Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #395646 > unrolled thread

Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137

Started by"David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
First post2016-10-14 08:21 -0700
Last post2016-10-18 15:31 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 44 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 08:21 -0700
    Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 08:37 -0700
      Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 08:43 -0700
        Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 09:26 -0700
          Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 12:19 -0700
            Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 12:30 -0700
              Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 13:06 -0700
                Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 15:48 -0700
                  Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 20:56 -0700
                    Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 21:57 -0700
                      Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 05:05 -0700
                        Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-15 09:37 -0700
                        Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-15 09:49 -0700
                          Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-15 10:52 -0700
                          Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-15 11:05 -0700
                            Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-15 11:33 -0700
                              Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-15 20:50 -0700
                        Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-18 16:02 -0700
                          Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-24 13:38 -0700
                            Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-25 13:18 -0700
                              Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-25 13:25 -0700
                              Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-25 18:02 -0700
                                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-26 06:50 -0700
                                  Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-26 10:19 -0700
                                    Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-31 17:17 -0700
                                      Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-01 06:46 -0700
                                        Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-01 10:12 -0700
                                          Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-01 10:27 -0700
                                            Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-01 10:56 -0700
                                              Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-03 14:57 -0700
                                                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-03 20:41 -0700
                                                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-03 21:17 -0800
                                                  Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-03 21:21 -0700
                                                    Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-04 00:15 -0800
                                                      Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-04 10:10 -0700
                                                    Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-04 10:02 -0800
                                                      Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-04 11:13 -0700
                                                        Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-04 11:21 -0800
                                                          Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-04 12:02 -0800
                                                            Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-12 18:59 -0800
                                                              Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-12 19:07 -0800
                                                                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-16 20:22 -0800
        Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-17 08:47 -0700
          Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-18 15:31 -0700

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#396788

From"David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2016-10-25 13:25 -0700
Message-ID<3b7cb8f8-d1a7-490a-854e-9655346dbedc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#396786
2 / 3.00003792966 = 0.66665823796 


(510998946.1^0.5) = (3.00003792966 * 5 * 11 * 137) 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koide_formula 

http://i57.tinypic.com/102v0gh.jpg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#396800

From"David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2016-10-25 18:02 -0700
Message-ID<61589614-4077-401e-8808-5eb9ce4d212b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#396786
(5109989.461^0.5) * 0.66665823796 = 1507

Koide formula 

(((4 * 376.730313461) / (2 / 3)) / (10^0.5))^2 = 510932.62469

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#396831

From"David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2016-10-26 06:50 -0700
Message-ID<b3c3d8b5-4b7b-494a-afed-f8a2f377f2db@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#396800
2 / 3.00003792966 = 0.66665823796 


(510998946.1^0.5) = (3.00003792966 * 5 * 11 * 137) 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koide_formula 

http://i57.tinypic.com/102v0gh.jpg 

Oct 25me
(5109989.461^0.5) * 0.66665823796 = 1507 

Koide formula 

(((4 * 376.730313461) / (2 / 3)) / (10^0.5))^2 = 510932.62469 

http://oi61.tinypic.com/2hd0cug.jpg

(1 - (1 / tau)) / (0.5^0.25) = 0.99993892429

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#396859

From"David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2016-10-26 10:19 -0700
Message-ID<7d10e304-3777-4a2d-beeb-6f370fa37bc3@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#396831
(((159.7225625 gHz) / c) / 376.730313461) / (2^0.5) = 1
CMBR  ( 510998 eV / 2)  per meter^3 per second^2

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#397344

From"David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2016-10-31 17:17 -0700
Message-ID<5c0c3976-2c6a-4729-855c-de61a88397e6@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#396859
(1 / (((4 * 3.12500) / 1e+7) / (376.75^2))) / ((3 * 5 * 11 * 137)^2) = 222.222222222

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#397382

From"David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2016-11-01 06:46 -0700
Message-ID<49a85f43-5ec7-4fe6-b169-b6cb7e034c79@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#397344
1e+11 / ((1 / (((((5^0.5) + 1) / 2) * ((180 / pi) / 90))^4)) * 375.53500) = 299792409.9

(0.01 / ((376.730313461 / 375.53500) - 1)) / pi = 1.00004314356

0.01 / ((376.730313461 / 375.53500) - 1) = 3.14172819309

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#397405

From"David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2016-11-01 10:12 -0700
Message-ID<7b2a4354-ef00-4d1f-ae16-cf00025efc6c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#397382
510986.025 / (376.75^2) = 3.6

7 / ((1 / 0.36) - 2) = 3^2

1 / ((1 / 0.36) - 2) = 1.28571428571

1 / 1.28571428571 = 0.77777777778

(1 / 1.28571428571) / 1.1111111111 = 0.7

(7D) = truncated octahedral tessellation 

1/(G*(7^2+1)) = c

1 / (G * ((7^2) + 1)) = 299666771

http://i68.tinypic.com/xfn9rt.jpg

http://i57.tinypic.com/294ksba.jpg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#397407

From"David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2016-11-01 10:27 -0700
Message-ID<7e257560-9035-4122-a5dc-4ae352c5a299@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#397405
12 / 0.333333333333333 = 36
45 / 0.333333333333333 = 135


137 + (1 / pi) = 137.318309886
45 / 32.7705 = 1.37318624983

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#397411

From"David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2016-11-01 10:56 -0700
Message-ID<cc089dd9-a827-483f-9aa5-e847cbc1ff9e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#397407
(45 / (0.375 + 1)) * 11 = 360

(45 / (0.37675 + 1)) * 11 = 359.542400581

(45 / (0.376730313461 + 1)) * 11 = 359.547541853

1 / (3e+8 / 375) = 0.00000125 u0

1 / (3e+8 * 375) = 8.8888889e-12 e0

3e+8 c

375 z0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#397629

From"David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2016-11-03 14:57 -0700
Message-ID<5af91e7a-7bd7-4aef-8605-f8bcddbefdc1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#397411
(3e+8 / (1000 + 273 + 173)) - 3e+8 = -299792531.12

However, these extrapolations are unlikely to be fulfilled, due to the impending end of the periodic table at Z = 173.

In element 173 (unsepttrium), the last electron would enter the 6g7/2 subshell.

 (1 + 0.17 + 0.27)

(30 - (3 / 144)) * (4pi) = 376.729319043

144 = 2^4 * 3^2 = Fibonacci 

377 = Fibonacci = 13 * 29

377*4 = (11*137)+1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#397653

From"David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2016-11-03 20:41 -0700
Message-ID<97748ffe-0717-4709-adaf-8000141b2884@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#397629
((c * 376.730313461) * (c / 376.730313461))^0.5 = 299792458
 
((50 / ((c * 376.730313462)^2)) / 0.88)^0.5 = 6.67409519e-11

6.67409519e-11 / gravitational constant = 1.00000228

G * (c * 3.76730313462 * (((2^4) * 11)^0.5)) = 0.999997725
                                                                                                   
1 / (c * 3.76730313462 * (((2^4) * 11)^0.5)) = 6.67409519e-11 = G

2^4*11 = 176

((2^4) * 11)^0.5 = 13.2664991614

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#397658

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-11-03 21:17 -0800
Message-ID<581C19D5.43CE@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#397629
David (Time Lord) Fuller wrote:
> 
> (3e+8 / (1000 + 273 + 173)) - 3e+8 = -299792531.12
> 
> However, these extrapolations are unlikely to be fulfilled, due to the impending end of the periodic table at Z = 173.
> 
> In element 173 (unsepttrium), the last electron would enter the 6g7/2 subshell.
> 
>  (1 + 0.17 + 0.27)
> 
> (30 - (3 / 144)) * (4pi) = 376.729319043
> 
> 144 = 2^4 * 3^2 = Fibonacci
> 
> 377 = Fibonacci = 13 * 29
> 
> 377*4 = (11*137)+1


it's not fun if you have to use a calculator....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#397659

From"David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2016-11-03 21:21 -0700
Message-ID<c70e2440-7c04-4128-b0ae-1053f960038c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#397658
On Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 11:16:04 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> David (Time Lord) Fuller wrote:
> > 
> > (3e+8 / (1000 + 273 + 173)) - 3e+8 = -299792531.12
> > 
> > However, these extrapolations are unlikely to be fulfilled, due to the impending end of the periodic table at Z = 173.
> > 
> > In element 173 (unsepttrium), the last electron would enter the 6g7/2 subshell.
> > 
> >  (1 + 0.17 + 0.27)
> > 
> > (30 - (3 / 144)) * (4pi) = 376.729319043
> > 
> > 144 = 2^4 * 3^2 = Fibonacci
> > 
> > 377 = Fibonacci = 13 * 29
> > 
> > 377*4 = (11*137)+1
> 
> 
> it's not fun if you have to use a calculator....

It is NOT a Calculator 
It is Google

Prime integers are interesting

If you are not interested in calculations or Numbers or Geometry or Physics or Electro magnetics YOU ARE IN THE WRONG PLACE !!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#397667

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-11-04 00:15 -0800
Message-ID<581C43BD.77BB@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#397659
David (Time Lord) Fuller wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 11:16:04 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > David (Time Lord) Fuller wrote:
> > >
> > > (3e+8 / (1000 + 273 + 173)) - 3e+8 = -299792531.12
> > >
> > > However, these extrapolations are unlikely to be fulfilled, due to the impending end of the periodic table at Z = 173.
> > >
> > > In element 173 (unsepttrium), the last electron would enter the 6g7/2 subshell.
> > >
> > >  (1 + 0.17 + 0.27)
> > >
> > > (30 - (3 / 144)) * (4pi) = 376.729319043
> > >
> > > 144 = 2^4 * 3^2 = Fibonacci
> > >
> > > 377 = Fibonacci = 13 * 29
> > >
> > > 377*4 = (11*137)+1
> >
> >
> > it's not fun if you have to use a calculator....
> 
> It is NOT a Calculator
> It is Google
> 
> Prime integers are interesting
> 
> If you are not interested in calculations or Numbers or Geometry or Physics or Electro magnetics YOU ARE IN THE WRONG PLACE !!!


I'm interested in Electro gravity, are you? If not, you are in the right
place!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#397708

From"David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2016-11-04 10:10 -0700
Message-ID<5a8e8b5c-7740-429c-9238-233e08094446@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#397667
The StarSharter wrote:

I'm interested in Electro gravity, are you? If not, you are in the right 
place! 

Gravity is Sonic, gravity is a physical motion of matter through spacetime as a result of increasing Entropy of spacetime following the inverse square law 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1qNd2C6h0g

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#397715

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-11-04 10:02 -0800
Message-ID<581CCD42.1EF@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#397659
David (Time Lord) Fuller wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 11:16:04 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > David (Time Lord) Fuller wrote:
> > >
> > > (3e+8 / (1000 + 273 + 173)) - 3e+8 = -299792531.12
> > >
> > > However, these extrapolations are unlikely to be fulfilled, due to the impending end of the periodic table at Z = 173.
> > >
> > > In element 173 (unsepttrium), the last electron would enter the 6g7/2 subshell.
> > >
> > >  (1 + 0.17 + 0.27)
> > >
> > > (30 - (3 / 144)) * (4pi) = 376.729319043
> > >
> > > 144 = 2^4 * 3^2 = Fibonacci
> > >
> > > 377 = Fibonacci = 13 * 29
> > >
> > > 377*4 = (11*137)+1
> >
> >
> > it's not fun if you have to use a calculator....
> 
> It is NOT a Calculator
> It is Google


Well, that is not a very smart thing to do...suppose 
Google programers made a mistake in programming? You would get the
wrong answer every time.


--
 Wrong result on Google unit converter
by Tristan Dyas 7/18/14
Add a reply
So, I went onto Google to convert 5GB to MB because I was too lazy to do
the math in my head and it told me that 5GB is 5000MB which is WRONG! So
I decided to do the math and 5GB is 5120MB. You can dumb it down all you
want so that your average Joe will find it easier to understand but that
does not change the fact that Googles answer is wrong. So what is
better, correct information or easy to understand information?



DeLayne T said:
Hi Tristan Dyas,
Thanks for sharing your concerns about the quality of Google's Search
results. When you see low quality results, please click the Send
Feedback button at the bottom of the search results page to let us know.
We can make the biggest improvements to our search results when we know
a specific search term and the results it triggers. 

Thanks for taking the time to submit reports like this -- it really does
make a big difference to us!

Best,
DeLayne
 
Matti nescio's profile photo [Top Contributor]
8/6/14
Matti nescio said:
The technically correct answer is 5 GiB = 5120 MiB 

https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/websearch/yFTDAURFIIA



Trust no one. Nothing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#397716

From"David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2016-11-04 11:13 -0700
Message-ID<ed2111b9-9532-4090-af4f-3406c06bd2e5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#397715
The StarSharter wrote:

Well, that is not a very smart thing to do...suppose 
Google programers made a mistake in programming? You would get the 
wrong answer every time. 

Verification is very easy with http://pocketcas.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#397724

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-11-04 11:21 -0800
Message-ID<581CDFC7.681C@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#397716
David (Time Lord) Fuller wrote:
> 
> The StarSharter wrote:
> 
> Well, that is not a very smart thing to do...suppose
> Google programers made a mistake in programming? You would get the
> wrong answer every time.
> 
> Verification is very easy with http://pocketcas.com/


It's just another 'programmers' program..all programmers make
mistakes..in different parts of
the program. 

But go ahead...being wrong is a pattern with yous people.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#397725

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-11-04 12:02 -0800
Message-ID<581CE961.7E13@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#397724
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> David (Time Lord) Fuller wrote:
> >
> > The StarSharter wrote:
> >
> > Well, that is not a very smart thing to do...suppose
> > Google programers made a mistake in programming? You would get the
> > wrong answer every time.
> >
> > Verification is very easy with http://pocketcas.com/
> 
> It's just another 'programmers' program..all programmers make
> mistakes..in different parts of
> the program.
> 
> But go ahead...being wrong is a pattern with yous people.



058:04:01 CC (CAPCOM)
Go ahead, Aquarius.
058:04:03 CDR (LOVELL)
Houston. Okay. I want you to double check my arithmetic to make sure we
got a good course align- The roll CAL angle was minus 2 degrees. The
command module angles were 355.57, 167.78, 351.87.
058:04:36 CC (CAPCOM)
Okay, Jim. We copy the roll CAL at minus 2.0. The command module is
355.57, 167.78, 351.87.
058:05:19 LMP (HAISE)
Okay. VERB 41, we've done that. Okay.
058:07:11 CC (CAPCOM)
Okay, Jack. Thank you. And, Aquarius, your arithmetic looks good on the
course align, there.
058:07:20 CMP (SWIGERT)
Okay. Okay stand by for an ENTER.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#398382

From"David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2016-11-12 18:59 -0800
Message-ID<5f6360fb-8d5e-40e9-a0c2-2a35be5d32ef@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#397725
(2 * 7 * 293339) / 137 = 29976.2481752

2 * 7 * 293339 * 73 = 299792458

(2 * 7 * 293339 * 73) / ((2 * 7 * 293 339) / 137) = 10001

the speed of light / 10 001 = 29976.2482

73 * 137 = 10001

29.9762481752 * 4pi = 376.692644198

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web