Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376358 > unrolled thread

GRAVITY...

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 11:44 -0800
    Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:44 -0600
      Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 12:49 -0800
        Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0600
          Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 14:27 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 17:31 -0600
              Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 15:54 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:05 -0600
                  Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 21:28 -0800
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:37 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 09:42 -0800
        Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:48 -0600
          Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 15:12 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-17 15:29 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:02 -0600
            Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 23:54 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:40 -0500
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 11:16 -0500
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 11:26 -0800
                  Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:06 -0600
                    Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 14:09 -0800
                      Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 16:12 -0600
                        Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 16:29 -0800
                        Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 05:00 -0800
                      Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:06 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:24 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY... Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 05:33 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0600
          Re: GRAVITY... Monique de Brabant <moniqb@cafedelmar.org> - 2016-02-18 15:55 +0000

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#376497 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
> > proves that people fall down.
> 
>    What force causes them to fall down?
> 


I don't care to speculate.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376498 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

On 2/18/16 4:09 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Sam Wormley wrote:
>>
>> On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
>>> proves that people fall down.
>>
>>     What force causes them to fall down?
>>
>
>
> I don't care to speculate.
>

   No problem, the rest of us know.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376502 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 2/18/16 4:09 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Sam Wormley wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
> >>> proves that people fall down.
> >>
> >>     What force causes them to fall down?
> >>
> >
> >
> > I don't care to speculate.
> >
> 
>    No problem, the rest of us know.
> 


The rest of yous know 'What force causes them to fall down' is not known, and has not proven to be true.


Unless you can point to a link that states unequivocally that the theory of gravity has been proven to be true...



I'll accept user-edited websites like wiki.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376550 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 10:12:05 PM UTC, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 2/18/16 4:09 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Sam Wormley wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
> >>> proves that people fall down.
> >>
> >>     What force causes them to fall down?
> >>
> >
> >
> > I don't care to speculate.
> >
> 
>    No problem, the rest of us know.
> 
> 

Shame that nobody gets the scam.

There was no 'theory of gravity', there was only this idea that experimental sciences scale all the way up to planetary motions -

"Rule III. The qualities of bodies, which admit neither [intensification] nor remission of degrees, and which are found to belong to all bodies within the reach of our experiments, are to be esteemed the universal qualities of all bodies whatsoever." Newton 

Want to turn a common greenhouse into the planet Earth (universal qualities) or the planet Earth into a common greenhouse then thank Sir Isaac. Want to turn the falling apple into the orbital motion of the Earth or the Earth into a falling apple then Isaac is your man. Instead of a falling apple, call it the planet Earth 'falling around' the Sun or better still, call 'falling around' angular momentum and look superior.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376574 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >
> > On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
> > > proves that people fall down.
> >
> >    What force causes them to fall down?
> >
> 
> I don't care to speculate.



but i do suspect the Sun is doing all the leg work...is there
electricity inside the sun?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376598

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >
> > On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
> >
> >    You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
> >    therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
> >    into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.
> 
> You have no evidence that gravity exist.
> 
> I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
> 
> : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
> 
> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
> 
> or
> 
> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
> 
> Ja or nien?


Sam Wormley could not answer the question "is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??" because...

the truth can be answered with either a Yes or No answer.


Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.


Are there aliens on other planets? No.


Is there water on Mars? No.


Are we alone. Yes.


Is there a God?


You might not know the answer but it's either yes or no...



Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376620

On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 12:23:39 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> the truth can be answered with either a Yes or No answer.

True.

> Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.

"Can be" but not by us.  At our stage of development, we must answer many
questions with "We don't know."

> Are there aliens on other planets? No.

False.  At the VERY least, this must be a "We don't know" answer.

"I'll tell you one thing about the universe, though. The universe is a
pretty big place. It's bigger than anything anyone has ever dreamed
of before. So if it's just us... seems like an awful waste of space."

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118884/quotes

Certainly, YOU don't know and cannot not answer with either a "yes" or "no."

> Is there water on Mars? No.

False:

http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-confirms-evidence-that-liquid-water-flows-on-today-s-mars

> Are we alone. Yes.

False.  This question is a composite of "Are there aliens on other planets"
and the one here:

> Is there a God?
> 
> 
> You might not know the answer but it's either yes or no...

Many people know the answer to this question.  Only people that claim the
answer is "No" are wrong.

> Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.

"Can be" but not by us.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376670

On 2/20/16 1:24 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Sam Wormley could not answer the question "is Gravity a Theory?



   Gravitation is a fundamental force described mathematically by Sir
   Isaac Newton's Law of Gravitation.

   Einstein's theory of gravitation (general relativity) is even more
   accurate than Newton's and supported by countless experiments and
   observations, including GNSS 24/7.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376414

On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist and is true...how can you find gravity waves?


   Gravitation, magnetic field, like electric filed can be static and
   can change and can have ripples.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376449

Sam Wormley wrote:

> On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist and is true...how
>> can you find gravity waves?
>
>    Gravitation, magnetic field, like electric filed can be static and
>    can change and can have ripples.

You mean spacetime, not gravity, mister. Gravity is something else, a 
phenomenon, not a medium not a field. You have much to learn in physics.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web