Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #414457 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-29 09:43 -0800 |
| Last post | 2017-04-02 23:57 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 27 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
NASA tells artist... Dont ever use the color green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-29 09:43 -0800
Re: NASA tells artist... Dont ever use the color green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-29 12:09 -0800
Re: NASA tells artist... Don’t ever use the color green Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-03-30 09:27 +1100
Re: Re: NASA tells artist... Don’t ever use the color green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-29 15:59 -0800
Re: NASA tells artist... Don’t ever use the color green Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-03-30 10:01 +1100
Re: Re: NASA tells artist... Don’t ever use the color green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-29 20:27 -0800
Re: Re: NASA tells artist... Don’t ever use the color green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-29 22:29 -0800
Re: NASA tells artist... Dont ever use the color green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-30 08:38 -0800
Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-03-30 13:11 -0400
Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-30 11:15 -0800
Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-03-30 15:09 -0400
Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-30 12:52 -0800
Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-03-31 09:11 -0400
Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-31 10:07 -0800
Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-03-31 16:56 -0400
Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-31 14:36 -0800
Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-02 23:51 -0700
Re: NASA tells artist... Don’t ever use the color green Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2017-03-29 21:26 -0600
Re: NASA tells artist... Don’t ever use the color green Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-03-30 06:44 +0200
Re: NASA tells artist... Dont ever use the color green Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-03-29 21:07 -0600
Re: NASA tells artist... Don’t ever use the color green Awa Idayumi <auu@wayyaw.yi> - 2017-03-30 22:11 +0000
Re: NASA tells artist... Dont ever use the color green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-30 16:22 -0800
Re: NASA tells artist... Dont ever use the color green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-30 16:33 -0800
Re: NASA tells artist... Dont ever use the color green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-31 13:32 -0800
Re: NASA tells artist... Dont ever use the color green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-31 14:07 -0800
Re: NASA tells artist... Dont ever use the color green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-01 20:47 -0800
Re: NASA tells artist... Dont ever use the color green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-02 23:57 -0700
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-29 09:43 -0800 |
| Subject | NASA tells artist... Dont ever use the color green |
| Message-ID | <58DBF243.1042@ix.netcom.com> |
Don’t make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much like Earth. Don’t ever use the color green, which hints at vegetation. “We try to avoid anything that might imply there is life,” Mr. Pyle says. So the artists added oceans to their illustrations, which are posted on NASA websites and republished in newspapers and magazines world-wide. “We are one step closer to the science fiction we all grew up on,” says Mr. Delgado. That's strange...I didn't grow up on "science fiction". Did yous guys grow up on science fiction???? It's best to keep your children away from reading science fiction, give them pot instead. Then, when they grow up instead of searching for water they will be searching for grass. I always wondered Why NASA's illustrations didn't have trees... God forbid that they "imply there is life"... "So the artists added oceans to their illustrations, which are posted on NASA websites and republished in newspapers and magazines world-wide." Oh, it has oceans, that means there is no life. So, NASA has a Rule: Don’t ever use the color green, which hints at vegetation. IT'S TIME TO DROP THAT STUPID FUCKING RULE AND ADD SOME FUCKING TREES!!! stupid motherfuckers they got water in their brains... https://www.google.com/#q=The+Sky+Is+Orange!+How+NASA+Artists+Draw+Planets+No+One+Can+See&*
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-29 12:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <58DC1485.1F7C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #414457 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Don’t make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much like Earth. Don’t ever use the color green, which hints at vegetation. > “We try to avoid anything that might imply there is life,” Mr. Pyle says. > > So the artists added oceans to their illustrations, which are posted on NASA websites and republished in newspapers and magazines world-wide. > > “We are one step closer to the science fiction we all grew up on,” says Mr. Delgado. > > That's strange...I didn't grow up on "science fiction". Did yous guys grow up on science fiction???? > > It's best to keep your children away from reading science fiction, give them pot instead. > > Then, when they grow up instead of searching for water they will be searching for grass. > > I always wondered Why NASA's illustrations didn't have trees... > > God forbid that they "imply there is life"... > > "So the artists added oceans to their illustrations, which are posted on NASA websites and republished in newspapers and magazines world-wide." > > Oh, it has oceans, that means there is no life. > > So, NASA has a Rule: > Don’t ever use the color green, which hints at vegetation. > > IT'S TIME TO DROP THAT STUPID FUCKING RULE AND ADD SOME FUCKING TREES!!! > > stupid motherfuckers > > they got water in their brains... > > https://www.google.com/#q=The+Sky+Is+Orange!+How+NASA+Artists+Draw+Planets+No+One+Can+See&* So, NASA has a Rule: "Don’t ever use the color green, which hints at vegetation." What other rules does NASA have? No trains, boats or planes?? How about a girl???? When you sell a car, you put a girl in front of a car...sex sells! Can they not put a chick on those stupid fuckin picture?? Is that suppose to 'imply' something??? i tink i saw a movie wit a whole bunch of girls on mars..wit za za gaarbore no ugly aliens, just pretty chicks. Come on NASA, I want to see some PUSSY up there! No Black Holes with soft hair on it... --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-30 09:27 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: NASA tells artist... Don’t ever use the color green |
| Message-ID | <ek2qn2Fh4fcU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #414457 |
On 30/03/2017 4:43 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > Don’t make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much like Earth. Don’t ever use the color green, which hints at vegetation. > “We try to avoid anything that might imply there is life,” Mr. Pyle says. > > Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to use the red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the green, seems to have been because their ancestors lived in the sea below other photosynthetic life (now extinct) that absorbed the green (high energy) end of the spectrum. So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any more than red does, or even black. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-29 15:59 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Re: NASA tells artist... Don’t ever use the color green |
| Message-ID | <58DC4A7D.62F5@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #414498 |
Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 30/03/2017 4:43 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Don’t make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much like Earth. Don’t ever use the color green, which hints at vegetation. > > “We try to avoid anything that might imply there is life,” Mr. Pyle says. > > > > > > Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to use the > red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the green, seems to > have been because their ancestors lived in the sea below other > photosynthetic life (now extinct) that absorbed the green (high energy) > end of the spectrum. > > So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any more than > red does, or even black. > > Sylvia. Red, too hot Blue, too cold Green...just right. Know your colors... --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-30 10:01 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: NASA tells artist... Don’t ever use the color green |
| Message-ID | <ek2slqFhebjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #414501 |
On 30/03/2017 10:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > Sylvia Else wrote: >> >> On 30/03/2017 4:43 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> Don’t make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much like Earth. Don’t ever use the color green, which hints at vegetation. >>> “We try to avoid anything that might imply there is life,” Mr. Pyle says. >>> >>> >> >> Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to use the >> red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the green, seems to >> have been because their ancestors lived in the sea below other >> photosynthetic life (now extinct) that absorbed the green (high energy) >> end of the spectrum. >> >> So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any more than >> red does, or even black. >> >> Sylvia. > > Red, too hot > > Blue, too cold > > Green...just right. > Those have nothing to do with the relationship between photon energy and colour. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-29 20:27 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Re: NASA tells artist... Don’t ever use the color green |
| Message-ID | <58DC8945.44B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #414502 |
Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 30/03/2017 10:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Sylvia Else wrote: > >> > >> On 30/03/2017 4:43 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> Don’t make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much like Earth. Don’t ever use the color green, which hints at vegetation. > >>> “We try to avoid anything that might imply there is life,” Mr. Pyle says. > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to use the > >> red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the green, seems to > >> have been because their ancestors lived in the sea below other > >> photosynthetic life (now extinct) that absorbed the green (high energy) > >> end of the spectrum. > >> > >> So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any more than > >> red does, or even black. > >> > >> Sylvia. > > > > Red, too hot > > > > Blue, too cold > > > > Green...just right. > > > > Those have nothing to do with the relationship between photon energy and > colour. > > Sylvia. This might be a little differcult for you to understand.. but Colors have no relationship to photon energy. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-29 22:29 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Re: NASA tells artist... Don’t ever use the color green |
| Message-ID | <58DCA5E3.2E99@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #414513 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > On 30/03/2017 10:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > Sylvia Else wrote: > > >> > > >> On 30/03/2017 4:43 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>> Don’t make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much like Earth. Don’t ever use the color green, which hints at vegetation. > > >>> “We try to avoid anything that might imply there is life,” Mr. Pyle says. > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to use the > > >> red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the green, seems to > > >> have been because their ancestors lived in the sea below other > > >> photosynthetic life (now extinct) that absorbed the green (high energy) > > >> end of the spectrum. > > >> > > >> So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any more than > > >> red does, or even black. > > >> > > >> Sylvia. > > > > > > Red, too hot > > > > > > Blue, too cold > > > > > > Green...just right. > > > > > > > Those have nothing to do with the relationship between photon energy and > > colour. > > > > Sylvia. > > This might be a little differcult for you to understand.. > > but Colors have no relationship to photon energy. > Actually, Colors have nothing to do with ...physics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-30 08:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <58DD3477.4321@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #414518 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > > > On 30/03/2017 10:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Sylvia Else wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On 30/03/2017 4:43 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>> Don’t make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much like Earth. Don’t ever use the color green, which hints at vegetation. > > > >>> “We try to avoid anything that might imply there is life,” Mr. Pyle says. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to use the > > > >> red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the green, seems to > > > >> have been because their ancestors lived in the sea below other > > > >> photosynthetic life (now extinct) that absorbed the green (high energy) > > > >> end of the spectrum. > > > >> > > > >> So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any more than > > > >> red does, or even black. > > > >> > > > >> Sylvia. > > > > > > > > Red, too hot > > > > > > > > Blue, too cold > > > > > > > > Green...just right. > > > > > > > > > > Those have nothing to do with the relationship between photon energy and > > > colour. > > > > > > Sylvia. > > > > This might be a little differcult for you to understand.. > > > > but Colors have no relationship to photon energy. > > > > Actually, Colors have nothing to do with ...physics. If you understand just ...Colors, then you can throw away your physics and math books. So lets start understanding the universe with just Colors... As you already know from my teachings...there is no other planet in the universe whose surface is the color blue, only earth. There is only Red, Green and Blue. The spectrum is irrevelant. All the Colors in between ...don't matter. Now, lets start with the beginning of the universe..What came first, the color Red, Green or Blue? In other words, when the universe was first created it started out with only one Color, What was the one Color? I'll give you a hint, you only have three choices, red, green, or blue... Here is the hint. You already know about red shift...it's shifting from the other colors. Get the hint? Get the hint? Get the hint?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-30 13:11 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green |
| Message-ID | <obje1v$m7a$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #414544 |
The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: >> >> The Starmaker wrote: >>> >>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> >>>> On 30/03/2017 10:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 30/03/2017 4:43 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> Don't make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much like >>>>>>> Earth. Don't ever use the color green, which hints at vegetation. >>>>>>> "We try to avoid anything that might imply there is life," Mr. >>>>>>> Pyle says. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to use >>>>>> the red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the green, >>>>>> seems to have been because their ancestors lived in the sea below >>>>>> other photosynthetic life (now extinct) that absorbed the green >>>>>> (high energy) end of the spectrum. >>>>>> >>>>>> So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any more >>>>>> than red does, or even black. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>> >>>>> Red, too hot >>>>> >>>>> Blue, too cold >>>>> >>>>> Green...just right. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Those have nothing to do with the relationship between photon energy >>>> and colour. >>>> >>>> Sylvia. >>> >>> This might be a little differcult for you to understand.. >>> >>> but Colors have no relationship to photon energy. >>> >> >> Actually, Colors have nothing to do with ...physics. > > If you understand just ...Colors, then you can throw away your physics > and math books. > > So lets start understanding the universe with just Colors... > > > As you already know from my teachings...there is no other planet in the > universe whose surface is the color blue, only earth. > > There is only Red, Green and Blue. The spectrum is irrevelant. All the > Colors in between ...don't matter. > > Now, lets start with the beginning of the universe..What came first, > the color Red, Green or Blue? > > In other words, when the universe was first created it started out with > only one Color, What was the one Color? > > I'll give you a hint, you only have three choices, red, green, or > blue... > > > Here is the hint. You already know about red shift...it's shifting from > the other colors. > > Get the hint? Get the hint? Get the hint? But if the light is red to begin with.......what color does it shift to ??
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-30 11:15 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green |
| Message-ID | <58DD5960.4C6C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #414552 |
Bast wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >> The Starmaker wrote: > >>> > >>> Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 30/03/2017 10:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 30/03/2017 4:43 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>> Don't make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much like > >>>>>>> Earth. Don't ever use the color green, which hints at vegetation. > >>>>>>> "We try to avoid anything that might imply there is life," Mr. > >>>>>>> Pyle says. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to use > >>>>>> the red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the green, > >>>>>> seems to have been because their ancestors lived in the sea below > >>>>>> other photosynthetic life (now extinct) that absorbed the green > >>>>>> (high energy) end of the spectrum. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any more > >>>>>> than red does, or even black. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sylvia. > >>>>> > >>>>> Red, too hot > >>>>> > >>>>> Blue, too cold > >>>>> > >>>>> Green...just right. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Those have nothing to do with the relationship between photon energy > >>>> and colour. > >>>> > >>>> Sylvia. > >>> > >>> This might be a little differcult for you to understand.. > >>> > >>> but Colors have no relationship to photon energy. > >>> > >> > >> Actually, Colors have nothing to do with ...physics. > > > > If you understand just ...Colors, then you can throw away your physics > > and math books. > > > > So lets start understanding the universe with just Colors... > > > > > > As you already know from my teachings...there is no other planet in the > > universe whose surface is the color blue, only earth. > > > > There is only Red, Green and Blue. The spectrum is irrevelant. All the > > Colors in between ...don't matter. > > > > Now, lets start with the beginning of the universe..What came first, > > the color Red, Green or Blue? > > > > In other words, when the universe was first created it started out with > > only one Color, What was the one Color? > > > > I'll give you a hint, you only have three choices, red, green, or > > blue... > > > > > > Here is the hint. You already know about red shift...it's shifting from > > the other colors. > > > > Get the hint? Get the hint? Get the hint? > > But if the light is red to begin with.......what color does it shift to ?? "shift" is not a color. "shift" means...move. The red simply is the first to move. what you see is the movement of red, not turning to red.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-30 15:09 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green |
| Message-ID | <objl06$ged$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #414559 |
The Starmaker wrote: > Bast wrote: >> >> The Starmaker wrote: >>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>> >>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 30/03/2017 10:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 30/03/2017 4:43 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>> Don't make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much like >>>>>>>>> Earth. Don't ever use the color green, which hints at >>>>>>>>> vegetation. "We try to avoid anything that might imply there is >>>>>>>>> life," Mr. Pyle says. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to use >>>>>>>> the red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the green, >>>>>>>> seems to have been because their ancestors lived in the sea below >>>>>>>> other photosynthetic life (now extinct) that absorbed the green >>>>>>>> (high energy) end of the spectrum. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any more >>>>>>>> than red does, or even black. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Red, too hot >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Blue, too cold >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Green...just right. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Those have nothing to do with the relationship between photon >>>>>> energy and colour. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>> >>>>> This might be a little differcult for you to understand.. >>>>> >>>>> but Colors have no relationship to photon energy. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Actually, Colors have nothing to do with ...physics. >>> >>> If you understand just ...Colors, then you can throw away your physics >>> and math books. >>> >>> So lets start understanding the universe with just Colors... >>> >>> >>> As you already know from my teachings...there is no other planet in >>> the universe whose surface is the color blue, only earth. >>> >>> There is only Red, Green and Blue. The spectrum is irrevelant. All the >>> Colors in between ...don't matter. >>> >>> Now, lets start with the beginning of the universe..What came first, >>> the color Red, Green or Blue? >>> >>> In other words, when the universe was first created it started out >>> with only one Color, What was the one Color? >>> >>> I'll give you a hint, you only have three choices, red, green, or >>> blue... >>> >>> >>> Here is the hint. You already know about red shift...it's shifting >>> from the other colors. >>> >>> Get the hint? Get the hint? Get the hint? >> >> But if the light is red to begin with.......what color does it shift >> to ?? > > > "shift" is not a color. "shift" means...move. The red simply is the > first to move. what you see is the movement of red, not turning to red. Well then, where does the red move to ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-30 12:52 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green |
| Message-ID | <58DD6FFA.397@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #414563 |
Bast wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > Bast wrote: > >> > >> The Starmaker wrote: > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> > >>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 30/03/2017 10:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 30/03/2017 4:43 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Don't make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much like > >>>>>>>>> Earth. Don't ever use the color green, which hints at > >>>>>>>>> vegetation. "We try to avoid anything that might imply there is > >>>>>>>>> life," Mr. Pyle says. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to use > >>>>>>>> the red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the green, > >>>>>>>> seems to have been because their ancestors lived in the sea below > >>>>>>>> other photosynthetic life (now extinct) that absorbed the green > >>>>>>>> (high energy) end of the spectrum. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any more > >>>>>>>> than red does, or even black. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Sylvia. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Red, too hot > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Blue, too cold > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Green...just right. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Those have nothing to do with the relationship between photon > >>>>>> energy and colour. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sylvia. > >>>>> > >>>>> This might be a little differcult for you to understand.. > >>>>> > >>>>> but Colors have no relationship to photon energy. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Actually, Colors have nothing to do with ...physics. > >>> > >>> If you understand just ...Colors, then you can throw away your physics > >>> and math books. > >>> > >>> So lets start understanding the universe with just Colors... > >>> > >>> > >>> As you already know from my teachings...there is no other planet in > >>> the universe whose surface is the color blue, only earth. > >>> > >>> There is only Red, Green and Blue. The spectrum is irrevelant. All the > >>> Colors in between ...don't matter. > >>> > >>> Now, lets start with the beginning of the universe..What came first, > >>> the color Red, Green or Blue? > >>> > >>> In other words, when the universe was first created it started out > >>> with only one Color, What was the one Color? > >>> > >>> I'll give you a hint, you only have three choices, red, green, or > >>> blue... > >>> > >>> > >>> Here is the hint. You already know about red shift...it's shifting > >>> from the other colors. > >>> > >>> Get the hint? Get the hint? Get the hint? > >> > >> But if the light is red to begin with.......what color does it shift > >> to ?? > > > > > > "shift" is not a color. "shift" means...move. The red simply is the > > first to move. what you see is the movement of red, not turning to red. > > Well then, where does the red move to ? it is not moving towards anything... what is this "move to" business???? it's Red, it fades...away. Not to, ...away. Left behind...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-31 09:11 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green |
| Message-ID | <oblkck$1jn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #414565 |
The Starmaker wrote: > Bast wrote: >> >> The Starmaker wrote: >>> Bast wrote: >>>> >>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 30/03/2017 10:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 30/03/2017 4:43 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Don't make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much >>>>>>>>>>> like Earth. Don't ever use the color green, which hints at >>>>>>>>>>> vegetation. "We try to avoid anything that might imply there >>>>>>>>>>> is life," Mr. Pyle says. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to >>>>>>>>>> use the red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the >>>>>>>>>> green, seems to have been because their ancestors lived in the >>>>>>>>>> sea below other photosynthetic life (now extinct) that >>>>>>>>>> absorbed the green (high energy) end of the spectrum. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any >>>>>>>>>> more than red does, or even black. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Red, too hot >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Blue, too cold >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Green...just right. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Those have nothing to do with the relationship between photon >>>>>>>> energy and colour. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This might be a little differcult for you to understand.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> but Colors have no relationship to photon energy. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Actually, Colors have nothing to do with ...physics. >>>>> >>>>> If you understand just ...Colors, then you can throw away your >>>>> physics and math books. >>>>> >>>>> So lets start understanding the universe with just Colors... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As you already know from my teachings...there is no other planet in >>>>> the universe whose surface is the color blue, only earth. >>>>> >>>>> There is only Red, Green and Blue. The spectrum is irrevelant. All >>>>> the Colors in between ...don't matter. >>>>> >>>>> Now, lets start with the beginning of the universe..What came first, >>>>> the color Red, Green or Blue? >>>>> >>>>> In other words, when the universe was first created it started out >>>>> with only one Color, What was the one Color? >>>>> >>>>> I'll give you a hint, you only have three choices, red, green, or >>>>> blue... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Here is the hint. You already know about red shift...it's shifting >>>>> from the other colors. >>>>> >>>>> Get the hint? Get the hint? Get the hint? >>>> >>>> But if the light is red to begin with.......what color does it shift >>>> to ?? >>> >>> >>> "shift" is not a color. "shift" means...move. The red simply is the >>> first to move. what you see is the movement of red, not turning to >>> red. >> >> Well then, where does the red move to ? > > > > it is not moving towards anything... what is this "move to" > business???? > > it's Red, it fades...away. Not to, ...away. Left behind... Well if it's fading then it must be getting sucked up in a black hole. But after millions of years of sucking up red light, wouldn't the black hole turn red itself ????
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-31 10:07 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green |
| Message-ID | <58DE9AF3.5E70@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #414620 |
Bast wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > Bast wrote: > >> > >> The Starmaker wrote: > >>> Bast wrote: > >>>> > >>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 30/03/2017 10:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 30/03/2017 4:43 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> Don't make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much > >>>>>>>>>>> like Earth. Don't ever use the color green, which hints at > >>>>>>>>>>> vegetation. "We try to avoid anything that might imply there > >>>>>>>>>>> is life," Mr. Pyle says. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to > >>>>>>>>>> use the red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the > >>>>>>>>>> green, seems to have been because their ancestors lived in the > >>>>>>>>>> sea below other photosynthetic life (now extinct) that > >>>>>>>>>> absorbed the green (high energy) end of the spectrum. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any > >>>>>>>>>> more than red does, or even black. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Sylvia. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Red, too hot > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Blue, too cold > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Green...just right. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Those have nothing to do with the relationship between photon > >>>>>>>> energy and colour. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Sylvia. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> This might be a little differcult for you to understand.. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> but Colors have no relationship to photon energy. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Actually, Colors have nothing to do with ...physics. > >>>>> > >>>>> If you understand just ...Colors, then you can throw away your > >>>>> physics and math books. > >>>>> > >>>>> So lets start understanding the universe with just Colors... > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> As you already know from my teachings...there is no other planet in > >>>>> the universe whose surface is the color blue, only earth. > >>>>> > >>>>> There is only Red, Green and Blue. The spectrum is irrevelant. All > >>>>> the Colors in between ...don't matter. > >>>>> > >>>>> Now, lets start with the beginning of the universe..What came first, > >>>>> the color Red, Green or Blue? > >>>>> > >>>>> In other words, when the universe was first created it started out > >>>>> with only one Color, What was the one Color? > >>>>> > >>>>> I'll give you a hint, you only have three choices, red, green, or > >>>>> blue... > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Here is the hint. You already know about red shift...it's shifting > >>>>> from the other colors. > >>>>> > >>>>> Get the hint? Get the hint? Get the hint? > >>>> > >>>> But if the light is red to begin with.......what color does it shift > >>>> to ?? > >>> > >>> > >>> "shift" is not a color. "shift" means...move. The red simply is the > >>> first to move. what you see is the movement of red, not turning to > >>> red. > >> > >> Well then, where does the red move to ? > > > > > > > > it is not moving towards anything... what is this "move to" > > business???? > > > > it's Red, it fades...away. Not to, ...away. Left behind... > > Well if it's fading then it must be getting sucked up in a black hole. > But after millions of years of sucking up red light, wouldn't the black hole > turn red itself ???? Black holes are designed to eat blue, not red.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-31 16:56 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green |
| Message-ID | <obmfl7$398$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #414642 |
The Starmaker wrote: > Bast wrote: >> >> The Starmaker wrote: >>> Bast wrote: >>>> >>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> Bast wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 30/03/2017 10:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 30/03/2017 4:43 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much >>>>>>>>>>>>> like Earth. Don't ever use the color green, which hints at >>>>>>>>>>>>> vegetation. "We try to avoid anything that might imply there >>>>>>>>>>>>> is life," Mr. Pyle says. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to >>>>>>>>>>>> use the red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the >>>>>>>>>>>> green, seems to have been because their ancestors lived in >>>>>>>>>>>> the sea below other photosynthetic life (now extinct) that >>>>>>>>>>>> absorbed the green (high energy) end of the spectrum. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any >>>>>>>>>>>> more than red does, or even black. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Red, too hot >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Blue, too cold >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Green...just right. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Those have nothing to do with the relationship between photon >>>>>>>>>> energy and colour. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This might be a little differcult for you to understand.. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> but Colors have no relationship to photon energy. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Actually, Colors have nothing to do with ...physics. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you understand just ...Colors, then you can throw away your >>>>>>> physics and math books. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So lets start understanding the universe with just Colors... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As you already know from my teachings...there is no other planet >>>>>>> in the universe whose surface is the color blue, only earth. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is only Red, Green and Blue. The spectrum is irrevelant. All >>>>>>> the Colors in between ...don't matter. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now, lets start with the beginning of the universe..What came >>>>>>> first, the color Red, Green or Blue? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In other words, when the universe was first created it started out >>>>>>> with only one Color, What was the one Color? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'll give you a hint, you only have three choices, red, green, or >>>>>>> blue... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here is the hint. You already know about red shift...it's shifting >>>>>>> from the other colors. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Get the hint? Get the hint? Get the hint? >>>>>> >>>>>> But if the light is red to begin with.......what color does it >>>>>> shift to ?? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "shift" is not a color. "shift" means...move. The red simply is the >>>>> first to move. what you see is the movement of red, not turning to >>>>> red. >>>> >>>> Well then, where does the red move to ? >>> >>> >>> >>> it is not moving towards anything... what is this "move to" >>> business???? >>> >>> it's Red, it fades...away. Not to, ...away. Left behind... >> >> Well if it's fading then it must be getting sucked up in a black hole. >> But after millions of years of sucking up red light, wouldn't the >> black hole turn red itself ???? > > > > Black holes are designed to eat blue, not red. How do black holes decide what colors they like to eat ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-31 14:36 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green |
| Message-ID | <58DED9E8.4218@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #414660 |
Bast wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > Bast wrote: > >> > >> The Starmaker wrote: > >>> Bast wrote: > >>>> > >>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> Bast wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 30/03/2017 10:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 30/03/2017 4:43 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much > >>>>>>>>>>>>> like Earth. Don't ever use the color green, which hints at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> vegetation. "We try to avoid anything that might imply there > >>>>>>>>>>>>> is life," Mr. Pyle says. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to > >>>>>>>>>>>> use the red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the > >>>>>>>>>>>> green, seems to have been because their ancestors lived in > >>>>>>>>>>>> the sea below other photosynthetic life (now extinct) that > >>>>>>>>>>>> absorbed the green (high energy) end of the spectrum. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any > >>>>>>>>>>>> more than red does, or even black. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Red, too hot > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Blue, too cold > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Green...just right. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Those have nothing to do with the relationship between photon > >>>>>>>>>> energy and colour. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Sylvia. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> This might be a little differcult for you to understand.. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> but Colors have no relationship to photon energy. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Actually, Colors have nothing to do with ...physics. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> If you understand just ...Colors, then you can throw away your > >>>>>>> physics and math books. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> So lets start understanding the universe with just Colors... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> As you already know from my teachings...there is no other planet > >>>>>>> in the universe whose surface is the color blue, only earth. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> There is only Red, Green and Blue. The spectrum is irrevelant. All > >>>>>>> the Colors in between ...don't matter. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Now, lets start with the beginning of the universe..What came > >>>>>>> first, the color Red, Green or Blue? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In other words, when the universe was first created it started out > >>>>>>> with only one Color, What was the one Color? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'll give you a hint, you only have three choices, red, green, or > >>>>>>> blue... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Here is the hint. You already know about red shift...it's shifting > >>>>>>> from the other colors. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Get the hint? Get the hint? Get the hint? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> But if the light is red to begin with.......what color does it > >>>>>> shift to ?? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> "shift" is not a color. "shift" means...move. The red simply is the > >>>>> first to move. what you see is the movement of red, not turning to > >>>>> red. > >>>> > >>>> Well then, where does the red move to ? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> it is not moving towards anything... what is this "move to" > >>> business???? > >>> > >>> it's Red, it fades...away. Not to, ...away. Left behind... > >> > >> Well if it's fading then it must be getting sucked up in a black hole. > >> But after millions of years of sucking up red light, wouldn't the > >> black hole turn red itself ???? > > > > > > > > Black holes are designed to eat blue, not red. > > How do black holes decide what colors they like to eat ? The instructions are contained in the blacks hole dna.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-02 23:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: NASA tells artist... Don't ever use the color green |
| Message-ID | <58E1F0FC.443A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #414662 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Bast wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > Bast wrote: > > >> > > >> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>> Bast wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>> Bast wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 30/03/2017 10:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 30/03/2017 4:43 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> like Earth. Don't ever use the color green, which hints at > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> vegetation. "We try to avoid anything that might imply there > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> is life," Mr. Pyle says. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to > > >>>>>>>>>>>> use the red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the > > >>>>>>>>>>>> green, seems to have been because their ancestors lived in > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the sea below other photosynthetic life (now extinct) that > > >>>>>>>>>>>> absorbed the green (high energy) end of the spectrum. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any > > >>>>>>>>>>>> more than red does, or even black. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Red, too hot > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Blue, too cold > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Green...just right. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Those have nothing to do with the relationship between photon > > >>>>>>>>>> energy and colour. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Sylvia. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> This might be a little differcult for you to understand.. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> but Colors have no relationship to photon energy. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Actually, Colors have nothing to do with ...physics. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> If you understand just ...Colors, then you can throw away your > > >>>>>>> physics and math books. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> So lets start understanding the universe with just Colors... > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> As you already know from my teachings...there is no other planet > > >>>>>>> in the universe whose surface is the color blue, only earth. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> There is only Red, Green and Blue. The spectrum is irrevelant. All > > >>>>>>> the Colors in between ...don't matter. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Now, lets start with the beginning of the universe..What came > > >>>>>>> first, the color Red, Green or Blue? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> In other words, when the universe was first created it started out > > >>>>>>> with only one Color, What was the one Color? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I'll give you a hint, you only have three choices, red, green, or > > >>>>>>> blue... > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Here is the hint. You already know about red shift...it's shifting > > >>>>>>> from the other colors. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Get the hint? Get the hint? Get the hint? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> But if the light is red to begin with.......what color does it > > >>>>>> shift to ?? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> "shift" is not a color. "shift" means...move. The red simply is the > > >>>>> first to move. what you see is the movement of red, not turning to > > >>>>> red. > > >>>> > > >>>> Well then, where does the red move to ? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> it is not moving towards anything... what is this "move to" > > >>> business???? > > >>> > > >>> it's Red, it fades...away. Not to, ...away. Left behind... > > >> > > >> Well if it's fading then it must be getting sucked up in a black hole. > > >> But after millions of years of sucking up red light, wouldn't the > > >> black hole turn red itself ???? > > > > > > > > > > > > Black holes are designed to eat blue, not red. > > > > How do black holes decide what colors they like to eat ? > > The instructions are contained in the blacks hole dna. Of course...the question nobody asks (or dares to ask, or is forbidden to ask) is... "Where does the DNA gets it's ...instructions?" if you are a little dna, you probably have no idea what becomes of your intructions or where the instructions comd from. a little dna is too close to the trees to see the forest..
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-29 21:26 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: NASA tells artist... Don’t ever use the color green |
| Message-ID | <1b8tnn78cq.fsf@pfeifferfamily.net> |
| In reply to | #414502 |
Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> writes: > On 30/03/2017 10:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >> Sylvia Else wrote: >>> >>> On 30/03/2017 4:43 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> Don’t make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much like Earth. Don’t ever use the color green, which hints at vegetation. >>>> “We try to avoid anything that might imply there is life,” Mr. Pyle says. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to use the >>> red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the green, seems to >>> have been because their ancestors lived in the sea below other >>> photosynthetic life (now extinct) that absorbed the green (high energy) >>> end of the spectrum. >>> >>> So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any more than >>> red does, or even black. >>> >>> Sylvia. >> >> Red, too hot >> >> Blue, too cold >> >> Green...just right. >> > > Those have nothing to do with the relationship between photon energy > and colour. Wow. Someone who can make starmaker's posts look rational. Of *course* they have nothing to do with photon energy. This is about evoking desired perceptions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-30 06:44 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: NASA tells artist... Don’t ever use the color green |
| Message-ID | <1776133.oMNUckLgyt@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #414514 |
Joe Pfeiffer amok-crossposted across 4 newsgroups without Followup-To: > Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> writes: >> On 30/03/2017 10:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to use the >>>> red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the green, seems to >>>> have been because their ancestors lived in the sea below other >>>> photosynthetic life (now extinct) that absorbed the green (high energy) >>>> end of the spectrum. >>>> >>>> So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any more than >>>> red does, or even black. >>> >>> Red, too hot >>> >>> Blue, too cold >>> >>> Green...just right. >> >> Those have nothing to do with the relationship between photon energy >> and colour. > > Wow. Someone who can make starmaker's posts look rational. > > Of *course* they have nothing to do with photon energy. This is about > evoking desired perceptions. I am not entirely sure what you clueless troll-feeding amok-crossposters are talking about, but as you have crossposted to sci.physics.ALL too, JFTR & JFYI: The energy of a single photon is E = ℎ f. It depends only on the frequency f of the electromagnetic radiation it belongs to (ℎ is Planck’s *constant*). Frequency/wavelength (where wavelength λ = c∕f) do have something to do with color: Color and visible light itself are human concept based on the energy of the photons required to activate specialized cone photoreceptor cells in the human retina. See also: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_vision> They do not necessarily have something to do with temperature, contrary to common misconception and what the “Starmaker” troll suggested. BTW, black is not really a color, it is basically the absence of light with energies/frequencies/wavelengths corresponding to the visible light part of the electromagnetic spectrum. F'up2 sci.physics -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-29 21:07 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ek3b36Fjsq6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #414498 |
Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: >On 30/03/2017 4:43 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >> Don’t make the ocean too azure blue, lest it seem too much like Earth. Don’t ever use the color green, which hints at vegetation. >> “We try to avoid anything that might imply there is life,” Mr. Pyle says. >> >> > >Green may hint at chlorophyll, but the evolution of plants to use the >red (low energy) end of the spectrum, and reflect the green, seems to >have been because their ancestors lived in the sea below other >photosynthetic life (now extinct) that absorbed the green (high energy) >end of the spectrum. > >So there's nothing about "green" that really says "life" any more than >red does, or even black. Green isn't the END of the spectrum. Those weird coloured grow lights have both ends of the spectrum. I found this graph https://www.supergrowled.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/PAR-Spectrum-Graph---Chili.jpg under the text "Even within this spectrum, not all light is equal for chilies, which utilize light with wavelengths primarily in the red and blue regions for growth, photosynthesis and flowering. Green light is of little use to chilies and other plants, and is mostly reflected, resulting in the green leaves and stems we see in our gardens." -- We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web