Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #358441 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-23 12:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-07-24 04:25 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 230 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-23 12:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-23 18:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-23 20:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 00:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 11:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 16:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 18:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-24 18:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 00:20 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 06:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 11:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-28 18:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-28 17:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-26 03:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-27 04:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-29 03:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 07:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:17 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 09:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 10:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-02 11:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 12:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 12:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-02 14:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 15:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 16:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-02 10:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-03 03:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-03 09:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-03 18:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-04 15:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-03 17:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-04 18:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-05 12:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-06 19:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-06 17:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 01:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 20:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 22:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-07 09:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 16:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-08 04:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 08:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 14:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-08 18:12 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 08:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-08 14:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 14:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 00:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 12:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-07 15:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-07 15:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 12:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 13:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-16 12:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-20 12:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-04 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-16 12:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> - 2015-08-18 19:04 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 12:33 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2015-08-19 18:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 21:52 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-29 11:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-29 13:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-29 18:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-30 06:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-30 11:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-31 04:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:19 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-31 12:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 21:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 00:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-31 22:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 22:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 01:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-01 12:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 11:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-25 10:32 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 09:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-26 10:09 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 06:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-25 11:31 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-26 15:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-07-26 22:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-26 23:03 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-27 18:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-24 04:25 -0400
Page 5 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 12 Next page →
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 14:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ruo1ta5f5ujjchrc379rer549d9ofl63dh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360959 |
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 04:01:36 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:48:25 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><v9rusapp79p6e91o4qhe3esapag5fgaest@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 03:19:26 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:51:17 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><iedksah7bs1ep4iuqh0q39q4i1vh5kaq5g@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>Since you refuse to acknowledge the difference between one unverified >>>>>source and thousands of independently verified sources no additional >>>>>discussion is possible. >>>> >>>>Why are they unverified. People actually experienced life then. >>> >>>See? You prove my point. >> >>I know I did mine. > >You have only proven how brainwashed you are. When I'm right, I'm right. >>>>>Based upon your logic every word in Gone With the Wind describes an >>>>>true and accurate account of actual events. >>>> >>>>No reason to believe that. >> >>>As much reason as there is to believe any of the drivel in your book >>>of superstitions. >> >>The skin off your ass, not mine. >That doesn't bother me in the slightest. Well, it sure doesn't bother me. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mqqq7m$her$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #361022 |
On 8/16/2015 2:26 PM, duke wrote: > On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 04:01:36 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:48:25 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >> alt.atheism with message-id >> <v9rusapp79p6e91o4qhe3esapag5fgaest@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 03:19:26 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:51:17 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>> <iedksah7bs1ep4iuqh0q39q4i1vh5kaq5g@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Since you refuse to acknowledge the difference between one unverified >>>>>> source and thousands of independently verified sources no additional >>>>>> discussion is possible. >>>>> >>>>> Why are they unverified. People actually experienced life then. >>>> >>>> See? You prove my point. >>> >>> I know I did mine. >> >> You have only proven how brainwashed you are. > > When I'm right, I'm right. > >>>>>> Based upon your logic every word in Gone With the Wind describes an >>>>>> true and accurate account of actual events. >>>>> >>>>> No reason to believe that. >>> >>>> As much reason as there is to believe any of the drivel in your book >>>> of superstitions. >>> >>> The skin off your ass, not mine. > >> That doesn't bother me in the slightest. > > Well, it sure doesn't bother me. > > the dukester, American-American > > ***** > "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI > ***** > It should.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 05:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <bbb3tahvia1t9n21n59v5908edduibl341@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361022 |
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:26:51 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <ruo1ta5f5ujjchrc379rer549d9ofl63dh@4ax.com> wrote: >On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 04:01:36 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:48:25 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><v9rusapp79p6e91o4qhe3esapag5fgaest@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 03:19:26 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:51:17 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><iedksah7bs1ep4iuqh0q39q4i1vh5kaq5g@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>Since you refuse to acknowledge the difference between one unverified >>>>>>source and thousands of independently verified sources no additional >>>>>>discussion is possible. >>>>> >>>>>Why are they unverified. People actually experienced life then. >>>> >>>>See? You prove my point. >>> >>>I know I did mine. >> >>You have only proven how brainwashed you are. > >When I'm right, I'm right. When your are brainwashed, you are brainwashed. > >>>>>>Based upon your logic every word in Gone With the Wind describes an >>>>>>true and accurate account of actual events. >>>>> >>>>>No reason to believe that. >>> >>>>As much reason as there is to believe any of the drivel in your book >>>>of superstitions. >>> >>>The skin off your ass, not mine. > >>That doesn't bother me in the slightest. > >Well, it sure doesn't bother me. > It seems to - you harp on it often enough. According to you I am going to hell. According to me no such place has ever been proven to exist. Those points have been firmly established. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 04:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <f1j3sad4c4k1ia3spt0i27pf477qopqmt1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359643 |
On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: > >>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>> etc. >> >>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. > >What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. > What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or indirectly, with your bible? Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization connected to it? What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 13:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <s4n4sapjfaebpm0nr1ct0vqt4bbf7huigd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359684 |
On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:44:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >> >>>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>> etc. >>> >>>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >> >>What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >indirectly, with your bible? You don't have a clue as to what I have nor how it is found in the bible. You're going to have to do some quick study if you want to engage in serious discussion. > Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' >by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization >connected to it? >What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? >Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? Yep, exactly what you have after the last eye witnessed died. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 05:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <qp86sa18a9s2mmpq4t4fp5ddpg253hktl4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359751 |
On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:59:37 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <s4n4sapjfaebpm0nr1ct0vqt4bbf7huigd@4ax.com> wrote: >On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:44:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>> etc. >>>> >>>>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>> >>>What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. > >>What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>indirectly, with your bible? > >You don't have a clue as to what I have So you say, and refuse to elaborate. > nor how it is found in the bible. You evidently can't understand that what is found in that source DOES NOT MATTER! >You're >going to have to do some quick study if you want to engage in serious >discussion. Study what? > >> Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' >>by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization >>connected to it? >>What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? >>Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? > >Yep, exactly what you have after the last eye witnessed died. > Obviously you do not. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 16:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <b1aasa588bg2g87ihj51edvvk5bio3kbaf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359796 |
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:06:52 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:59:37 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><s4n4sapjfaebpm0nr1ct0vqt4bbf7huigd@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:44:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>> etc. >>>>> >>>>>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>> >>>>What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >> >>>What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>indirectly, with your bible? >> >>You don't have a clue as to what I have > >So you say, and refuse to elaborate. We people of God outnumber you atheist 25:1 >> nor how it is found in the bible. >You evidently can't understand that what is found in that source DOES >NOT MATTER! Not to you that want nothing to do with God. > >>You're >>going to have to do some quick study if you want to engage in serious >>discussion. > >Study what? > >> >>> Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' >>>by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization >>>connected to it? >>>What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? >>>Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? >> >>Yep, exactly what you have after the last eye witnessed died. >> > >Obviously you do not. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 04:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ogebsa9oeuo922b4esip9uq9jpm9h0loab@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359963 |
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:51:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <b1aasa588bg2g87ihj51edvvk5bio3kbaf@4ax.com> wrote: >On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:06:52 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:59:37 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><s4n4sapjfaebpm0nr1ct0vqt4bbf7huigd@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:44:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>> etc. >>>>>> >>>>>>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>> >>>>>What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>> >>>>What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>indirectly, with your bible? >>> >>>You don't have a clue as to what I have >> >>So you say, and refuse to elaborate. > >We people of God outnumber you atheist 25:1 Which means what? Numbers alone prove something? As I have frequently asked and you of course have never answered - does that mean back when your superstition was just starting out and only a few people had even heard of it does that mean the numbers involved made it invalid? Just how many does it take to 'prove' a superstition is valid? > >>> nor how it is found in the bible. > >>You evidently can't understand that what is found in that source DOES >>NOT MATTER! > >Not to you that want nothing to do with God. Because it has never been validated as far as what it says is concerned. How does anyone know it's contents are not pure mythology? After all, a lot of it is a bit unlikely, and physically impossible. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 13:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pthcsa1qp81s6n2i2ccjpekv9k2loqptda@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359992 |
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:19:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:51:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><b1aasa588bg2g87ihj51edvvk5bio3kbaf@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:06:52 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:59:37 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><s4n4sapjfaebpm0nr1ct0vqt4bbf7huigd@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:44:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>> >>>>>>What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>>Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>> >>>>>What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>indirectly, with your bible? >>>> >>>>You don't have a clue as to what I have >>> >>>So you say, and refuse to elaborate. >> >>We people of God outnumber you atheist 25:1 > >Which means what? Numbers alone prove something? Just wanted you to know that you are clearly in a minority. >As I have frequently asked and you of course have never answered - >does that mean back when your superstition was just starting out and >only a few people had even heard of it does that mean the numbers >involved made it invalid? >Just how many does it take to 'prove' a superstition is valid? I would say the answer is one (1). > >> >>>> nor how it is found in the bible. >> >>>You evidently can't understand that what is found in that source DOES >>>NOT MATTER! >> >>Not to you that want nothing to do with God. > >Because it has never been validated as far as what it says is >concerned. How does anyone know it's contents are not pure mythology? >After all, a lot of it is a bit unlikely, and physically impossible. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 04:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <hv4esalk46telejbmg7952m6mmnc6is65l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360031 |
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:19:05 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <pthcsa1qp81s6n2i2ccjpekv9k2loqptda@4ax.com> wrote: >On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:19:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:51:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><b1aasa588bg2g87ihj51edvvk5bio3kbaf@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:06:52 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:59:37 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><s4n4sapjfaebpm0nr1ct0vqt4bbf7huigd@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:44:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>>>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>>>Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>> >>>>>>What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>>indirectly, with your bible? >>>>> >>>>>You don't have a clue as to what I have >>>> >>>>So you say, and refuse to elaborate. >>> >>>We people of God outnumber you atheist 25:1 >> >>Which means what? Numbers alone prove something? > >Just wanted you to know that you are clearly in a minority. So what? It isn't the first time. And I am in good company. Many people were in a minority when they first took a position, and were later shown to be correct. Sometimes a minority of one. > >>As I have frequently asked and you of course have never answered - >>does that mean back when your superstition was just starting out and >>only a few people had even heard of it does that mean the numbers >>involved made it invalid? >>Just how many does it take to 'prove' a superstition is valid? > >I would say the answer is one (1). Amusing. That would make every superstition valid wouldn't it? Why do you keep mentioning my position is in a minority and most people disagree with me when it only takes one to "validate" something? >> >>> >>>>> nor how it is found in the bible. >>> >>>>You evidently can't understand that what is found in that source DOES >>>>NOT MATTER! >>> >>>Not to you that want nothing to do with God. >> >>Because it has never been validated as far as what it says is >>concerned. How does anyone know it's contents are not pure mythology? >>After all, a lot of it is a bit unlikely, and physically impossible. > -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 09:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6mpesatddc86osfghkug9om4tmqilj6f0v@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360080 |
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 04:54:24 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:19:05 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><pthcsa1qp81s6n2i2ccjpekv9k2loqptda@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:19:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:51:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><b1aasa588bg2g87ihj51edvvk5bio3kbaf@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:06:52 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:59:37 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><s4n4sapjfaebpm0nr1ct0vqt4bbf7huigd@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:44:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>>>>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>>>>Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>>> >>>>>>>What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>>>indirectly, with your bible? >>>>>> >>>>>>You don't have a clue as to what I have >>>>> >>>>>So you say, and refuse to elaborate. >>>> >>>>We people of God outnumber you atheist 25:1 >>> >>>Which means what? Numbers alone prove something? >> >>Just wanted you to know that you are clearly in a minority. > >So what? It isn't the first time. Nor the last. >And I am in good company. Many people were in a minority when they >first took a position, and were later shown to be correct. Sometimes >a minority of one. And I rest my case on my correct position. >>>As I have frequently asked and you of course have never answered - >>>does that mean back when your superstition was just starting out and >>>only a few people had even heard of it does that mean the numbers >>>involved made it invalid? >>>Just how many does it take to 'prove' a superstition is valid? >> >>I would say the answer is one (1). Nope, but as you said, all it takes is one sometimes. >Amusing. That would make every superstition valid wouldn't it? >Why do you keep mentioning my position is in a minority and most >people disagree with me when it only takes one to "validate" >something? All depends on what you're trying to validate. >>>>>> nor how it is found in the bible. >>>> >>>>>You evidently can't understand that what is found in that source DOES >>>>>NOT MATTER! >>>> >>>>Not to you that want nothing to do with God. >>> >>>Because it has never been validated as far as what it says is >>>concerned. How does anyone know it's contents are not pure mythology? >>>After all, a lot of it is a bit unlikely, and physically impossible. I have the same validity of evidence for the cross as you have or the American Revolution. - artifacts, documents, paintings, etc. But no live witnesses, videos, tv cameras, etc. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 05:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <6nqgsa54qtjl59k7fb8o1qc26e71dm9enf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360107 |
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:46:50 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <6mpesatddc86osfghkug9om4tmqilj6f0v@4ax.com> wrote: >On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 04:54:24 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:19:05 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><pthcsa1qp81s6n2i2ccjpekv9k2loqptda@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:19:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:51:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><b1aasa588bg2g87ihj51edvvk5bio3kbaf@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:06:52 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:59:37 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><s4n4sapjfaebpm0nr1ct0vqt4bbf7huigd@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:44:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>><9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>>>>>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>>>>>Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>>>>indirectly, with your bible? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You don't have a clue as to what I have >>>>>> >>>>>>So you say, and refuse to elaborate. >>>>> >>>>>We people of God outnumber you atheist 25:1 >>>> >>>>Which means what? Numbers alone prove something? >>> >>>Just wanted you to know that you are clearly in a minority. >> >>So what? It isn't the first time. > >Nor the last. Nope. I don't expect it to be. > >>And I am in good company. Many people were in a minority when they >>first took a position, and were later shown to be correct. Sometimes >>a minority of one. > >And I rest my case on my correct position. Nope. You are still wrong. I would point out you were the one who tried to use numbers to support your unsupportable position. > > >>>>As I have frequently asked and you of course have never answered - >>>>does that mean back when your superstition was just starting out and >>>>only a few people had even heard of it does that mean the numbers >>>>involved made it invalid? >>>>Just how many does it take to 'prove' a superstition is valid? >>> >>>I would say the answer is one (1). > >Nope, but as you said, all it takes is one sometimes. Then why did you introduce numbers as if those alone proved you assertion to be correct? > >>Amusing. That would make every superstition valid wouldn't it? > >>Why do you keep mentioning my position is in a minority and most >>people disagree with me when it only takes one to "validate" >>something? > >All depends on what you're trying to validate. No, it doesn't. > >>>>>>> nor how it is found in the bible. >>>>> >>>>>>You evidently can't understand that what is found in that source DOES >>>>>>NOT MATTER! >>>>> >>>>>Not to you that want nothing to do with God. >>>> >>>>Because it has never been validated as far as what it says is >>>>concerned. How does anyone know it's contents are not pure mythology? >>>>After all, a lot of it is a bit unlikely, and physically impossible. > >I have the same validity of evidence for the cross as you have or the American >Revolution. - artifacts, documents, paintings, etc. But no live witnesses, >videos, tv cameras, etc. > Covered elsewhere. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 12:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6hdksa9ei1456majqjlithmd5l0iuu88uu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360197 |
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:15:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:46:50 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><6mpesatddc86osfghkug9om4tmqilj6f0v@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 04:54:24 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:19:05 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><pthcsa1qp81s6n2i2ccjpekv9k2loqptda@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:19:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:51:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><b1aasa588bg2g87ihj51edvvk5bio3kbaf@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:06:52 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:59:37 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><s4n4sapjfaebpm0nr1ct0vqt4bbf7huigd@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:44:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>><9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>>>>>>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>>>>>>Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>>>>>indirectly, with your bible? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You don't have a clue as to what I have >>>>>>> >>>>>>>So you say, and refuse to elaborate. >>>>>> >>>>>>We people of God outnumber you atheist 25:1 >>>>> >>>>>Which means what? Numbers alone prove something? >>>> >>>>Just wanted you to know that you are clearly in a minority. >>> >>>So what? It isn't the first time. >> >>Nor the last. > >Nope. I don't expect it to be. Then we both agree you are in the minority. >>>And I am in good company. Many people were in a minority when they >>>first took a position, and were later shown to be correct. Sometimes >>>a minority of one. >> >>And I rest my case on my correct position. > >Nope. You are still wrong. I would point out you were the one who >tried to use numbers to support your unsupportable position. Go ahead. >>>>>As I have frequently asked and you of course have never answered - >>>>>does that mean back when your superstition was just starting out and >>>>>only a few people had even heard of it does that mean the numbers >>>>>involved made it invalid? >>>>>Just how many does it take to 'prove' a superstition is valid? >>>> >>>>I would say the answer is one (1). >> >>Nope, but as you said, all it takes is one sometimes. > >Then why did you introduce numbers as if those alone proved you >assertion to be correct? To give you reason to accept that you are thus wrong. >>>Amusing. That would make every superstition valid wouldn't it? >> >>>Why do you keep mentioning my position is in a minority and most >>>people disagree with me when it only takes one to "validate" >>>something? >> >>All depends on what you're trying to validate. > >No, it doesn't. Yep. >>>>>>>> nor how it is found in the bible. >>>>>> >>>>>>>You evidently can't understand that what is found in that source DOES >>>>>>>NOT MATTER! >>>>>> >>>>>>Not to you that want nothing to do with God. >>>>> >>>>>Because it has never been validated as far as what it says is >>>>>concerned. How does anyone know it's contents are not pure mythology? >>>>>After all, a lot of it is a bit unlikely, and physically impossible. >> >>I have the same validity of evidence for the cross as you have or the American >>Revolution. - artifacts, documents, paintings, etc. But no live witnesses, >>videos, tv cameras, etc. >> >Covered elsewhere. Nope. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 03:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <3dslsa98na103mgalbm8rekmnsjl4qe4mk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360355 |
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:53:11 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <6hdksa9ei1456majqjlithmd5l0iuu88uu@4ax.com> wrote: >On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:15:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:46:50 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><6mpesatddc86osfghkug9om4tmqilj6f0v@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 04:54:24 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:19:05 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><pthcsa1qp81s6n2i2ccjpekv9k2loqptda@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:19:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:51:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><b1aasa588bg2g87ihj51edvvk5bio3kbaf@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:06:52 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:59:37 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>><s4n4sapjfaebpm0nr1ct0vqt4bbf7huigd@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:44:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>><9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>>>>>>>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>>>>>>>Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>>>>>>indirectly, with your bible? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>You don't have a clue as to what I have >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>So you say, and refuse to elaborate. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>We people of God outnumber you atheist 25:1 >>>>>> >>>>>>Which means what? Numbers alone prove something? >>>>> >>>>>Just wanted you to know that you are clearly in a minority. >>>> >>>>So what? It isn't the first time. >>> >>>Nor the last. >> >>Nope. I don't expect it to be. > >Then we both agree you are in the minority. Yep. So what? According to you that must make me correct. > >>>>And I am in good company. Many people were in a minority when they >>>>first took a position, and were later shown to be correct. Sometimes >>>>a minority of one. >>> >>>And I rest my case on my correct position. >> >>Nope. You are still wrong. I would point out you were the one who >>tried to use numbers to support your unsupportable position. > >Go ahead. I just did, you moron. > >>>>>>As I have frequently asked and you of course have never answered - >>>>>>does that mean back when your superstition was just starting out and >>>>>>only a few people had even heard of it does that mean the numbers >>>>>>involved made it invalid? >>>>>>Just how many does it take to 'prove' a superstition is valid? >>>>> >>>>>I would say the answer is one (1). >>> >>>Nope, but as you said, all it takes is one sometimes. >> >>Then why did you introduce numbers as if those alone proved you >>assertion to be correct? > >To give you reason to accept that you are thus wrong. So now numbers prove something? It appears you want it both ways. > >>>>Amusing. That would make every superstition valid wouldn't it? >>> >>>>Why do you keep mentioning my position is in a minority and most >>>>people disagree with me when it only takes one to "validate" >>>>something? >>> >>>All depends on what you're trying to validate. >> >>No, it doesn't. > >Yep. Of course it does. > >>>>>>>>> nor how it is found in the bible. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You evidently can't understand that what is found in that source DOES >>>>>>>>NOT MATTER! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Not to you that want nothing to do with God. >>>>>> >>>>>>Because it has never been validated as far as what it says is >>>>>>concerned. How does anyone know it's contents are not pure mythology? >>>>>>After all, a lot of it is a bit unlikely, and physically impossible. >>> >>>I have the same validity of evidence for the cross as you have or the American >>>Revolution. - artifacts, documents, paintings, etc. But no live witnesses, >>>videos, tv cameras, etc. >>> >>Covered elsewhere. > >Nope. > Of course it was, but your denial doesn't allow you to admit it for some reason. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 14:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <edo1tadlsvur7ooa4gfac8as58l71ld6ui@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360432 |
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 03:15:05 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:53:11 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><6hdksa9ei1456majqjlithmd5l0iuu88uu@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:15:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:46:50 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><6mpesatddc86osfghkug9om4tmqilj6f0v@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 04:54:24 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:19:05 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><pthcsa1qp81s6n2i2ccjpekv9k2loqptda@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:19:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:51:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><b1aasa588bg2g87ihj51edvvk5bio3kbaf@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:06:52 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:59:37 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>><s4n4sapjfaebpm0nr1ct0vqt4bbf7huigd@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:44:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>><9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>>>>>>>>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>>>>>>>>Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>>>>>>>indirectly, with your bible? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>You don't have a clue as to what I have >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>So you say, and refuse to elaborate. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>We people of God outnumber you atheist 25:1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Which means what? Numbers alone prove something? >>>>>> >>>>>>Just wanted you to know that you are clearly in a minority. >>>>> >>>>>So what? It isn't the first time. >>>> >>>>Nor the last. >>> >>>Nope. I don't expect it to be. >> >>Then we both agree you are in the minority. > >Yep. So what? According to you that must make me correct. Nope, that the huge majority, seeing a lot more than you do, sees you in error. >>>>>>>As I have frequently asked and you of course have never answered - >>>>>>>does that mean back when your superstition was just starting out and >>>>>>>only a few people had even heard of it does that mean the numbers >>>>>>>involved made it invalid? >>>>>>>Just how many does it take to 'prove' a superstition is valid? >>>>>> >>>>>>I would say the answer is one (1). >>>> >>>>Nope, but as you said, all it takes is one sometimes. >>> >>>Then why did you introduce numbers as if those alone proved you >>>assertion to be correct? >> >>To give you reason to accept that you are thus wrong. > >So now numbers prove something? It appears you want it both ways. Proves you are in the minority in your assessments. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mqqq6c$her$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #361018 |
On 8/16/2015 2:18 PM, duke wrote: > On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 03:15:05 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:53:11 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >> alt.atheism with message-id >> <6hdksa9ei1456majqjlithmd5l0iuu88uu@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:15:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:46:50 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>> <6mpesatddc86osfghkug9om4tmqilj6f0v@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 04:54:24 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:19:05 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>> <pthcsa1qp81s6n2i2ccjpekv9k2loqptda@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:19:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:51:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>> <b1aasa588bg2g87ihj51edvvk5bio3kbaf@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:06:52 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:59:37 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>> <s4n4sapjfaebpm0nr1ct0vqt4bbf7huigd@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:44:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>> <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>>>>>>>>> Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>>>>>>>> indirectly, with your bible? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You don't have a clue as to what I have >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So you say, and refuse to elaborate. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We people of God outnumber you atheist 25:1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Which means what? Numbers alone prove something? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just wanted you to know that you are clearly in a minority. >>>>>> >>>>>> So what? It isn't the first time. >>>>> >>>>> Nor the last. >>>> >>>> Nope. I don't expect it to be. >>> >>> Then we both agree you are in the minority. >> >> Yep. So what? According to you that must make me correct. > > Nope, that the huge majority, seeing a lot more than you do, sees you in error. > >>>>>>>> As I have frequently asked and you of course have never answered - >>>>>>>> does that mean back when your superstition was just starting out and >>>>>>>> only a few people had even heard of it does that mean the numbers >>>>>>>> involved made it invalid? >>>>>>>> Just how many does it take to 'prove' a superstition is valid? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would say the answer is one (1). >>>>> >>>>> Nope, but as you said, all it takes is one sometimes. >>>> >>>> Then why did you introduce numbers as if those alone proved you >>>> assertion to be correct? >>> >>> To give you reason to accept that you are thus wrong. >> >> So now numbers prove something? It appears you want it both ways. > > Proves you are in the minority in your assessments. > > > the dukester, American-American > > ***** > "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI > ***** > What makes you think so?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 05:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <osa3tahek108511aful0kpau8mi8hqhol0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361018 |
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:18:24 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <edo1tadlsvur7ooa4gfac8as58l71ld6ui@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>>>>>>>>>Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>>>>>>>>indirectly, with your bible? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>You don't have a clue as to what I have >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>So you say, and refuse to elaborate. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>We people of God outnumber you atheist 25:1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Which means what? Numbers alone prove something? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Just wanted you to know that you are clearly in a minority. >>>>>> >>>>>>So what? It isn't the first time. >>>>> >>>>>Nor the last. >>>> >>>>Nope. I don't expect it to be. >>> >>>Then we both agree you are in the minority. >> >>Yep. So what? According to you that must make me correct. > >Nope, that the huge majority, seeing a lot more than you do, sees you in error. Now you think numbers alone make anything correct? How many examples of such 'majority rules' in the past that turned out to be utter balderdash do you want? I have given you a number of such examples in prior conversations. With you there is nothing new under the sun - you just trot out the same lame excuses over and over. With you either one can prove something valid or a huge majority can prove something valid - depending on which you need at the particular time in question. > >>>>>>>>As I have frequently asked and you of course have never answered - >>>>>>>>does that mean back when your superstition was just starting out and >>>>>>>>only a few people had even heard of it does that mean the numbers >>>>>>>>involved made it invalid? >>>>>>>>Just how many does it take to 'prove' a superstition is valid? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I would say the answer is one (1). >>>>> >>>>>Nope, but as you said, all it takes is one sometimes. >>>> >>>>Then why did you introduce numbers as if those alone proved you >>>>assertion to be correct? >>> >>>To give you reason to accept that you are thus wrong. >> >>So now numbers prove something? It appears you want it both ways. > >Proves you are in the minority in your assessments. According to your prior comments one person can be correct and everyone else incorrect. Isn't that true? -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 01:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55C31685.54A6@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #359684 |
Attila < wrote: > > On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > alt.atheism with message-id > <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: > > >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: > > > >>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: > >>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye > >>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, > >>> etc. > >> > >>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. > > > >What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus > >Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. > > > > What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or > indirectly, with your bible? Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' > by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization > connected to it? > > What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? > > Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? “Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works—a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 20:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <glv7sa1seaqn0ko9hfhvjhsgmj08d689ic@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359789 |
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 01:10:45 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <55C31685.54A6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Attila < wrote: >> >> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >> alt.atheism with message-id >> <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >> >> >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >> > >> >>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >> >>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >> >>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >> >>> etc. >> >> >> >>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >> > >> >What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >> >Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >> > >> >> What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >> indirectly, with your bible? Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' >> by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization >> connected to it? >> >> What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? >> >> Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? > > >“Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to >call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works—a teacher of such >men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of >the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when >Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned >him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, >for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine >prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things >concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not >extinct at this day.” >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries ago to fit the necessary pattern. There is no independent verification from any other sources supporting him. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 22:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55C441F1.4E46@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #359863 |
Attila < wrote: > > On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 01:10:45 -0700, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id > <55C31685.54A6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >Attila < wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> alt.atheism with message-id > >> <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: > >> > > >> >>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: > >> >>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye > >> >>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, > >> >>> etc. > >> >> > >> >>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. > >> > > >> >What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus > >> >Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. > >> > > >> > >> What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or > >> indirectly, with your bible? Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' > >> by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization > >> connected to it? > >> > >> What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? > >> > >> Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? > > > > > >“Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to > >call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works—a teacher of such > >men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of > >the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when > >Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned > >him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, > >for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine > >prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things > >concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not > >extinct at this day.” > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus > > It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries > ago to fit the necessary pattern. There is no independent > verification from any other sources supporting him. > I'm shocked. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web