Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #460616
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? |
| Date | 2018-06-07 20:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <fntc75Fmu0bU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <94c2514f-bcd1-44ac-96f7-c6c2bffa9d3f@googlegroups.com> <fng9ksF7p51U1@mid.individual.net> <457fd0f1-eaeb-4098-b38b-77b599cbaeea@googlegroups.com> <pev50d$hie$2@pcls7.std.com> |
Am 03.06.2018 um 00:16 schrieb Michael Moroney: > kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: > >> On Saturday, June 2, 2018 at 3:31:42 PM UTC-4, Thomas Heger wrote: >>> Am 04.05.2018 um 14:54 schrieb kenseto: >>>> Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity >>>> isn't a force in general relativity? > > <snip Tom's explanation> > >> We are not talking about Minkowski's space-time diagram. We are taking >> about the DTG concept of gravity. > > No, Stupid Ken, you asked (in the original post) why gravity is > transmitted as particles if it is not a force in GR. You never even > mentioned your failed DTG in your question. > > Nobody even cares one whit about your DTG since it is a complete, total, > absolute failure of a gravity explanation anyway. If I look at 'DTG' I could see some kind of faint resemblance of 'spacetime' a la Minkowski (and that is an idea I try to promote.) But I had always avoided the problem to find out, what that might actually be: spacetime??? My current approach is: you can split 'nothing at all' into two opposing components. Then one component develops into one direction we call 'positive', while the other goes into the other direction (called 'negative'). (Both together add to zero) The positive direction is called 'timelike'. But the direction 'positive' is a question of the point of view. IOW: observed from the negative side the direction 'positive' is actually negative. The nothings splits then into two 'universes' and one is ours. The opposing universe is actually there and passes right through everything, but invisible. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-06-02 21:31 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-02 14:03 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-02 22:16 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-06-07 20:35 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-07 13:13 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 14:06 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-08 06:29 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-06-08 18:43 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-08 14:43 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-06-23 13:55 +0200
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-23 05:53 -0700
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-24 00:28 +0000
Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 13:21 -0700
csiph-web