Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #427395
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: Planetary Protection Officer |
| Date | 2017-08-06 15:05 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <eunmd2FcdgjU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <59841D3E.178B@ix.netcom.com> <euil6fF7n9lU1@mid.individual.net> <om27qi$8ih$1@gioia.aioe.org> <eul6p5FpjloU1@mid.individual.net> <59866dfb$0$43811$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 6/08/2017 11:16 AM, benj wrote: > On 8/5/2017 2:26 AM, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 5/08/2017 2:35 AM, Serg io wrote: >>> On 8/4/2017 2:14 AM, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> On 4/08/2017 5:07 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 3/08/2017 2:34 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/474414000 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nasa Is Hiring a Planetary Protection Officer to Save Earth from >>>>>>> Aliens >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> http://www.newsweek.com/nasa-hiring-planetary-protection-officer-save-earth-aliens-645254 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Looks like neither you, nor Newsweek, are capable of reading a clear >>>>>> description of what the job is actually about. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The job description title is clear.. >>>>> >>>>> "Planetary Protection Officer" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The question is..."Protection" from What???? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Can you answer that Mrs. Else? >>>>> >>>> >>>> The responsibility is to protect the planets and moons of the Solar >>>> System from microbiological contamination by NASA's space probes. >>> >>> impossable to do that if it lands on it. all things manufactured >>> already have microbio contamination on them, as soon as exposed to air. >>> >>> the only way is lots of hard radiation >> >> Well, for example, Galileo was deliberately crashed into Jupiter to >> avoid any possibility of its contaminating Europa after it can no >> longer control its orbit. >> >> Ensuring that any future landing on Europa won't risk contamination >> will likely be one of the responsibilities of the appointee. >> >> Sylvia. > > So crashing contamination into Jupiter is is fine in order to save the > purity of Europa? I'm sure glad we have a bunch of ethical scientists to > keep the universe uncontaminated by humans. Kind of reminds me of the > old "had to destroy the village to save it". > The heat of entry into Jupiter's atmosphere would sterilize anything alive. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-02 09:29 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-02 09:34 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-02 09:47 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-02 10:10 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-02 15:54 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-03 10:03 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-03 10:53 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-03 11:06 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-03 11:11 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-08-03 20:50 -0400
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-03 20:50 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-08-04 09:36 -0400
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-04 23:21 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-08-05 04:37 -0400
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-05 14:48 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-05 18:13 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-05 10:16 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-04 14:00 +1000
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-04 00:07 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-04 17:14 +1000
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-04 11:35 -0500
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Otten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op> - 2017-08-04 17:12 +0000
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-04 12:51 -0500
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Otten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op> - 2017-08-04 18:39 +0000
Re: Planetary Protection Officer MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-04 18:41 -0500
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-04 23:18 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Otten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op> - 2017-08-05 10:09 +0000
Re: Planetary Protection Officer MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-05 09:08 -0500
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Otten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op> - 2017-08-05 14:19 +0000
Re: Planetary Protection Officer MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-05 10:46 -0500
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Otten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op> - 2017-08-05 15:51 +0000
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-05 09:41 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-06 10:49 +0200
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-04 23:23 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-05 16:26 +1000
Re: Planetary Protection Officer MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-05 10:55 -0500
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-06 10:58 +0200
Re: Planetary Protection Officer benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-05 21:16 -0400
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-06 15:05 +1000
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Otten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op> - 2017-08-04 17:36 +0000
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-05 16:22 +1000
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Otten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op> - 2017-08-05 11:37 +0000
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-05 21:56 +1000
Re: Planetary Protection Officer MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-05 09:11 -0500
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Otten Schneijders <jii@pouartj.op> - 2017-08-05 15:16 +0000
Re: Planetary Protection Officer MaryK <nobody@invalid.com> - 2017-08-05 11:05 -0500
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-06 10:53 +0200
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Ustine Bertrand <ufu@ywwerw.su> - 2017-08-06 09:33 +0000
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-06 13:38 +0200
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-05 10:04 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-04 23:15 -0700
Re: Planetary Protection Officer Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-05 16:30 +1000
Nine year old kid applies for Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-05 13:28 -0700
Re: Nine year old kid applies for Planetary Protection Officer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-05 18:23 -0700
csiph-web