Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #404883
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!216.166.98.84.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Mon, 09 Jan 2017 23:48:50 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <587475FB.2117@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Mon, 09 Jan 2017 21:49:47 -0800 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: The Moon |
| References | <5873E9C8.7684@ix.netcom.com> <58747541.D1B@ix.netcom.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 18 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 108.219.229.47 |
| X-Trace | sv3-zpqFYKs3AaazMRKCURwgxA0JFY8Pu0NmqOwvQDPu/Q7hw0I3+yGnukOcDpnc5lw4Dt84FFh70TR2T8m!pXyXlMfvdAo7AIU1kzGGKgOw+QeyAAfFqZx8p+hZiEsijX5tAUlG5FMu8GrjZnwTqPzqmkKawTWt!HDrsMcd0VCA= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 1808 |
| Xref | csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:462008 sci.physics:612326 sci.physics.relativity:404883 alt.astronomy:288739 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > https://www.google.com/#q=Researchers+Suggest+New+Theory+for+the+Moon%E2%80%99s+Origin > > https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/01/moon-formation-theories/504449/ > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/01/09/moon-formed-merger-20-little-moonlets-new-theory-suggests/ > > > > It could only mean one thing....a trip to the moon. > > > > to stop their ridiculous bickering and stupid theories. > > > > I don't know why yous even bother with these 'new theroies' about the moon, ...you're going to > throw them away anyway by next week. probably it's because no matter what theories yous come up with, there is always something ...missing.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-09 11:51 -0800
Re: The Moon pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 13:08 -0800
Re: The Moon Nicholle Fiorillo <holhirlo@hololell.ho> - 2017-01-09 22:45 +0000
Re: The Moon pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 15:02 -0800
Re: The Moon Jaqueline Yoho <eau@oeJqq.org> - 2017-01-10 00:03 +0000
Re: The Moon pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 20:04 -0800
Re: The Moon Jaqueline Yoho <eau@oeJqq.org> - 2017-01-10 22:08 +0000
Re: The Moon pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-01-10 15:44 -0800
Re: The Moon pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 15:03 -0800
Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-09 21:28 -0800
Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-09 21:46 -0800
Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-09 21:49 -0800
Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-10 09:08 -0800
Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-10 23:05 -0800
Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-10 23:16 -0800
Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-11 14:21 -0800
Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-12 22:36 -0800
Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-13 11:01 -0800
Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-13 22:44 -0800
Re: The Moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-01-16 10:12 -0800
Re: The Moon John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-10 15:49 -0800
csiph-web