Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #425855

Re: artificial intelligence

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There is a lot of 'artificial intelligence' in these newsgroups...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > uknowatimean?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > people who point to a wiki link or
> > > > > > > cut and paste
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > thats artificial intelligence!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nobody on this planet but ME figured out that this is a radiation vest:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://www.google.com/patents/USD101756
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://www.google.com/patents/US8067759?dq=radiation+vest&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiA7p_E1ejUAhVHjlQKHdZ7D0gQ6AEIRzAE
> > > > > > > https://www.google.com/patents/US4196355?dq=radiation+vest&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiA7p_E1ejUAhVHjlQKHdZ7D0gQ6AEIQDAD
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm a fuckin genuies, somebody slap me! My head is going to explode...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Did you also see albert einstein patent for a nucluer plant?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That's my baby right there...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > the man who built the atomic bomb:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > cutout:
> > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm a fuckin genuies, somebody slap me! My head is going to explode...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There is nothing artificial about my intelligence, I'm fuckin GOD!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > somebody slap me! My head is going to explode...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now, if you look at Einsten's patent, you see the date: 1936
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Publication date        Oct 27, 1936
> > > > > > Filing date     Jul 2, 1936
> > > > > > https://www.google.com/patents/USD101756
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What was Einstein doing in 1936? He was putting together all the materials he needed to build an atomic bomb!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > He was building a Manhattan Project! He was going around bragging he was going to build an atomic bomb
> > > > > > (before it was called an atomic bomb)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Let's just say for the time being he told everyone it was going to bigger than..."firecrackers".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Going back to...the man who built the atomic bomb:
> > > > >
> > > > > The cutout here is an illustration blueprint for a nuclear reactor for the production of the atomic bomb.
> > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is the disquised version (just as the blouse patent):
> > > > > https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/US1781541-0.png
> > > > >
> > > > > The patents were designed for use on the production of the atomic bomb, (which were eventually used at the Manhattan project).
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is an excerpt from Scientific American magazine:
> > > > >
> > > > > "...the Einstein-Szilard pump eventually proved its value: "The built-in safety of its design later found a more critical task in cooling breeder reactors."
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, I know nobody here knows this...
> > > > > but 'this' patent actually is one of 8 patents that are not included in google's patents.
> > > > > https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/US1781541-0.png
> > > > > https://www.google.com/patents/US1781541?dq=albert+einstein&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjqjdzTt_rUAhUS5mMKHbdUAkgQ6AEIKTAB
> > > > >
> > > > > Where are the other 7 patents that are part of Albert Einstein refrideration? (A cooling apparatus for nuclear reactors)
> > > > >
> > > > > i think i might have it in my book somewhere...
> > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> > > >
> > > > (Excerpt from http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html)
> > > >
> > > > So, Leo Szilard is getting patents and building atomic bombs, and he tells his friends:
> > > >
> > > > "You know, I'm getting tired of this motherfucker Albert Einstein! I'm fuckin busy getting all these patents and
> > > > building atomic bombs, and you know what this stupid motherfucker is doing??? He's busy making
> > > > refridgerators and woman's blouses!!!!"
> > > >
> > > > I told Albert..."I'm not putting my name on no fuckin patent for woman's blouses, WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU?!?!"
> > > >
> > > > So Albert told me, "Okay motherfucker, just put your fuckin name on the fucking refridgerator patent!"
> > > >
> > > > Then I told Albert "WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT, THAT DON'T LOOK LIKE A FUCKIN REFRIDGERATOR!!!"
> > > >
> > > > Then Albert said, "Listen you stupid motherfucker, you were the dumbiest kid in my class, why do
> > > > you think I picked you to be my messenger boy? You're my bitch. You do what I tell you to do, bitch!"
> > > >
> > > > Then Albert said, "Now, put on this woman's blouse, BITCH!"
> > > >
> > > > "How, do I look, Alberto?"
> > > >
> > > > "You look like the bitch you are!"
> > > >
> > > > http://www.cccoe.k12.ca.us/abomb/popups/patent.htm
> > > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c3/Fermi-Szilard_Neutronic_Reactor_-_Figure_38.png
> > >
> > > Okay, now I'm going to take it a step further...
> > >
> > > You already know from reading excerpts from Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb
> > >
> > > that Einstein while in the process of the production of his atomic bomb...came out
> > > with patents like the 'blouse' that isn't really a blouse:
> > > https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/US1781541-0.png
> > >
> > > and the cooling process which really is a nuclear reactor blueprint (which btw at least 40 patents are associated with it:
> > >
> > >  cutout:
> > >  http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG
> > > https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/US1781541-0.png
> > >
> > > and his partner in crime Leo Szilard had sign his name with Einstein...
> > >
> > > but, not i'm going to take it a step further...(and I'm giving you the EXCLUSIVE!)
> > >
> > > What about Leo Szilard's patents? Did he patent something but was also...'something else'?
> > >
> > > Here is a patent he filed in 1934:
> > > http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Szilard-reactor-annotated-GB630726A.jpg
> > >
> > > Look at it and here is the question: DOES THAT LOOK LIKE A NUCLEUR REACTOR TO YOU????
> > >
> > > (All these patens were filed in the early 1930's when Albert Einstein was putting together his little private manhattan project...)
> > >
> > > But the question is...  DOES THIS LOOK LIKE A NUCLEUR REACTOR TO YOU????
> > > http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Szilard-reactor-annotated-GB630726A.jpg
> > >
> > > Of course it isn't...i know what it really is..but I'm the only one on earth who knows!
> > >
> > > Or is there a smart person in the room?
> > >
> > > I give you one week to figure out what it really is...(don't bother looking it up, you won't find out what it really is...but you'll be
> > > surprised when I let you know what it really is.)
> > >
> > > The Starmaker
> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> >
> > You guys ran out of time...besides, I'm the only genuieies here.
> >
> > Here is the patent Leo Szilard filed in 1934 (at the time albert einstein was putting together his blueprint for the
> > production of the atomimic bom.)
> >
> > Certaintly this is Albert Einstein's idea and design but he didn't want to put his name on it: (you can understand why)
> > http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Szilard-reactor-annotated-GB630726A.jpg
> >
> > It is not a blouse or a nuclear reactor...
> >
> > The patent that is missing ladies and gentlemen is...
> 
> You are looking at the missing link...
> http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Szilard-reactor-annotated-GB630726A.jpg
> 
> (you just got to remove the fake name)
> 
> http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Szilard-reactor-annotated-GB630726A.jpg
> 
> That ladies and gentlemen is....the actual bomb!
> 
> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/31/Ming_Dynasty_fragmentation_bomb.jpg/180px-Ming_Dynasty_fragmentation_bomb.jpg
> http://padevoe.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Chinese-ROCKET-in-J-Needhams-book-2nd-for-Feb-2015-in-jpg.jpg
> 
> http://www.madehow.com/images/hpm_0000_0007_0_img0052.jpg
> 
> https://www-tc.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/assets/img/full-size/nazis-and-the-bomb-merl.jpg
> http://greyfalcon.us/picturesd/bombe88.jpg
> 
> It's just a bomb! Instead of inserting black powder, you put in uranium! A Uranium Bomb!
> 
> Any boy can tell you that.
> 
> Now, here is the updated little boy:
> http://static4.businessinsider.com/image/5432ebd169bedd4458d2a55d-480/atomic-bomb.jpg
> http://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/ImplosionType.png
> http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-jmtNUY0KBb4/Tg1VL4wHPKI/AAAAAAAAANA/MBpkGqh5Ndw/s1600/image5HO.JPG
> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1e/Fat_Man_Internal_Components.png
> 
> This is Albert Einstein's Bomb
> http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Szilard-reactor-annotated-GB630726A.jpg
> 
> This information is an exclusive excerpt from:
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> 
> The Starmaker
> 
> All rights reserved.


"This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,

and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power-

ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this

type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy

the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However,

such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by

air." -- Albert Einstein


https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/



"A single bomb of this type"

http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Szilard-reactor-annotated-GB630726A.jpg



Now according to this timeline:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_nuclear_weapons_development

it reads:

1933 - Leó Szilárd realizes the concept of the nuclear chain reaction, although no such reaction was known. 
He invented the idea of an atomic bomb in 1933 while crossing a London street. He patented it in 1934. (British patent 630,726)

(British patent 630,726)
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?CC=GB&NR=630726&KC=&FT=E&locale=en_EP#



For some reason wiki says 

"He invented the idea of an atomic bomb in 1933 while crossing a London street. He patented it in 1934. (British patent 630,726)"



LEO: I was crossing the street one day...

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-01 11:21 -0700
  Re: artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-03 11:40 -0700
    Re: artificial intelligence Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-04 08:41 -0700
      Re: artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-04 12:05 -0700
      Re: artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-04 12:05 -0700
      Re: artificial intelligence Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-05 15:29 -0500
      Re: artificial intelligence Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-07-05 23:37 +0200
    Re: artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-08 12:45 -0700
      Re: artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-09 12:24 -0700
        Re: artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-19 14:31 -0700
          Re: artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-19 16:49 -0700
            Re: artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-21 10:48 -0700
              Re: artificial intelligence Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-21 17:51 +0000
                Re: artificial intelligence Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 12:58 -0500
                Re: artificial intelligence benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-21 21:16 -0400
              Re: artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-21 11:27 -0700
                Re: artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-21 15:17 -0700
                Re: artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-21 15:25 -0700
                Re: artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-21 18:35 -0700
          Re: artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-21 11:01 -0700
          Re: artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-22 10:21 -0700
            Re: artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-22 10:46 -0700
              Re: artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-22 11:06 -0700
                Re: artificial intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-22 11:23 -0700

csiph-web