Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #463190 > unrolled thread

Ken on the planet Setorn

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Ken on the planet Setorn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 20:14 +0000
    Re: Ken on the planet Setorn The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-01 13:41 -0700
      Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 20:47 +0000
        Re: Ken on the planet Setorn The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-02 10:38 -0700
          Re: Ken on the planet Setorn The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-02 13:22 -0700
            Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 13:49 -0700
              Re: Ken on the planet Setorn The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-02 15:41 -0700
              Re: Ken on the planet Setorn The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-02 23:55 -0700
    Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-07-02 12:19 +0000
    Re: Ken on the planet Setorn kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-02 07:50 -0700
      Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-07-02 16:56 +0200
      Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 15:07 +0000
        Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 15:15 +0000
      Re: Ken on the planet Setorn rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 15:21 -0700
        Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 22:55 +0000

#463190 — Ken on the planet Setorn

In Ken’s imaginary world, one does not become a famous physicist by
learning physics and the prerequisite skills; one becomes a truly famous
physicist by being a complete outsider, untainted by physics concepts or
specialized skills. 

In Ken’s imaginary world, one doesn’t become a famous physicist by doing
actual calculations or doing careful experimental measurements; one becomes
famous by using ordinary language that ordinary people understand, and
demonstrating how the universe works using only the kinds of supplies you
might find in your kitchen. 

In Ken’s imaginary world, if you take the trouble to write a whole book on
physics, especially if you claim in the book that you have a theory of all
reality and that the nature of God is even revealed, then the sweeping
scope of the book automatically makes you a physicist of note. As a tip,
include some equations to prove that you can do math, and that way no one
will ask you to do arithmetic or algebra you can’t do. 

In Ken’s imaginary world, anyone at all who has a physics idea of any kind
is deserving of serious attention, because true physicists are inquisitive
people who will seriously consider any and all ideas. 

Oh look, Ken fell asleep with his space helmet on again. At least he got
his Mr Scientist pajamas on. 


-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#463192

Odd Bodkin wrote:
> 
> In Ken’s imaginary world, one does not become a famous physicist by
> learning physics and the prerequisite skills; one becomes a truly famous
> physicist by being a complete outsider, untainted by physics concepts or
> specialized skills.
> 
> In Ken’s imaginary world, one doesn’t become a famous physicist by doing
> actual calculations or doing careful experimental measurements; one becomes
> famous by using ordinary language that ordinary people understand, and
> demonstrating how the universe works using only the kinds of supplies you
> might find in your kitchen.
> 
> In Ken’s imaginary world, if you take the trouble to write a whole book on
> physics, especially if you claim in the book that you have a theory of all
> reality and that the nature of God is even revealed, then the sweeping
> scope of the book automatically makes you a physicist of note. As a tip,
> include some equations to prove that you can do math, and that way no one
> will ask you to do arithmetic or algebra you can’t do.
> 
> In Ken’s imaginary world, anyone at all who has a physics idea of any kind
> is deserving of serious attention, because true physicists are inquisitive
> people who will seriously consider any and all ideas.
> 
> Oh look, Ken fell asleep with his space helmet on again. At least he got
> his Mr Scientist pajamas on.
> 
> --
> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables


sez the mayor and chief of police of Toyland..

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463194

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> 
>> In Ken’s imaginary world, one does not become a famous physicist by
>> learning physics and the prerequisite skills; one becomes a truly famous
>> physicist by being a complete outsider, untainted by physics concepts or
>> specialized skills.
>> 
>> In Ken’s imaginary world, one doesn’t become a famous physicist by doing
>> actual calculations or doing careful experimental measurements; one becomes
>> famous by using ordinary language that ordinary people understand, and
>> demonstrating how the universe works using only the kinds of supplies you
>> might find in your kitchen.
>> 
>> In Ken’s imaginary world, if you take the trouble to write a whole book on
>> physics, especially if you claim in the book that you have a theory of all
>> reality and that the nature of God is even revealed, then the sweeping
>> scope of the book automatically makes you a physicist of note. As a tip,
>> include some equations to prove that you can do math, and that way no one
>> will ask you to do arithmetic or algebra you can’t do.
>> 
>> In Ken’s imaginary world, anyone at all who has a physics idea of any kind
>> is deserving of serious attention, because true physicists are inquisitive
>> people who will seriously consider any and all ideas.
>> 
>> Oh look, Ken fell asleep with his space helmet on again. At least he got
>> his Mr Scientist pajamas on.
>> 
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> 
> 
> sez the mayor and chief of police of Toyland..
> 

Happy to meet you! Since you are here only to play around, I may some
things you’d be interested in. How about a six-car wooden train you can
actually ride? Does that sound fun?

-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463271

Odd Bodkin wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>
> >> In Ken’s imaginary world, one does not become a famous physicist by
> >> learning physics and the prerequisite skills; one becomes a truly famous
> >> physicist by being a complete outsider, untainted by physics concepts or
> >> specialized skills.
> >>
> >> In Ken’s imaginary world, one doesn’t become a famous physicist by doing
> >> actual calculations or doing careful experimental measurements; one becomes
> >> famous by using ordinary language that ordinary people understand, and
> >> demonstrating how the universe works using only the kinds of supplies you
> >> might find in your kitchen.
> >>
> >> In Ken’s imaginary world, if you take the trouble to write a whole book on
> >> physics, especially if you claim in the book that you have a theory of all
> >> reality and that the nature of God is even revealed, then the sweeping
> >> scope of the book automatically makes you a physicist of note. As a tip,
> >> include some equations to prove that you can do math, and that way no one
> >> will ask you to do arithmetic or algebra you can’t do.
> >>
> >> In Ken’s imaginary world, anyone at all who has a physics idea of any kind
> >> is deserving of serious attention, because true physicists are inquisitive
> >> people who will seriously consider any and all ideas.
> >>
> >> Oh look, Ken fell asleep with his space helmet on again. At least he got
> >> his Mr Scientist pajamas on.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >
> >
> > sez the mayor and chief of police of Toyland..
> >
> 
> Happy to meet you! Since you are here only to play around, I may some
> things you’d be interested in. How about a six-car wooden train you can
> actually ride? Does that sound fun?
> 
> --
> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables


Did you go to...Toy Maker University? I don't get the connection between ...toys and tools?? tables????

i never heard of a person who makes toys..also makes tools??? 


I don't get the connection between ...toys and tools?


Are you talking about...toy tools???? I'll hit you on your head with my rubber hammer! I get it now, you sell rubber hammers to the Three Stooges!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cY4OoPWcHE

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463291

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > >>
> > >> In Ken’s imaginary world, one does not become a famous physicist by
> > >> learning physics and the prerequisite skills; one becomes a truly famous
> > >> physicist by being a complete outsider, untainted by physics concepts or
> > >> specialized skills.
> > >>
> > >> In Ken’s imaginary world, one doesn’t become a famous physicist by doing
> > >> actual calculations or doing careful experimental measurements; one becomes
> > >> famous by using ordinary language that ordinary people understand, and
> > >> demonstrating how the universe works using only the kinds of supplies you
> > >> might find in your kitchen.
> > >>
> > >> In Ken’s imaginary world, if you take the trouble to write a whole book on
> > >> physics, especially if you claim in the book that you have a theory of all
> > >> reality and that the nature of God is even revealed, then the sweeping
> > >> scope of the book automatically makes you a physicist of note. As a tip,
> > >> include some equations to prove that you can do math, and that way no one
> > >> will ask you to do arithmetic or algebra you can’t do.
> > >>
> > >> In Ken’s imaginary world, anyone at all who has a physics idea of any kind
> > >> is deserving of serious attention, because true physicists are inquisitive
> > >> people who will seriously consider any and all ideas.
> > >>
> > >> Oh look, Ken fell asleep with his space helmet on again. At least he got
> > >> his Mr Scientist pajamas on.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> > >
> > >
> > > sez the mayor and chief of police of Toyland..
> > >
> >
> > Happy to meet you! Since you are here only to play around, I may some
> > things you’d be interested in. How about a six-car wooden train you can
> > actually ride? Does that sound fun?
> >
> > --
> > Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> 
> Did you go to...Toy Maker University? I don't get the connection between ...toys and tools?? tables????
> 
> i never heard of a person who makes toys..also makes tools???
> 
> I don't get the connection between ...toys and tools?
> 
> Are you talking about...toy tools???? I'll hit you on your head with my rubber hammer! I get it now, you sell rubber hammers to the Three Stooges!
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cY4OoPWcHE


I mean, i just don't get it...i cannot figure it out...it doesn't make sense..a

machine shop that makes wooden toys is not the same type of
machine shop that makes...tools.

i just don't get it..


Toys are wood or plastic...

tools on the otherhand are made of metal.

You cannot make tools with the same machines used to make....toys.

i just don't get it...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463293

On Monday, July 2, 2018 at 4:22:17 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > 
> > i never heard of a person who makes toys..also makes tools???
> > 
> > I don't get the connection between ...toys and tools?
> > 
> > Are you talking about...toy tools????
> > I'll hit you on your head with my rubber hammer!
> > I get it now, you sell rubber hammers to the Three Stooges!
> > 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cY4OoPWcHE
> 
> 
> I mean, i just don't get it...i cannot
> figure it out...it doesn't make sense..a
> 
> machine shop that makes wooden toys is not the same type of
> machine shop that makes...tools.
> 
> i just don't get it..
> 
> 
> Toys are wood or plastic...
> 
> tools on the otherhand are made of metal.
> 
> You cannot make tools with the same machines used to make....toys.
> 
> i just don't get it...

You clearly have never done ANY woodworking!
Possibly because you have never done any real work?

Star maker?
Question: What tools do you use to make stars?
Answer: None, you just need a lot of hot air!

Ed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463300

Edward Prochak wrote:
> 
> On Monday, July 2, 2018 at 4:22:17 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > i never heard of a person who makes toys..also makes tools???
> > >
> > > I don't get the connection between ...toys and tools?
> > >
> > > Are you talking about...toy tools????
> > > I'll hit you on your head with my rubber hammer!
> > > I get it now, you sell rubber hammers to the Three Stooges!
> > >
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cY4OoPWcHE
> >
> >
> > I mean, i just don't get it...i cannot
> > figure it out...it doesn't make sense..a
> >
> > machine shop that makes wooden toys is not the same type of
> > machine shop that makes...tools.
> >
> > i just don't get it..
> >
> >
> > Toys are wood or plastic...
> >
> > tools on the otherhand are made of metal.
> >
> > You cannot make tools with the same machines used to make....toys.
> >
> > i just don't get it...
> 
> You clearly have never done ANY woodworking!
> Possibly because you have never done any real work?
> 
> Star maker?
> Question: What tools do you use to make stars?
> Answer: None, you just need a lot of hot air!
> 
> Ed



Let me see...

Odd Bodkin - Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

What else does the Odd Bodkin maker that stars with the letter "T"???? Tacos? Tanks??

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463321

Edward Prochak wrote:
> 
> On Monday, July 2, 2018 at 4:22:17 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > i never heard of a person who makes toys..also makes tools???
> > >
> > > I don't get the connection between ...toys and tools?
> > >
> > > Are you talking about...toy tools????
> > > I'll hit you on your head with my rubber hammer!
> > > I get it now, you sell rubber hammers to the Three Stooges!
> > >
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cY4OoPWcHE
> >
> >
> > I mean, i just don't get it...i cannot
> > figure it out...it doesn't make sense..a
> >
> > machine shop that makes wooden toys is not the same type of
> > machine shop that makes...tools.
> >
> > i just don't get it..
> >
> >
> > Toys are wood or plastic...
> >
> > tools on the otherhand are made of metal.
> >
> > You cannot make tools with the same machines used to make....toys.
> >
> > i just don't get it...
> 
> You clearly have never done ANY woodworking!
> Possibly because you have never done any real work?
> 
> Star maker?
> Question: What tools do you use to make stars?
> Answer: None, you just need a lot of hot air!
> 
> Ed


Question: What tools do you use to make stars?

How do you think stars are made?


The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463244

Odd Bodkin wrote:

> In Ken’s imaginary world, one does not become a famous physicist by
> learning physics and the prerequisite skills; one becomes a truly famous
> physicist by being a complete outsider, untainted by physics concepts or
> specialized skills.

Said the man having no theory and no new ideas. Dr. Kenseto is working on 
a stable theory, subset or not, entitled IRT Model Mechanics. What can YOU 
come up with, nothing. ZEROO.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463252

On Sunday, July 1, 2018 at 4:15:01 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> In Ken’s imaginary world, one does not become a famous physicist by
> learning physics and the prerequisite skills; one becomes a truly famous
> physicist by being a complete outsider, untainted by physics concepts or
> specialized skills. 

It’s better than  a moron woodworker (Odd) who is wasting his life cruising the internet and criticize anybody who has new ideas. He think that that will make him an authority of modern physics. Sadly, it is not and as a result he accomplished nothing in life.

> 
> In Ken’s imaginary world, one doesn’t become a famous physicist by doing
> actual calculations or doing careful experimental measurements; one becomes
> famous by using ordinary language that ordinary people understand, and
> demonstrating how the universe works using only the kinds of supplies you
> might find in your kitchen. 
> 
> In Ken’s imaginary world, if you take the trouble to write a whole book on
> physics, especially if you claim in the book that you have a theory of all
> reality and that the nature of God is even revealed, then the sweeping
> scope of the book automatically makes you a physicist of note. As a tip,
> include some equations to prove that you can do math, and that way no one
> will ask you to do arithmetic or algebra you can’t do. 
> 
> In Ken’s imaginary world, anyone at all who has a physics idea of any kind
> is deserving of serious attention, because true physicists are inquisitive
> people who will seriously consider any and all ideas. 
> 
> Oh look, Ken fell asleep with his space helmet on again. At least he got
> his Mr Scientist pajamas on. 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463253

kenseto wrote:
> On Sunday, July 1, 2018 at 4:15:01 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> In Ken’s imaginary world, one does not become a famous physicist by
>> learning physics and the prerequisite skills; one becomes a truly famous
>> physicist by being a complete outsider, untainted by physics concepts or
>> specialized skills.
> 
> It’s better than ...

No Ken. Everything is better than an old silly senile bloke who is
posting nonsense on Usenet for decades, cannot grasp the basic of
elementary physics at high school level and only published vanity
books with his own money, exposing idiotic void theories.

Mr Bodkin actually manage to learn physics, you didn't.

You are a pathetic joke, Mr Seto.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463256

kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> On Sunday, July 1, 2018 at 4:15:01 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> In Ken’s imaginary world, one does not become a famous physicist by
>> learning physics and the prerequisite skills; one becomes a truly famous
>> physicist by being a complete outsider, untainted by physics concepts or
>> specialized skills. 
> 
> It’s better than  a moron woodworker (Odd) who is wasting his life
> cruising the internet and criticize anybody who has new ideas. 

I don’t have an issue with new ideas. I read about new ideas from
physicists every week. I have an issue with people like you who want
attention for new ideas while being completely uneducated about the
subject. 

So, no, what you’re doing is not better. Being a fraudulent pretender is
always worse, and that’s what you are. 

> He think that that will make him an authority of modern physics. 

No I don’t. 

> Sadly, it is not and as a result he accomplished nothing in life.

I’ve accomplished plenty and I’m quite happy with my successes in my chosen
vocation. I don’t know why you aren’t happy with your successes in your
chosen vocation and feel compelled to pretend to have an impact in an area
where you are wholly uneducated. 

> 
>> 
>> In Ken’s imaginary world, one doesn’t become a famous physicist by doing
>> actual calculations or doing careful experimental measurements; one becomes
>> famous by using ordinary language that ordinary people understand, and
>> demonstrating how the universe works using only the kinds of supplies you
>> might find in your kitchen. 
>> 
>> In Ken’s imaginary world, if you take the trouble to write a whole book on
>> physics, especially if you claim in the book that you have a theory of all
>> reality and that the nature of God is even revealed, then the sweeping
>> scope of the book automatically makes you a physicist of note. As a tip,
>> include some equations to prove that you can do math, and that way no one
>> will ask you to do arithmetic or algebra you can’t do. 
>> 
>> In Ken’s imaginary world, anyone at all who has a physics idea of any kind
>> is deserving of serious attention, because true physicists are inquisitive
>> people who will seriously consider any and all ideas. 
>> 
>> Oh look, Ken fell asleep with his space helmet on again. At least he got
>> his Mr Scientist pajamas on. 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463259

Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote:
> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>> On Sunday, July 1, 2018 at 4:15:01 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>> In Ken’s imaginary world, one does not become a famous physicist by
>>> learning physics and the prerequisite skills; one becomes a truly famous
>>> physicist by being a complete outsider, untainted by physics concepts or
>>> specialized skills. 
>> 
>> It’s better than  a moron woodworker (Odd) who is wasting his life
>> cruising the internet and criticize anybody who has new ideas. 
> 
> I don’t have an issue with new ideas. I read about new ideas from
> physicists every week. I have an issue with people like you who want
> attention for new ideas while being completely uneducated about the
> subject. 
> 
> So, no, what you’re doing is not better. Being a fraudulent pretender is
> always worse, and that’s what you are. 
> 
>> He think that that will make him an authority of modern physics. 
> 
> No I don’t. 
> 
>> Sadly, it is not and as a result he accomplished nothing in life.
> 
> I’ve accomplished plenty and I’m quite happy with my successes in my chosen
> vocation. I don’t know why you aren’t happy with your successes in your
> chosen vocation and feel compelled to pretend to have an impact in an area
> where you are wholly uneducated. 

I also want to know why you denigrate my chosen profession. I don’t
denigrate chemical engineering but you seem to scoff at my being a
craftsman. Do you think it makes you look better as a chemical engineer
(who is unread in physics) to look down on a craftsman (who has read a fair
amount in physics)? 

Do you want to be known as a fraudulent pretender AND a bigot? You’re
headed pretty far down that road already, Ken. You cranky bastard you. 

> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> In Ken’s imaginary world, one doesn’t become a famous physicist by doing
>>> actual calculations or doing careful experimental measurements; one becomes
>>> famous by using ordinary language that ordinary people understand, and
>>> demonstrating how the universe works using only the kinds of supplies you
>>> might find in your kitchen. 
>>> 
>>> In Ken’s imaginary world, if you take the trouble to write a whole book on
>>> physics, especially if you claim in the book that you have a theory of all
>>> reality and that the nature of God is even revealed, then the sweeping
>>> scope of the book automatically makes you a physicist of note. As a tip,
>>> include some equations to prove that you can do math, and that way no one
>>> will ask you to do arithmetic or algebra you can’t do. 
>>> 
>>> In Ken’s imaginary world, anyone at all who has a physics idea of any kind
>>> is deserving of serious attention, because true physicists are inquisitive
>>> people who will seriously consider any and all ideas. 
>>> 
>>> Oh look, Ken fell asleep with his space helmet on again. At least he got
>>> his Mr Scientist pajamas on. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463298

On Monday, July 2, 2018 at 10:50:11 AM UTC-4, kenseto wrote:

> cruising the internet and criticize anybody who has new ideas. 

Idiot kem, you dont have any new ideas. You STOLE your "model" from others, then tried to modify it, and consequently ruined their models. You are a fraud and a liar. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463302

rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, July 2, 2018 at 10:50:11 AM UTC-4, kenseto wrote:
> 
>> cruising the internet and criticize anybody who has new ideas. 
> 
> Idiot kem, you dont have any new ideas. You STOLE your "model" from
> others, then tried to modify it, and consequently ruined their models.
> You are a fraud and a liar. 
> 
> 

Like he’s done with other things. His sister’s restaurant. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web