Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #452989

Re: Inflation

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Inflation
Date 2018-03-17 10:59 -0700
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <5AAD5782.7603@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <ef6d7309-400a-4c5a-84be-6aa7ecc8b83d@googlegroups.com> <1G2rC.9637$Cz7.1632@fx10.am4> <d637ac33-291f-4d63-8f9e-d3f397613fb1@googlegroups.com> <pr3rC.50607$FL3.49543@fx08.iad>

Show all headers | View raw


benj wrote:
> 
> On 3/17/2018 2:37 AM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 11:34:39 PM UTC-7, Keith Stein wrote:
> >> On 11/03/2018 19:23, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> >>> Duration
> >>
> >> Maybe the universe is infinitely old eh!
> >>
> >>> A key requirement is that inflation must continue long enough to produce the present observable universe from a single, small inflationary Hubble volume.
> >>
> >> A key requirement,for an infinitely old universe, is that the Hubble
> >> red-shifts are not indicating velocities, or even space expansion, but
> >> something else altogether.  Maybe the speed of light is slowing down eh!
> >>
> >>> This is necessary to ensure that the Universe appears flat, homogeneous and isotropic at the largest observable scales.
> >>>
> >>> This requirement is generally thought to be satisfied if the Universe expanded by a factor of at least 10^26 during inflation.
> >>
> >> expanded by a factor of 100000000000000000000000000 eh!!!
> >> How long did that take eh? :)
> >>
> >>> 1 / (((1 kg * G) / (c^2)) * 1e+26) =
> >>> 13.4663531
> >>>
> >>> Maybe it is just (Energy /“Pocket Volume”)
> >>>
> >>> Maybe it was just “Worm Holes that only allow passage of a wavelength of energy at Planck Temp or above” connecting Distant parts of the universe evenly distributing the Energy resulting in a homogeneous isotopic CMBR distribution.
> >>>
> >> Maybe the CMBR is just highly red-shifted radiation from very distant
> >> galaxies eh!
> >>
> >> keith stein
> >
> > Inflation was the first instant of the absolute beginning.
> > Then time started.
> >
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> >
> Babbling drool.
> You are STILL a moron. You have NO idea if time started or not or if it
> did when and how it occurred. You imagined you were there, right?
> Take you meds.


If you want to know the truth about Time...

Time existed before the big bang..since the big bang was an expansion of space and space is time then you simply got more time.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Inflation "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-11 12:23 -0700
  Re: Inflation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-11 23:15 -0700
  Re: Inflation Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-17 06:34 +0000
    Re: Inflation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-16 23:37 -0700
      Re: Inflation benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-17 03:27 -0400
        Re: Inflation Térov Balónky <iytn@yeicenlw.ik> - 2018-03-17 12:28 +0000
        Re: Inflation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-17 10:56 -0700
        Re: Inflation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-17 10:59 -0700
          Re: Inflation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-17 13:44 -0700
            Re: Inflation benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-17 17:02 -0400
              Re: Inflation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-17 19:25 -0700
                Re: Inflation Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 08:58 +0000
    Re: Inflation benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-17 03:25 -0400
  Inflation "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-17 05:55 -0700

csiph-web