Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #615141
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler |
| Date | 2023-07-13 00:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kh9hg9F8ugpU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <kh98nqF7sfhU1@mid.individual.net> <7a157400-d3d7-4f2b-a661-0c65e67d06dan@googlegroups.com> <kh9bbuF8bo4U1@mid.individual.net> <edd32cdc-bb42-4481-9e99-bf70b7987644n@googlegroups.com> <kh9d6oF8me7U1@mid.individual.net> |
On 7/12/2023 11:34 PM, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 13-July-23 2:08 pm, patdolan wrote: >> On Wednesday, July 12, 2023 at 9:03:14 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote: >>> On 13-July-23 1:55 pm, patdolan wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, July 12, 2023 at 8:18:23 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>> On 13-July-23 1:50 am, patdolan wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday, July 12, 2023 at 5:11:28 AM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>> On 12-July-23 5:13 pm, patdolan wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, July 12, 2023 at 12:00:44 AM UTC-7, Sylvia Else >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12-July-23 5:19 am, patdolan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 11:19:42 AM UTC-7, Tom Roberts >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/11/23 11:14 AM, patdolan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> An interplanetary traveler takes off from the earth for a >>>>>>>>>>>> twenty year >>>>>>>>>>>> (proper time) out and back trip at .867c relative to Big Ben in >>>>>>>>>>>> London. The traveler keeps his video recording camera >>>>>>>>>>>> trained on Big >>>>>>>>>>>> Ben for the entire trip. Will the twin paradox answer >>>>>>>>>>>> reconcile with >>>>>>>>>>>> the what the rocket ship video recording at the end of the >>>>>>>>>>>> trip? >>>>>>>>>>> THINK about what you are asking: will a gedenkenexperiment >>>>>>>>>>> formulated >>>>>>>>>>> using SR reconcile with the predictions of SR? -- OF COURSE >>>>>>>>>>> IT WILL! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Famous last words, Tom Roberts. AFAIK, no one has ever >>>>>>>>>> performed the independent calculations. >>>>>>>>> You seriously think that no one has looked at that? Of course >>>>>>>>> they have. >>>>>>>>> But nothing of interest came out of it, so you don't hear about >>>>>>>>> it. If >>>>>>>>> it led to a contradiction, SR would have been abandoned long ago. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You really need to learn basic logic and modes of thought, in >>>>>>>>>>> addition >>>>>>>>>>> to very basic physics. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tom Roberts >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I say the accumulated time on Big Ben for the round trip >>>>>>>>>> according to 1/gamma WILL NOT tally with the elapsed time >>>>>>>>>> shown by BB on the rocket's video. Prove me wrong. I would do >>>>>>>>>> it, but I'm busy today interviewing potential body guards. >>>>>>>>> If you're convinced a priori that there's a problem, then the work >>>>>>>>> required to follow someone else's algebra will exceed what you >>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>> need to do it yourself. Always assuming, of course, that you're >>>>>>>>> capable. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>>>>> I have done the work. Two posts up. SR provides two methods to >>>>>>>> compute the proper and coordinate duration of the traveling >>>>>>>> twin's flight. The LT time dilation formula ∆t' = ∆t/gamma is in >>>>>>>> conflict with with the relativistic doppler formulae when >>>>>>>> applied to a the twins paradox. >>>>>>> There is no Lorentz Transformation time dilation formula. Time >>>>>>> dilation >>>>>>> is a popular-science special case of the Lorentz Transformation that >>>>>>> many people, including you, end up misapplying. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>>> Okay Sylvia Else, I'll take you at your word and accept that there >>>>>> is some non-populist, gnostic method in which to apply the LTs in >>>>>> this situation that reconciles them with the rel-dop equations. >>>>>> And furthermore, I'll admit that as a populist, I don't understand >>>>>> that method. Am I condemned to wander the earth for the rest of my >>>>>> life in ignorance of the correct method or will you teach it to me? >>>>> The problem is that you're trying to criticise something that is not >>>>> part of Special Relativity (SR) for not being consistent with SR. That >>>>> popular-science time dilation does not work in this context is no >>>>> great >>>>> surprise, and just means that this particular popular science >>>>> representation of SR is wrong, not that there's anything amiss with >>>>> SR. >>>>> >>>>> As for teaching you, a correct analysis of the scenario requires >>>>> transformation (using the Lorentz Transform) of the time at Big Ben, >>>>> between the frame of the space craft just before it reverses direction >>>>> to the frame just after it reverses. >>>>> >>>>> Sylvia. >>>> >>>> Sylvia, you continually refer to a gnostic argument that will prove >>>> the twins true. Yet you quail at producing it. >>> No, I was not seeking to prove the twin paradox true. I was showing you >>> that your approach to proving it false was misconceived. >>>> >>>> It has been characteristic of the history of relativity that >>>> arguments against the twins paradox are simple, terse, cogent and >>>> powerful. No such argument exists in favor of the twins paradox. It >>>> has been this way for over 100 years. Witness the foolish Prokary as >>>> he carefully picks and chooses the most plausible and least >>>> laughable explanation. As with Darwinism, a younger and more >>>> skeptical generation is rejecting the specious arguments of >>>> relativity. Damned old Legion is almost unreadable with all his ad >>>> hoc inventions: "skew of simultaneity", "temporal foliations", etc. >>>> I am very readable and very unanswerable, as your own reticence (see >>>> above) testifies to. To whom will the young physicist of the future >>>> eventually rally to? >>>> >>> So, having had your previous objection demolished, you shift your >>> ground, and in the process become even less intelligible. >>> >>> Sylvia. >> Nothing has been proved by you, Sylvia. You have merely alluded to a >> proof but never typed it out line by line. I claim that no such proof >> exists. Prove me wrong. > > Do you have difficulty understanding "I was not seeking to prove..." ? Simple: Dolan wants desperately to be top dog. No, it makes no sense at all.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-11 09:14 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-07-11 13:19 -0500
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-11 12:19 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-11 14:31 -0500
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-11 12:55 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-11 16:03 -0500
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 09:41 +0200
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 00:53 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 02:28 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 02:38 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 12:12 +0200
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-12 17:00 +1000
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-12 00:13 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-12 22:11 +1000
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 05:16 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-12 08:50 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 16:44 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-12 17:08 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 17:55 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 18:00 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-12 18:05 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-12 18:17 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 18:21 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-12 21:11 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 22:01 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 22:11 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-12 23:17 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 00:03 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-13 09:50 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 11:46 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-13 12:20 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 14:39 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-13 15:41 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 16:53 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-13 17:35 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 17:49 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-13 17:53 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 18:30 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-13 18:33 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 22:32 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 19:28 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-13 19:38 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 19:58 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-14 02:50 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 04:45 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 05:08 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-14 14:22 -0400
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-14 11:26 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-14 18:21 -0400
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-14 16:28 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-15 19:48 -0400
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-15 16:54 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 08:34 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 08:42 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-16 16:08 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 16:49 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-16 22:17 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 00:15 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-17 01:44 -0400
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-16 22:57 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-17 02:50 -0400
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Mitchell Demas <letl@alliecim.he> - 2023-07-17 09:28 +0000
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 00:08 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Newton Patselas <nale@lsawttnp.no> - 2023-07-17 09:54 +0000
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 10:05 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 11:30 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 06:32 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-14 07:43 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 09:39 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-14 09:48 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-14 10:56 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 19:15 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-14 19:50 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-14 20:02 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 23:35 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 23:50 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-15 06:21 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-15 16:50 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-13 13:18 +1000
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-12 20:55 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-13 14:03 +1000
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-12 21:08 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-13 14:34 +1000
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-12 21:36 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-13 00:48 -0500
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-13 00:47 -0500
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Teofilo Totolos <tltt@tooioltt.lo> - 2023-07-12 13:58 +0000
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-11 14:29 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 19:04 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-11 19:09 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 21:19 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 21:23 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 22:20 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-11 22:58 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-11 23:10 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-12 20:37 +1000
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 04:32 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 04:39 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-12 11:37 +0000
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 06:01 -0700
Re: Reconciling the Time Dilation and Relativistic Doppler Jack Liu <liuedy@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 02:42 -0700
csiph-web