Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #463259
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Ken on the planet Setorn |
| Date | 2018-07-02 15:15 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <phdfjd$ov7$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <phbco1$1ej5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <c1a5ddf8-b90a-4761-ae48-eb3dab8906a8@googlegroups.com> <phdf36$ntj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote: > kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >> On Sunday, July 1, 2018 at 4:15:01 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> In Ken’s imaginary world, one does not become a famous physicist by >>> learning physics and the prerequisite skills; one becomes a truly famous >>> physicist by being a complete outsider, untainted by physics concepts or >>> specialized skills. >> >> It’s better than a moron woodworker (Odd) who is wasting his life >> cruising the internet and criticize anybody who has new ideas. > > I don’t have an issue with new ideas. I read about new ideas from > physicists every week. I have an issue with people like you who want > attention for new ideas while being completely uneducated about the > subject. > > So, no, what you’re doing is not better. Being a fraudulent pretender is > always worse, and that’s what you are. > >> He think that that will make him an authority of modern physics. > > No I don’t. > >> Sadly, it is not and as a result he accomplished nothing in life. > > I’ve accomplished plenty and I’m quite happy with my successes in my chosen > vocation. I don’t know why you aren’t happy with your successes in your > chosen vocation and feel compelled to pretend to have an impact in an area > where you are wholly uneducated. I also want to know why you denigrate my chosen profession. I don’t denigrate chemical engineering but you seem to scoff at my being a craftsman. Do you think it makes you look better as a chemical engineer (who is unread in physics) to look down on a craftsman (who has read a fair amount in physics)? Do you want to be known as a fraudulent pretender AND a bigot? You’re headed pretty far down that road already, Ken. You cranky bastard you. > >> >>> >>> In Ken’s imaginary world, one doesn’t become a famous physicist by doing >>> actual calculations or doing careful experimental measurements; one becomes >>> famous by using ordinary language that ordinary people understand, and >>> demonstrating how the universe works using only the kinds of supplies you >>> might find in your kitchen. >>> >>> In Ken’s imaginary world, if you take the trouble to write a whole book on >>> physics, especially if you claim in the book that you have a theory of all >>> reality and that the nature of God is even revealed, then the sweeping >>> scope of the book automatically makes you a physicist of note. As a tip, >>> include some equations to prove that you can do math, and that way no one >>> will ask you to do arithmetic or algebra you can’t do. >>> >>> In Ken’s imaginary world, anyone at all who has a physics idea of any kind >>> is deserving of serious attention, because true physicists are inquisitive >>> people who will seriously consider any and all ideas. >>> >>> Oh look, Ken fell asleep with his space helmet on again. At least he got >>> his Mr Scientist pajamas on. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >> > > > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Ken on the planet Setorn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 20:14 +0000
Re: Ken on the planet Setorn The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-01 13:41 -0700
Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 20:47 +0000
Re: Ken on the planet Setorn The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-02 10:38 -0700
Re: Ken on the planet Setorn The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 13:49 -0700
Re: Ken on the planet Setorn The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-02 15:41 -0700
Re: Ken on the planet Setorn The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-02 23:55 -0700
Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-07-02 12:19 +0000
Re: Ken on the planet Setorn kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-02 07:50 -0700
Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-07-02 16:56 +0200
Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 15:07 +0000
Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 15:15 +0000
Re: Ken on the planet Setorn rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 15:21 -0700
Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 22:55 +0000
csiph-web