Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #358441 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-23 12:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-07-24 04:25 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 228 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-23 12:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-23 18:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-23 20:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 00:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 11:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 16:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 18:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-24 18:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 00:20 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 06:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 11:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-28 18:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-28 17:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-26 03:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-27 04:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-29 03:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 07:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:17 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 09:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 10:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-02 11:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 12:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 12:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-02 14:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 15:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 16:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-02 10:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-03 03:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-03 09:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-03 18:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-04 15:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-03 17:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-04 18:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-05 12:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-06 19:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-06 17:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 01:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 20:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 22:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-07 09:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 16:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-08 04:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 08:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 14:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-08 18:12 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 08:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-08 14:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 14:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 00:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 12:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-07 15:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-07 15:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 12:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 13:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-16 12:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-20 12:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-04 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-16 12:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> - 2015-08-18 19:04 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 12:33 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2015-08-19 18:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 21:52 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-29 11:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-29 13:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-29 18:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-30 06:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-30 11:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-31 04:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:19 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-31 12:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 21:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 00:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-31 22:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 22:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 01:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-01 12:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 11:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-25 10:32 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 09:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-26 10:09 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 06:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-25 11:31 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-26 15:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-07-26 22:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-26 23:03 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-27 18:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-24 04:25 -0400
Page 10 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 Next page →
| From | Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-30 11:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <m5hkrad05obk83vjbft734m7dn4a3dusdv@reader80.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #359090 |
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 04:11:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:56:04 -0500, Christopher A. Lee ><c.lee@fairpoint.net> in alt.atheism with message-id ><6b8irap373cue0oe9p15hv2egjqlr5m8kc@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:15:04 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: >> >>>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>>>guaranteed above average income for every person. >>> >>>I've never understood how the "poverty line" is set for a particular >>>country or region. >> >>Remember how Dan Quayle lamented the fact that half the population >>were below average intelligence? >> >>A Quayle in the hand is worth two in the Bush. > >FINALLY some actually got it. Good for you. Some of us got it all along but saw no need to comment on a lame joke lifted from Garrison Keillor. -- My webpage is at http://www.watt-evans.com --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-31 04:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <tpamrahbhag8q59t7c49fp0oqt93i4pqne@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359106 |
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:38:22 -0400, Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <m5hkrad05obk83vjbft734m7dn4a3dusdv@reader80.eternal-september.org> wrote: >On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 04:11:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >wrote: > >>On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:56:04 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >><c.lee@fairpoint.net> in alt.atheism with message-id >><6b8irap373cue0oe9p15hv2egjqlr5m8kc@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:15:04 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: >>> >>>>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>>>>guaranteed above average income for every person. >>>> >>>>I've never understood how the "poverty line" is set for a particular >>>>country or region. >>> >>>Remember how Dan Quayle lamented the fact that half the population >>>were below average intelligence? >>> >>>A Quayle in the hand is worth two in the Bush. >> >>FINALLY some actually got it. Good for you. > >Some of us got it all along but saw no need to comment on a lame joke >lifted from Garrison Keillor. Since I have vaguely heard the name but have never heard/read/seen him I could hardly 'lift' anything from him could I? I am simply betting on the stupidity of the liberal left loons. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-31 04:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <oebmrap7oqlokmb8to7on6vfp1310i6d78@reader80.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #359168 |
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:03:05 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:38:22 -0400, Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> >in alt.atheism with message-id ><m5hkrad05obk83vjbft734m7dn4a3dusdv@reader80.eternal-september.org> >wrote: > >>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 04:11:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:56:04 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >>><c.lee@fairpoint.net> in alt.atheism with message-id >>><6b8irap373cue0oe9p15hv2egjqlr5m8kc@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:15:04 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>>>>>guaranteed above average income for every person. >>>>> >>>>>I've never understood how the "poverty line" is set for a particular >>>>>country or region. >>>> >>>>Remember how Dan Quayle lamented the fact that half the population >>>>were below average intelligence? >>>> >>>>A Quayle in the hand is worth two in the Bush. >>> >>>FINALLY some actually got it. Good for you. >> >>Some of us got it all along but saw no need to comment on a lame joke >>lifted from Garrison Keillor. > >Since I have vaguely heard the name but have never heard/read/seen him >I could hardly 'lift' anything from him could I? Maybe not directly, but the introduction to every episode of his radio show, "A Prairie Home Companion," described the imaginary town of Lake Woebegon as a place where "all the children are above average." So you may have come up with it independently, but it's still a gag most of us heard a long time ago. -- My webpage is at http://www.watt-evans.com --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-01 07:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ljbpratldm2kia9107lt39pbeq9g7tg23m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359169 |
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:14:52 -0400, Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <oebmrap7oqlokmb8to7on6vfp1310i6d78@reader80.eternal-september.org> wrote: >On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:03:05 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >wrote: > >>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:38:22 -0400, Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> >>in alt.atheism with message-id >><m5hkrad05obk83vjbft734m7dn4a3dusdv@reader80.eternal-september.org> >>wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 04:11:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:56:04 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >>>><c.lee@fairpoint.net> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>><6b8irap373cue0oe9p15hv2egjqlr5m8kc@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:15:04 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>>>>>>guaranteed above average income for every person. >>>>>> >>>>>>I've never understood how the "poverty line" is set for a particular >>>>>>country or region. >>>>> >>>>>Remember how Dan Quayle lamented the fact that half the population >>>>>were below average intelligence? >>>>> >>>>>A Quayle in the hand is worth two in the Bush. >>>> >>>>FINALLY some actually got it. Good for you. >>> >>>Some of us got it all along but saw no need to comment on a lame joke >>>lifted from Garrison Keillor. >> >>Since I have vaguely heard the name but have never heard/read/seen him >>I could hardly 'lift' anything from him could I? > >Maybe not directly, but the introduction to every episode of his radio >show, "A Prairie Home Companion," described the imaginary town of Lake >Woebegon as a place where "all the children are above average." > >So you may have come up with it independently, but it's still a gag >most of us heard a long time ago. Thus proving there is nothing new under the sun. I don't consider it a gag - I consider it an accurate representation of the Loony Left. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-31 10:19 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <d21lhsFn46vU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #359168 |
Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>>>>>guaranteed above average income for every person. >>Some of us got it all along but saw no need to comment on a lame joke >>lifted from Garrison Keillor. > >Since I have vaguely heard the name but have never heard/read/seen him >I could hardly 'lift' anything from him could I? Garrison Keillor had a radio show, and one of his ongoing schticks was describing events in a town where "all the children were above average". The joke has traveled a lot further than the rest of his fame, and gets paraphrased by many people who don't know him. -- We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-31 12:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0lanra90ov7fqhg2bit0li3aq9udcpi401@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359222 |
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 10:19:44 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: >Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>>>>>>guaranteed above average income for every person. > >>>Some of us got it all along but saw no need to comment on a lame joke >>>lifted from Garrison Keillor. >> >>Since I have vaguely heard the name but have never heard/read/seen him >>I could hardly 'lift' anything from him could I? > >Garrison Keillor had a radio show, and one of his ongoing schticks was >describing events in a town where "all the children were above >average". The joke has traveled a lot further than the rest of his >fame, and gets paraphrased by many people who don't know him. Dan Quayle wasn't joking. He was a complete idiot - on another occasion he said he wished he'd learned Latin so he could speak the local language in Latin America.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-31 21:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55BC5087.21BA@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #359226 |
pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 10:06:15 AM UTC-7, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > > > Dan Quayle wasn't joking. He was a complete idiot - on another > > occasion he said he wished he'd learned Latin so he could speak the > > local language in Latin America. > > http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/d/dan_quayle.html I don't understand the problem...Dan Quayle like...latinas. Latin girls. Spanish girls. But yous always have a problem with...definitions. Lat·in 'latn/ noun 2. a native or inhabitant of a country whose language developed from Latin, especially a Latin American.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-01 00:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mphjel$jgl$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #359296 |
Le 2015-08-01 00:52, The Starmaker a écrit : > pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: >> >> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 10:06:15 AM UTC-7, Christopher A. Lee wrote: >> >>> Dan Quayle wasn't joking. He was a complete idiot - on another >>> occasion he said he wished he'd learned Latin so he could speak the >>> local language in Latin America. >> >> http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/d/dan_quayle.html > > > > I don't understand the problem...Dan Quayle like...latinas. Latin girls. Spanish girls. > > > But yous always have a problem with...definitions. > > > Lat·in > 'latn/ > noun > > 2. > a native or inhabitant of a country whose language developed from Latin, especially a Latin American. I hope you enjoy yourself. -- Olrik aa #1981 EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-31 22:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-1A8123.22221931072015@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #359297 |
In article <mphjel$jgl$6@dont-email.me>, Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> wrote: > Le 2015-08-01 00:52, The Starmaker a écrit : > > pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > >> > >> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 10:06:15 AM UTC-7, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > >> > >>> Dan Quayle wasn't joking. He was a complete idiot - on another > >>> occasion he said he wished he'd learned Latin so he could speak the > >>> local language in Latin America. > >> > >> http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/d/dan_quayle.html > > > > > > > > I don't understand the problem...Dan Quayle like...latinas. Latin girls. > > Spanish girls. > > > > > > But yous always have a problem with...definitions. > > > > > > Lat·in > > 'latn/ > > noun > > > > 2. > > a native or inhabitant of a country whose language developed from Latin, > > especially a Latin American. > > I hope you enjoy yourself. I see Starfucker doesn't know the difference between Latin and languages derived from it. -- JD Iąve officially given up trying to find the bottom of the barrel that is Republican depravity.--Jidyom Rosario, Addicting Info
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-31 22:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55BC59F1.3BAB@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #359299 |
Jeanne Douglas wrote: > > In article <mphjel$jgl$6@dont-email.me>, Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Le 2015-08-01 00:52, The Starmaker a écrit : > > > pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > >> > > >> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 10:06:15 AM UTC-7, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > > >> > > >>> Dan Quayle wasn't joking. He was a complete idiot - on another > > >>> occasion he said he wished he'd learned Latin so he could speak the > > >>> local language in Latin America. > > >> > > >> http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/d/dan_quayle.html > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't understand the problem...Dan Quayle like...latinas. Latin girls. > > > Spanish girls. > > > > > > > > > But yous always have a problem with...definitions. > > > > > > > > > Lat·in > > > 'latn/ > > > noun > > > > > > 2. > > > a native or inhabitant of a country whose language developed from Latin, > > > especially a Latin American. > > > > I hope you enjoy yourself. > > I see Starfucker doesn't know the difference between Latin and languages > derived from it. I don't fuck stars, i make stars... what are you thinking, ...Jeannne? Latin girls are Spanish girls. They speak Spanish, not Latin. In other words, Spanish girls don't speak Latin, they speak Spanish. Latin girls speak...Spanish. If a guy says he wish he knew how to speak Lating, he really means...Spanish. Comprende? chica chica chica...cha cha cha...salsa... I dance latin. I'm a latin dancer. What does that mean? I dance like the Romans do???? dumb dumb dumb. estupido!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-01 01:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mphmt8$u0j$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #359300 |
<snip> You've just got your ticket to PARADISE! Enjoy it! Forever! I mean it!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-01 12:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55BD2057.D57@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #359300 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Jeanne Douglas wrote: > > > > In article <mphjel$jgl$6@dont-email.me>, Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Le 2015-08-01 00:52, The Starmaker a écrit : > > > > pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 10:06:15 AM UTC-7, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Dan Quayle wasn't joking. He was a complete idiot - on another > > > >>> occasion he said he wished he'd learned Latin so he could speak the > > > >>> local language in Latin America. > > > >> > > > >> http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/d/dan_quayle.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't understand the problem...Dan Quayle like...latinas. Latin girls. > > > > Spanish girls. > > > > > > > > > > > > But yous always have a problem with...definitions. > > > > > > > > > > > > Lat·in > > > > 'latn/ > > > > noun > > > > > > > > 2. > > > > a native or inhabitant of a country whose language developed from Latin, > > > > especially a Latin American. > > > > > > I hope you enjoy yourself. > > > > I see Starfucker doesn't know the difference between Latin and languages > > derived from it. > > I don't fuck stars, i make stars... > > what are you thinking, ...Jeannne? > > Latin girls are Spanish girls. They speak Spanish, not Latin. > > In other words, Spanish girls don't speak Latin, they speak Spanish. > > Latin girls speak...Spanish. > > If a guy says he wish he knew how to speak Lating, he really > means...Spanish. > > Comprende? > > chica chica chica...cha cha cha...salsa... > > I dance latin. I'm a latin dancer. What does that mean? I dance like the > Romans do???? dumb dumb dumb. estupido! I gotta go to ancient Rome to learn Latin dancing! MAMBO!!!! I always wondered what the Romans dance steps were like...dancing with the romans. Julius Ceasar was a salsa dancer! How come I'm finding out this stuff for the first time? Any Latin dancers out there?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-01 07:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ctbprad03g2cv33ckrhp7jiv5716odpuak@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359226 |
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:06:10 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <0lanra90ov7fqhg2bit0li3aq9udcpi401@4ax.com> wrote: >On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 10:19:44 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: > >>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>>>>>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>>>>>>>guaranteed above average income for every person. >> >>>>Some of us got it all along but saw no need to comment on a lame joke >>>>lifted from Garrison Keillor. >>> >>>Since I have vaguely heard the name but have never heard/read/seen him >>>I could hardly 'lift' anything from him could I? >> >>Garrison Keillor had a radio show, and one of his ongoing schticks was >>describing events in a town where "all the children were above >>average". The joke has traveled a lot further than the rest of his >>fame, and gets paraphrased by many people who don't know him. > >Dan Quayle wasn't joking. He was a complete idiot - on another >occasion he said he wished he'd learned Latin so he could speak the >local language in Latin America. Most politicians are idiots. They prove it by opening their mouths. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-01 07:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <hmbprahl09tqn15f84f9u066updubdl8q3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359222 |
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 10:19:44 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> in alt.atheism with message-id <d21lhsFn46vU4@mid.individual.net> wrote: >Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>>>>>>guaranteed above average income for every person. > >>>Some of us got it all along but saw no need to comment on a lame joke >>>lifted from Garrison Keillor. >> >>Since I have vaguely heard the name but have never heard/read/seen him >>I could hardly 'lift' anything from him could I? > >Garrison Keillor had a radio show, and one of his ongoing schticks was >describing events in a town where "all the children were above >average". The joke has traveled a lot further than the rest of his >fame, and gets paraphrased by many people who don't know him. I meant it as a reflection of what I consider the Insane Left and did not knowingly repeat anything I had previously heard. I actually expect some idiot to suggest this - they think taking everything from anyone who has earned an income to give it to people who are incapable of supporting themselves is a solution to something other than a way to buy votes. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-30 04:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <btmjrap5h1lfqp7n5m31kuq6lh04obo1db@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359023 |
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:15:04 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> in alt.atheism with message-id <d1sg0vFdsoqU2@mid.individual.net> wrote: >Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>guaranteed above average income for every person. > >I've never understood how the "poverty line" is set for a particular >country or region. It is a political line, and thus set by nothing rational. I have been waiting for months for someone to actually read that comment. So far no luck. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 11:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <90g7ra13gji6gofusrvjicdpgc3cihk5o4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #358546 |
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:13:27 -0400, "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: >In article <87d5rad59qettshmm9lg4m8u463btirglj@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32 >@cox.net says... >> >> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >> >> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> >> how can an atheist >> >> prove >> >> there is no God >> > >> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. >> >> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. >This is something that the nonChristians don't get. In Christianity >death is not an end of existence, it's just a relocation. Well, the physical body dies. But the real discussion he doesn't get is that the contrary to the innocent dying. That's false. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-24 16:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mouhlg1120c@news4.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #358545 |
On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: > >> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> >> how can an atheist >>> >> prove >>> >> there is no God >> > >> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. > No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 10:32 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <d1h3dbFhdt5U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #358560 |
On 25/07/2015 00:27, talishi wrote: > On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >> >>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> >> how can an atheist >>>> >> prove >>>> >> there is no God >>> > >>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. >> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. > > So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? Have you ever sat in a plane or shared a restaurant with a screaming baby?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 09:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.301d364ad0b07c9e9899ce@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #358589 |
In article <d1h3dbFhdt5U1@mid.individual.net>, ingilt@yahoo.co.uk says... > > On 25/07/2015 00:27, talishi wrote: > > On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: > >> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: > >> > >>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> >> how can an atheist > >>>> >> prove > >>>> >> there is no God > >>> > > >>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your > >>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. > >> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. > > > > So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? > > Have you ever sat in a plane or shared a restaurant with a screaming baby? But the kid can't help it--he doesn't know any better. It's his parents that deserve to go to Hell. I think one function of a belief in an interfering god and a hell is that faith that the bastards will go there gives enough solace that we don't just kill the bastards ourselves.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 12:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9bg7rapur67hvrmar23ed9dv0s622hihbu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #358595 |
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 09:07:29 -0400, "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: >In article <d1h3dbFhdt5U1@mid.individual.net>, ingilt@yahoo.co.uk >says... >> >> On 25/07/2015 00:27, talishi wrote: >> > On 07/24/2015 02:58 PM, duke wrote: >> >> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:08:33 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >On 07/23/2015 12:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> >>>> >> how can an atheist >> >>>> >> prove >> >>>> >> there is no God >> >>> > >> >>> >We can prove that your god is not God. Because God is love. But your >> >>> >god killed all the puppies and babies in a world wide flood. >> >> No, he didn't. All the innocent were saved. >> > >> > So what did the babies and puppies do to piss off your god? >> >> Have you ever sat in a plane or shared a restaurant with a screaming baby? > >But the kid can't help it--he doesn't know any better. It's his parents >that deserve to go to Hell. > >I think one function of a belief in an interfering god and a hell is >that faith that the bastards will go there gives enough solace that we >don't just kill the bastards ourselves. You belong to the unrighteous that died. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web