Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #452342 > unrolled thread

Inflation

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Inflation "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-11 12:23 -0700
    Re: Inflation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-11 23:15 -0700
    Re: Inflation Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-17 06:34 +0000
      Re: Inflation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-16 23:37 -0700
        Re: Inflation benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-17 03:27 -0400
          Re: Inflation Térov Balónky <iytn@yeicenlw.ik> - 2018-03-17 12:28 +0000
          Re: Inflation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-17 10:56 -0700
          Re: Inflation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-17 10:59 -0700
            Re: Inflation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-17 13:44 -0700
              Re: Inflation benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-17 17:02 -0400
                Re: Inflation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-17 19:25 -0700
                  Re: Inflation Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 08:58 +0000
      Re: Inflation benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-17 03:25 -0400
    Inflation "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-17 05:55 -0700

#452342 — Inflation

Duration
A key requirement is that inflation must continue long enough to produce the present observable universe from a single, small inflationary Hubble volume. 

This is necessary to ensure that the Universe appears flat, homogeneous and isotropic at the largest observable scales. 

This requirement is generally thought to be satisfied if the Universe expanded by a factor of at least 10^26 during inflation.

1 / (((1 kg * G) / (c^2)) * 1e+26) =
13.4663531

Maybe it is just (Energy /“Pocket Volume”)

Maybe it was just “Worm Holes that only allow passage of a wavelength of energy at Planck Temp or above” connecting Distant parts of the universe evenly distributing the Energy resulting in a homogeneous isotopic CMBR distribution.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#452402

David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> 
> Duration
> A key requirement is that inflation must continue long enough to produce the present observable universe from a single, small inflationary Hubble volume.
> 
> This is necessary to ensure that the Universe appears flat, homogeneous and isotropic at the largest observable scales.
> 
> This requirement is generally thought to be satisfied if the Universe expanded by a factor of at least 10^26 during inflation.
> 
> 1 / (((1 kg * G) / (c^2)) * 1e+26) =
> 13.4663531
> 
> Maybe it is just (Energy /“Pocket Volume”)
> 
> Maybe it was just “Worm Holes that only allow passage of a >wavelength of energy at Planck Temp or above” connecting Distant >parts of the universe evenly distributing the Energy resulting in a >homogeneous isotopic CMBR distribution.


Haven't you heard...Inflation is ad-hoc.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452955

On 11/03/2018 19:23, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> Duration

Maybe the universe is infinitely old eh!

> A key requirement is that inflation must continue long enough to produce the present observable universe from a single, small inflationary Hubble volume.

A key requirement,for an infinitely old universe, is that the Hubble 
red-shifts are not indicating velocities, or even space expansion, but 
something else altogether.  Maybe the speed of light is slowing down eh!

> This is necessary to ensure that the Universe appears flat, homogeneous and isotropic at the largest observable scales.
> 
> This requirement is generally thought to be satisfied if the Universe expanded by a factor of at least 10^26 during inflation.

expanded by a factor of 100000000000000000000000000 eh!!!
How long did that take eh? :)

> 1 / (((1 kg * G) / (c^2)) * 1e+26) =
> 13.4663531
> 
> Maybe it is just (Energy /“Pocket Volume”)
> 
> Maybe it was just “Worm Holes that only allow passage of a wavelength of energy at Planck Temp or above” connecting Distant parts of the universe evenly distributing the Energy resulting in a homogeneous isotopic CMBR distribution.
> 
Maybe the CMBR is just highly red-shifted radiation from very distant 
galaxies eh!

keith stein

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452956

On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 11:34:39 PM UTC-7, Keith Stein wrote:
> On 11/03/2018 19:23, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> > Duration
> 
> Maybe the universe is infinitely old eh!
> 
> > A key requirement is that inflation must continue long enough to produce the present observable universe from a single, small inflationary Hubble volume.
> 
> A key requirement,for an infinitely old universe, is that the Hubble 
> red-shifts are not indicating velocities, or even space expansion, but 
> something else altogether.  Maybe the speed of light is slowing down eh!
> 
> > This is necessary to ensure that the Universe appears flat, homogeneous and isotropic at the largest observable scales.
> > 
> > This requirement is generally thought to be satisfied if the Universe expanded by a factor of at least 10^26 during inflation.
> 
> expanded by a factor of 100000000000000000000000000 eh!!!
> How long did that take eh? :)
> 
> > 1 / (((1 kg * G) / (c^2)) * 1e+26) =
> > 13.4663531
> > 
> > Maybe it is just (Energy /“Pocket Volume”)
> > 
> > Maybe it was just “Worm Holes that only allow passage of a wavelength of energy at Planck Temp or above” connecting Distant parts of the universe evenly distributing the Energy resulting in a homogeneous isotopic CMBR distribution.
> > 
> Maybe the CMBR is just highly red-shifted radiation from very distant 
> galaxies eh!
> 
> keith stein

Inflation was the first instant of the absolute beginning.
Then time started.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452960

On 3/17/2018 2:37 AM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 11:34:39 PM UTC-7, Keith Stein wrote:
>> On 11/03/2018 19:23, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
>>> Duration
>>
>> Maybe the universe is infinitely old eh!
>>
>>> A key requirement is that inflation must continue long enough to produce the present observable universe from a single, small inflationary Hubble volume.
>>
>> A key requirement,for an infinitely old universe, is that the Hubble
>> red-shifts are not indicating velocities, or even space expansion, but
>> something else altogether.  Maybe the speed of light is slowing down eh!
>>
>>> This is necessary to ensure that the Universe appears flat, homogeneous and isotropic at the largest observable scales.
>>>
>>> This requirement is generally thought to be satisfied if the Universe expanded by a factor of at least 10^26 during inflation.
>>
>> expanded by a factor of 100000000000000000000000000 eh!!!
>> How long did that take eh? :)
>>
>>> 1 / (((1 kg * G) / (c^2)) * 1e+26) =
>>> 13.4663531
>>>
>>> Maybe it is just (Energy /“Pocket Volume”)
>>>
>>> Maybe it was just “Worm Holes that only allow passage of a wavelength of energy at Planck Temp or above” connecting Distant parts of the universe evenly distributing the Energy resulting in a homogeneous isotopic CMBR distribution.
>>>
>> Maybe the CMBR is just highly red-shifted radiation from very distant
>> galaxies eh!
>>
>> keith stein
> 
> Inflation was the first instant of the absolute beginning.
> Then time started.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch
> 
Babbling drool.
You are STILL a moron. You have NO idea if time started or not or if it 
did when and how it occurred. You imagined you were there, right?
Take you meds.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452967

benj wrote:

>> Inflation was the first instant of the absolute beginning.
>> Then time started. Mitchell Raemsch
>> 
> Babbling drool.
> You are STILL a moron. You have NO idea if time started or not or if it
> did when and how it occurred. You imagined you were there, right?
> Take you meds.

SOmething which doesnt even exists cannot start nor end. Here is exactly 
where they are taking it, their relativity, into the deep forest. By 
intercalating time into their tensors. Why, since they relate whatever 
speeds and curvature to the drift of Entropy. Unbelievable stupid. 
Happily, my the

*_Divergent Matter of the Moving Bodies Model_* suffers not from this 
limitation.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452988

On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 12:27:19 AM UTC-7, benj wrote:
> On 3/17/2018 2:37 AM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 11:34:39 PM UTC-7, Keith Stein wrote:
> >> On 11/03/2018 19:23, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> >>> Duration
> >>
> >> Maybe the universe is infinitely old eh!
> >>
> >>> A key requirement is that inflation must continue long enough to produce the present observable universe from a single, small inflationary Hubble volume.
> >>
> >> A key requirement,for an infinitely old universe, is that the Hubble
> >> red-shifts are not indicating velocities, or even space expansion, but
> >> something else altogether.  Maybe the speed of light is slowing down eh!
> >>
> >>> This is necessary to ensure that the Universe appears flat, homogeneous and isotropic at the largest observable scales.
> >>>
> >>> This requirement is generally thought to be satisfied if the Universe expanded by a factor of at least 10^26 during inflation.
> >>
> >> expanded by a factor of 100000000000000000000000000 eh!!!
> >> How long did that take eh? :)
> >>
> >>> 1 / (((1 kg * G) / (c^2)) * 1e+26) =
> >>> 13.4663531
> >>>
> >>> Maybe it is just (Energy /“Pocket Volume”)
> >>>
> >>> Maybe it was just “Worm Holes that only allow passage of a wavelength of energy at Planck Temp or above” connecting Distant parts of the universe evenly distributing the Energy resulting in a homogeneous isotopic CMBR distribution.
> >>>
> >> Maybe the CMBR is just highly red-shifted radiation from very distant
> >> galaxies eh!
> >>
> >> keith stein
> > 
> > Inflation was the first instant of the absolute beginning.
> > Then time started.
> > 
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> > 
> Babbling drool.
> You are STILL a moron. You have NO idea if time started or not or if it 
> did when and how it occurred. You imagined you were there, right?
> Take you meds.

Then how could you know either way Roy Masters?

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452989

benj wrote:
> 
> On 3/17/2018 2:37 AM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 11:34:39 PM UTC-7, Keith Stein wrote:
> >> On 11/03/2018 19:23, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> >>> Duration
> >>
> >> Maybe the universe is infinitely old eh!
> >>
> >>> A key requirement is that inflation must continue long enough to produce the present observable universe from a single, small inflationary Hubble volume.
> >>
> >> A key requirement,for an infinitely old universe, is that the Hubble
> >> red-shifts are not indicating velocities, or even space expansion, but
> >> something else altogether.  Maybe the speed of light is slowing down eh!
> >>
> >>> This is necessary to ensure that the Universe appears flat, homogeneous and isotropic at the largest observable scales.
> >>>
> >>> This requirement is generally thought to be satisfied if the Universe expanded by a factor of at least 10^26 during inflation.
> >>
> >> expanded by a factor of 100000000000000000000000000 eh!!!
> >> How long did that take eh? :)
> >>
> >>> 1 / (((1 kg * G) / (c^2)) * 1e+26) =
> >>> 13.4663531
> >>>
> >>> Maybe it is just (Energy /“Pocket Volume”)
> >>>
> >>> Maybe it was just “Worm Holes that only allow passage of a wavelength of energy at Planck Temp or above” connecting Distant parts of the universe evenly distributing the Energy resulting in a homogeneous isotopic CMBR distribution.
> >>>
> >> Maybe the CMBR is just highly red-shifted radiation from very distant
> >> galaxies eh!
> >>
> >> keith stein
> >
> > Inflation was the first instant of the absolute beginning.
> > Then time started.
> >
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> >
> Babbling drool.
> You are STILL a moron. You have NO idea if time started or not or if it
> did when and how it occurred. You imagined you were there, right?
> Take you meds.


If you want to know the truth about Time...

Time existed before the big bang..since the big bang was an expansion of space and space is time then you simply got more time.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#453016

On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 10:59:32 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> benj wrote:
> > 
> > On 3/17/2018 2:37 AM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 11:34:39 PM UTC-7, Keith Stein wrote:
> > >> On 11/03/2018 19:23, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> > >>> Duration
> > >>
> > >> Maybe the universe is infinitely old eh!
> > >>
> > >>> A key requirement is that inflation must continue long enough to produce the present observable universe from a single, small inflationary Hubble volume.
> > >>
> > >> A key requirement,for an infinitely old universe, is that the Hubble
> > >> red-shifts are not indicating velocities, or even space expansion, but
> > >> something else altogether.  Maybe the speed of light is slowing down eh!
> > >>
> > >>> This is necessary to ensure that the Universe appears flat, homogeneous and isotropic at the largest observable scales.
> > >>>
> > >>> This requirement is generally thought to be satisfied if the Universe expanded by a factor of at least 10^26 during inflation.
> > >>
> > >> expanded by a factor of 100000000000000000000000000 eh!!!
> > >> How long did that take eh? :)
> > >>
> > >>> 1 / (((1 kg * G) / (c^2)) * 1e+26) =
> > >>> 13.4663531
> > >>>
> > >>> Maybe it is just (Energy /“Pocket Volume”)
> > >>>
> > >>> Maybe it was just “Worm Holes that only allow passage of a wavelength of energy at Planck Temp or above” connecting Distant parts of the universe evenly distributing the Energy resulting in a homogeneous isotopic CMBR distribution.
> > >>>
> > >> Maybe the CMBR is just highly red-shifted radiation from very distant
> > >> galaxies eh!
> > >>
> > >> keith stein
> > >
> > > Inflation was the first instant of the absolute beginning.
> > > Then time started.
> > >
> > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > >
> > Babbling drool.
> > You are STILL a moron. You have NO idea if time started or not or if it
> > did when and how it occurred. You imagined you were there, right?
> > Take you meds.
> 
> 
> If you want to know the truth about Time...
> 
> Time existed before the big bang..since the big bang was an expansion of space and space is time then you simply got more time.

Space is dimension... time is not a dimension...
The hypersphere is the one higher round spatial
dimension.

Mitchll Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#453018

On 3/17/2018 4:44 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 10:59:32 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>> benj wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/17/2018 2:37 AM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 11:34:39 PM UTC-7, Keith Stein wrote:
>>>>> On 11/03/2018 19:23, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
>>>>>> Duration
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe the universe is infinitely old eh!
>>>>>
>>>>>> A key requirement is that inflation must continue long enough to produce the present observable universe from a single, small inflationary Hubble volume.
>>>>>
>>>>> A key requirement,for an infinitely old universe, is that the Hubble
>>>>> red-shifts are not indicating velocities, or even space expansion, but
>>>>> something else altogether.  Maybe the speed of light is slowing down eh!
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is necessary to ensure that the Universe appears flat, homogeneous and isotropic at the largest observable scales.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This requirement is generally thought to be satisfied if the Universe expanded by a factor of at least 10^26 during inflation.
>>>>>
>>>>> expanded by a factor of 100000000000000000000000000 eh!!!
>>>>> How long did that take eh? :)
>>>>>
>>>>>> 1 / (((1 kg * G) / (c^2)) * 1e+26) =
>>>>>> 13.4663531
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe it is just (Energy /“Pocket Volume”)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe it was just “Worm Holes that only allow passage of a wavelength of energy at Planck Temp or above” connecting Distant parts of the universe evenly distributing the Energy resulting in a homogeneous isotopic CMBR distribution.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe the CMBR is just highly red-shifted radiation from very distant
>>>>> galaxies eh!
>>>>>
>>>>> keith stein
>>>>
>>>> Inflation was the first instant of the absolute beginning.
>>>> Then time started.
>>>>
>>>> Mitchell Raemsch
>>>>
>>> Babbling drool.
>>> You are STILL a moron. You have NO idea if time started or not or if it
>>> did when and how it occurred. You imagined you were there, right?
>>> Take you meds.
>>
>>
>> If you want to know the truth about Time...
>>
>> Time existed before the big bang..since the big bang was an expansion of space and space is time then you simply got more time.
> 
> Space is dimension... time is not a dimension...
> The hypersphere is the one higher round spatial
> dimension.
> 
> Mitchll Raemsch
> 
Babbling insane nonsense as usual.
Spatial dimensions are only round if there are even more dimensions to 
allow the bending, AS for time, well Mitch has spoken and as your savior 
that is all that needs to be said.


Mitch you are STILL a moron. Posting gibberish to the INTERNET does NOT 
cure mental illness. Trust me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#453050

On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 2:02:05 PM UTC-7, benj wrote:
> On 3/17/2018 4:44 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 10:59:32 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> >> benj wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 3/17/2018 2:37 AM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>> On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 11:34:39 PM UTC-7, Keith Stein wrote:
> >>>>> On 11/03/2018 19:23, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> >>>>>> Duration
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe the universe is infinitely old eh!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> A key requirement is that inflation must continue long enough to produce the present observable universe from a single, small inflationary Hubble volume.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A key requirement,for an infinitely old universe, is that the Hubble
> >>>>> red-shifts are not indicating velocities, or even space expansion, but
> >>>>> something else altogether.  Maybe the speed of light is slowing down eh!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> This is necessary to ensure that the Universe appears flat, homogeneous and isotropic at the largest observable scales.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This requirement is generally thought to be satisfied if the Universe expanded by a factor of at least 10^26 during inflation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> expanded by a factor of 100000000000000000000000000 eh!!!
> >>>>> How long did that take eh? :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> 1 / (((1 kg * G) / (c^2)) * 1e+26) =
> >>>>>> 13.4663531
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Maybe it is just (Energy /“Pocket Volume”)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Maybe it was just “Worm Holes that only allow passage of a wavelength of energy at Planck Temp or above” connecting Distant parts of the universe evenly distributing the Energy resulting in a homogeneous isotopic CMBR distribution.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe the CMBR is just highly red-shifted radiation from very distant
> >>>>> galaxies eh!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> keith stein
> >>>>
> >>>> Inflation was the first instant of the absolute beginning.
> >>>> Then time started.
> >>>>
> >>>> Mitchell Raemsch
> >>>>
> >>> Babbling drool.
> >>> You are STILL a moron. You have NO idea if time started or not or if it
> >>> did when and how it occurred. You imagined you were there, right?
> >>> Take you meds.
> >>
> >>
> >> If you want to know the truth about Time...
> >>
> >> Time existed before the big bang..since the big bang was an expansion of space and space is time then you simply got more time.
> > 
> > Space is dimension... time is not a dimension...
> > The hypersphere is the one higher round spatial
> > dimension.
> > 
> > Mitchll Raemsch

... as your savior that is all that needs to be said. 

???? You are not my savior Roy Masters. You are the hypnotist...

There is only one higher dimension and it is the
round radial spatial 4th dimension. The universe
is in its higher boundary and because of that
the universe has no boundaries.

There are no black hole event horizons because
there are no local space boundaries anywhere...

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#453220

On 18/03/2018 02:25, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 2:02:05 PM UTC-7, benj wrote:
>> On 3/17/2018 4:44 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 10:59:32 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> benj wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/17/2018 2:37 AM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 11:34:39 PM UTC-7, Keith Stein wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/03/2018 19:23, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
>>>>>>>> Duration
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe the universe is infinitely old eh!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A key requirement is that inflation must continue long enough to produce the present observable universe from a single, small inflationary Hubble volume.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A key requirement,for an infinitely old universe, is that the Hubble
>>>>>>> red-shifts are not indicating velocities, or even space expansion, but
>>>>>>> something else altogether.  Maybe the speed of light is slowing down eh!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is necessary to ensure that the Universe appears flat, homogeneous and isotropic at the largest observable scales.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This requirement is generally thought to be satisfied if the Universe expanded by a factor of at least 10^26 during inflation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> expanded by a factor of 100000000000000000000000000 eh!!!
>>>>>>> How long did that take eh? :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1 / (((1 kg * G) / (c^2)) * 1e+26) =
>>>>>>>> 13.4663531
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe it is just (Energy /“Pocket Volume”)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe it was just “Worm Holes that only allow passage of a wavelength of energy at Planck Temp or above” connecting Distant parts of the universe evenly distributing the Energy resulting in a homogeneous isotopic CMBR distribution.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe the CMBR is just highly red-shifted radiation from very distant
>>>>>>> galaxies eh!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> keith stein
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Inflation was the first instant of the absolute beginning.
>>>>>> Then time started.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mitchell Raemsch
>>>>>>
>>>>> Babbling drool.
>>>>> You are STILL a moron. You have NO idea if time started or not or if it
>>>>> did when and how it occurred. You imagined you were there, right?
>>>>> Take you meds.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you want to know the truth about Time...
>>>>
>>>> Time existed before the big bang..since the big bang was an expansion of space and space is time then you simply got more time.
>>>
>>> Space is dimension... time is not a dimension...
>>> The hypersphere is the one higher round spatial
>>> dimension.
>>>
>>> Mitchll Raemsch
> 
> ... as your savior that is all that needs to be said.
> 
> ???? You are not my savior Roy Masters. You are the hypnotist...
> 
> There is only one higher dimension and it is the
> round radial spatial 4th dimension. The universe
> is in its higher boundary and because of that
> the universe has no boundaries.
> 
> There are no black hole event horizons because
> there are no local space boundaries anywhere...
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch


Searching for an alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts, it 
occurred to me that if the speed of light is slowing down, then this 
will necessarily lead to increasing red-shift with increasing distance,
as observed by Hubble et. al., without any expansion at all.

Merely by assuming      dc = -K c dt ..................(1)
I was led to             c = c(0) e^-Kt ...............(2)
and on to               Red-Shift = e^-Kt - 1 .........(3)

     K ~= 10^-10 /year
     t = time in years

Only after starting the PHYSICS PRIZE thread, in which i was trying to 
enlist the help of sci.physics.relativity readers to obtain a more 
accurate value of K, did the obvious solution occur to me...........

                        K = H = Hubble's Constant
and                    t = -t  ( so times past become +ve)

which substituted in (3) gives:

             Red-Shift = e^Ht - 1 .........(4)

then for times which are small compared to 1/H (i.e. small compared
to the 'age of the universe'), we may use the approximation:
             e^x ~= 1 + x .................(5)

So for t << 1/H we have:

             Red-Shift = H * t ............(6)

which is of course the normal "Hubble's Law", valid only
for modest times into the past ( t < ~5 billion years).

As our telescopes manage to see further out into space, and therefore 
further back in time, we will find that the normal linear Hubble's Law 
expressed in equation(6), will have to be replaced by the more accurate
exponential form expressed in equation(4). This is indeed what is found
in observatories all around the world eh!

Conclusions:
     1. The speed of light in intergalactic-space is slowing down.
     2. There was no "Big Bang"
     3. There was no "Inflation"
     4. The galaxies are not accelerating away from us.
     5. There is no "Dark Energy"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452959

On 3/17/2018 2:34 AM, Keith Stein wrote:
> On 11/03/2018 19:23, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
>> Duration
> 
> Maybe the universe is infinitely old eh!

"Infinite" is a mathematical concept (fantasy). Nothing in the universe 
is infinite except human stupidity.

>> A key requirement is that inflation must continue long enough to 
>> produce the present observable universe from a single, small 
>> inflationary Hubble volume.
> 
> A key requirement,for an infinitely old universe, is that the Hubble 
> red-shifts are not indicating velocities, or even space expansion, but 
> something else altogether.  Maybe the speed of light is slowing down eh!

Hubble Red shift does not indicate velocity. But "Tired light" theory is 
equally wrong.

>> This is necessary to ensure that the Universe appears flat, 
>> homogeneous and isotropic at the largest observable scales.
>>
>> This requirement is generally thought to be satisfied if the Universe 
>> expanded by a factor of at least 10^26 during inflation.

Inverse is a hypersphere of immense but finite size. It's expansion or 
contraction is an open issue.

> expanded by a factor of 100000000000000000000000000 eh!!!
> How long did that take eh? :)
> 
>> 1 / (((1 kg * G) / (c^2)) * 1e+26) =
>> 13.4663531
>>
>> Maybe it is just (Energy /“Pocket Volume”)
>>
>> Maybe it was just “Worm Holes that only allow passage of a wavelength 
>> of energy at Planck Temp or above” connecting Distant parts of the 
>> universe evenly distributing the Energy resulting in a homogeneous 
>> isotopic CMBR distribution.
>>
> Maybe the CMBR is just highly red-shifted radiation from very distant 
> galaxies eh!

Maybe it's coming from places you have no concept of? Or maybe it's your 
own farts coming round and greeting you from the front. (sphere, remember?)

> keith stein

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452970

Cosmic Inflation = Pressure Above (c^7/(hbar*G^2)) = Exceeding the Wave Speed of the Medium 

https://photos.app.goo.gl/mQRmqEnjy9tmxc1K2 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web