Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #478705 > unrolled thread

estimate of the age of the universe

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  estimate of the age of the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-01 11:21 -0800
    Re: estimate of the age of the universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-01 11:29 -0800
      Re: estimate of the age of the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-01 12:04 -0800
        Re: estimate of the age of the universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-01 13:43 -0800
          Re: estimate of the age of the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-01 14:52 -0800
            Re: estimate of the age of the universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-01 21:03 -0800
              Re: estimate of the age of the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-01 21:25 -0800
                Re: estimate of the age of the universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-02 11:56 -0800
                  Re: estimate of the age of the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-02 15:55 -0800
                    Re: estimate of the age of the universe "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-02 19:29 -0800
                    Re: estimate of the age of the universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-02 19:39 -0800
      Re: estimate of the age of the universe Mole Santiago <msb@awwnuvs.an> - 2018-12-01 20:14 +0000
        Re: estimate of the age of the universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-01 13:45 -0800

#478705 — estimate of the age of the universe

I just realized that
how 'they' measure the
age of the universe is
done incorrectly.

1) by looking for the oldest star


I don't see how they can look for the
oldest star since stars existed trillions
of years before the big bang.

2) and back to the big bang


measuring stars from a
big bang is not how you measure
the universe since stars existed Before
the big bang.



I mean like WOW, you people got everything wrong, haven't you?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#478707

The light year age requires its expansion at the speed of light.
If it is expanding below light speed the universe is much older.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478710

mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> The light year age requires its expansion at the speed of light.
> If it is expanding below light speed the universe is much older.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch



and if it is expanding above the speed of light, is it younger or older?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478723

On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 12:04:29 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > The light year age requires its expansion at the speed of light.
> > If it is expanding below light speed the universe is much older.
> > 
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> 
> 
> 
> and if it is expanding above the speed of light, is it younger or older?

I don't believe it is.
What is your point?

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478733

mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 12:04:29 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > The light year age requires its expansion at the speed of light.
> > > If it is expanding below light speed the universe is much older.
> > >
> > > Mitchell Raemsch
> >
> >
> >
> > and if it is expanding above the speed of light, is it younger or older?
> 
> I don't believe it is.
> What is your point?
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch


but, but you wrote "If it is expanding below light speed"

I'm asking "if it is expanding above the speed of light, is it younger
or older?"


the operative words is "if it is"...that doesn't sound like 'you believe
it is or not'.


You wrote..."if".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478740

On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 2:50:52 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 12:04:29 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The light year age requires its expansion at the speed of light.
> > > > If it is expanding below light speed the universe is much older.
> > > >
> > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > and if it is expanding above the speed of light, is it younger or older?
> > 
> > I don't believe it is.
> > What is your point?
> > 
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> 
> 
> but, but you wrote "If it is expanding below light speed"
> 
> I'm asking "if it is expanding above the speed of light, is it younger
> or older?"

That is your idea... can't you use your own mind to find the answer for your own belief?

> 
> 
> the operative words is "if it is"...that doesn't sound like 'you believe
> it is or not'.
> 
> 
> You wrote..."if".

Roy Masters. It doesn't matter what I say... Right?

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478743

mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 2:50:52 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 12:04:29 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The light year age requires its expansion at the speed of light.
> > > > > If it is expanding below light speed the universe is much older.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > and if it is expanding above the speed of light, is it younger or older?
> > >
> > > I don't believe it is.
> > > What is your point?
> > >
> > > Mitchell Raemsch
> >
> >
> > but, but you wrote "If it is expanding below light speed"
> >
> > I'm asking "if it is expanding above the speed of light, is it younger
> > or older?"
> 
> That is your idea... can't you use your own mind to find the answer for your own belief?
> 
> >
> >
> > the operative words is "if it is"...that doesn't sound like 'you believe
> > it is or not'.
> >
> >
> > You wrote..."if".
> 
> Roy Masters. It doesn't matter what I say... Right?
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch


if you tell a lie to the fbi...it matters.


This is Usenet. That means you need to provide true, accurate and correct information.


I'm just correcting your inaccurate, incorrect and false information.


I'm just a tool of Usenet...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478792

On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 9:23:32 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 2:50:52 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 12:04:29 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The light year age requires its expansion at the speed of light.
> > > > > > If it is expanding below light speed the universe is much older.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > and if it is expanding above the speed of light, is it younger or older?
> > > >
> > > > I don't believe it is.
> > > > What is your point?
> > > >
> > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > >
> > >
> > > but, but you wrote "If it is expanding below light speed"
> > >
> > > I'm asking "if it is expanding above the speed of light, is it younger
> > > or older?"
> > 

That is your idea... can't you use your own mind to find the answer for your own belief?

> > 
> > >
> > >
> > > the operative words is "if it is"...that doesn't sound like 'you believe
> > > it is or not'.
> > >
> > >
> > > You wrote..."if".
> > 
> > Roy Masters. It doesn't matter what I say... Right?
> > 
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> 
> 
> if you tell a lie to the fbi...it matters.
> 
> 
> This is Usenet. That means you need to provide true, accurate and correct information.
> 
> 
> I'm just correcting your inaccurate, incorrect and false information.
> 
> 
> I'm just a tool of Usenet...

Answer for your own idea don't expect me Roy Masters...
If the hypersphere universe expands slower than the
speed of light AND IT DOES the universal age is larger.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478817

mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 9:23:32 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 2:50:52 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 12:04:29 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The light year age requires its expansion at the speed of light.
> > > > > > > If it is expanding below light speed the universe is much older.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > and if it is expanding above the speed of light, is it younger or older?
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't believe it is.
> > > > > What is your point?
> > > > >
> > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > but, but you wrote "If it is expanding below light speed"
> > > >
> > > > I'm asking "if it is expanding above the speed of light, is it younger
> > > > or older?"
> > >
> 
> That is your idea... can't you use your own mind to find the answer for your own belief?
> 
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > the operative words is "if it is"...that doesn't sound like 'you believe
> > > > it is or not'.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You wrote..."if".
> > >
> > > Roy Masters. It doesn't matter what I say... Right?
> > >
> > > Mitchell Raemsch
> >
> >
> > if you tell a lie to the fbi...it matters.
> >
> >
> > This is Usenet. That means you need to provide true, accurate and correct information.
> >
> >
> > I'm just correcting your inaccurate, incorrect and false information.
> >
> >
> > I'm just a tool of Usenet...
> 
> Answer for your own idea don't expect me Roy Masters...
> If the hypersphere universe expands slower than the
> speed of light AND IT DOES the universal age is larger.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch


But you wrote " If it is expanding below light speed the universe is much older."


You said "older" not "larger"...


you're beginning to sound...evil.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478830

The universe will always appear to be 13.8880509 Billion years old

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478831

On Sunday, December 2, 2018 at 3:53:22 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 9:23:32 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 2:50:52 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 12:04:29 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The light year age requires its expansion at the speed of light.
> > > > > > > > If it is expanding below light speed the universe is much older.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > and if it is expanding above the speed of light, is it younger or older?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't believe it is.
> > > > > > What is your point?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > but, but you wrote "If it is expanding below light speed"
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm asking "if it is expanding above the speed of light, is it younger
> > > > > or older?"
> > > >
> >
 
That is your idea... can't you use your own mind to find the answer for your own belief?

> > 
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > the operative words is "if it is"...that doesn't sound like 'you believe
> > > > > it is or not'.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You wrote..."if".
> > > >
> > > > Roy Masters. It doesn't matter what I say... Right?
> > > >
> > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > >
> > >
> > > if you tell a lie to the fbi...it matters.
> > >
> > >
> > > This is Usenet. That means you need to provide true, accurate and correct information.
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm just correcting your inaccurate, incorrect and false information.

That is your claim to the truth...
That does not mean it is real...

> > >
> > >
> > > I'm just a tool of Usenet...
> > 
> > Answer for your own idea don't expect me Roy Masters...
> > If the hypersphere universe expands slower than the
> > speed of light AND IT DOES the universal age is larger.
> > 
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> 
> 
> But you wrote " If it is expanding below light speed the universe is much older."
> 
> 
> You said "older" not "larger"...

older and smaller...
Can you verify that yourself?

> 
> 
> you're beginning to sound...evil.

Right Roy. You're the hypocrite...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478712

mitchrae3323 wrote:

> The light year age requires its expansion at the speed of light.
> If it is expanding below light speed the universe is much older.

Absolutely wrong assessment. Light speed is nothing compared to its 
constancy variation. That's intrinsic, at another time scale. You people 
relativists are not even knowing about the power and the deepness of what 
I just said.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478724

On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 12:14:52 PM UTC-8, Mole Santiago wrote:
> mitchrae3323 wrote:
> 
> > The light year age requires its expansion at the speed of light.
> > If it is expanding below light speed the universe is much older.
> 
> Absolutely wrong assessment. Light speed is nothing compared to its 
> constancy variation. That's intrinsic, at another time scale. You people 
> relativists are not even knowing about the power and the deepness of what 
> I just said.

What does it mean Roy masters?
If expansion is slow and it is
the universe got to its size slower
making it older than in the light years.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web