20Einstein
> >
> > https://www.amazon.com/Albert-Einstein-Files-F-B-I-Vault-ebook/dp/B0B64W78C3
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616344

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 

ALBERT EINSTEIN 
PART 1 OF 9 


BUFILE NUMBER: 61-7099 



_ 1 


-S-^trt *sr 





I 



Officers 


^ Ifrs. Randolph Frothlnghan, - 
~| President , Brook line, Mass. 
&ra# John Fremont Hill, r 

?ice-President , Boston. 
Vtb. Lewis C.Luoas, 
Secretary-Treasurer^- 
Wa5hington>D.C. 


OMAN PAWtXOT OORpdwWXOi 
#a«kson *ls^^# 
Washington, J,<U ¦-*4W**"'***rJ 


¦ 1 

¦ i 
e - 1 


. ..... -jt 


SlrWtors ' ^Ǥ* 


mas *W f 
. Chsfcrman^S w 
tonJf.lM strs.Buftt* 

JC0i*be*Ba3 


.3 

.5 

9 
P 


1 
I 

I 

1 

» - 

'95 ^ 

t* -- • 
n 4 
e« - 

a * 

• ¦ 

ITT 

HI 

ii 

H 

IS - 

is 

I? \ 


! 


u 
•i 

43 
44 
IS 
44 

*I 
41 

4* 

SO 
SI 
S2 

«. 
M 
S5 
S« " 

s*— 

St 

s» 

40 
41 
42 


- Cambridge ,nass; ' ^ 
HrB.Frederie 
tongfellow, U.Y,C. 
•trs.Francls i.BUtterT^ 
Brighton^Uaaa.; Mm.*^ 
•VeSerlo Jay Cotton # ^Jg 
-. nim Boston; «nd tha "-r^T^ 
• PEP Of«Aara ax-off iei©# -V?:=J 


C0P"i OF CHARGES FILED AGAINST llfistisBlOf U t ~ 1 0 
OF ALBERT^SlN STEIN TO THE UNITED 


Honorable A ?Dana Bodgdon,Chief g£C 2 " Mil 
Visa Division,Department of State, .. 
Washington^. C. ' - — ~— - — -r-- 



Worembor 19-1932 "¦'53 
,JJ "TiATBAN " 


mm 


Dean Sir: - v ..- y . r-w 

It is re ape ot fully requested, in Tie* of tb© . ZZ&^jtftt&tfiZ 
mandatory Alien Exclusion Lairs af the United Statea, -s mB ^f'-^ j ^ >5 
the laws making it a Xolony ^for -any |>erson knowingly:*© - 1 
"assist or permit certain c las see of inadmissible aliens %* '£SN^^ :
3P 
enter the United States, that the American Consul General ;| 
at Berlin, or Geneva, o"r any other American consular of flea 
at which application by Professor Albert Einstoln for 'a -V-^i^^li^^i 
passport visa nay be made, bo Instructed to refuse and wltsv 
hold such passport visa to Professor Einstein; or. If auen >A'-. v : y
:•• < 
passport visa has been issued, to suspend or revoko tho same* *.-;rv'5 
in accordance with the laws and facts hcroaftcr sot forth 4 
and charged , under tho requirement of Fodoral law making %t 
a duty of citisons undor ponalty of tho law- to make known *.'£!$^ f :&.
: !* 
to proper authorities certain facts within tho knowlodgo
>'\'*fc«$'*j;~-f\i£4 
of such citizens. '¦/- 


1. MANDATORY PROVISIONS OF LAW IN THIS CASE 


The mandatory provisions of law to which attention is ^6%^ :V',' r 
invited, and the duty of tho Department of S^ato. to onf oroo .^^V^'-v • 
them, wore clearly set forth in tho roply of tho Stato Itopart*. * 
mont, through Eonorablo William R. Castle (them Chief *of ' • .-^T r 'f 
Western European AffairB, now TJndcr secretary of " Stato) to ";• 
lawyers for Countess -Michael Karolyi. Tho ttatorlal parts of 



;o th 

subject* •••••The Act of Oetc? 
by the Ect of Juno 5,1920. . x 
"Tho Dopartment 1 s action Wats' t 



l6 f 1 9lE«««aa amondod 


duties imposed and the authority cunforrod 
laws;-" nnd it is, therefore, unable to comply" with your W£ 
request that a visa bo grantod to Countess Karolyl**^^^ 

It is submitted that as tho law has not "boon ohangod in 
this respect sinoo the refusal of a passport visa to Counts 
s - y ess Karolyl; and slnco the mandatory Alien £xoluirton Iowa 

\c doemod moro applicable to Profossor Albert Blnatoiarfc Wi „ 
they -were to Countess Karolyl (whoso visa* was .re^*^^** 2 ^ 5 * 



"boliovc that the immigrant i« Inadmissible to ; tho 
-~TJnltod States tmder +ho lniidEyr^lo&.a^8»^-™^ 
*8cc,15(«>: p Ko alien Ineligible t^ o mzcnghlp, ahall bo_ 

admitted:.. unless such" 5Ho» is admissible *b a non-quota 

Immigrant... or is cot an Immigrant* 
^-Soo ~?BURDEN JF-FBOPF*- Thencvcr -any -nilon attospt a 

enter the Unltod States the burd £n ^M^°$*J^1L-^ 

upon s uch alien to catatlTih^h^rhTTT^noTTubJcct to^ 

exclusion under any, provision of the immigration laws. 

The Act of February 6,1917, provides: . 

: ftoc .16 t " Every alien who any hot appear to the oxamining 
immigrant inspoetof at the port of arrival to he clearly 
and beyon d a doubt entitled to land shall bo detained 
for oxaminaUon in relation thoroto by a hoard of »pocial 
Inquiry.'' * ; >-¦ : 7 -"' 

Procedure under tho section last quoted is under tho ------ 

immigration inepoctors of the Labor Department. &it It is — - 
clear from this soetioh, ae well as from See .8(f) and Boo. 
25 of the Immigration Act of 1924, that Congress determined 

that "the burden of proof shall ho -aponauoh alion -ana 

that noither consular officers nor immigration inspectors 
have authority to waive or noglcct to onforco this mandate 
of the law, 

"Thia legal -roquiromont -1m -al*o emphatically statod'by 


the Supreme Court of tho Unitod Statos: 

"...in ordor to safeguard against admission of thoso 
who arc unworthy or who for any reason fail to mcasuro 
up to required standards, the law puts tho burdon upon 
every applicant to show by satisfactory cvidonco that 
he has the specif led qualifications... and when doubts 
exist... they should be resolved in favor of the United 
States and against the claimant... And when, upon a fair 
consideration of tho ovidonco adduced. . .doubt roraains... 
' the Unit ed Sta tes Is entitled to _tho benefit of__such 
doubt "an d" the applicat ion _sh^uld_b^_dcnj^d. (United 
States v.Rosika Schwirarocr* 279 U.S. 650). 

That Suprcno Court docislon rolatod to roqulrcmonts of 
the naturallzationJLaws* But the similar, if not more 

^ngnfremonts of th e lmmlgrat I on laws regarding tho 
"burden of proof" mako this principlo clearly mandatory 
in considering application of "any alien" to entor tho 
Unitod States*,,,. V 1 ¦* . ¦ . * 
CERTAIN CLASSES V C3P ALIENS "SHALL BE EXCLUDED" ' 

Tho Immigration Act of Penary s;iCl7;-a»d^tho^AU0£^ 
Exclusion and Deportation ^fct. of October 16.l9lB.ai « 

~™„„Ar.A v» A«t of Juno^A920. *cau2ror^^ , 

•""?"That the following el'asic* of ^i«u«~«$aii bo/c*<styd<jd«, 
from admission into the United States^' ' * •* . V*... 

"Anarchists or persons who bcliovo <"T 
overthrow by force and violence of tho Covomraont or 
the Si?cd States... or who disbelieve in or are opposed 
to organized government... or who are °* 
affiliated with any organitatlon entertaining and 

teaching disbelief in or opposition to organises „_ 

government," etc. CSco73,Act of Fcb.5,1917). 

(b) Aliens who adviso, advooato or toach, or J** — 
members of or affiliatod with any organisation, 
association, society, or group, that adviaoa, . 

toioVieB. ©pppsltlon t°_ o rganlsert 


£ "(d) Aliens who wrlto,publiab,or cause to bo written 

f or published, or «/ho knowingly oirculnto, distribute, 

J print or display, or knowingly cause to bo circulated, 

| distributed, print od, publisbod or displayed ,or Who « — — 

1 — Snowing ly tusvo In their possession for the purpose of . 

(oirculation,distributiDn,pTiblicatioh or display, any 
writton or printed matter, advising, advocating or 
teaching..... I the doctrines omuaoratod in subdivision " 

* ( C ) | — 


5 ., — - - - -- 7m Jo)*lloitf . who^are -aoaborc -of -or ufflllatda with
any organ* 
. - - -r ¦ i«atl on* association, society or group that writos, cir- 

culates, distributes, prints, publlahos or displays, or 

1 causes to be written, circulated, distributed, printed ^, 
published, or displayed, or that has In its possession 
«L ?2.E! rp 2l! 0 ..? f distribution, publioa- ¦ 

i | I;T?iJ ,BU0 * °? «Ji;play > any written or printed matter 

; * * r th0 character described in subdivision (d). 

i I 'For tho purpose of this soctionx (1) tho givinR.loan- 

t i»S or promising of money or anything of value to bo 

> « U80 J f or thc advising, advocacy, or toaehing of any :.:-37*«SKs 

li - : doctrine above onuaoratod s hall c onstitute the advisimr 

* ! advocacy,or teaching of suolTo^rlncT^ (2) tho ^ f 

Citing, loaning or promising of aonoy or anything of 
value to any organisation, association. socictyTor 


* „ group of the character Above described sha ll cons'tit^to~ 

_ afflliat ion therewith j but nothi ng in tHT baram nh ° 

I IpIT^^pconas ^.cxcfrs^d ^flnltion of advf siL,- - 
; } - advocacy, teaching orTfflW^^^ ^ r 

¦t J FORMAL CHARGES AGAIN 8T ALBERT ^EIHSTEST ~ 

ij .•J ir L a E? ln*ormod and bolicvo and chnrgo that Professor 

Albert Einstoin is inadmissible to tho Unitod States On tho 
t . following grounds; 

\ - (a * 1 ^Lf^ a i£j?v b0 J ioirC ? in * advl «°»» advocates or teaches 

\ a doctrlno which, in a legal sonso, as hold by tho courts 

in other cases, "would allow anarchy to stalk in 

unmolested and result in "government only In naao.* .¦;--*-•¦¦ 
M (b) Albert Einstoin advises, advocates or toachos. and is 

SL B ??? or ^S r S*g affiliated with groups that aro in 
.{ "militant" and admittodly "illogal" opposition to tho 

most fundamental principle of organised government; 
" (c J Albert Einstoin boliovos in or is affiliated with 

j«; Communist groups that advooato tho ovorthrow by force 

i °* violonco of tho Oovornraont of -the Unitod Statoss ho ' " : " 

.) advocates "acts of robollion" against thc basic 

f principle of all organised govornnont that it may " " 

" • l™™™ »¦ OXiBtoneo and compel obedionoo to its laws 
it-'' v ^^Z or il °J ho aAvoeatos "conflict with publio 

r> '¦ ' ' auth ority; , admits that his "attitude is revolutionary** 
¦ that his purposo is "illegal" and that ho intends to 

I I ; organise and lead, and colloet money for and contribute 

\ _ money to o "militant opposition" and to "combat* tho \ 

i - i a s if Principle of our Constitution that our Supreme * 

: < Court has always uphold- as o&sontial to thc^iEistdh**** * 

^ * of OUJ - Govornnentf ho tcaohos ^^o^JranTor^Ts^l 2 : 

|t S n ? vo »S nt £°r, unl ^ wful "individual rosistanec" and 

fi . - aet . 8 of rebcilion" against, of fleers of the l^itod 

ijf^-" States In £ime of war, which is almost impossible k ' * .' 

^ without tho assaulting or killing of such of floors as 

W$ ^ : a nocessnry consoqueneo of such "acts of rebellion,' and " 

* whicb,on tho part of V^rticipants in such unlawful and 

.4. ¦*. ¦ "rovolutlonary" "combat /• "conflict* or "robollion" (as 

Aibor t E instoin hims elf namos his objec tives) must ~T 
-i promote treason, do soft ion or othor w crjmos~ agilnst tho 

PXlstonco of the Go vornrvent^ B ho boliovos in or advocatos 
a *"I^ to S °i orcAnisod sabotage against all proparati""s_A^ 
tbo^Ujilted 8*. tn« tj ^.ifr-rt^ <»«*^«>y^^ . ; »^*«ft*f*4WV 


— - and Bet # S~Df the Ad «, j: February 5 , 1917 . — ^ 

Albert Einstein fcivos, loans or promises moncyjer jcrao- - ¦•- 
"¦^tfaing of -valuo ^including his own prostigc.lcaaorship-- " 

— and labor) and collects money for and promises «onoy *o — 

— bo usod for advising, advocacy or t\9acMne *f tbo «oc- 

trlnos above onuncr«.tod,, which, according to iaw snail 

constitute the advising, advocacy w toaohinc of such 
« r ocTrIne v ~and "shall constitute* a ff iliation* with «uoh 
organisation, society or group. 

If the above charges aro true, Albert Binstoln nust bo bold 
anadmissiblo to the Dnitod States un dor each and all of the 
subdivisions of the mandatory laws excluding certain classo* — 
of aliens from this country, aboro »ot forth. 

whllo tho 'burden of proof 11 by law Is clearly upon Albort 

^lIlBlOin *Q Q6b'4Ui>iau uvjuxiu i liiiOWi«iu*v mwmw* »»«" - — 

the mandatory re Btrlctl one -of -the -iaw applios Jn>ia case, the — 

frima facie proof of all the above ehargos may bo established 
y an Investigation by tho Visa Division of tho State Depart- . 
mont, and by careful examination of Profossor Einstoin by tho 
consular officers, and will bo subnittod boruaftcr, by tho 
undersigned, when compilation of documentary evidence on these 
points now being made is coraplotod» ^ 

It is to bo notod that admissions of an alien concerning 
himself, or his beliefs, are on an oqual footing with actual 
ccrvric ti cr.s in foreign court g for tho purpose of dot o mining 
his right to enter the United Statos. "(Soo Sec .3, Immigration 
Act of 1924). Ho is roquired by the samo law (Soc.7) to state 
whether ho is or is not a member of " each class of Individuals 
excluded from admission.. .under tho immigration laws ; and is 
subject to a $10,000 f ino or five years imprisonment for 
knowingly making any. false sta tcmont -in his application under_ 
oath* 

The admissions of Albert Einstein concerning his "illegal" 
„and * rev dictionary" objectives and affiliations are matters 
of public record," but appear hitherto Jto.hnvo_boon ^ unnot lcod 

Inmoetors who haVO - 
granted visas .and ontry to Einstein for several former 
transitory visits to the Unltod States* *- ^ 
* • * ' * ... 

But now ho is socking to become a permanent or semi- 

foraanont resident of the* Unltod States, and in any ease, 
oe.2 of tho Alien Exclusion and Deportation Act of October 
16,1918, as amended, is applicable to tho c lassos of alions 
oxcludod by that act, " lrrospoctlvc of tho tine of their 
ontry into tho Unitod States" and such alions may even be 
sported " at any tlno aftor entering tho United Statos" if 
found to have boon at tho tirao of entry, or to hive become _ 
theroaftor, a mombor of "any one of tho clot soo i onuae^atoa.'' 
(Ibid.).J : ..- VT ^^ 

Previous trancltory admissions to tho Wtoi 4 t ^^° 8 t thoro- 
"fore, give rto alien Shy "exemption .from the ^mandatory provisions 
of the Allen Exclusion anfl Deportation Ia*«r*J V*J . *hon they • 
. are found applicable to such" alien — and tho ;*buiidcn of proof" 
-rests upon such alion in any application for pa assort visa 
'or admission, regard loss of previous visas or admissions to. • 
tho United States as a temporary visito*."., <'''% : fe>v ¦ . i 

¦ '- •'• • 

: ¦**"*¦ *v V ." (Krs. Randolph Prothingham) 

President, The Woman Patriot. Corporation. 

^. _ 0 ; 

JRviojKf>.l!* *A,Dana Hodcdon.C^^T*^ ¦.„ „ - MO 

Vi§a DiilteA-n^Dopartmont of Stato Kovombor 82,1932 

Doar Sir: Tho attachod morootfandum of ovidenco in proof ©f 

inadmissible to tho Unitod States.... is hcrowith rospoct- 

fully auhmitted, Vfcry truly yours, 

, (Signed) Harriet A^FrtOTHINGHAJI . 

. (lire .Randolph Fro thingham] 

-. * '* Prosldont, Tho Woman Patriot Corporation 


tfEHORANDUM .-OF E£ ,*CE THAT ALBERT EIKETEIl^ INADMISSIBLE TT^ 


r 4 


"First, - to provcnt eohfuslon "{such as nas 'eTtcn nanlfostod ~~* 7 '' 
it < elf in regard to alien exclusion eases, ovon anong lawyers) 
V^T* ~lt is to be recalled 'that an alien wocking admission to the — - 
=rrr ~ - United States is askings a favor and a poking a high privllogo
, 

¦ - that nay be gran t FdTon iy upon such tome, Conditions and 
« -- -- restrictions as the United States may doom desirable, . 

£ Ko alien is eonpelled to entor the United Btatos. If he .... . 

I does not like Aaorlcan terns of admission, ho con stay out . 

3 . And If he does not meet Aacrloan terns ef admission, our 
* Covernmont can keep Mn out, without any Injury to his 

person or property, or denial of his .Jlbqrty, and altogether:; 
without any trial by eourt or jury undor the striet rulos of 
evidence that safeguard the person or property of ono charged 
with an off onso , from unjust punishment or less • Many govorn- 


nonts, notably Great Britain, simply tell an alien that thoy 
don 4 1 want him - and -that end s tho nattpr, without oven 


- ; right of the alien to ask then - why! 

• Tho nlion socking admission is not on trial before a eourt 

| * of law ; ho is not in Jeopardy of his lifo, liberty or property; 
I j • he is undor no eocipulsion at all to appoar at our gatos. And 

! likewise, tho two sots of Amorican officers, in two difforont 

* t departments of Government, that Congress has dirootod to guard 
j'j the gates, nood not open then until and unless eaeh is satis- 


fled, "beyond reasonable doubt* that tho allon is worthy of 
hi gh privilege — whl eh millions ef aliens throughout the 
world are derilod. 


. 

r The "burden ef proof" Is upon tho alion; not upon the * -^r---^ 


I - Government. The United States, not the alien, is legally * 

I | '. entitled to tho benofit of all doubts. Tho "final dotomina- 

t tlon of facts" is entrusted to administrative of fleers, not 

r-i to a jury. Administrative -of fleers are *not obligod to believo"--
— 

A tho tostinony of an allon in his own behalf, and ."noro orror* * ' 

£!* oven if it consists in finding an essential fact without « V 

jM adequate supporting evidence, is not a denial of duo process 

»' of law" in those alien exclusion ea ecs. (See doclsion by 

X~ HrTJustlce "Bra ndels In Tisl v.Todr264 U.S rl34r^fio^isnvtenjra~" T
^~^~ 

fjj Ekiu v.U.S.,142 U.S.651,660). 

4 i It is not nocossary to prove the alion guilty of any criminal - • 

S[- or other offenso, or of any ovort aet. It is enough if his 

4 '.' bcliofs, opinions or af fi liations show bin to be anong a ny one 

{f h of the soveral e la sacs or aliens that "shall be excluded* . . ' , 

4 fron admission into tho United States. 

it:i . ¦ ' ¦ ~'£*-> r * ! - ; ;.; ^: 

lijil An executive offlcor, noroovor,' "is not bound to
-'&>ao&$^#>*£^x*\£ 

\t I tho strict rules of evidence onforeod by Judioial \i^b^^'^^'P.y^,r 

IJt - in oxcludlng.er dcportlngwiliejis. (Soo £Jar v # Doak,7th U»5. ^
^' ^ ! 

11 ¦ Circuit Ceurt 'of Appoals, dooidod Oct.l^°£^o^a&4)* V ^ c 

l£ i * "in, qs/ery easox, wko*« fon-alionj*^ «xc>udod 1 ' tho *<w« iXion
-of^v/f " ^' ^ 

If '; administratiro .oXfief|rs v Xt V x< V«rsa ^o jthp adrrlsslefi pf
such • 

rf j . alien, shall bo final... .P^odT?TStat.737i738). ^ ** ***** 

JJ« 4 1 Congress has been diligent i^ostablishing barriors against 

j 0 ..; the entry of undesirable 'alions.. It has ontrustod tho koys of 

^ our gatos to two soparato sots "of officials, eithor of which' 

52 4 nay decline to opon them — -tho consular officers of tho St a to 

jj ta Dopartnont, who nay refuse visas, and tho immigration inspectors 

54 1 °f the Labor Department, who nay refuse admi ssio n notwlthstand- 

5 ^ |£Q-.^|gl« J>£«?9i^^P»_of gjclg^' Finally," Congress has maa? — 

ij i It a felony for any porson lbaoTrTngly to assist or pomlt tEo~" 

J* classes of aliens oxcludod by tho statutos horo~cltod, to enter 

$t ' thC Unltod stat c«. (See .165, Title 6, U.S.Codo). . 

??¦ , Having thus established tho logal fact that ALBERT EINSTEIN 

J» is seeking a high privilege; that tho UNITED STATES, not Albort 

g f Einstoin, is ontitlod to tho boncfit of all doubts (particularly 

•J of all loyal officials in tho omploy of tho Oovornnent of the 

i United Statos) tho following nonorandun of evidonco is sub- 

. mittod as sufficient, whon eonfirnod by roferonco to tho — 

f " published documents eitod, te suetainxx tho ehargos heretofore 

¦ filed, and to require that any passport Tisa to Albort Einstoin 

* ho refused or revoked* 


and publi ah anorciii -t^ond c nrnunl Bt doct rinc*-, ancly : ; ~ - r ~" 

(1) Tho World CongroBs Against Inporlallst War- « - characterized 
Oven "by European Socialist loaders as u a Connunist plo^—ln 


which 800 Connunist dologr>tos took part, and In which: 

- - "ttaroel Caehln, Connunist nonber of the Pronch Chanber of 

E r ;t)optttla« «n3 wllil llunxonborg, Connunist deputy to the . 
Gernan Roicbstag. put forth nost offootlvoly and oranatl- : 
oally the Connunist pro gran of action against war." (Soe 
The low *aaB08,Novonbor, 1932,p.l0,col.£) # . 

ALBERT EIHSTEIH la on tho •World Connittoo" of tho above 
-Connunist Congress* his none loadin g tho . lost of Ooman ~— • 
nonber a # followod by that of CLARA ZETKIN, Willi Hunr onborg 
and other notorious Connunist lcadors. (Soo tho Dally 
Worker , official Anorlcan Connunist organ, Oct .ll,1932,p.4, 
eol,S)„ . . . - 


the "Marilfosto" of the above Congress doclaros that ."oach 
of us" and "all together" they hove pledged and wworn thon- 
sclves: 

"..•to fight with all our force and with all tho neons at 

our eonaand against imperialist capital! 

"against arnanents, against war preparations, and In 

eon sequence against tho govornnonts ruling us*" (Vow 

Masfl0fl,Novenber,1932). 

"They strossod tho fact that war as a collosal nass 
novenont cannot bo prevented by tho sacrifices of individual 
conscientious objectors no natter now couragoous and well 
notivatod these persona night bo. Thoy advocatod nass anti- 
war activities in the arnica and navlos. in nunitlon plants 
and anong transport workcra who could triplo | cripple ?i tho 
production jmdjlellveryjpf jaunitionB Jt il _JlMd«p»10J . 


In abort, both Connunisn and sabofrago wore openly urged at 
this oo-callod "World Congross Against Inporialiet War*. 

ALBERT SIKSTEUI'js nonber snip on tho. EWorld Xonnit too * of 


this Connunist organization is in itsolf sufficient to ex- 
clude hln fron adnisaion to tho United States. Nor la it 
necessary to prove that ho "had knowlodgo of tho contents 
of tho pro grans • . .or any ono of thon. It Is sufficient if 
tho evidence ehowod that he was a nenbor of. or afflllatod 
with, such an organisation aa eonXonplatod by tho statuto." 
(Soo KJar v.Doak. supra , p.6). 

• : . • 
ALBERT EIHSTEIH was also ono of tho loadora of tho World 
Congross of tho Ant 1- Imperialist Lcaguo— -a subsidized 
srr^- - affiliate of tho Connunist International — -that not at 
IV Fro riktottfte^rr, JclI? £0,1929. And bir-picturo was * , 

raatuyo^toofi^p'.^ lea dera Of that Cortjunlst Congroaa, \t. J. 
by the lg lln ooanunist organ, ^llustrl crtc ArbpjLty , . f « 

(2) Tho Work ers International Roll of This orgnnt*atT$Q x l« dt 
well-known offlliato arid creature- of tb7o Connunist IntonaZitional. 
Tbo contribution of noncy, "or anything ,«f valuo to any organ- 
ization of this olass, constitutes affiliation, under tjje 
JJ statute, with the Workcra International ficllof , and therefore' 

with its affilioto, tho Connunist International, (Soo KJar 
v.Doak,p.6). . 

ALBERT EINSTEIH, March 1,1931 /wrote to tho Workers 
International Roliof,Anorican Section* 

"Tho work of your organization haa tho hi ghost import anco 
in a country in which the individual la so insuf ficiontly 
protectod." 

That Elnatoln'a indorsonont bad connorcial valuo la not only 
solf-cvldont (as ovon Bernard Shaw and Loon Trctzky regularly 
colloct nonoy for norc press interviews) but as a nattor of 
fact, Einstoin'B indorsonont was dconcd of such groat "value 
to tho organization" that it wae tho first and principal thing 
nontionod In an a ppoal for funds, issuod March 14,1931, by 
The Workora Xhtornationa 1 Rollof, Anoriean Section. 

(3) J^5^^°?i^cr^ International . Tbia organization or 
poup, with which AL^f^lNSfSlN is enthusiastically affil- 
latod, op only adnlt* and unfu»iain« — — - ¦* ¦¦ ¦ 


-as well as "Conay- - groups-.-and under tho> and -tho 


doelalon In thenar caae cited EIHSTEIM'S W^iliation 
-with the Wa T Rcslatera* International constitutes 
off illation with Its affiliates. ' ," ,". 

In "the liat'of ^affillatoaVcctionfl'* .^>f tho War Rcaiators 

International at loast throe "anarcho~socialiat and anarcho- 
connunist" affiliations arc adaitted t [ Soo J»ar Rcaietanec, T . ,^ 
n Practical Policy, pp#p5-6). - 

Ita belief a and cbjootivea are officially adnittbfl 4n 
part aa followa: ^ _ 

"Out of the present ehaea tho War Roaiatora Interna t local 
Tx>liovea that a now Social Oracr oa~ n and will bo estab- 
lished. It looks to an order of aocioty whoro all shall 
have the opportunity to co-oporatc for tho good of all 
nankind. It bollevos that tho so ohangos nay bo accoftpanlod 
— by revolut ionary uprisings wEIch will, In all probability 
— lead for a tlno "to war. ro act ion and groat oppression* 
Every war reaiator deairoa to tako part In the atrup^ lo* 
c^ftd'ont^TiPEho ultinato triunph of tho rorcoa which 
nako for a now aoclal order "(Ibid. p.7) • 

"The way to atop war la to rofuao to tako part in it, 
to refuae to train as a soldier, to rofuao to nako nunitions, 
and then to organise na aa ro al a t a nco ¦ . . .Tho aontinont 
againat war waa there" right enough, but tho International 
called for op en re sista nce • * 

"The largest Soction of tho War Resistors International 
ia the Fellowship In the Unitod States, which nunbora 7,600 
nenbers." (Ibid.) 


*We have nade rcpreaentctioha to tho varioua GovornnontS _ 
...These representations are notaont direct fron the Inter- 
natio nal, but in this wo novo always had tho willing he lp 
o f rton 'of cnlncnco auch as Professor Einstein *..* (Ibid. 
p,2& f Enphaaia our a throughout). ~~ 


In ^thor word s # ~wlth tho ~ain bTTrofossor^nstbin** - 


"willing help* aa an "eminent nan" those revolutionary 
radica la arc ablo to pronoto thoir objeotivos noro effect- 
ively than thoy can through tho organisation thoy eatabliahod 
for the purpose. 

Anarchla t affiliationa aro not only Hated, aa prevlouely 
noted, but featured In the official roport of tho War 
Resistors Internationa l f in part aa follows: 
• - < i 

"An Anarchlat conrado • . .rof errod to you, Kr.Chaiman, 
aa that 'extraordinary Socialist.*. Y^i were -i«5«r T<wr . 
p- -r it It: i ¦rlianont as 4 Socialist l< a \r f ar a plat- . ^ 
t;- i^cren to tho world tho d og frrlnja v»hic'i a* 

our noveneftt and Socialist Ic^c* V*-/ 7* ^L?!^ 


In our novenen* win. ooc*^ - - - -¦ - t - 

natiortal pained tho r espect of Aftarchlsts. (Official 
Report of the Secretary , Ibid .p • 

Could there be clearer proof of tho affiliation of too 
War Resistors International with Anarchist a J And^ ALBERT 
EINSTEIN created to aid this anarcho-connuniat War Resistors 
International, tho "Einstein War Rosistera international 
Fund." (Ibid»p t C 0). . 

The official roport of tho socrotary of tho War Resistora 
international ahow? alao that it has no intorneat in the noro 
main tenance of peace , but is frankly an anarcno-coxinunlst 
orgf ni^ti on°-- ln wh ich "every war resistor"^ do sires to take 
"his part in tho struggle" and "revolutionary uprisings 
contemplated by the War Roalatora Internet ienal, aa olroady 
shown • 

The roport declaros: 

•wo insist upon tho responsibility of ^j"** 1 
hlnaclf to cormonco to bttilfl tho now world without 
waiting for his follows to agroo to do tho sano, l*ar 
Re ai stance, p»14)» 

"Wo have attained tho power to atop war brooking out. I 
»**»*.*a1» nSt* n full fiojaac4ouaue«a <tf tho 


^apparent -prApptrtcrousncsB _ or "Xno assert'on, i eo not 
-elain that ' owor is within the gras^ the War 
Hesistors Intt. .ational ^lono. Wo havo QtL allloa in ~ 

the groat proletar ia n novononts of the world , (ibid* , 
J?. 15)* — — - —¦ — ¦— 

-"Before the International was found od, tho war to sis tor 
-was called a -Conscientious Objector. . .Today wo aeclaln 
-4he Individual responsibility to organigo nase resist- 
ance to war and to unlto the detornlnatlon to build the 
WoiTworld." (Ibid*) 

s Ono of the ncthods of co-oporation has boon t>y the 
fomation of the Joint Poaco Council. In this Council 
all the radical pacifist and ant 1 -militarist Interna-" 
Clonals aro affiliated ." (Ibid#p»17), * 

"l wont to aako it Tory eloar that whon the nln Is " 
oorely (po aco 1 and the establishnont of tho status quo, 
wo, as an international, havo no intorost in lt « <Ibld* 

^.17). : — ; - 



r 
I 
I 
i 
i 

I 

» 

I 
t 

6 

i 

V r 
I 

t 
I 
I 
i 

> 
i 

>i ¦ 
I • 
• 
a 
i 
a 


ALBERT EINSTEIN'S affiliation with this nnaroho~c canonist 
War Resistors International that adnits that it ha* "hp 
interest" In poaoo alone , but oontonplatos "revolutionary 
uprisings" ana "mass resistance" as woll as anarchistic 
individual " resistance" to Oovernnont . rather than nere 
conscientious" obi opt Ion to war , is attostod In tho sano 
official docuaont of tho War Rosistors International, 
ontitled "War Resistance," at pages 28*2 9: : 

*• * 

"ADDRESS 0? PROF .ALBERT EINSTEIN TO THE CONFERENCE" 

"I address nysolf to you, tho dologates of tho War 
Resistors International, nooting in Conforonoo at Lyon, 
because you represent tho novonent nost oortaln jto end 


7 


war.... 

"All tho nations of tho world are talking about Dis- 
Amanont. You nust lead then to noro than talk. Tho pcoplo 
Dust take this natter out of tho hands of statosncn and 
dlplona ts» '--Tfaoy nust grip it in their own hands. 

..... 

"We have to faco today a nilltorlsn far noro powerful 
than the nllitarian which brought tho disaster of the 
Great War. This is tho achievement of Govornnonts. But 


4-U. 


this idea. 


You nust challengingly and fearlessly extend 
You nust lead the pooplo to tako disamonont into their 
own hand s. • • • . . 

"This is no tlno for tonporising. You aro either for 
War or against War. If you are for War, you nust onouura 
science, finance, industry ,roligio» and labour to sjocort 


oers.iu.se ccalason* 

"1 appeal td^all nen and wonen, whether they bo cninent 
or nunsx&, to declaro before tho World 01 samanent Confor- 
enco hoots at Geneva in February, that -they will rcfuso 
to givo any further assistance to war or tho proper at ion 
for war. I ask then to tell tholr Govornnonts t h is in 
writing, and to regi ster fhoir doc 1 si on by inforhira: ho 

^hat $hoy havo done 80."*^ "* ¦••<•«*¦¦;• *..—.<¦*- 

r 1 shall oxpoct to havo thousands of responses to this 
appeal. Thoy should bo addressed to no at tho Headquarters 
of the War Resistors International, 11 Abbey Road, Enfiold, 
Middle sex, England. To pnavlo this groat effort to bo carrlod 
through effectively, I havo authorised tho establishnont of 
tho 'Einstein War Rosistors International Fund." Contribu- 
tions to this fund should bo sent to tho Troasuror of tho 
W.R.I. ,11 Abbey Road, Enficld,Hiddloscx.England« 

"(Signed) ALBERT EINSTEIN" 

ALBERT EINSTEIN'S affiliation with this anarchp-connunist 

froup known as Tho War Rosistors International is thus provod 
y his own words and actions un'cr ovory possible definition of 
what shall constitute "affiliatian" in tho Alion Exclusion and 
Deportation Lew whi'*^' after ©nunoratin" certain definitions 
of^"amiis)tion^""d^olaro8 : 



^but tiothinr: In V e paragraph ahall t>c 'take _ 
exclusi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616346

i can post the WHOLE fbi file on einstein here if needed...


i don't see the need.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616347

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> i can post the WHOLE fbi file on einstein here if needed...
> 
> i don't see the need.


Oh, i forgot...you can get  it all here for free:

https://archive.org/details/Einstein-FBI/einstein1a/

 DOWNLOAD OPTIONS
download 17 files
ABBYY GZ
download 17 files
DAISY

For print-disabled users
download 17 files
EPUB
download 17 files
FULL TEXT
download 1 file
ITEM TILE download
download 17 files
KINDLE
download 17 files
PDF
download 17 files
PDF WITH TEXT
download 17 files
SINGLE PAGE PROCESSED JP2 ZIP 


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616247

Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:
[-]
> It has to be Heisenberg, in charge to developing a nuclear reactor. Bohr
> was on Britain's side all the WWII, even when Heisenberg visited him in
> 1941 to obtain guidance.
> 
> The other Nobel was Otto Hahn, who received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry
> in 1944, that he $$ collected in 1945.
> 
> In total, 11 first rank physicists were incarcerated at Scotland after
> WWII, but they were cleared of any charges, like Sommerfeld.
> 
> But you have to ask: WHY the 1944 Nobel was awarded to Hahn, who
> discovered U-235 fission in 1938?

Because he didn't. It was Lise Meitner who did. (with Otto Frisch)
Hahn by himself was clueless about his findings,
and he asked her (by letter) to tell him what he had found.
She told him, and proposed a suitable experiment to prove it.
Hahn did the experiment, and confirmed that she was right about it.

Lise Meitner was in Sweden, having had to flee Nazi persecution.
The Nobel committee was too anti-semitic and too anti-feminist
to recognise her fundamental breakthrough,

Jan

-- 
Meitner, L.; Frisch, O. R. (1939). "Disintegration of Uranium by
Neutrons: a New Type of Nuclear Reaction". Nature. 143 (3615): 239.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616176

On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 8:24:15 PM UTC-7, patdolan wrote:
> On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 8:09:08 PM UTC-7, patdolan wrote: 
> > Where to begin...The movie was a cinematic apotheosis of Robert J. Oppenheimer. The plot concentrated on an obscure hearing in which RJO was deprived of his top secret security clearance for not championing the H bomb in a timely manner and for his former association with the American Communist Party. Einstein, the traitorous Klaus Fuchs and all the usual scientific suspects were portrayed in the movie. Not portrayed: the 220,000 casualties at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the crew of the Enola Gay, nor Richland WA, the site of the second nukular reactor ever built. The movie was somewhat abstract. Lots of smash edits to all sorts of things. Once during the security committee hearing Oppy was suddenly copulating with his paramour in front of the committee. The timeline was no linear. I might have more to type later. I am interested in Dono's review. 
> > 
> > Einstein was god himself. If you have Einstein derangement syndrome then do not watch this movie. I guess the post World War II world did in fact treat these people like gods.
> Scene in the Oval Office post-Nagasaki 
> 
> Oppy: I feel I have blood on my hands, Mr. President. 
> 
> POTUS: Do you think anyone gives a sh&t who built it?...I dropped it. 
> 
> Oppy is ushered out of the Oval by the Defense secretary. As door closes, Truman is heard muttering "Never let that (inaudible) back into this office again. 
> 
> Great scene putting the little communist sympathizing, tensor-wielding wimp in his virtue signaling place.
I'm pretty sure that physic's perennial bag of wind for decades, Richard Fyneman, had a cameo portrayal in the movie.  Just after a successful Trinity test, as the scientists cheer with joy over the successful detonation, we catch a momentary glimpse of a silhouetted figure ecstatically banging away on a set of bongos up a ladder.  But no lines or close ups.  The bongos are supposed to be enough, I guess.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web