Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #391265
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: a thought on the garage paradox |
| Date | 2016-08-31 11:23 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <e2mpsnFt4ccU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <a8bdb078-f117-4f80-a9a8-c63cfada9518@googlegroups.com> <e2g43oFae5bU1@mid.individual.net> <b8e026a4-d038-44bf-8c66-7858bdd7d7c8@googlegroups.com> <e2ka4mFamv1U1@mid.individual.net> <2613bdfd-b54c-4503-9dd6-9e008b271c46@googlegroups.com> |
On 31/08/2016 7:28 AM, RichD wrote: > On August 29, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>> Let's consider the Corvette in the garage scenario, again - >>>>> The Vette drives through at high speed, it fits inside, >>>>> or not, the garage is too shallow, the usual. >>>>> To be specific, irrespective of particular numbers: >>>>> The garage doors are oriented north-south, normally >>>>> open, the car approaches from the south. >>>>> The garage's center point is clearly marked. The >>>>> driver is centered within the vehicle. Two cameras >>>>> are posted at the driver's seat, facing fore and aft. >>>>> I) In the garage frame: >>>>> The car approaches, enters, then completely inside. >>>>> Both doors close simultaneously at the moment the driver >>>>> passes the center, then very quickly open, and the car transits. >>>>> II) In the Corvette's frame: >>>>> The car is stationary, the garage approaches >>>>> (so to speak), the open front door rolls over the >>>>> front fender, the rear door closes, then quickly >>>>> opens. The driver passes the center; at this moment, >>>>> the car extends through both open doorways, by equal >>>>> amount. The Vette continues forward, the rear fender >>>>> crosses through the front doorway, which then closes, etc. >>>>> So far, so standard. >>>>> Now, what do the cameras record? >>>>> In particular, what goes on film, at the instant the >>>>> driver hits the center point? >>>>> Facing north, the camera sees the front fender interior >>>>> to the garage... it must be so, for logical consistency. >>>>> However, facing south, I don't see any such tautology; >>>>> it appears the rear fender may be seen either in or >>>>> outside the garage. >>>>> Thus the analysis indicates an unexpected asymmetry. >> >>>> You don't seem to made any allowance for the time it takes for >>>> light to get from the event being observed and arriving at the >>>> camera. >> >>> huh? >>> Of course I do, that's the crux of the biscuit. >> >>>> I posted an mathematical analysis of the barn and pole paradox with >>>> cameras some while back >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics.relativity/iuBoRUD4-kE/bF0BsiTDWAUJ> >>>> and showed that everything works out fine. >> >>> Your memo is vague on camera placement, and number. >> >> It clearly states that the ones attached to the barn are midway between >> the doors, > > No it doesn't: > "... attach video cameras to the barn and to the > pole (a pair each, pointing towards the opposite ends of the barn and > pole respectively)" > > That's "clear", only if a reader hallucinates alongside you. > > >> and the the ones attached to the pole are a distance 40 * >> sqrt(3/4) metres behind the centre of the pole. > > ... after some tortured arithmetic. > > And your example isn't symmetrical, as mine clearly is, > hence doesn't answer my point of asymmetry in the result. > Just some hand waving about a barn and some cameras. > > > -- > Rich > If you can't discuss this without being aggressive, I can't see why I should bother with you. By all means go on being mistaken, it's no skin off my nose. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
a thought on the garage paradox RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-24 15:31 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 02:52 +0200
Re: a thought on the garage paradox mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-08-24 23:35 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox Python <python@org.invalid> - 2016-08-25 12:20 +0200
Re: a thought on the garage paradox mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-08-25 03:33 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-29 19:55 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-29 19:59 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-29 20:02 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 15:49 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-30 10:34 +0200
Re: a thought on the garage paradox mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-08-30 01:48 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-30 11:38 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-08-30 23:13 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 11:51 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-09-01 22:08 +0200
Re: a thought on the garage paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 15:25 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-27 20:55 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 06:44 +0200
Re: a thought on the garage paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 07:05 +0200
Re: a thought on the garage paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 07:48 +0200
Re: a thought on the garage paradox Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-08-28 22:35 +1000
Re: a thought on the garage paradox "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-28 08:51 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-28 09:05 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-28 09:26 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-29 15:04 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-08-30 12:42 +1000
Re: a thought on the garage paradox RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-30 14:28 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-08-31 11:23 +1000
Re: a thought on the garage paradox benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-30 21:45 -0400
Re: a thought on the garage paradox Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-08-31 12:20 +1000
Re: a thought on the garage paradox mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-08-30 23:15 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-01 11:12 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-02 13:46 +1000
a thought on the garage paradox "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 08:31 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-09-02 19:03 +0200
Re: a thought on the garage paradox "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 16:58 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 19:32 -0700
Re: a thought on the garage paradox "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 20:00 -0700
csiph-web