Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #397715

Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137

Show all headers | View raw

David (Time Lord) Fuller wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 11:16:04 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > David (Time Lord) Fuller wrote:
> > >
> > > (3e+8 / (1000 + 273 + 173)) - 3e+8 = -299792531.12
> > >
> > > However, these extrapolations are unlikely to be fulfilled, due to the impending end of the periodic table at Z = 173.
> > >
> > > In element 173 (unsepttrium), the last electron would enter the 6g7/2 subshell.
> > >
> > >  (1 + 0.17 + 0.27)
> > >
> > > (30 - (3 / 144)) * (4pi) = 376.729319043
> > >
> > > 144 = 2^4 * 3^2 = Fibonacci
> > >
> > > 377 = Fibonacci = 13 * 29
> > >
> > > 377*4 = (11*137)+1
> >
> >
> > it's not fun if you have to use a calculator....
> 
> It is NOT a Calculator
> It is Google


Well, that is not a very smart thing to do...suppose 
Google programers made a mistake in programming? You would get the
wrong answer every time.


--
 Wrong result on Google unit converter
by Tristan Dyas 7/18/14
Add a reply
So, I went onto Google to convert 5GB to MB because I was too lazy to do
the math in my head and it told me that 5GB is 5000MB which is WRONG! So
I decided to do the math and 5GB is 5120MB. You can dumb it down all you
want so that your average Joe will find it easier to understand but that
does not change the fact that Googles answer is wrong. So what is
better, correct information or easy to understand information?



DeLayne T said:
Hi Tristan Dyas,
Thanks for sharing your concerns about the quality of Google's Search
results. When you see low quality results, please click the Send
Feedback button at the bottom of the search results page to let us know.
We can make the biggest improvements to our search results when we know
a specific search term and the results it triggers. 

Thanks for taking the time to submit reports like this -- it really does
make a big difference to us!

Best,
DeLayne
 
Matti nescio's profile photo [Top Contributor]
8/6/14
Matti nescio said:
The technically correct answer is 5 GiB = 5120 MiB 

https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/websearch/yFTDAURFIIA



Trust no one. Nothing.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 08:21 -0700
  Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 08:37 -0700
    Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 08:43 -0700
      Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 09:26 -0700
        Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 12:19 -0700
          Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 12:30 -0700
            Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 13:06 -0700
              Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 15:48 -0700
                Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 20:56 -0700
                Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 21:57 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 05:05 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-15 09:37 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-15 09:49 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-15 10:52 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-15 11:05 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-15 11:33 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-15 20:50 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-18 16:02 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-24 13:38 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-25 13:18 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-25 13:25 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-25 18:02 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-26 06:50 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-26 10:19 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-31 17:17 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-01 06:46 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-01 10:12 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-01 10:27 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-01 10:56 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-03 14:57 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-03 20:41 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-03 21:17 -0800
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-03 21:21 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-04 00:15 -0800
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-04 10:10 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-04 10:02 -0800
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-04 11:13 -0700
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-04 11:21 -0800
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-04 12:02 -0800
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-12 18:59 -0800
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-12 19:07 -0800
                Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-16 20:22 -0800
      Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-17 08:47 -0700
        Re: Fun with prime numbers 3 5 11 137 "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-18 15:31 -0700

csiph-web