Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #617236
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: too easy? |
| Date | 2023-08-09 20:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kjiu4uF6rdaU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <e6f71497-0cf3-4020-a9ab-b5da1b008039n@googlegroups.com> |
On 8/9/2023 7:17 PM, nero wrote: > I should like to know the theoric energy in kwh necessary for keeping in air a kg for an hour ... > It is the problem of all the birds , drones, plains , helicopters..... > It is the number for calculating the efficienty of the fligth Generally speaking it is advised an individual achieve communication skills before progressing to more advanced topics. As stated above it is clear that you don't know enough to properly state the problem you're attempting to solve. Stick with the accepted learning sequence rather than jumping ahead into realms you're not yet capable of understanding. Don't take this as a putdown, take it as a strong suggestion that you slow down. The question(s) you're attempting to ask will probably be resolved as a matter of routine as your education progresses. Best to you.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
too easy? nero <oldogf@yahoo.it> - 2023-08-09 17:17 -0700
Re: too easy? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-09 20:51 -0500
Re: too easy? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-09 21:48 -0500
Re: too easy? nero <oldogf@yahoo.it> - 2023-08-10 16:45 -0700
Re: too easy? nero <oldogf@yahoo.it> - 2023-08-10 16:48 -0700
Re: too easy? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-10 11:37 +0200
Re: too easy? nero <oldogf@yahoo.it> - 2023-08-10 16:52 -0700
Re: too easy? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-11 12:53 +0200
Re: too easy? nero <oldogf@yahoo.it> - 2023-08-10 16:54 -0700
Re: too easy? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-12 12:01 -0700
Re: too easy? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-12 14:16 -0500
Re: too easy? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-12 17:31 -0400
Re: too easy? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-13 10:34 +0200
Re: too easy? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-13 10:34 +0200
Re: too easy? nero <oldogf@yahoo.it> - 2023-08-13 18:19 -0700
Re: too easy? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-14 10:30 +0200
Re: too easy? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-15 10:17 -0700
Re: too easy? Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 21:02 +0200
Re: too easy? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-15 23:38 +0200
Re: too easy? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-16 09:25 -0700
Re: too easy? Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 09:47 -0700
Re: too easy? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 17:51 -0700
Re: too easy? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 09:45 +0200
Re: too easy? patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-17 11:31 -0700
Re: too easy? Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-17 13:03 -0500
Re: too easy? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-11 11:40 +1000
Re: too easy? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-11 12:53 +0200
Re: too easy? Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 11:02 -0700
Re: too easy? patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-11 11:33 -0700
Re: too easy? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-11 21:01 +0200
Re: too easy? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-11 20:54 +0200
Re: too easy? Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 14:38 -0700
Re: too easy? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-12 12:07 +0200
Re: too easy? nero <oldogf@yahoo.it> - 2023-08-18 18:38 -0700
csiph-web