Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #1961832
| From | Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism, rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. |
| Date | 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mqqq6c$her$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <6mpesatddc86osfghkug9om4tmqilj6f0v@4ax.com> <6nqgsa54qtjl59k7fb8o1qc26e71dm9enf@4ax.com> <6hdksa9ei1456majqjlithmd5l0iuu88uu@4ax.com> <3dslsa98na103mgalbm8rekmnsjl4qe4mk@4ax.com> <edo1tadlsvur7ooa4gfac8as58l71ld6ui@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 8/16/2015 2:18 PM, duke wrote: > On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 03:15:05 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:53:11 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >> alt.atheism with message-id >> <6hdksa9ei1456majqjlithmd5l0iuu88uu@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:15:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:46:50 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>> <6mpesatddc86osfghkug9om4tmqilj6f0v@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 04:54:24 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:19:05 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>> <pthcsa1qp81s6n2i2ccjpekv9k2loqptda@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:19:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:51:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>> <b1aasa588bg2g87ihj51edvvk5bio3kbaf@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:06:52 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:59:37 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>> <s4n4sapjfaebpm0nr1ct0vqt4bbf7huigd@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:44:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>> <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>>>>>>>>> Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>>>>>>>> indirectly, with your bible? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You don't have a clue as to what I have >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So you say, and refuse to elaborate. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We people of God outnumber you atheist 25:1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Which means what? Numbers alone prove something? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just wanted you to know that you are clearly in a minority. >>>>>> >>>>>> So what? It isn't the first time. >>>>> >>>>> Nor the last. >>>> >>>> Nope. I don't expect it to be. >>> >>> Then we both agree you are in the minority. >> >> Yep. So what? According to you that must make me correct. > > Nope, that the huge majority, seeing a lot more than you do, sees you in error. > >>>>>>>> As I have frequently asked and you of course have never answered - >>>>>>>> does that mean back when your superstition was just starting out and >>>>>>>> only a few people had even heard of it does that mean the numbers >>>>>>>> involved made it invalid? >>>>>>>> Just how many does it take to 'prove' a superstition is valid? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would say the answer is one (1). >>>>> >>>>> Nope, but as you said, all it takes is one sometimes. >>>> >>>> Then why did you introduce numbers as if those alone proved you >>>> assertion to be correct? >>> >>> To give you reason to accept that you are thus wrong. >> >> So now numbers prove something? It appears you want it both ways. > > Proves you are in the minority in your assessments. > > > the dukester, American-American > > ***** > "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI > ***** > What makes you think so?
Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:18 -0500 Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500 Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:43 -0400
csiph-web