Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #457888

Re: The logic of a physicist

Show all headers | View raw

<mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> On Monday, 14 May 2018 16:06:55 UTC+2, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 13 May 2018 20:47:10 UTC+2, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
>>>> <jgreenfield97@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 9:32:41 PM UTC+9:30, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
>>>>>> From sci. math
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Monday, 7 May 2018 10:41:19 UTC+2, Zelos Malum  wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Euclidean geometry is invalid no matter what because it assumes an
>>>>>>> infinitely divisable space which is not true.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Right. My moronic gurus have invented a theory inconsistent with
>>>>>> basic school math. So, it's obvious basic school math is false.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Isn't it?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Since  1+1 NOT equal 2     anything is possible for the morono-gurati
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Pretty sure relativity doesn’t say 1+1=2. What it does say is that
>>>> velocities don’t combine as a sum. But then again 1 liter of oxygen plus 1
>>>> liter of nitrogen doesn’t combine to 2 liters of combined gas either. You
>>>> can fuss all day long “But why NOT?”  The answer is that it just doesn’t,
>>>> by direct measurement.
>>> 
>>> A lie, of course. Not by any direct measurement, 
>> 
>> You’re wrong. 
>> Now, I get that you CHOOSE to disbelieve any direct measurement done by
>> physicists. But your disbelief doesn’t change the fact that those
>> measurements exist and have been documented. 
> 
> 
> Most of your "direct measurements" is just screami9ng
> "our beloved Shit has told!!!!!!", and this is one of them.

That is again wrong. The direct measurements have been done. 

> Of course, your direct direct measurements are worthless
> too; 

As I said, it doesn’t matter that you don’t believe the direct
measurements. They’ve nevertheless been done and documented. It also
wouldn’t matter if you didn’t believe that Greenland is real; its existence
is documented whether you accept it or not. Nobody can force you to believe
anything you don’t want to believe; but on the other hand, your disbelief
won’t sway anyone to think as you do either. 

> your moronic cult of desenchronizing clocks didn't
> establish itself and direct measurements of sane people
> deny your direct measurements.
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The logic of a physicist mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-05-08 05:02 -0700
  Re: The logic of a physicist mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-05-08 15:49 -0700
  Re: The logic of a physicist jgreenfield97@gmail.com - 2018-05-09 23:27 -0700
    Re: The logic of a physicist Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 18:47 +0000
      Re: The logic of a physicist mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-05-13 20:47 -0700
        Re: The logic of a physicist Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-13 20:55 -0700
          Re: The logic of a physicist mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-05-13 21:27 -0700
            Re: The logic of a physicist Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-14 03:25 -0700
        Re: The logic of a physicist Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 14:06 +0000
          Re: The logic of a physicist mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-05-14 08:50 -0700
            Re: The logic of a physicist Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-14 09:38 -0700
            Re: The logic of a physicist Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 16:52 +0000
              Re: The logic of a physicist mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-05-14 10:56 -0700
                Re: The logic of a physicist Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 20:37 +0000
                Re: The logic of a physicist mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-05-14 21:19 -0700
      Re: The logic of a physicist alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-14 09:45 -0700

csiph-web