Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #357912
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 |
| Date | 2015-07-20 08:48 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <moiu6m$b9b$2@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <modvbr$ol5$1@speranza.aioe.org> <cc44096f-bc66-4486-8967-b5b3f975816f@googlegroups.com> <mog73f$63r$5@speranza.aioe.org> <6b23fa5f-5701-4366-8ff3-4193c72a764d@googlegroups.com> <moiu43$b9b$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
On 7/20/2015 8:46 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 7/19/2015 12:51 PM, Koobee Wublee wrote: >> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 6:01:39 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> >On 7/19/2015 1:39 AM, Koobee Wublee wrote: >>>> > >Keep in mind that SR was not even one of these hypotheses to >>>> > >explain the null results of the MMX. In fact, all hypotheses to do >>>> > >so demand the very existence of the Aether. They are namely the >>>> > >Voigt, Larmor's, and Lorentz's infinite other transforms. <shrug> >>> > >>> >That's right, and notice that LATER tests ruled those out. >> There are no tests that rule out SR's antitheses. If insisting on >> such a big ass, point out >> which experiment like a man. <shrug> >> > > Furthermore, you may note that the Voigt transforms do not comprise a > mathematical group. Since this is a key mathematical property, you might > well say that the Voigt transformations were dead in the water from the > outset, though they did the obligatory function of preserving the > invariance of Maxwell's equations with inertial reference frame. > > And anybody who rants the way Koobee Wublee does about the importance of the mathematics, I would have thought would know that. Koobee's love for pretense and posturing is matched only by Frank Abignale. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 23:39 -0700
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-19 05:02 -0700
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-07-19 14:23 +0200
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 10:51 -0700
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-19 16:00 -0700
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 08:46 -0500
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 08:48 -0500
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-21 23:49 -0700
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 00:17 -0700
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 06:35 -0500
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 06:41 -0500
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 06:32 -0500
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 05:08 -0700
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-07-22 17:17 +0200
csiph-web