Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #450959
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy |
| Date | 2018-02-28 12:04 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ffmdh9F8r27U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <316648ca-a8e2-4a00-ba60-3b2b4714d9bb@googlegroups.com> <ffm2poF6k74U1@mid.individual.net> <a25fa11d-c24a-45a6-a7cd-3f9816651a45@googlegroups.com> <ffmbpmF8g6nU1@mid.individual.net> <83d7fc72-7d99-44b1-9de5-b174eff15a63@googlegroups.com> |
On 28/02/2018 11:51 AM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote: > What about gravity energy change shift? Potential energy converted to kinetic energy. Energy is conserved. In a non-circular orbit, this process takes place for half the orbit, and then operates in reverse for the other half. > Show me where I am wrong... > New energy quantity means no conservation... > New energy order is the more objective > energy principle. > >> >> Sylvia. > > Show how your example goes exact... > can you prove it solves exact? Theories in physics are never proofs. However, no one has ever managed to do an experiment in which there is a demonstrable gain or loss of total energy. Absent such an experiment, the conservation law stands. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-02-26 15:22 -0800
Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-02-26 16:31 -0800
Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-02-26 17:40 -0800
Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-02-26 22:19 -0800
Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 02:06 -0800
Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-08 10:00 -0800
Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-02-27 13:51 +1100
Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-02-26 19:02 -0800
Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-02-27 19:11 +1100
Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-02-27 10:20 -0800
Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-02-28 09:01 +1100
Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-02-27 16:28 -0800
Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-02-28 11:35 +1100
Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-02-27 16:51 -0800
Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-02-28 12:04 +1100
Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-02-27 18:07 -0800
Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-02-27 17:31 -0800
Re: Blue shift and red shift changing means no conservation of energy mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-02-27 17:46 -0800
csiph-web