Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #673617

Re: UK Love Is Blind

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english, rec.arts.tv
Subject Re: UK Love Is Blind
Date 2026-09-22 11:11 -0700
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <6AB2C4C5.730E@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References (9 earlier) <nhdb36FolraU5@mid.individual.net> <6AB1A466.7B17@ix.netcom.com> <ebi3bl5b8ann2sjrt0hsgd3hr9505s2lok@4ax.com> <118t5li$jqgj$1@dont-email.me> <n9h4bldffdl4c4cnm6choks5qlhtbjcih3@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Steve Hayes wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:02:25 +0200, Bertel Lund Hansen
> <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> wrote:
> 
> >Den 22.09.2026 kl. 02.25 skrev Steve Hayes:
> >
> >> But posting with an attitude of "let's you and him fight" *is*
> >> trolling, and if that is combined with an *abuse* of crossposting,
> >> like posting to a bunch of disparate newsgroups, in most of which the
> >> content is off-topic, such abuse of crossposting is a recognised
> >> symptom of trolling.
> >
> >Do you think that arguing achieves anything - but more trolling?
> 
> I was merely dealing with the English usage questions: that there is a
> clear distinction between crossposting and trolling, and the OP was
> mistaken in assuming that that he/she/it was the only one aware of
> that distinction.


You should appologize to Bertel Lund Hansen for speaking out-of-term.

You need *permission* to speak.

Address Bertel Lund Hansen as "Yes Master, Bertel Lund Hansen."


Of course I would tell Bertel Lund Hansen, "Go fuck your mother!"


Go ahead Steve, tell Master Bertel Lund Hansen, "Go fuck yourself!"

with permission first..
Bertel Lund Hansen has you in ...chains.

on a leash.


Simon sez...do this. no this. no this.






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-14 21:47 -0700
  Re: UK Love Is Blind Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-09-15 16:51 +0200
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-15 11:32 -0700
      Re: UK Love Is Blind "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-16 03:34 +0800
        Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-15 15:11 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:04 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:07 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:10 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:14 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:16 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:21 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:23 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:26 -0700
      Re: UK Love Is Blind Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-09-21 10:05 +1000
        Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 19:38 -0700
        Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-21 14:27 -0700
        Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-21 14:40 -0700
          Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-21 15:16 -0700
          Re: UK Love Is Blind Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-09-22 02:25 +0200
            Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-21 20:57 -0700
              Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-21 21:14 -0700
            Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-22 00:42 -0700
              Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-22 00:47 -0700
            Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-22 00:44 -0700
              Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-22 01:02 -0700
            Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-22 11:11 -0700
            Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-22 20:17 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:28 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:32 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:36 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:39 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:44 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 00:59 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 01:03 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 01:04 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 01:06 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 01:11 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 01:13 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 01:16 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 01:18 -0700
    Re: UK Love Is Blind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 01:20 -0700

csiph-web