Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #674061

Re: "Love Is Blind - Netherlands"

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Okay, I just switch
"Love Is Blind - Netherlands"
to their language Dutch..
and it is ...scary!

It looks and sounds like Insects talking!!!!


They have Insect eyes
Insect mouths
they are talking Insect.

They talk Insect!

I gots to switch back to English dubbing
so that at least they
look and sound human.




The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Dutch???? I didn't even know Dutch was a language??
> 
> "Love Is Blind - Netherlands" is out now...
> 
> i gots to switch it to Dutch to see what it sounds like...
> 
> You know, I went inside a Russian grocery store in my neighbor hood..
> 
> all the Letters were backwards! It was like looking at food jars with a
> mirror!
> 
> wat da fuck happen? why are russian letters backwards?? is it a mirrow
> universe??
> 
> is their left hand on the right side?
> 
> is dat why russian women look like men?
> 
> its a house of mirrors.
> 
> i saw letters on the jar din't even look like a letters...
> 
> wat da fuck happen?
> 
> and why are russian women holding their place at the checkout stand,
> while the other companion continues shopping???
> 
> Dutch???? Netherlands must be a small country from the past...
> 
> its not inglish is it?
> 
> If they talk like UK, it ain't english.
> 
> spoon in da mouth talk.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > There is a New Love is Blind coming out soon on Netflix..."Love Is Blind - Netherlands"
> >
> > but where is Netherlands??? is dat a country?? what language do they speak there??
> >
> > if i see a chink...arghhh.
> >
> > it's confusing what is coming out of their eyes and what is coming out of ther  mouth, you know what i mean?
> >
> > Einstein said Chinks are a threat to other races
> >
> >  https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Travel_Diaries_of_Albert_Einstein/dEZ7EAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=einstein+soulless+chinese&pg=PA64&printsec=frontcove
> >
> > https://books.google.com/books/publisher/content?id=dEZ7EAAAQBAJ&pg=PA64&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&bul=1&sig=ACfU3U3ymgEsWl5SUoqkbUnj1GWaTF5BZg&w=1280
> >
> > It was Albert Einstein that gave the order to drop the two atomic bombs on Japan.
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Peter Moylan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 23/09/26 04:07, Sam Plusnet wrote:
> > > > > On 22/09/2026 08:18, Hibou wrote:
> > > > >> Le 22/09/2026 à 07:02, Bertel Lund Hansen a écrit :
> > > > >>> Den 22.09.2026 kl. 02.25 skrev Steve Hayes:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> But posting with an attitude of "let's you and him fight" *is*
> > > > >>>> trolling, and if that is combined with an *abuse* of
> > > > >>>> crossposting, like posting to a bunch of disparate newsgroups,
> > > > >>>> in most of which the content is off-topic, such abuse of
> > > > >>>> crossposting is a recognised symptom of trolling.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Do you think that arguing achieves anything - but more trolling?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Killfile. Problem sorted.
> > > > >
> > > > > I use a killfile plus another filter which removes all cross-posted
> > > > > messages. That works for me, but I do accept that others might see
> > > > > more value in cross-posted messages.
> > > >
> > > > Long ago I had a filter that counted the commas in the "Newsgroups"
> > > > header, and blocked anything cross-posted to more than three groups.
> > > > I've forgotten whether Thunderbird can do this. It depends on whether
> > > > wildcards are allowed in the strings to match.
> > > >
> > > > But, in fact, killfiles are less important now than they used to be,
> > > > because many old trolls are no longer around. My filters kill only eight
> > > > individuals, including the recently encountered Starfighter.
> > >
> > > Learn to spel maker correctly, it's Starmaker, not Starfighter!
> > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Peter Moylan       peter@pmoylan.org    http://www.pmoylan.org
> > > > Newcastle, NSW
> > >
> > > What about the likes of these people list Peter Moylan who sig
> > > (signature) contains a
> > > spam link also known as...STEALTH MARKETING links?
> > >
> > > Eveybody knows using "stealth marketing" links in your sig is...SPAM!!!!
> > >
> > > YOU FUCKING SPAMMER!!!
> > >
> > > SPAMMERS WERE THE WORST PEOPLE ON THE USENET SINCE IT'S VERY INCEPTION!
> > >
> > > Do as I say, not as I do? You are a hypocrite, Steve!
> > >
> > > Who can trust a fucking hypocrite spamming disquise as a normal post
> > > when all your intention of posting is
> > > to SELL STUFF ON USENET?
> > >
> > > GET RID OF DAT http://www.pmoylan.org STEALTH MARKETTING LINK!
> > >
> > > Stealth Marketing in Usenet news groups
> > >
> > > Stealth Marketing in Usenet news groups
> > >
> > > OK, if you are familiar with Usenet, you know that you can't blanket
> > > newsgroups with advertisements without getting in a lot of trouble.
> > > But there is a sneaky way to:
> > >
> > >     Post thousands of advertisements.
> > >     Put those ads in front of the people most likely to buy.
> > >     Expose your ads to buyers at the exact moment when they are ready to
> > > buy.
> > >     Establish a reputation as an expert.
> > >     Stay out of trouble.
> > >     Make friends.
> > >
> > > Here is how you do it:
> > >
> > > When I first started reading Usenet news, I noticed an extremely helpful
> > > man in one of the computer newsgroups. He answered many questions, and
> > > about 10% of the time his solution involved a computer item that he just
> > > happened to sell. So naturally, he would mention his price on the item
> > > and his telephone number.
> > > He was stealth marketing on Usenet!
> > >
> > > Three years later, he is still successfully selling products in that
> > > newsgroup. But suppose you don't sell computer equipment. Suppose you
> > > are a bookkeeper. Find a newsgroup full of bookkeeping questions that
> > > you can answer. Answer 10 of those questions each day. Put a link to
> > > your webpage in your sig file, so it appears at the bottom of every
> > > answer. Make sure your sig is less than 5 lines of fewer than 72
> > > characters, and keep the hype to a minimum. If the answer to the
> > > question involves something that you sell, give whatever general advice
> > > you can, then tell the original poster that you will be happy to help
> > > them (for $) if they email or call you. Remember, keep the hype to a
> > > minimum. You are a "trusted friend", not a barracuda. Your goal is to
> > > answer 95% of the questions without trying to sell anything, then have
> > > the remaining 5% of posters beg you to sell them the solution to their
> > > problem.
> > > This accomplishes two things:
> > >
> > >     It proves that you are a helpful and informed expert on the subject,
> > > and hence can be trusted.
> > >     It puts your website in front of the people who are most likely to
> > > need your services, at exactly the moment when they most need them.
> > >
> > > What is the meaning of stealth marketing?
> > >
> > > Stealth marketing is defined as exposing consumers to advertisements
> > > without them knowing they are being advertised to.
> > > It is a subtle way of marketing products to influence consumers to use
> > > products and be open to future promotions.
> > >
> > > https://www.tincher.to/stealth.htm
> > > https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=fef1c1264a2e2ea2&hl=en&sxsrf=APpeQntTtvMSZeqFCg-Xm9uEG6hVpiAyJg%3A1790132637234&q=stealth+marketing+links+in+USENET
> > > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=stealth+marketing+unethical
> > >
> > > FUCKING SPAMMERS!!!!!
> > > ECCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
> > >
> > > I don't want to click your link, you might be selling used panties...
> > >
> > > How much are they? Do you take PayPal??   pink. a dozen.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-14 21:47 -0700
  Re: UK Love Is Blind Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-09-15 16:51 +0200
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-15 11:32 -0700
      Re: UK Love Is Blind "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-16 03:34 +0800
        Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-15 15:11 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:04 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:07 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:10 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:14 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:16 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:21 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:23 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:26 -0700
      Re: UK Love Is Blind Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-09-21 10:05 +1000
        Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 19:38 -0700
        Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-21 14:27 -0700
        Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-21 14:40 -0700
          Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-21 15:16 -0700
          Re: UK Love Is Blind Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-09-22 02:25 +0200
            Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-21 20:57 -0700
              Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-21 21:14 -0700
            Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-22 00:42 -0700
              Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-22 00:47 -0700
            Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-22 00:44 -0700
              Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-22 01:02 -0700
            Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-22 11:11 -0700
            Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-22 20:17 -0700
              Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-26 10:23 -0700
                Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:11 -0700
                Re: "Love Is Blind - Netherlands" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:49 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:28 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:32 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:36 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:39 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:44 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:59 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 01:03 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 01:04 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 01:06 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 01:11 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 01:13 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 01:16 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 01:18 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 01:20 -0700

csiph-web