Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #392468 > unrolled thread

Vegetation is missing...on Mars

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2016-09-15 10:29 -0700
Last post2016-09-17 15:00 -0700
Articles 10 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity


Contents

  Vegetation is missing...on Mars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-15 10:29 -0700
    Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-09-15 11:29 -0700
      Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-15 20:52 +0000
        Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-15 20:57 +0000
    Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-15 23:09 -0700
      Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-15 23:32 -0700
        Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-15 23:59 -0700
          Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-16 12:46 -0700
            Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-16 13:48 -0700
              Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-17 15:00 -0700

#392468 — Vegetation is missing...on Mars

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-09-15 10:29 -0700
SubjectVegetation is missing...on Mars
Message-ID<57DADA8C.15E@ix.netcom.com>
http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1


Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere.


Rocks.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#392472

Fromje suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where>
Date2016-09-15 11:29 -0700
Message-ID<charlie-gordon1492-42F4CD.11290415092016@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#392468
In article <57DADA8C.15E@ix.netcom.com>,
 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tra
> cking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> 
> 
> Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere.

Bacteria is not visible at the magnification available.

-- 
Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments
of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from
coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true
of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#392486

Fromdjheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt)
Date2016-09-15 20:52 +0000
Message-ID<oDKCnC.ID3@kithrup.com>
In reply to#392472
In article <charlie-gordon1492-42F4CD.11290415092016@news.eternal-september.org>,
je suis charly  <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote:
>In article <57DADA8C.15E@ix.netcom.com>,
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>> http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tra
>> cking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
>> 
>> 
>> Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere.
>
>Bacteria is not visible at the magnification available.

Nitpick: Bacteria are.  Or in this case, are not.

-- 
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#392487

Fromdjheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt)
Date2016-09-15 20:57 +0000
Message-ID<oDKCvn.Iwp@kithrup.com>
In reply to#392486
In article <oDKCnC.ID3@kithrup.com>,
Dorothy J Heydt <djheydt@kithrup.com> wrote:
>In article
><charlie-gordon1492-42F4CD.11290415092016@news.eternal-september.org>,
>je suis charly  <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote:
>>In article <57DADA8C.15E@ix.netcom.com>,
>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tra
>>> cking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere.
>>
>>Bacteria is not visible at the magnification available.
>
>Nitpick: Bacteria are.  Or in this case, are not.

On the other hand, here's a link comparing Mars to Utah.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2016/09/15/wind_eroded_sandstone_on_mars_looks_like_american_southwest.html



-- 
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#392549

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-09-15 23:09 -0700
Message-ID<57DB8C9E.3665@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#392468
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> 
> Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere.
> 
> Rocks.


Okay, since there is no vegetation on Mars,
what is there that NASA doesn't see?

http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1

For one, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and  all over each other.


http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1


NASA will try to show comparisons, but they won't mention the differences.


They are either too stupid or crooks, or both.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#392553

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-09-15 23:32 -0700
Message-ID<57DB91E7.1D1@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#392549
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> >
> > Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere.
> >
> > Rocks.
> 
> Okay, since there is no vegetation on Mars,
> what is there that NASA doesn't see?
> 
> http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> 
> For one, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and  all over each other.
> 
> http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> 
> NASA will try to show comparisons, but they won't mention the differences.
> 
> They are either too stupid or crooks, or both.


Of course...there are other differences,

instead of looking for how they are alike, look for how they are.. unalike.

http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#392558

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-09-15 23:59 -0700
Message-ID<57DB985C.7BFD@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#392553
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> > >
> > > Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere.
> > >
> > > Rocks.
> >
> > Okay, since there is no vegetation on Mars,
> > what is there that NASA doesn't see?
> >
> > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> >
> > For one, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and  all over each other.
> >
> > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> >
> > NASA will try to show comparisons, but they won't mention the differences.
> >
> > They are either too stupid or crooks, or both.
> 
> Of course...there are other differences,
> 
> instead of looking for how they are alike, look for how they are.. unalike.
> 
> http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1



...another difference is that the Mars rocks are pointing in a different direction.


So, so far you got 3 difference

1) Vegetation is missing...on Mars

2) rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and  all over each other.

3)  Mars rocks are pointing in a different direction, they are pointing up towards the hill, not down down the hill.


http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1


In other words...Mars rocks are nothing like those on Earth.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#392624

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-09-16 12:46 -0700
Message-ID<57DC4C1A.38AE@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#392558
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> > > >
> > > > Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere.
> > > >
> > > > Rocks.
> > >
> > > Okay, since there is no vegetation on Mars,
> > > what is there that NASA doesn't see?
> > >
> > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> > >
> > > For one, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and  all over each other.
> > >
> > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> > >
> > > NASA will try to show comparisons, but they won't mention the differences.
> > >
> > > They are either too stupid or crooks, or both.
> >
> > Of course...there are other differences,
> >
> > instead of looking for how they are alike, look for how they are.. unalike.
> >
> > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> 
> ...another difference is that the Mars rocks are pointing in a different direction.
> 
> So, so far you got 3 difference
> 
> 1) Vegetation is missing...on Mars
> 
> 2) rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and  all over each other.
> 
> 3)  Mars rocks are pointing in a different direction, they are pointing up towards the hill, not down down the hill.
> 
> http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> 
> In other words...Mars rocks are nothing like those on Earth.


Here is a different photo of rocks on Mars...

If you notice, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other, (even the small stones are spaced apart from each other ) they don't touch each other..

http://minornotes.com/spirit1.jpg


but on Earth...rocks are close and touch each other. 


Is someone playing a game on Mars????

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#392631

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-09-16 13:48 -0700
Message-ID<57DC5A8B.10EA@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#392624
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> > > > >
> > > > > Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere.
> > > > >
> > > > > Rocks.
> > > >
> > > > Okay, since there is no vegetation on Mars,
> > > > what is there that NASA doesn't see?
> > > >
> > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> > > >
> > > > For one, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and  all over each other.
> > > >
> > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> > > >
> > > > NASA will try to show comparisons, but they won't mention the differences.
> > > >
> > > > They are either too stupid or crooks, or both.
> > >
> > > Of course...there are other differences,
> > >
> > > instead of looking for how they are alike, look for how they are.. unalike.
> > >
> > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> >
> > ...another difference is that the Mars rocks are pointing in a different direction.
> >
> > So, so far you got 3 difference
> >
> > 1) Vegetation is missing...on Mars
> >
> > 2) rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and  all over each other.
> >
> > 3)  Mars rocks are pointing in a different direction, they are pointing up towards the hill, not down down the hill.
> >
> > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> >
> > In other words...Mars rocks are nothing like those on Earth.
> 
> Here is a different photo of rocks on Mars...
> 
> If you notice, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other, (even the small stones are spaced apart from each other ) they don't touch each other..
> 
> http://minornotes.com/spirit1.jpg
> 
> but on Earth...rocks are close and touch each other.

The bottom line is, the characteristics and the behavior of rocks on Mars is not the same as rocks on Earth.


Earth rocks hug each other. Mars rocks are almost spaced apart from each other...evenly.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#392757

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-09-17 15:00 -0700
Message-ID<57DDBD08.79F8@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#392631
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rocks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Okay, since there is no vegetation on Mars,
> > > > > what is there that NASA doesn't see?
> > > > >
> > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> > > > >
> > > > > For one, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and  all over each other.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> > > > >
> > > > > NASA will try to show comparisons, but they won't mention the differences.
> > > > >
> > > > > They are either too stupid or crooks, or both.
> > > >
> > > > Of course...there are other differences,
> > > >
> > > > instead of looking for how they are alike, look for how they are.. unalike.
> > > >
> > > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> > >
> > > ...another difference is that the Mars rocks are pointing in a different direction.
> > >
> > > So, so far you got 3 difference
> > >
> > > 1) Vegetation is missing...on Mars
> > >
> > > 2) rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and  all over each other.
> > >
> > > 3)  Mars rocks are pointing in a different direction, they are pointing up towards the hill, not down down the hill.
> > >
> > > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> > >
> > > In other words...Mars rocks are nothing like those on Earth.
> >
> > Here is a different photo of rocks on Mars...
> >
> > If you notice, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other, (even the small stones are spaced apart from each other ) they don't touch each other..
> >
> > http://minornotes.com/spirit1.jpg
> >
> > but on Earth...rocks are close and touch each other.
> 
> The bottom line is, the characteristics and the behavior of rocks on Mars is not the same as rocks on Earth.
> 
> Earth rocks hug each other. Mars rocks are almost spaced apart from each other...evenly.



Mars rocks look nothing like that of Earth rocks...

another example there are rocks on Mars that look like they have zebra stipes, or groves like a screw driver:
https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-PU549_MARSRO_M_20160912222655.jpg


Fact is, Mars is unlike Earth. 


You guys have been hoodwinked by NASA bias.

shame on yous.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity


csiph-web