Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #422370

Re: the speed of light is wrong

Message-ID	<593EC3EE.589A@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2017-06-12 09:40 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy
Subject	Re: the speed of light is wrong
References	<593AEB3E.5E36@ix.netcom.com> <8037e211-8b68-4afe-a08c-4314a859f97c@googlegroups.com> <593B09F9.249A@ix.netcom.com> <593C3297.6BB@ix.netcom.com> <593C37F5.F37@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 11:39:02 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > i certaintly wouldn't use any of your..
> > > > > 'measuring tools'.. to measure it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > just as i wouldn't measure Time using some ...clock a nut invented.
> > > >
> > > > The speed of light isn't measured anymore.  It's now a defined constant.  The value is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second.
> > >
> > > Translation: "a defined constant" means, somebody said "That's it, don't question it, it's set in stone..it's our law, don't fuckin break it."
> > >
> > > Translation: it's not exactly 299,792,458 meters per second, it's fucking exactly 299,792,458 meters per second.
> > >
> > > meter peter
> > >
> > > 'meter' nonsence.
> > >
> > > In other words, those old guys in the scientific community decide to put up a 'wall' with a fixed idea, like
> > >
> > > 'the universe comes from nothing'
> > >
> > > 'exactly 299,792,458'
> > >
> > > you're not suppose to go pass the wall they put up...
> > >
> > > In other words, you think what 'they' want you to think.
> > >
> > > untill 'they' say otherwise.
> >
> > The fact is...no one has ever seen light travel at the speed of light, or even touch it.
> >
> > And light travels sometimes...slow..depending what is slowing it down.
> >
> > The slow speed of light.
> 
> The question is, How slow can light travel?
> 
> Slower than slow...real slow.
> 
> I mean...slow.
> 
> not      so        fast
> 
> not so q  uick


i would have to guess the speed of light slows down to more than half
it's speed when it is passing through something.

Thread

the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-09 11:38 -0700
  Re: the speed of light is wrong "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-09 13:24 -0700
  Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-09 13:50 -0700
    Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-10 10:55 -0700
      Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-10 11:18 -0700
        Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-12 09:40 -0700
          Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:34 -0700
            Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 01:36 -0700
              Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-22 10:53 -0700
                Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-23 11:12 -0700
                Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-25 10:51 -0700
                Re: the speed of light is wrong Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-25 19:04 +0100
                Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-25 11:30 -0700
                Re: the speed of light is wrong Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-25 19:38 +0100
                Re: the speed of light is wrong "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-25 15:15 -0400
                Re: the speed of light is wrong Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 07:45 +0200
                Re: the speed of light is wrong Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 07:56 +0200
                Re: the speed of light is wrong Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-27 12:15 +0000
                Re: the speed of light is wrong Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-27 12:21 +0000
                Re: the speed of light is wrong jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-27 16:22 +0000
                Re: the speed of light is wrong Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-27 20:36 +0000
                Re: the speed of light is wrong jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-27 21:00 +0000
                Re: the speed of light is wrong Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-27 21:10 +0000
                Re: the speed of light is wrong jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-27 21:52 +0000
                Re: the speed of light is wrong Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-29 09:55 +0000
                Re: the speed of light is wrong jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-27 16:20 +0000
                Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-26 12:08 -0700
    Re: the speed of light is wrong "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-11 20:51 +1000
      Re: the speed of light is wrong Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-12 19:54 +0000
  Re: the speed of light is wrong Kitubu Nkyaku <akntuu@buwkau.kk> - 2017-06-10 11:00 +0000
  Re: the speed of light is wrong Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-10 13:06 -0700

csiph-web