Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #478743

Re: estimate of the age of the universe

Message-ID	<5C036CAD.229F@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2018-12-01 21:25 -0800
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: estimate of the age of the universe
References	(1 earlier) <fe19b99b-aa58-420a-8909-8c1f388d0143@googlegroups.com> <5C02E956.3E44@ix.netcom.com> <33df09fd-9146-4873-aed6-2a3483e8f03a@googlegroups.com> <5C0310A1.7339@ix.netcom.com> <1f4f228f-956e-45d4-a798-da74041e8305@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 2:50:52 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 12:04:29 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The light year age requires its expansion at the speed of light.
> > > > > If it is expanding below light speed the universe is much older.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > and if it is expanding above the speed of light, is it younger or older?
> > >
> > > I don't believe it is.
> > > What is your point?
> > >
> > > Mitchell Raemsch
> >
> >
> > but, but you wrote "If it is expanding below light speed"
> >
> > I'm asking "if it is expanding above the speed of light, is it younger
> > or older?"
> 
> That is your idea... can't you use your own mind to find the answer for your own belief?
> 
> >
> >
> > the operative words is "if it is"...that doesn't sound like 'you believe
> > it is or not'.
> >
> >
> > You wrote..."if".
> 
> Roy Masters. It doesn't matter what I say... Right?
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch


if you tell a lie to the fbi...it matters.


This is Usenet. That means you need to provide true, accurate and correct information.


I'm just correcting your inaccurate, incorrect and false information.


I'm just a tool of Usenet...

Thread

estimate of the age of the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-01 11:21 -0800
  Re: estimate of the age of the universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-01 11:29 -0800
    Re: estimate of the age of the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-01 12:04 -0800
      Re: estimate of the age of the universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-01 13:43 -0800
        Re: estimate of the age of the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-01 14:52 -0800
          Re: estimate of the age of the universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-01 21:03 -0800
            Re: estimate of the age of the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-01 21:25 -0800
              Re: estimate of the age of the universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-02 11:56 -0800
                Re: estimate of the age of the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-02 15:55 -0800
                Re: estimate of the age of the universe "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-02 19:29 -0800
                Re: estimate of the age of the universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-02 19:39 -0800
    Re: estimate of the age of the universe Mole Santiago <msb@awwnuvs.an> - 2018-12-01 20:14 +0000
      Re: estimate of the age of the universe mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-01 13:45 -0800

csiph-web