Path: csiph.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsgate.cuhk.edu.hk!news.netfront.net!.POSTED.108.219.229.47!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: atomic clocks
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 10:54:05 -0700
Organization: Netfront http://www.netfront.net/
Message-ID: <5BCB6BBD.1369@ix.netcom.com>
References: <5BCB691D.4F1E@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: adenine.netfront.net; posting-host="108.219.229.47"; logging-data="60444"; mail-complaints-to="news@netfront.net"
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 181020-8, 10/20/2018), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:475349

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Atomic Clocks today...are not accurate.
> 
> They are off...
> 
> so any calculations
> 
> based on your
> 
> most accurate clock will be
> 
> ...wrong.
> 
> It will be off.
> 
> It will always be wrong.


Lets put it this way...

you're not on the right track.



Don't forget..

you got a bunch of stupid people making, designing and building atomic clocks.



"Hey, go make me another clock!"


"What was wrong with the last one?"



"IT'S FUCKING OFF, YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"