Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #451272
| Message-ID | <57D84A27.406C@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-13 11:49 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: all people are computer simulations |
| References | <57D5C1B7.4D5C@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
in today's news...
Bank of America analysts claim there's a 50% chance we live in a 'Matrix
reality simulation'
12:49, 13 Sep 2016
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/bank-america-analysts-claim-theres-8823425
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> I hesitate to publish my findings..
> that all people are computer simulations, because
> you will never look at people the same way again.
>
> People have two illusions.
>
> The regular illusion you're familiar with, and
> the optical illusion.
>
> The 'regular illusion' is much stronger than
> the 'optical illusion'.
>
> The 'regular illusion' is...that people are just
> highly complicated machines.
>
> You look at your girlfriend (or girlfriend experience)
> and you see the illusion..that she is just a machine.
>
> A very highly complicated machines, a robot..
> built in the form of a woman.
>
> Ask your girlfriend, "What's your name?"
>
> Of course she doesn't have the nuts and bolts,
> with wires, built in motherboard and things like that..
>
> but she has a face, Why? She's covered with flesh...
> she's a lie....an illusion.
>
> But the illusion goes away when she ..smiles.
>
> Now...the 'optical illusion'...I hesitate to publish because
> once I reveal to you the 'optical illusion'...it will not
> go away with a smile. They will be seen as zeros and ones.
>
> But to demonstrate that all people are computer simulations means
> I have to publish...the 'optical illusion'.
>
> That is something I have to think about...like a responsible hacker.
Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
all people are computer simulations The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-11 13:42 -0700
Re: all people are computer simulations Sergoi <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-11 16:02 -0500
Re: all people are computer simulations djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-11 21:10 +0000
Re: all people are computer simulations quasi <quasi@null.set> - 2016-09-11 17:43 -0400
Re: all people are computer simulations Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-11 23:04 +0100
Re: all people are computer simulations goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu (David Goldfarb) - 2016-09-12 00:42 +0000
Re: all people are computer simulations The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-11 18:34 -0700
Re: all people are computer simulations The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-11 16:59 -0700
Re: all people are computer simulations The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 11:49 -0700
csiph-web