Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #615894
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
| Subject | Re: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' |
| Date | 2023-07-22 11:20 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <64BC1DF7.5674@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <64B96B99.5660@ix.netcom.com> <ki0g24Fu72rU1@mid.individual.net> <u9f3a4$3fppn$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Volney wrote: > > On 7/21/2023 6:44 PM, Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 21-July-23 3:15 am, The Starmaker wrote: > >> News • University > >> Stanford president resigns over manipulated research, will retract at > >> least three papers > >> Marc Tessier-Lavigne failed to address manipulated papers, fostered > >> unhealthy lab dynamic, Stanford report says > >> https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/ > >> > >> investigation found “manipulation of research data.†> >> > >> "The report concluded that the fudging of results under > >> Tessier-Lavigne’s purview “spanned labs at three separate institutions.†> >> It identified a culture where Tessier-Lavigne “tended to reward the > >> ‘winners’ (that is, postdocs who could generate favorable results) and > >> marginalize or diminish the ‘losers’ (that is, postdocs who were > >> unable or struggled to generate such data).†> >> > >> "For several papers worthy of retraction to have been principally > >> authored by the same scientist represents “unusual frequency of > >> manipulation of research data and/or substandard scientific > >> practices,†"   (pattern of racketteering) > >> > >> ""In the report, the scientific panel raised questions about > >> allegations of fraud in a major 2009 Alzheimer’s study that claimed to > >> have found the cause of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s patients and > >> was publicly called “the most important discovery in Alzheimer’s in > >>  the last 20 years, maybe ever†by former Genentech executive Richard > >> Scheller.""  (follow the money) > >> > >> "...contain doctored imagery..." > >> > >> https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/ > >> > >> > >> https://boardoftrustees.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/07/Scientific-Panel-Final-Report.pdf > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein > >> > > > > He never said that. > > The facts didn't fit Starfarter's theory so he changed the facts. I didn't change the facts. Fact number one: This link points to a book that reads: The Ultimate Quotable Einstein By Albert Einstein https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=editions:tNFoVCjXVqkC&hl Fact number two: copyright by The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Princeton University. Fact number three: The quote is in the book! see page 483 https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA483&dq=%27#v=onepage&q&f=false Now, let's go back to Fact #1: The Ultimate Quotable Einstein By Albert Einstein Doesn't the words ( By Albert Einstein) mean Albert Einstein is the author of the book entittled: The Ultimate Quotable Einstein By Albert Einstein? Fact #2 The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Princeton University certaintly should know better than anyone else. Fact #3 IT'S IN THE FUCKING BOOK!!!! https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA483&dq=%27#v=onepage&q&f=false ALBERT EINSTEIN IS THE FUCKING AUTHOR!!! https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA483&dq=%27#v=onepage&q&f=false Where did you people go to skool, Stanford University???? Fudging University! 'If the fudging don't fit the fudge, fudge the fudging.' -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-20 10:15 -0700
Re: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-20 12:14 -0700
Re: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-20 15:39 -0700
Re: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-22 08:44 +1000
Re: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-21 19:10 -0400
Re: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-22 09:17 +1000
Re: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-22 11:20 -0700
Re: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-23 10:24 -0700
Re: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-21 20:39 -0700
Re: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-21 21:06 -0700
Re: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-21 23:53 -0500
Re: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-21 22:58 -0700
Re: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-21 21:23 -0700
csiph-web