Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.atheism > #1961832

Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science.

From Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net>
Newsgroups alt.atheism, rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science.
Date 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <mqqq6c$her$3@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <6mpesatddc86osfghkug9om4tmqilj6f0v@4ax.com> <6nqgsa54qtjl59k7fb8o1qc26e71dm9enf@4ax.com> <6hdksa9ei1456majqjlithmd5l0iuu88uu@4ax.com> <3dslsa98na103mgalbm8rekmnsjl4qe4mk@4ax.com> <edo1tadlsvur7ooa4gfac8as58l71ld6ui@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 8/16/2015 2:18 PM, duke wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 03:15:05 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:53:11 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>> alt.atheism with message-id
>> <6hdksa9ei1456majqjlithmd5l0iuu88uu@4ax.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:15:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:46:50 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>> alt.atheism with message-id
>>>> <6mpesatddc86osfghkug9om4tmqilj6f0v@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 04:54:24 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:19:05 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>> <pthcsa1qp81s6n2i2ccjpekv9k2loqptda@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:19:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:51:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>>> <b1aasa588bg2g87ihj51edvvk5bio3kbaf@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:06:52 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:59:37 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>>>>> <s4n4sapjfaebpm0nr1ct0vqt4bbf7huigd@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:44:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>>>>>>> <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred.  Same difference.  No eye
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> witnesses to testify.  Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What 3rd party verification.  I have the same types of verification for Jesus
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or
>>>>>>>>>>>> indirectly, with your bible?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You don't have a clue as to what I have
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So you say, and refuse to elaborate.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We people of God outnumber you atheist 25:1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which means what?  Numbers alone prove something?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just wanted you to know that you are clearly in a minority.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So what?  It isn't the first time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nor the last.
>>>>
>>>> Nope.  I don't expect it to be.
>>>
>>> Then we both agree you are in the minority.
>>
>> Yep.  So what?  According to you that must make me correct.
>
> Nope, that the huge majority, seeing a lot more than you do, sees you in error.
>
>>>>>>>> As I have frequently asked and you of course have never answered -
>>>>>>>> does that mean back when your superstition was just starting out and
>>>>>>>> only a few people had even heard of it does that mean the numbers
>>>>>>>> involved made it invalid?
>>>>>>>> Just how many does it take to 'prove' a superstition is valid?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would say the answer is one (1).
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope, but as you said, all it takes is one sometimes.
>>>>
>>>> Then why did you introduce numbers as if those alone proved you
>>>> assertion to be correct?
>>>
>>> To give you reason to accept that you are thus wrong.
>>
>> So now numbers prove something?  It appears you want it both ways.
>
> Proves you are in the minority in your assessments.
>
>
> the dukester, American-American
>
> *****
> "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
> Pope Paul VI
> *****
>
What makes you think so?

Back to alt.atheism | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:18 -0500
  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:43 -0400

csiph-web