Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #358944
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Sensors in Motion Launches MEMS-Based Inertial Nav System |
| Date | Tue, 28 Jul 2015 22:14:03 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | Wobbliness |
| Lines | 32 |
| Message-ID | <mp8urb$1k6$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <FIWdnTJPWbk32SnInZ2dnUVZ5oMAAAAA@giganews.com> <7c9e8c-9t1.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <mp2nj0$684$1@speranza.aioe.org> <5igf8c-msc.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <mp35d8$617$1@speranza.aioe.org> <v9jf8c-l9d.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <mp38bc$cm9$1@speranza.aioe.org> <c7darala9fr0oe3bpj8pgo3hu7f92t1luj@4ax.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | OScweCjqm8fsTS+mPuyBIw.user.speranza.aioe.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@aioe.org |
| User-Agent | NewsTap/6.0.2 (iPhone) |
| X-Notice | Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 |
| Xref | aioe.org sci.physics:510101 sci.physics.relativity:358944 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
kefischer wrote: >>Not the magnetic. If you rotate 360° in whatever direction, the >>orientation of the magnetic line will stay fixed. Its magnitude (Earth) >>may vary around 0.5 gauss, but this is not an issue. (0.25 to 0.65 gauss >>around the world) >> >>The accelerometer use to have a bit of drift, however, the gravity >>direction line is again, still fixed. (the dis-alignment of the axis are >>specified by the manufacturer) > > Moron NYM-changing TROLL, the magnetic pole is presently > somewhere in Northwest Canada, which is a different direction for > everybody on Earth. :) Does not matter where it is. The point is that the position of the pole does not change significantly enough (to be measurable) over a time period of days or hours. Ie is been said, rotating your sensor 360⁰, where do you think it will arrive exactly (at the end of that rotation)? > IMU components are readily available, but are useless > for navigation. Too bat you know nothing about anything. > The US Army Air Force in WWII had a device with > inputs from gyros, pitot tube airspeed, barometric pressure and compass > heading, but the longer the trip, the more it could be off. Only because of the gyros (drift), as is been said, having no natural axis of reference. Use a brain, big mouth.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Sensors in Motion Launches MEMS-Based Inertial Nav System kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-07-26 15:40 -0400 Re: Sensors in Motion Launches MEMS-Based Inertial Nav System wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-07-28 22:14 +0000
csiph-web