Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #422186
| Message-ID | <593C37F5.F37@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-10 11:18 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: the speed of light is wrong |
| References | <593AEB3E.5E36@ix.netcom.com> <8037e211-8b68-4afe-a08c-4314a859f97c@googlegroups.com> <593B09F9.249A@ix.netcom.com> <593C3297.6BB@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 11:39:02 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > i certaintly wouldn't use any of your.. > > > > 'measuring tools'.. to measure it. > > > > > > > > > > > > just as i wouldn't measure Time using some ...clock a nut invented. > > > > > > The speed of light isn't measured anymore. It's now a defined constant. The value is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > Translation: "a defined constant" means, somebody said "That's it, don't question it, it's set in stone..it's our law, don't fuckin break it." > > > > Translation: it's not exactly 299,792,458 meters per second, it's fucking exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > meter peter > > > > 'meter' nonsence. > > > > In other words, those old guys in the scientific community decide to put up a 'wall' with a fixed idea, like > > > > 'the universe comes from nothing' > > > > 'exactly 299,792,458' > > > > you're not suppose to go pass the wall they put up... > > > > In other words, you think what 'they' want you to think. > > > > untill 'they' say otherwise. > > The fact is...no one has ever seen light travel at the speed of light, or even touch it. > > And light travels sometimes...slow..depending what is slowing it down. > > The slow speed of light. The question is, How slow can light travel? Slower than slow...real slow. I mean...slow. not so fast not so q uick
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-09 11:38 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-09 13:24 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-09 13:50 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-10 10:55 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-10 11:18 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-12 09:40 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:34 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 01:36 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-22 10:53 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-23 11:12 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-25 10:51 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-25 19:04 +0100
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-25 11:30 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-25 19:38 +0100
Re: the speed of light is wrong "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-25 15:15 -0400
Re: the speed of light is wrong Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 07:45 +0200
Re: the speed of light is wrong Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 07:56 +0200
Re: the speed of light is wrong Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-27 12:15 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-27 12:21 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-27 16:22 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-27 20:36 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-27 21:00 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-27 21:10 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-27 21:52 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-29 09:55 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-27 16:20 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-26 12:08 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-11 20:51 +1000
Re: the speed of light is wrong Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-12 19:54 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong Kitubu Nkyaku <akntuu@buwkau.kk> - 2017-06-10 11:00 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-10 13:06 -0700
csiph-web