Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #462415
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? |
| Date | 2018-06-24 00:28 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <pgmok0$i8v$5@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <93371b79-bb42-45a4-978b-232769531a2a@googlegroups.com> <fnvq0rF6b64U1@mid.individual.net> <285b114e-dec0-414c-b22a-46c6657dfc62@googlegroups.com> <fp6qpkFiiqfU1@mid.individual.net> <31a07f12-67fd-4d20-aacc-5434549520e2@googlegroups.com> |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >On Saturday, June 23, 2018 at 7:55:35 AM UTC-4, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am 08.06.2018 um 23:43 schrieb kenseto: >> .. >> >> It's not a theory, but what write about bears the title 'your >> >> hypothesis'. >> > It is a theory. Your assertion is not valid. >> No. A theory is a hypothesis, which could not be falsified. >> What you have written is a hypothesis. >My theory can be falsified. See the proposed experiments in the following >link: No, what you wrote is just vague babble and is not in any way falsification. So your claims are just a hypothesis, not a theory.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-06-02 21:31 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-02 14:03 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-02 22:16 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-06-07 20:35 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-07 13:13 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 14:06 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-08 06:29 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-06-08 18:43 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-08 14:43 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-06-23 13:55 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-23 05:53 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-24 00:28 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 13:21 -0700
csiph-web