Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #386725

Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics
Date 2016-06-27 09:22 +0200
Message-ID <dtc2h0Fb96bU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <nk5acu$5bd$2@dont-email.me> <dsn1b6F4jb5U1@mid.individual.net> <nk5k3f$ai$1@dont-email.me> <dsn2s3F4rkmU2@mid.individual.net> <nk5l44$2o6$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


Am 19.06.2016 10:28, schrieb Poutnik:
> Dne 19/06/2016 v 10:19 Thomas Heger napsal(a):
>> Am 19.06.2016 10:11, schrieb Poutnik:
>>> Dne 19/06/2016 v 09:53 Thomas Heger napsal(a):
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> But it's actually a question from the realm of relativity, since it
>>>> would answer the question, whether or not matter is also 'relative'.
>>>>
>>> Relativistic treatment of matter does not mean
>>> matter is relative.
>>
>> Well, yes. But I wanted to provide evidence to my own idea, that matter
>> actually is.
>>
>> I call that concept 'structured spacetime' and have written kind of
>> 'book' about it, that you find here:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6
>>
>
> I see. Then, good luck  with evidence.
>

Evidence in favour of 'Growing Earth' would be hints for falling sea-levels.

And we have a lot of hints, which would support such an assumptions.

Since the process is extremely slow, we need to find evidence for 
sea-levels much higher several hundred million years ago.

Former sea-floor would contain sand and pebbles. We only need to search 
for sand and pebbles in mountains.

And, sure, we find such places.

My favourite example is the Atacama desert. This is 'only' about 15 
million years old. But it is accepted knowledge, the Atacama desert was 
once part of the ocean. Then the area got cut off as internal sea and 
later dried out.

The former sea-floor then became a desert. And we can still view that 
desert as former ocean bottom, since it has next to never rained in all 
these years. Actually we can find former shores with petrified Guano. We 
find dried out rivers and former islands. And all of this we find 1200 m 
above sea-level.

Similar findings are possible all around the globe. E.g. the Sahara 
could be explained as former sea-floor. Fish-fossils are found in the 
Alps. Atolls are remains of corals and those are ocean animals.

Also harbours have existed, where today is no ocean or other body of 
water, the harbour could possibly have served.

To see why sea-levels drop by growth, it is possible to use the Atacama 
desert and its geological features as example.

Growth means: the interior of the planet gets larger. This would make 
the crust too small, hence it gets stretched and breaks apart.

Into these cracks the water flows, hence sea-levels fall.

Such cracks are found in the Atacama desert.


Now this does not happen in one big step, but in many subsequent steps.

This would change former sea-floor to marshes and later to deserts.

The subsequent steps would gain parallel horizontal lines in hill-sides 
and step-like terraces of former marshes.

Former river could be seen in hills, that seemingly have ended in such 
plains (because there was once ocean).

Even more astonishing are remains of former settlements. Humans actually 
like to settle at the coast. And if the coastlines change, they would 
move and leave ruins of former cities behind.

And actually such ruins of cities are found in places, that are 
completely inhabitable now or are quite illogic to chose.

Other hints for 'Growing Earth' are matching coastlines over the Pacific 
Ocean or the age of sea-floors.

There is also the fact, that the continental shelfs could be fit 
together to a single ball. But that ball is much smaller than the Earth 
is now.

TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-19 07:12 +0200
  Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 07:25 +0200
    Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-19 09:53 +0200
      Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 10:11 +0200
        Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-19 10:19 +0200
          Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 10:28 +0200
            Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-27 09:22 +0200
    Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-19 23:35 +0200
    Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-06-19 21:11 -0700
      Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-06-19 21:36 -0700
  Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 07:28 +0200
    Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-19 10:16 +0200
      Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 10:32 +0200
        Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-20 06:10 +0200
  Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-06-19 10:15 +0200
  Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-06-19 12:10 -0500
    Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-21 06:14 +0200
      Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 08:28 -0500
        Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-22 06:33 +0200
          Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 08:20 -0500
            Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-08 10:59 +0200
              Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 07:41 -0500
              Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 05:42 -0700
                Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-09 06:52 +0200
                Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Jack Chardy <jackc@outlool.org> - 2016-07-11 15:31 +0000
                Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-11 22:33 +0200
  Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-21 13:32 -0700
    Re: Idiocy of Plate Tectonics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-06-23 06:21 +0200

csiph-web