Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #392076 > unrolled thread

all people are computer simulations

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  all people are computer simulations The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-11 13:42 -0700
    all people are computer simulations "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-11 14:02 -0700
    Re: all people are computer simulations The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-11 16:59 -0700
    Re: all people are computer simulations The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 11:49 -0700
    Re: all people are computer simulations Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-13 11:59 -0700
      Re: all people are computer simulations Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-09-13 13:40 -0600

#392076 — all people are computer simulations

I hesitate to publish my findings..
that all people are computer simulations, because
you will never look at people the same way again.

People have two illusions.

The regular illusion you're familiar with, and
the optical illusion.

The 'regular illusion' is much stronger than
the 'optical illusion'.

The 'regular illusion' is...that people are just
highly complicated machines.

You look at your girlfriend (or girlfriend experience)
and you see the illusion..that she is just a machine.

A very highly complicated machines, a robot..
built in the form of a woman.

Ask your girlfriend, "What's your name?"

Of course she doesn't have the nuts and bolts,
with wires, built in motherboard and things like that..

but she has a face, Why? She's covered with flesh...
she's a lie....an illusion.

But the illusion goes away when she ..smiles.

Now...the 'optical illusion'...I hesitate to publish because
once I reveal to you the 'optical illusion'...it will not
go away with a smile. They will be seen as zeros and ones.


But to demonstrate that all people are computer simulations means
I have to publish...the 'optical illusion'.

That is something I have to think about...like a responsible hacker.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#392079

StarSharter sharted:

Blah blah shart, blah blah shart, sharty sharty bo barty.... sharty ...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#392100

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> I hesitate to publish my findings..
> that all people are computer simulations, because
> you will never look at people the same way again.
> 
> People have two illusions.
> 
> The regular illusion you're familiar with, and
> the optical illusion.
> 
> The 'regular illusion' is much stronger than
> the 'optical illusion'.
> 
> The 'regular illusion' is...that people are just
> highly complicated machines.
> 
> You look at your girlfriend (or girlfriend experience)
> and you see the illusion..that she is just a machine.
> 
> A very highly complicated machines, a robot..
> built in the form of a woman.
> 
> Ask your girlfriend, "What's your name?"
> 
> Of course she doesn't have the nuts and bolts,
> with wires, built in motherboard and things like that..
> 
> but she has a face, Why? She's covered with flesh...
> she's a lie....an illusion.
> 
> But the illusion goes away when she ..smiles.

I think I got this "illusion" backwards, let me correct it...

The illusion comes back ...when she smiles, she looks Human again.


> 
> Now...the 'optical illusion'...I hesitate to publish because
> once I reveal to you the 'optical illusion'...it will not
> go away with a smile. They will be seen as zeros and ones.


Once I reveal the 'optical illusion', it will disapear...and even a smile will not bring it back.
You will see people as  zeros and ones, forever. I don't yous people can handle it.


> 
> But to demonstrate that all people are computer simulations means
> I have to publish...the 'optical illusion'.
> 
> That is something I have to think about...like a responsible hacker.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#392238

in today's news...




Bank of America analysts claim there's a 50% chance we live in a 'Matrix
reality simulation'

    12:49, 13 Sep 2016
    

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/bank-america-analysts-claim-theres-8823425



The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> I hesitate to publish my findings..
> that all people are computer simulations, because
> you will never look at people the same way again.
> 
> People have two illusions.
> 
> The regular illusion you're familiar with, and
> the optical illusion.
> 
> The 'regular illusion' is much stronger than
> the 'optical illusion'.
> 
> The 'regular illusion' is...that people are just
> highly complicated machines.
> 
> You look at your girlfriend (or girlfriend experience)
> and you see the illusion..that she is just a machine.
> 
> A very highly complicated machines, a robot..
> built in the form of a woman.
> 
> Ask your girlfriend, "What's your name?"
> 
> Of course she doesn't have the nuts and bolts,
> with wires, built in motherboard and things like that..
> 
> but she has a face, Why? She's covered with flesh...
> she's a lie....an illusion.
> 
> But the illusion goes away when she ..smiles.
> 
> Now...the 'optical illusion'...I hesitate to publish because
> once I reveal to you the 'optical illusion'...it will not
> go away with a smile. They will be seen as zeros and ones.
> 
> But to demonstrate that all people are computer simulations means
> I have to publish...the 'optical illusion'.
> 
> That is something I have to think about...like a responsible hacker.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#392239

On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 2:41:36 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> I hesitate to publish my findings..
> that all people are computer simulations,


Speak for yourself.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#392241

On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 2:41:36 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> I hesitate to publish my findings..
> that all people are computer simulations,

When I was young, all computer simulations were people.

It was not until fairly late in WWII 
that there were any computers that were not people!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web