Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #475349

Re: atomic clocks

Path csiph.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsgate.cuhk.edu.hk!news.netfront.net!.POSTED.108.219.229.47!not-for-mail
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: atomic clocks
Date Sat, 20 Oct 2018 10:54:05 -0700
Organization Netfront http://www.netfront.net/
Message-ID <5BCB6BBD.1369@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <5BCB691D.4F1E@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Info adenine.netfront.net; posting-host="108.219.229.47"; logging-data="60444"; mail-complaints-to="news@netfront.net"
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus Avast (VPS 181020-8, 10/20/2018), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status Clean
Xref csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:475349

Show key headers only | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Atomic Clocks today...are not accurate.
> 
> They are off...
> 
> so any calculations
> 
> based on your
> 
> most accurate clock will be
> 
> ...wrong.
> 
> It will be off.
> 
> It will always be wrong.


Lets put it this way...

you're not on the right track.



Don't forget..

you got a bunch of stupid people making, designing and building atomic clocks.



"Hey, go make me another clock!"


"What was wrong with the last one?"



"IT'S FUCKING OFF, YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

atomic clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-10-20 10:42 -0700
  Re: atomic clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-10-20 10:54 -0700
    Re: atomic clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-10-20 11:26 -0700
  Re: atomic clocks rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-10-20 11:04 -0700

csiph-web