Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #357912

Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005
Date 2015-07-20 08:48 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <moiu6m$b9b$2@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <modvbr$ol5$1@speranza.aioe.org> <cc44096f-bc66-4486-8967-b5b3f975816f@googlegroups.com> <mog73f$63r$5@speranza.aioe.org> <6b23fa5f-5701-4366-8ff3-4193c72a764d@googlegroups.com> <moiu43$b9b$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On 7/20/2015 8:46 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 7/19/2015 12:51 PM, Koobee Wublee wrote:
>> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 6:01:39 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>> >On 7/19/2015 1:39 AM, Koobee Wublee wrote:
>>>> > >Keep in mind that SR was not even one of these hypotheses to
>>>> > >explain the null results of the MMX.  In fact, all hypotheses to do
>>>> > >so demand the very existence of the Aether.  They are namely the
>>>> > >Voigt, Larmor's, and Lorentz's infinite other transforms.  <shrug>
>>> >
>>> >That's right, and notice that LATER tests ruled those out.
>> There are no tests that rule out SR's antitheses.  If insisting on
>> such a big ass, point out
>> which experiment like a man.  <shrug>
>>
>
> Furthermore, you may note that the Voigt transforms do not comprise a
> mathematical group. Since this is a key mathematical property, you might
> well say that the Voigt transformations were dead in the water from the
> outset, though they did the obligatory function of preserving the
> invariance of Maxwell's equations with inertial reference frame.
>
>

And anybody who rants the way Koobee Wublee does about the importance of 
the mathematics, I would have thought would know that.

Koobee's love for pretense and posturing is matched only by Frank Abignale.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 23:39 -0700
  Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-19 05:02 -0700
    Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-07-19 14:23 +0200
  Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 10:51 -0700
    Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-19 16:00 -0700
    Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 08:46 -0500
      Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 08:48 -0500
    Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-21 23:49 -0700
      Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 00:17 -0700
        Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 06:35 -0500
        Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 06:41 -0500
      Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 06:32 -0500
        Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 05:08 -0700
    Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-07-22 17:17 +0200

csiph-web