Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #463259

Re: Ken on the planet Setorn

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Ken on the planet Setorn
Date 2018-07-02 15:15 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <phdfjd$ov7$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <phbco1$1ej5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <c1a5ddf8-b90a-4761-ae48-eb3dab8906a8@googlegroups.com> <phdf36$ntj$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote:
> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>> On Sunday, July 1, 2018 at 4:15:01 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>> In Ken’s imaginary world, one does not become a famous physicist by
>>> learning physics and the prerequisite skills; one becomes a truly famous
>>> physicist by being a complete outsider, untainted by physics concepts or
>>> specialized skills. 
>> 
>> It’s better than  a moron woodworker (Odd) who is wasting his life
>> cruising the internet and criticize anybody who has new ideas. 
> 
> I don’t have an issue with new ideas. I read about new ideas from
> physicists every week. I have an issue with people like you who want
> attention for new ideas while being completely uneducated about the
> subject. 
> 
> So, no, what you’re doing is not better. Being a fraudulent pretender is
> always worse, and that’s what you are. 
> 
>> He think that that will make him an authority of modern physics. 
> 
> No I don’t. 
> 
>> Sadly, it is not and as a result he accomplished nothing in life.
> 
> I’ve accomplished plenty and I’m quite happy with my successes in my chosen
> vocation. I don’t know why you aren’t happy with your successes in your
> chosen vocation and feel compelled to pretend to have an impact in an area
> where you are wholly uneducated. 

I also want to know why you denigrate my chosen profession. I don’t
denigrate chemical engineering but you seem to scoff at my being a
craftsman. Do you think it makes you look better as a chemical engineer
(who is unread in physics) to look down on a craftsman (who has read a fair
amount in physics)? 

Do you want to be known as a fraudulent pretender AND a bigot? You’re
headed pretty far down that road already, Ken. You cranky bastard you. 

> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> In Ken’s imaginary world, one doesn’t become a famous physicist by doing
>>> actual calculations or doing careful experimental measurements; one becomes
>>> famous by using ordinary language that ordinary people understand, and
>>> demonstrating how the universe works using only the kinds of supplies you
>>> might find in your kitchen. 
>>> 
>>> In Ken’s imaginary world, if you take the trouble to write a whole book on
>>> physics, especially if you claim in the book that you have a theory of all
>>> reality and that the nature of God is even revealed, then the sweeping
>>> scope of the book automatically makes you a physicist of note. As a tip,
>>> include some equations to prove that you can do math, and that way no one
>>> will ask you to do arithmetic or algebra you can’t do. 
>>> 
>>> In Ken’s imaginary world, anyone at all who has a physics idea of any kind
>>> is deserving of serious attention, because true physicists are inquisitive
>>> people who will seriously consider any and all ideas. 
>>> 
>>> Oh look, Ken fell asleep with his space helmet on again. At least he got
>>> his Mr Scientist pajamas on. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Ken on the planet Setorn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 20:14 +0000
  Re: Ken on the planet Setorn The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-01 13:41 -0700
    Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 20:47 +0000
      Re: Ken on the planet Setorn The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-02 10:38 -0700
        Re: Ken on the planet Setorn The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-02 13:22 -0700
          Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 13:49 -0700
            Re: Ken on the planet Setorn The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-02 15:41 -0700
            Re: Ken on the planet Setorn The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-02 23:55 -0700
  Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-07-02 12:19 +0000
  Re: Ken on the planet Setorn kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-07-02 07:50 -0700
    Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-07-02 16:56 +0200
    Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 15:07 +0000
      Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 15:15 +0000
    Re: Ken on the planet Setorn rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 15:21 -0700
      Re: Ken on the planet Setorn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 22:55 +0000

csiph-web