Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #387481

Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics
Date 2016-07-09 06:52 +0200
Message-ID <dube7tFa98jU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <nkbfdt$og4$2@gioia.aioe.org> <dsuipsFk891U1@mid.individual.net> <nke3b1$lqk$1@gioia.aioe.org> <du98blFor78U1@mid.individual.net> <8a5879b1-3b0d-406c-b9e9-1c3b5feec8a2@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Am 08.07.2016 14:42, schrieb paparios:

>>>> GPS does not measure the interior of the Earth, since the satellites
>>>> circle around in orbit, what is outside of the Earth.
>>>>
>>>> The interior is impossible to access.
>>>>
>>>> But it would be eventually be possible to measure changes of the
>>>> diameter of the Earth indirectly.
>>>>
>>>> How could the GPS system be used to measure such changes?
>>>
>>> Thomas, please.
>>> The GPS orbit is well known, including the orbit path circumference and
>>> its diameter, which means that the location of the center of the earth
>>> is well known just because of the circle the satellites travel through.
>>
>> Simply not true, since in reality they use 'differential GPS' for high
>> precision measurements:
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_GPS
>>
>> Quote:
>>
>> "DGPS uses a network of fixed, ground-based reference stations to
>> broadcast the difference between the positions indicated by the GPS
>> satellite systems and the known fixed positions."
>>
>>   From 'fixed known positions' follows the inability to measure changes
>> of those positions.
>>
>> This is so, because 'known fixed position' is an axiom, on which further
>> measurements are based.
>>
>> If these positions would in fact change, you need something else as
>> reference.
>>
>> This could actually be the orbit itself. But this is not usable for high
>> precision measurements, because it would allow only a precision in the
>> range of 15 m (not the required mm).
>>
>>
>>
>> TH
>
> Nonsense. We have in Chile a network of GPS-based earthquake stations which are being used to monitor small ground displacements (of the mm scale). Besides that INSAR techniques can measure millimetre-scale changes in deformation over spans of days to years.


'Changes' means, that a difference occurs, which the GPS-system is able 
to detect.

These changes are not absolute values. What we're talking about is the 
radius of the Earth. Since the reference is the surface of Earth, these 
changes are not a measurement of the diameter itself, but based on a 
reference point on top of a radius.

But 'Odd Bodkin' claimed, that GPS could measure the diameter to this 
precision. This I have rejected, since GPS does not measure the Earth' 
diameter at all.

Actually it's even more complicated, since the meter itself is based on 
the size of the Earth, as it was once defined as 10 millionth part of 
the distance from pole to equator (along the meridian through Paris).

According to this definition: if the Earth would grow, than also the meter.

Now the meter is defined by means of light and as fraction of a 
light-second.

Unfortunately the length of a second is also a function of hight (as 
seen in the experiments at the Harvard towers).

So we had use other means and show Growing Earth in the fossil records 
or in geological formations.

This could be done by searching for marine fossils in high places, like 
mountains.

And - sure - we find fish-bones and shells in all sort of high places. 
Also sand and pebbles are found in several locations, where today is no 
water.

Other possibility: ancient harbours.

E.g. it is actually possible to interpret certain ruins as harbours, 
even if they sit on a mountain top.

Direct measurement is actually difficult, since these changes are VERY 
slow and GPS didn't exist a million years ago. (Actually it didn't even 
exist a thousand years ago - not even one hundred).

TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-19 07:12 +0200
  Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 07:25 +0200
    Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-19 09:53 +0200
      Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 10:11 +0200
        Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-19 10:19 +0200
          Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 10:28 +0200
            Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-27 09:22 +0200
    Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-19 23:35 +0200
    Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-06-19 21:11 -0700
      Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-06-19 21:36 -0700
  Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 07:28 +0200
    Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-19 10:16 +0200
      Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 10:32 +0200
        Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-20 06:10 +0200
  Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-06-19 10:15 +0200
  Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-06-19 12:10 -0500
    Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-21 06:14 +0200
      Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 08:28 -0500
        Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-22 06:33 +0200
          Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 08:20 -0500
            Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-08 10:59 +0200
              Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 07:41 -0500
              Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 05:42 -0700
                Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-09 06:52 +0200
                Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Jack Chardy <jackc@outlool.org> - 2016-07-11 15:31 +0000
                Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-11 22:33 +0200
  Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-21 13:32 -0700
    Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-23 06:21 +0200

csiph-web