Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #477398 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-17 22:26 -0800 |
| Last post | 2018-11-28 15:09 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 59 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
How many Black Holes are there? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-17 22:26 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com> - 2018-11-18 19:39 +1100
Re: How many Black Holes are there? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-18 15:46 +0100
Re: How many Black Holes are there? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-18 15:48 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-18 15:55 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-18 19:35 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-19 09:36 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-19 11:55 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-20 10:20 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-20 13:28 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-20 17:54 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-21 10:28 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-21 23:46 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-24 14:01 -0800
How many Black Holes are there? "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-11-20 14:28 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-20 14:51 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-11-21 03:04 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-11-21 03:45 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-11-20 15:27 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-21 00:57 +0100
Re: How many Black Holes are there? numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-11-20 15:54 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-11-20 16:09 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-11-20 16:13 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-11-21 12:21 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-21 22:13 +0100
Re: How many Black Holes are there? numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-11-21 12:23 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-21 15:17 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-11-21 12:28 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-11-21 13:30 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-24 13:35 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-24 13:44 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-24 17:03 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-24 18:37 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-25 04:18 +0100
Re: How many Black Holes are there? "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-11-25 07:38 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-11-25 07:51 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-11-25 07:57 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-25 11:34 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-25 12:27 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 11:38 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-25 23:23 +0100
Re: How many Black Holes are there? consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 11:48 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 11:50 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 12:32 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-25 22:10 +0100
Re: How many Black Holes are there? carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 14:11 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-25 23:47 +0100
Re: How many Black Holes are there? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 15:02 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 15:37 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 16:18 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 17:16 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 17:21 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 17:57 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 18:23 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-28 13:22 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-26 13:40 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-28 13:16 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-28 13:25 -0800
Re: How many Black Holes are there? carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-28 15:09 -0800
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-17 22:26 -0800 |
| Subject | How many Black Holes are there? |
| Message-ID | <5BF1060A.5EA5@ix.netcom.com> |
How many Black Holes are there?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-18 19:39 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <3N6dndnRAI7IuGzGnZ2dnUU7-budnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #477398 |
On 18/11/2018 5:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > How many Black Holes are there? > It doesn't matter. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-18 15:46 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <24953050-c0e7-3270-f122-88cf4935668e@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #477399 |
Whisper wrote: > On 18/11/2018 5:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> How many Black Holes are there? > > It doesn't matter. But it does. F’up2 sci.physics.relativity -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-18 15:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <psstor$fc9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #477398 |
On 11/17/2018 10:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > How many Black Holes are there? > I don't know. If the universe is infinite, then there are an infinite amount. Well, how many stars are being tracked right now that are decent candidates to go supernova in less than 100 years? Some of them should end up creating black holes...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | carleto4157990662@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-18 15:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <14965947-bdd6-47a5-bca5-38fe0a91e840@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #477398 |
There are no such thing as a black holes or galaxies since the Hubble has a maximum parallax distance of .114 ly. You have to resolve the star that composed a galaxy and the star around the black hole which is not possible using a reflection telly.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-18 19:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9a330893-969f-44f2-93a5-273a44bd5385@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #477452 |
On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 3:55:57 PM UTC-8, carleto4...@gmail.com wrote: > There are no such thing as a black holes or galaxies since the Hubble has a maximum parallax distance of .114 ly. You have to resolve the star that composed a galaxy and the star around the black hole which is not possible using a reflection telly. Clearly, you have zero education regarding black holes or galaxies. Whatever does parallax have to do with seeing a galaxy? Go read a book.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | carleto4157990662@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-19 09:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <fc3d4eb1-6558-4d07-a7ae-b5ba85d1b2e0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #477398 |
How far or near is the closest galaxy in ly, shit for brains?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-19 11:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <f632afad-0649-41da-9a13-1c4b91a30f05@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #477505 |
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 9:36:10 AM UTC-8, carleto4...@gmail.com wrote: > How far or near is the closest galaxy in ly, shit for brains? So you are incapable of Googling this for yourself? Doesn't that make *you* the actual shit-for-brains here? The LMC is 158,200 light years away and the SMC is 199,000 light years away, but these are dwarf galaxies. M-31, the Andromeda galaxy, is 2.537 million light years away, with all estimates coming from Wikipedia. All 3 of these objects are easily seen with the naked eye in a clear dark sky by anyone with normal vision, although you need to be in the southern hemisphere to see the Magellanic Clouds. You claim that galaxies don't exist because the Hubble has a maximum parallax distance of .114 light years is easily proven to be complete bullshit. WTF does parallax have to do with galaxies and black holes? Are you perhaps under the impression that parallax is the only way to measure distances to objects in the universe? In any case, .114 light years is incorrect in any case, since the nearest star is about 4 light years away, about 40 times further than .114 light years. Like I said before, read a book or an article, like this one, for example... https://lco.global/spacebook/parallax-and-distance-measurement/ ... where you might learn that spaced-based parallax measurements can work only to about 1000 parsecs... you do know what a parsec is, right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-20 10:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5BF45082.3D0C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #477398 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > How many Black Holes are there? maybe yous people didn't understand the question... How many Black Holes are there? "are there?" "are there" means...in a place or position. "are there" How many Black Holes ... *are there*? Look, I understand yous numbers guys like to say 'billions and billions'... 'billions and billions of earths', and 'billions and billions of black holes'... but the question is...How many Black Holes are there? You know, confirmed.. is it 10... or around 20? maybe 25??
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-20 13:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <pt1ua8$s48$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #477620 |
On 11/20/2018 10:20 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: >> >> How many Black Holes are there? > > > > maybe yous people didn't understand the question... > > > How many Black Holes are there? "are there?" > > "are there" means...in a place or position. > > "are there" > > How many Black Holes ... *are there*? > > > Look, I understand yous numbers guys like to say 'billions and billions'... > > > 'billions and billions of earths', and 'billions and billions of black holes'... > > > but the question is...How many Black Holes are there? > > > You know, confirmed.. > > > is it 10... or around 20? maybe 25?? > Imagine that most, if not all galaxies have super massive black holes nested within their cores. Are there more than 25 galaxies? Also, there can be smaller black holes wandering the dust lanes of a galaxy. I have a feeling that these small wandering bh's might be "connected" to the main super large giant bh in the center.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-20 17:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5BF4BAF1.43D5@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #477620 |
palsing wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > How many Black Holes are there? > > > > > > > > maybe yous people didn't understand the question... > > > > > > How many Black Holes are there? "are there?" > > > > "are there" means...in a place or position. > > > > "are there" > > > > How many Black Holes ... *are there*? > > > > > > Look, I understand yous numbers guys like to say 'billions and billions'... > > > > > > 'billions and billions of earths', and 'billions and billions of black holes'... > > > > > > but the question is...How many Black Holes are there? > > > > > > You know, confirmed.. > > > > > > is it 10... or around 20? maybe 25?? > > Another guy who can't be bothered to look this up for himself, but would rather just make a wild-ass guess. > > Here you go, Lazy... > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_black_holes > > I count 139 on that page, including galaxies containing bit double and triple black holes. That link you provided reads: This is an ordered list of the most massive black holes so far discovered (and probable candidates), You would have to omit (probable candidates) since "probable candidates" you cannot confirm that which you have no proof of. I would estimate there are over 100 probable candidates. That leaves 10 balck holes... or around 20? or maybe even 25?? But certaintly not 130 since you didn't omit probable candidates. There you go, Lazy...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 10:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5BF5A3C6.B45@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #477684 |
palsing wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 5:54:06 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > palsing wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > How many Black Holes are there? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > maybe yous people didn't understand the question... > > > > > > > > > > > > How many Black Holes are there? "are there?" > > > > > > > > "are there" means...in a place or position. > > > > > > > > "are there" > > > > > > > > How many Black Holes ... *are there*? > > > > > > > > > > > > Look, I understand yous numbers guys like to say 'billions and billions'... > > > > > > > > > > > > 'billions and billions of earths', and 'billions and billions of black holes'... > > > > > > > > > > > > but the question is...How many Black Holes are there? > > > > > > > > > > > > You know, confirmed.. > > > > > > > > > > > > is it 10... or around 20? maybe 25?? > > > > > > Another guy who can't be bothered to look this up for himself, but would rather just make a wild-ass guess. > > > > > > Here you go, Lazy... > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_black_holes > > > > > > I count 139 on that page, including galaxies containing bit double and triple black holes. > > > > > > That link you provided reads: > > > > > > > > This is an ordered list of the most massive black holes so far discovered (and probable candidates), > > > > > > You would have to omit (probable candidates) since "probable candidates" you cannot confirm that which you have no proof of. > > > > > > I would estimate there are over 100 probable candidates. > > > > > > That leaves 10 balck holes... or around 20? or maybe even 25?? But certaintly not 130 since you didn't omit probable candidates. > > > > > > There you go, Lazy... > > In the interest of accuracy, the page says "This is a list of black holes (and stars considered probable candidates)". Note it says "stars" and not Supermassive black holes, which are definitely not individual stars. Okay Lazy, here it is on the line you provided: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_black_holes Supermassive black holes and candidates (then under it it reads: See also: List of most massive black holes and List of quasars) Then, you put your mouse on the highlighted link: List of most massive black holes The link pop-up reads: This is an ordered list of the most massive black holes so far discovered (and probable candidates) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_massive_black_holes Here you go, Lazy...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 23:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5BF65ECD.2E33@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #477741 |
palsing wrote: > > On Wednesday, November 21, 2018 at 10:26:49 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > palsing wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 5:54:06 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > palsing wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How many Black Holes are there? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > maybe yous people didn't understand the question... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How many Black Holes are there? "are there?" > > > > > > > > > > > > "are there" means...in a place or position. > > > > > > > > > > > > "are there" > > > > > > > > > > > > How many Black Holes ... *are there*? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Look, I understand yous numbers guys like to say 'billions and billions'... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'billions and billions of earths', and 'billions and billions of black holes'... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but the question is...How many Black Holes are there? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You know, confirmed.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is it 10... or around 20? maybe 25?? > > > > > > > > > > Another guy who can't be bothered to look this up for himself, but would rather just make a wild-ass guess. > > > > > > > > > > Here you go, Lazy... > > > > > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_black_holes > > > > > > > > > > I count 139 on that page, including galaxies containing bit double and triple black holes. > > > > > > > > > > > > That link you provided reads: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an ordered list of the most massive black holes so far discovered (and probable candidates), > > > > > > > > > > > > You would have to omit (probable candidates) since "probable candidates" you cannot confirm that which you have no proof of. > > > > > > > > > > > > I would estimate there are over 100 probable candidates. > > > > > > > > > > > > That leaves 10 balck holes... or around 20? or maybe even 25?? But certaintly not 130 since you didn't omit probable candidates. > > > > > > > > > > > > There you go, Lazy... > > > > > > In the interest of accuracy, the page says "This is a list of black holes (and stars considered probable candidates)". Note it says "stars" and not Supermassive black holes, which are definitely not individual stars. > > > > > > Okay Lazy, here it is on the line you provided: > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_black_holes > > > > > > Supermassive black holes and candidates > > > > (then under it it reads: See also: List of most massive black holes and List of quasars) > > > > Then, you put your mouse on the highlighted link: > > > > > > List of most massive black holes > > > > > > The link pop-up reads: This is an ordered list of the most massive black holes so far discovered (and probable candidates) > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_massive_black_holes > > > > > > > > Here you go, Lazy... > > So, what's your point? 'Probable candidates' is a strong statement, Maybe you don't know what the word "Probable" means...it means no proof. How can you confirm something without proof? >and I see where casually dismissed my question about how you 'estimated' that there were over 100 'probable candidates'? The math is simple, you counted 139 black holes and I took away the 'probable candidates', 139 Supermassive black holes and candidates - 25 confirmed _________ 114 'probable candidates' There are over 100 'probable candidates' (they don't count). and i didn't say two dozen...Here you go, Lazy...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-24 14:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5BF9CA1F.66E1@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #477788 |
palsing wrote: > > On Wednesday, November 21, 2018 at 11:44:17 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > palsing wrote: > > > > > > On Wednesday, November 21, 2018 at 10:26:49 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > palsing wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 5:54:06 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > palsing wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 10:20:50 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How many Black Holes are there? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > maybe yous people didn't understand the question... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How many Black Holes are there? "are there?" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "are there" means...in a place or position. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "are there" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How many Black Holes ... *are there*? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Look, I understand yous numbers guys like to say 'billions and billions'... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'billions and billions of earths', and 'billions and billions of black holes'... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but the question is...How many Black Holes are there? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You know, confirmed.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is it 10... or around 20? maybe 25?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another guy who can't be bothered to look this up for himself, but would rather just make a wild-ass guess. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here you go, Lazy... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_black_holes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I count 139 on that page, including galaxies containing bit double and triple black holes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That link you provided reads: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an ordered list of the most massive black holes so far discovered (and probable candidates), > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You would have to omit (probable candidates) since "probable candidates" you cannot confirm that which you have no proof of. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would estimate there are over 100 probable candidates. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That leaves 10 balck holes... or around 20? or maybe even 25?? But certaintly not 130 since you didn't omit probable candidates. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There you go, Lazy... > > > > > > > > > > In the interest of accuracy, the page says "This is a list of black holes (and stars considered probable candidates)". Note it says "stars" and not Supermassive black holes, which are definitely not individual stars. > > > > > > > > > > > > Okay Lazy, here it is on the line you provided: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_black_holes > > > > > > > > > > > > Supermassive black holes and candidates > > > > > > > > (then under it it reads: See also: List of most massive black holes and List of quasars) > > > > > > > > Then, you put your mouse on the highlighted link: > > > > > > > > > > > > List of most massive black holes > > > > > > > > > > > > The link pop-up reads: This is an ordered list of the most massive black holes so far discovered (and probable candidates) > > > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_massive_black_holes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here you go, Lazy... > > > > > > So, what's your point? 'Probable candidates' is a strong statement, > > > > Maybe you don't know what the word "Probable" means...it means no proof. How can you confirm something without proof? > > Get a dictionary... > > https://www.google.com/search?q=probable&rlz=1C1ILPI_enUS745US745&oq=probable&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.4949j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 > > prob·a·ble > adjective > 1. > likely to be the case or to happen. > "it is probable that the economic situation will deteriorate further" > synonyms: likely, most likely, odds-on, expected, anticipated, predictable, foreseeable, ten to one; > > Besides, in science there is no such thing as "proof"... > > https://www.google.com/search?q=is+there+proof+in+science%3F&rlz=1C1ILPI_enUS745US745&oq=is+there+proof+in+science%3F&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i64l3.6901j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 > > > >and I see where casually dismissed my question about how you 'estimated' that there were over 100 'probable candidates'? > > > > > > The math is simple, you counted 139 black holes and I took away the 'probable candidates', > > You cannot determine which ones are probable candidates... you are just making it up... It's very easy to determined which ones are...confimed black holes from the canidate, ..unless if you're tooooo lazy. > > > > 139 Supermassive black holes and candidates > > - 25 confirmed > > _________ > > 114 'probable candidates' > > > > > > There are over 100 'probable candidates' (they don't count). > > Make it up as you go along... Here you go, Lazy...find out how may are confirmed. Separate the men from the boys...read a book. laaaaazzzzzzzzzzeeeeeeey. oh, i forgot...you get your 'specailized knowledge' from the...Internet. What do you call the rest of the 'billions and billions' of black holes???? garbage.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-20 14:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d926ec13-7822-4da6-b554-4865af3bdea9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #477398 |
The Starmaker Sharted How many Black Holes are there? Well... if you’re inside the event horizon.... There is only ONE black hole The one you’re trapped inside of.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-20 14:51 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <pt235q$nqp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #477652 |
On 11/20/2018 2:28 PM, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > The Starmaker Sharted > > How many Black Holes are there? > > Well... > if you’re inside the event horizon.... > There is only ONE black hole > > The one you’re trapped inside of. > ;^) I have always had a sneaking suspicion that our observable universe is contained inside of a black hole residing in our "parent" universe, so to speak. We are one of its children, and time wrt the parent and its young offspring is radically different. Not quite unlike a bunch of kids playing around, vs a bunch of 90 year old people hanging out without Geritol, 24 proof?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 03:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a9ced096-e4b9-43f9-9f0e-49bef5c64cb8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #477655 |
Chris M. Thomasson - hide quoted text - On 11/20/2018 2:28 PM, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > The Starmaker Sharted > > How many Black Holes are there? > > Well... > if you’re inside the event horizon.... > There is only ONE black hole > > The one you’re trapped inside of. > ;^) I have always had a sneaking suspicion that our observable universe is contained inside of a black hole residing in our "parent" universe, so to speak. We are one of its children, and time wrt the parent and its young offspring is radically different. Not quite unlike a bunch of kids playing around, vs a bunch of 90 year old people hanging out without Geritol, 24 proof? Yes ..... (Bjerknes Forces & Oscillation Period) = Bulk Modulus & Wave Speed Oscillation Period 13.8880509 Billion light years according to Max Planck Redshift Hubble 70406.791856 m / s/Mpc = (67798.6422484*6.5248935/2pi) 1.70377849e+53 kg * (((70406.791856 * (m / s)) / (1 Mpc)) * (planck length / (2pi))) = 1 m kg / s Hubble ((mass universe * (((70406.791856 * (m / s)) / (1 Mpc)) *planck length) = (2pi kg m/s) c * ((((planck length * 0.5)^3) / (Planck Time * 0.5)) * 1.70377849e+53 (kg^(-1))) = 1 m^4 kg^-1 s^-2 Bulk Modulus Reverberations & Wave Speed @ c …. Bjerknes Forces (((((1.70377849e+53 kg) * G) / (c^2)) / (13.88805086 billion light years)) * 6.5248935) / (2pi) = 1 1.70377849e+53 kg * (((70406.791856 * (m / s)) / (1 Mpc)) * (planck length / (2pi))) = 1.00000000 m kg/s https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble%27s_law#Observed_values_of_the_Hubble_constant ((0.5 Planck Time) / ((0.5 Planck Length)^3)) / 299792458 = 1.70377849e+53 s / m^3 = mass universe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 03:45 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <19b75fec-0cbb-4ee8-8e1a-cbeae2c7be66@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #477710 |
On Wednesday, November 21, 2018 at 5:04:28 AM UTC-6, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > Chris M. Thomasson > - hide quoted text - > On 11/20/2018 2:28 PM, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > > > > The Starmaker Sharted > > > > How many Black Holes are there? > > > > Well... > > if you’re inside the event horizon.... > > There is only ONE black hole > > > > The one you’re trapped inside of. > > > > ;^) > > I have always had a sneaking suspicion that our observable universe is > contained inside of a black hole residing in our "parent" universe, so > to speak. We are one of its children, and time wrt the parent and its > young offspring is radically different. Not quite unlike a bunch of kids > playing around, vs a bunch of 90 year old people hanging out without > Geritol, 24 proof? > > Yes ..... (Bjerknes Forces & Oscillation Period) = Bulk Modulus & Wave Speed > > Oscillation Period 13.8880509 Billion light years according to Max Planck > > Redshift Hubble 70406.791856 m / s/Mpc = (67798.6422484*6.5248935/2pi) > > 1.70377849e+53 kg * (((70406.791856 * (m / s)) / (1 Mpc)) * (planck length / (2pi))) = 1 m kg / s > > Hubble ((mass universe * (((70406.791856 * (m / s)) / (1 Mpc)) *planck length) = (2pi kg m/s) > > c * ((((planck length * 0.5)^3) / (Planck Time * 0.5)) * 1.70377849e+53 (kg^(-1))) = 1 m^4 kg^-1 s^-2 > > Bulk Modulus Reverberations & Wave Speed @ c …. Bjerknes Forces > > (((((1.70377849e+53 kg) * G) / (c^2)) / (13.88805086 billion light years)) * 6.5248935) / (2pi) = 1 > > 1.70377849e+53 kg * (((70406.791856 * (m / s)) / (1 Mpc)) * (planck length / (2pi))) = 1.00000000 m kg/s > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble%27s_law#Observed_values_of_the_Hubble_constant > > > ((0.5 Planck Time) / ((0.5 Planck Length)^3)) / 299792458 = 1.70377849e+53 s / m^3 = mass universe ((((0.5 Planck Length) / c) / ((0.5 Planck Length)^3)) / 299 792 458) * (planck length^3) = 7.19318636e-52 seconds ((((0.5 Planck Time)) / ((0.5 Planck Length)^3)) / c) * (planck length^3) * (((c^7) / (hbar * G))^0.5) = 4 ((0.5 Planck Length/c) / ((0.5 Planck Length)^3)) / c * (Planck volume)*(Planck Acceleration ) = 4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-20 15:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a275a9b4-c12e-4c64-a458-212b0e304a60@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #477398 |
How do you determine the distance to a galaxy, diarrhea brain?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 00:57 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <4940de4f-63e5-5d90-6e12-8a97612c9317@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #477656 |
numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: > How do you determine the distance to a galaxy, <OT> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_distance_ladder#Galactic_distance_indicators> </OT> > diarrhea brain? You must be speaking of yourself. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web