Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #392468 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-15 10:29 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-09-17 15:00 -0700 |
| Articles | 10 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Vegetation is missing...on Mars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-15 10:29 -0700
Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-09-15 11:29 -0700
Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-15 20:52 +0000
Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-15 20:57 +0000
Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-15 23:09 -0700
Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-15 23:32 -0700
Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-15 23:59 -0700
Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-16 12:46 -0700
Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-16 13:48 -0700
Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-17 15:00 -0700
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 10:29 -0700 |
| Subject | Vegetation is missing...on Mars |
| Message-ID | <57DADA8C.15E@ix.netcom.com> |
http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere. Rocks.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 11:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-42F4CD.11290415092016@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #392468 |
In article <57DADA8C.15E@ix.netcom.com>, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tra > cking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere. Bacteria is not visible at the magnification available. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 20:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oDKCnC.ID3@kithrup.com> |
| In reply to | #392472 |
In article <charlie-gordon1492-42F4CD.11290415092016@news.eternal-september.org>, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >In article <57DADA8C.15E@ix.netcom.com>, > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tra >> cking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 >> >> >> Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere. > >Bacteria is not visible at the magnification available. Nitpick: Bacteria are. Or in this case, are not. -- Dorothy J. Heydt Vallejo, California djheydt at gmail dot com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 20:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oDKCvn.Iwp@kithrup.com> |
| In reply to | #392486 |
In article <oDKCnC.ID3@kithrup.com>, Dorothy J Heydt <djheydt@kithrup.com> wrote: >In article ><charlie-gordon1492-42F4CD.11290415092016@news.eternal-september.org>, >je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >>In article <57DADA8C.15E@ix.netcom.com>, >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >>> >http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tra >>> cking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 >>> >>> >>> Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere. >> >>Bacteria is not visible at the magnification available. > >Nitpick: Bacteria are. Or in this case, are not. On the other hand, here's a link comparing Mars to Utah. http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2016/09/15/wind_eroded_sandstone_on_mars_looks_like_american_southwest.html -- Dorothy J. Heydt Vallejo, California djheydt at gmail dot com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 23:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <57DB8C9E.3665@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #392468 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere. > > Rocks. Okay, since there is no vegetation on Mars, what is there that NASA doesn't see? http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 For one, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and all over each other. http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 NASA will try to show comparisons, but they won't mention the differences. They are either too stupid or crooks, or both.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 23:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <57DB91E7.1D1@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #392549 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > > Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere. > > > > Rocks. > > Okay, since there is no vegetation on Mars, > what is there that NASA doesn't see? > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > For one, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and all over each other. > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > NASA will try to show comparisons, but they won't mention the differences. > > They are either too stupid or crooks, or both. Of course...there are other differences, instead of looking for how they are alike, look for how they are.. unalike. http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 23:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <57DB985C.7BFD@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #392553 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > > > > Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere. > > > > > > Rocks. > > > > Okay, since there is no vegetation on Mars, > > what is there that NASA doesn't see? > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > > For one, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and all over each other. > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > > NASA will try to show comparisons, but they won't mention the differences. > > > > They are either too stupid or crooks, or both. > > Of course...there are other differences, > > instead of looking for how they are alike, look for how they are.. unalike. > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 ...another difference is that the Mars rocks are pointing in a different direction. So, so far you got 3 difference 1) Vegetation is missing...on Mars 2) rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and all over each other. 3) Mars rocks are pointing in a different direction, they are pointing up towards the hill, not down down the hill. http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 In other words...Mars rocks are nothing like those on Earth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 12:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <57DC4C1A.38AE@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #392558 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > > > > > > Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere. > > > > > > > > Rocks. > > > > > > Okay, since there is no vegetation on Mars, > > > what is there that NASA doesn't see? > > > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > > > > For one, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and all over each other. > > > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > > > > NASA will try to show comparisons, but they won't mention the differences. > > > > > > They are either too stupid or crooks, or both. > > > > Of course...there are other differences, > > > > instead of looking for how they are alike, look for how they are.. unalike. > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > ...another difference is that the Mars rocks are pointing in a different direction. > > So, so far you got 3 difference > > 1) Vegetation is missing...on Mars > > 2) rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and all over each other. > > 3) Mars rocks are pointing in a different direction, they are pointing up towards the hill, not down down the hill. > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > In other words...Mars rocks are nothing like those on Earth. Here is a different photo of rocks on Mars... If you notice, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other, (even the small stones are spaced apart from each other ) they don't touch each other.. http://minornotes.com/spirit1.jpg but on Earth...rocks are close and touch each other. Is someone playing a game on Mars????
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 13:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <57DC5A8B.10EA@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #392624 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > > > > > > > > Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere. > > > > > > > > > > Rocks. > > > > > > > > Okay, since there is no vegetation on Mars, > > > > what is there that NASA doesn't see? > > > > > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > > > > > > For one, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and all over each other. > > > > > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > > > > > > NASA will try to show comparisons, but they won't mention the differences. > > > > > > > > They are either too stupid or crooks, or both. > > > > > > Of course...there are other differences, > > > > > > instead of looking for how they are alike, look for how they are.. unalike. > > > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > > ...another difference is that the Mars rocks are pointing in a different direction. > > > > So, so far you got 3 difference > > > > 1) Vegetation is missing...on Mars > > > > 2) rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and all over each other. > > > > 3) Mars rocks are pointing in a different direction, they are pointing up towards the hill, not down down the hill. > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > > In other words...Mars rocks are nothing like those on Earth. > > Here is a different photo of rocks on Mars... > > If you notice, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other, (even the small stones are spaced apart from each other ) they don't touch each other.. > > http://minornotes.com/spirit1.jpg > > but on Earth...rocks are close and touch each other. The bottom line is, the characteristics and the behavior of rocks on Mars is not the same as rocks on Earth. Earth rocks hug each other. Mars rocks are almost spaced apart from each other...evenly.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-17 15:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <57DDBD08.79F8@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #392631 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > Rocks. > > > > > > > > > > Okay, since there is no vegetation on Mars, > > > > > what is there that NASA doesn't see? > > > > > > > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > > > > > > > > For one, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and all over each other. > > > > > > > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > > > > > > > > NASA will try to show comparisons, but they won't mention the differences. > > > > > > > > > > They are either too stupid or crooks, or both. > > > > > > > > Of course...there are other differences, > > > > > > > > instead of looking for how they are alike, look for how they are.. unalike. > > > > > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > > > > ...another difference is that the Mars rocks are pointing in a different direction. > > > > > > So, so far you got 3 difference > > > > > > 1) Vegetation is missing...on Mars > > > > > > 2) rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and all over each other. > > > > > > 3) Mars rocks are pointing in a different direction, they are pointing up towards the hill, not down down the hill. > > > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 > > > > > > In other words...Mars rocks are nothing like those on Earth. > > > > Here is a different photo of rocks on Mars... > > > > If you notice, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other, (even the small stones are spaced apart from each other ) they don't touch each other.. > > > > http://minornotes.com/spirit1.jpg > > > > but on Earth...rocks are close and touch each other. > > The bottom line is, the characteristics and the behavior of rocks on Mars is not the same as rocks on Earth. > > Earth rocks hug each other. Mars rocks are almost spaced apart from each other...evenly. Mars rocks look nothing like that of Earth rocks... another example there are rocks on Mars that look like they have zebra stipes, or groves like a screw driver: https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-PU549_MARSRO_M_20160912222655.jpg Fact is, Mars is unlike Earth. You guys have been hoodwinked by NASA bias. shame on yous.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web