Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #357911
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 |
| Date | 2015-07-20 08:46 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <moiu43$b9b$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <75cdb45d-8aa5-48fc-b5d9-a87e9ff7b137@googlegroups.com> <modvbr$ol5$1@speranza.aioe.org> <cc44096f-bc66-4486-8967-b5b3f975816f@googlegroups.com> <mog73f$63r$5@speranza.aioe.org> <6b23fa5f-5701-4366-8ff3-4193c72a764d@googlegroups.com> |
On 7/19/2015 12:51 PM, Koobee Wublee wrote: > On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 6:01:39 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> >On 7/19/2015 1:39 AM, Koobee Wublee wrote: >>> > >Keep in mind that SR was not even one of these hypotheses to >>> > >explain the null results of the MMX. In fact, all hypotheses to do >>> > >so demand the very existence of the Aether. They are namely the >>> > >Voigt, Larmor's, and Lorentz's infinite other transforms. <shrug> >> > >> >That's right, and notice that LATER tests ruled those out. > There are no tests that rule out SR's antitheses. If insisting on such a big ass, point out > which experiment like a man. <shrug> > Furthermore, you may note that the Voigt transforms do not comprise a mathematical group. Since this is a key mathematical property, you might well say that the Voigt transformations were dead in the water from the outset, though they did the obligatory function of preserving the invariance of Maxwell's equations with inertial reference frame. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 23:39 -0700
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-19 05:02 -0700
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-07-19 14:23 +0200
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 10:51 -0700
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-19 16:00 -0700
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 08:46 -0500
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 08:48 -0500
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-21 23:49 -0700
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 00:17 -0700
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 06:35 -0500
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 06:41 -0500
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 06:32 -0500
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 05:08 -0700
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-07-22 17:17 +0200
csiph-web