Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #617370
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate |
| Date | 2023-08-11 18:04 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kjn4fkFrut0U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <226af45f-1b9b-4a39-9abc-60b88eaac79cn@googlegroups.com> <4f6067d7-04c2-4629-9427-f30229508be9n@googlegroups.com> <1o-dneoDx59Go0v5nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com> |
On 2023-08-11 13:59:55 +0000, Tom Roberts said: > On 8/8/23 11:46 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >> it was already known circa 1850 that sound waves share the velocity of >> the source, causing the Doppler effect. > > You just keep displaying your personal ignorance of basic physics. Sound > waves DO NOT "share the velocity of the source" -- the speed of sound > waves in air is ~343 m/s RELATIVE TO THE AIR, independent of the speed > of the source (relative to the air). > > As it does not happen, that cannot be the "cause of the Doppler effect". > > Grow up. LEARN SOMETHING about the subject before attempting to write > about it. That's not his way. Remember how he "reviewed" a book (Cosmology in Crisis?: The Fallacy of Universal Expansion by Kenneth Gonder) at Amazon without bothering to read it first. This "review" has been edited since I mentioned the original version, posted on 8th July, which read as follows: "I just bought it, but I already know it's good because I read a previous book by him. Thumbs up!" -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-08 01:53 -0700
Re: Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate Wallace Awturkhanoff <fuhc@fhacllat.ew> - 2023-08-08 14:33 +0000
Re: Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-08 09:09 -0700
Re: Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 09:46 -0700
Re: Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-08 12:53 -0500
Re: Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 11:11 -0700
Re: Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-08 15:23 -0500
Re: Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-08-09 11:27 +0300
Re: Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-11 08:59 -0500
Re: Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 18:04 +0200
Re: Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-11 18:08 +0200
Re: Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 12:56 -0700
Re: Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 10:10 -0700
Re: Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-08 12:54 -0500
Re: Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 11:08 -0700
Re: Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-08 15:17 -0500
Re: Why Antirelativists Worship Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 06:29 -0700
csiph-web