Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #617235

Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity
Date	Wed, 9 Aug 2023 20:40:08 -0500
Lines	20
Message-ID	<kjitftF6rdaU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<e3565a16-9876-492f-92d7-ced7b8849b88n@googlegroups.com> <ddd0e1c0-3687-4028-a9dd-8e0fc9274f68n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	individual.net D/xWvijkBFOGap37pK5AVAmFa3cxZLFiY89GqT4ELK1lhrhjUD
Cancel-Lock	sha1:rnfLnr1p8f9Lz5Cj6167ycc+I6o= sha256:cw3M0cugQzeUvpeFVfya5OX1E+T11pYxda6rTinxeOo=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.14.0
Content-Language	en-US
In-Reply-To	<ddd0e1c0-3687-4028-a9dd-8e0fc9274f68n@googlegroups.com>
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:617235

Show key headers only | View raw

On 8/9/2023 7:38 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 9:17:12 AM UTC-7, Pentcho Valev wrote:
>> ... And, as Feynman explains, the assumption entails the absurdity that "the velocity of light relative to the apparatus is c−u". So the assumption is obviously false, isn't it? That is the reason why the final prediction based on this assumption is incompatible with the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment.
> 
>>
>> Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
> Valev means here that c-u is false because it presumes light velocity does not share the velocity of the source.

Pathetic that Laurence thinks those who actually appreciate
mainstream physics need to have crank physics explained to us.

Laurence has nothing original to contribute, so he piggybacks
off other cranks because he's so desperately seeking recognition.

Laurence you're an idiot and even worse than that, a fool. Find
another hobby, one in which you can actually be successful. Science
isn't for you because you're not willing to learn. The crank world
is one of the default escape venues for failures like you. Acceptance
by fellow cranks is merely a different face painted on a circle jerk.

Thread

Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-09 09:17 -0700
  Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-09 10:34 -0700
    Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 17:42 -0700
      Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 20:31 -0700
      Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-09 22:41 -0500
        Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 21:05 -0700
      Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 07:58 -0400
        Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 05:05 -0700
  Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 17:38 -0700
    Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-09 20:40 -0500
    Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 08:01 -0400
      Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 05:05 -0700

csiph-web